| Peer-Reviewed

Promotion of Improved Tef (Eragrostis Tef) Technologies Through Cluster-Based Large-Scale Demonstration in Oromia and Amhara Regional States, Ethiopia

Received: 20 July 2023    Accepted: 8 August 2023    Published: 8 September 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Technology awareness and adoption by farmers in Ethiopia are low. Therefore, the study was conducted to improve farmers’ awareness, and enhance the adoption of full package Tef production technologies. The large-scale demonstration was implemented in two regional states using the Tef variety Dagim, Ebba and Boset for two years (2020-2021). The demonstration was implemented in three districts (Boset, Becho in Oromia region and Shebel Berenta in Amhara region) covering 9 kebeles and 100 hectares of land. A total of 212 households, including 29 women-headed households participated in the activity. Participated farmers contributed a land size of 0.25 to 1 hectares. The findings of the study showed that the improved variety of Tef showed better performance in grain yield where variety Specifically, Dagim variety gave 2370 kgha-1 and 2580 kgha-1 in Becho and Shebel Berenta districts respectively, whereas 2280 and 2480 kgha-1 were obtained from variety Ebba at the same location. In moisture deficit areas of Boset district, the average yield of Boset and Bora variety was 2260 kgha-1 and 2350 kgha-1 respectively, compared to the farmer’s practice of 222 kgha-1 in highland area and 211 in lowland areas. The technology gap (TG) for the demonstrated varieties ranged from 540 to 725 kgha−1, indicating that the technologies have not been adopted. Similarly, the extension gap ranged from 150to 275 kgha−1, highlighting the need to strengthen the extension approaches to bridge the gap. The results demonstrate that the varieties are the best fitted, and the large scale demonstration approach significantly increased yield s compared to the farmers’ local cultivars and traditional practices. Thus, to ensure a sustainable production of improved Tef technologies, both the extension and the seed system should be considered to deliver the seed supply for the entire Tef producers.

Published in Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 11, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.abb.20231103.12
Page(s) 42-47
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Demonstration, Extension Gap, Large-Scale, Technology Gap

References
[1] Abdisa Hirko, Gezehagn Mergia, Tilahun Dandesa and Asalifew Nigussie 2020. Seasonal And Annual Climate Profile of Boset District, East Shewa, Ethiopia. SSRG International Journal of Geoinformatics and Geological Science (SSRG-IJGGS) – Volume 7 Issue 2 – May – Aug 2020.
[2] Abeysiriwardena, D. S. de Z. (2016): Yield potential, potential yield and realized yield at farmer level of cereals with special reference to rice (Oryza sativa L.). pp 1-198. Sri Lanka Journal of Food and Agriculture (2016).
[3] Andersen, R. and Winge, T., 2012. The Access and Benefit-Sharing Agreement on Tef Genetic Resources. FNI Report, 6/2012.
[4] CASCAPE. 2015. Best Fit Practice Manual for Wheat Production Technologies in Becho District, Central Oromia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar].
[5] CSA (Central Statistical Agency) 2013. Population Projection of Ethiopia for All Regions at Wereda Level from 2014 - 2017. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar].
[6] CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2021. Agricultural Sample Survey 2020: Report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, 'Meher' season). Statistical Bulletin. Vol. 1. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: The Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia (CSA).
[7] CSA (Central Statistical Authority) 2022 Agricultural Sample Survey 2021/22 (2014 E. C). Report on Area and production of major crops. Vol I, 593 Bulletin 59.
[8] Elias E., van Beek C., L. Experiences and challenges; Wageningen, the Netherlands: 2015. Scaling Innovations and Agricultural Best Practices in Ethiopia. [Google Scholar].
[9] Kebebew Assefa, Solomon Chanyalew and Zerihun Tadele. 2017. Tef, Eragrostis Tef (Zucc.) Trotter. In: Patil JV (ed) Millets and Sorghum: Biological and Genetic Improvement). Wiley-Blackwell Publisher.
[10] Kebebew Assefa, Yu JK, Zeid M, Getachew Belay, Hailu Tefera and Sorrells ME. 2011. Breeding tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]: conventional and molecular approaches (review). Plant Breeding 130: 1-9.
[11] Mekuriaw A. 2006. The Role of Land-Use on Impacts of Drought in Shebel Berenta Woreda, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia: A Case Study in Kutkwat Sekela Catchment; School of Graduate Studies. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University; 2006.
[12] MoA. 2021. Ministry of Agriculture, Plant Variety Release, Protection and Seed Quality Control Directorate, Crop Variety Register, Issue No. 24, June 2021, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[13] Rämi H. 2009. Fewer surpluses in Gojam and Awi, and Severe shortages in lowland areas of Abaye River Gorge. UN-Emergencies Unit for Ethiopia; UN-OCHA Assessment Mission https://reliefweb.int/report/ethiopia/ethiopia-fewer-surpluses-gojam-and-awi-and-severe-shortages-lowlandareas-abaye.
[14] Seyfu Ketema. 1993. Tef (Eragrostis tef): Breeding, Genetic Resources, Agronomy, Utilization and Role in Ethiopian Agriculture. Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[15] Tenalem A. 2010. Impact of Climate Change on Household Water Security and on Sustainable Livelihoods in Shebel Berenta Woreda, East Gojam Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia [unpublished MSC thesis]. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University; 2010.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Truayinet Mekuriaw, Yazachew Genet, Abune Gudeta, Wubishet Chiche, Habtamu Geremew, et al. (2023). Promotion of Improved Tef (Eragrostis Tef) Technologies Through Cluster-Based Large-Scale Demonstration in Oromia and Amhara Regional States, Ethiopia. Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering, 11(3), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Truayinet Mekuriaw; Yazachew Genet; Abune Gudeta; Wubishet Chiche; Habtamu Geremew, et al. Promotion of Improved Tef (Eragrostis Tef) Technologies Through Cluster-Based Large-Scale Demonstration in Oromia and Amhara Regional States, Ethiopia. Adv. BioSci. Bioeng. 2023, 11(3), 42-47. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20231103.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Truayinet Mekuriaw, Yazachew Genet, Abune Gudeta, Wubishet Chiche, Habtamu Geremew, et al. Promotion of Improved Tef (Eragrostis Tef) Technologies Through Cluster-Based Large-Scale Demonstration in Oromia and Amhara Regional States, Ethiopia. Adv BioSci Bioeng. 2023;11(3):42-47. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20231103.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.abb.20231103.12,
      author = {Truayinet Mekuriaw and Yazachew Genet and Abune Gudeta and Wubishet Chiche and Habtamu Geremew and Mohammed Ahmed},
      title = {Promotion of Improved Tef (Eragrostis Tef) Technologies Through Cluster-Based Large-Scale Demonstration in Oromia and Amhara Regional States, Ethiopia},
      journal = {Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering},
      volume = {11},
      number = {3},
      pages = {42-47},
      doi = {10.11648/j.abb.20231103.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.abb.20231103.12},
      abstract = {Technology awareness and adoption by farmers in Ethiopia are low. Therefore, the study was conducted to improve farmers’ awareness, and enhance the adoption of full package Tef production technologies. The large-scale demonstration was implemented in two regional states using the Tef variety Dagim, Ebba and Boset for two years (2020-2021). The demonstration was implemented in three districts (Boset, Becho in Oromia region and Shebel Berenta in Amhara region) covering 9 kebeles and 100 hectares of land. A total of 212 households, including 29 women-headed households participated in the activity. Participated farmers contributed a land size of 0.25 to 1 hectares. The findings of the study showed that the improved variety of Tef showed better performance in grain yield where variety Specifically, Dagim variety gave 2370 kgha-1 and 2580 kgha-1 in Becho and Shebel Berenta districts respectively, whereas 2280 and 2480 kgha-1 were obtained from variety Ebba at the same location. In moisture deficit areas of Boset district, the average yield of Boset and Bora variety was 2260 kgha-1 and 2350 kgha-1 respectively, compared to the farmer’s practice of 222 kgha-1 in highland area and 211 in lowland areas. The technology gap (TG) for the demonstrated varieties ranged from 540 to 725 kgha−1, indicating that the technologies have not been adopted. Similarly, the extension gap ranged from 150to 275 kgha−1, highlighting the need to strengthen the extension approaches to bridge the gap. The results demonstrate that the varieties are the best fitted, and the large scale demonstration approach significantly increased yield s compared to the farmers’ local cultivars and traditional practices. Thus, to ensure a sustainable production of improved Tef technologies, both the extension and the seed system should be considered to deliver the seed supply for the entire Tef producers.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Promotion of Improved Tef (Eragrostis Tef) Technologies Through Cluster-Based Large-Scale Demonstration in Oromia and Amhara Regional States, Ethiopia
    AU  - Truayinet Mekuriaw
    AU  - Yazachew Genet
    AU  - Abune Gudeta
    AU  - Wubishet Chiche
    AU  - Habtamu Geremew
    AU  - Mohammed Ahmed
    Y1  - 2023/09/08
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.abb.20231103.12
    T2  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
    JF  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
    JO  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
    SP  - 42
    EP  - 47
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-4162
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20231103.12
    AB  - Technology awareness and adoption by farmers in Ethiopia are low. Therefore, the study was conducted to improve farmers’ awareness, and enhance the adoption of full package Tef production technologies. The large-scale demonstration was implemented in two regional states using the Tef variety Dagim, Ebba and Boset for two years (2020-2021). The demonstration was implemented in three districts (Boset, Becho in Oromia region and Shebel Berenta in Amhara region) covering 9 kebeles and 100 hectares of land. A total of 212 households, including 29 women-headed households participated in the activity. Participated farmers contributed a land size of 0.25 to 1 hectares. The findings of the study showed that the improved variety of Tef showed better performance in grain yield where variety Specifically, Dagim variety gave 2370 kgha-1 and 2580 kgha-1 in Becho and Shebel Berenta districts respectively, whereas 2280 and 2480 kgha-1 were obtained from variety Ebba at the same location. In moisture deficit areas of Boset district, the average yield of Boset and Bora variety was 2260 kgha-1 and 2350 kgha-1 respectively, compared to the farmer’s practice of 222 kgha-1 in highland area and 211 in lowland areas. The technology gap (TG) for the demonstrated varieties ranged from 540 to 725 kgha−1, indicating that the technologies have not been adopted. Similarly, the extension gap ranged from 150to 275 kgha−1, highlighting the need to strengthen the extension approaches to bridge the gap. The results demonstrate that the varieties are the best fitted, and the large scale demonstration approach significantly increased yield s compared to the farmers’ local cultivars and traditional practices. Thus, to ensure a sustainable production of improved Tef technologies, both the extension and the seed system should be considered to deliver the seed supply for the entire Tef producers.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia

  • Sections