| Peer-Reviewed

Network Capability, Innovation Strategy, and Innovation Performance

Received: 7 September 2016     Accepted: 28 October 2016     Published: 25 November 2016
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Based on a literature review, this paper classifies network capability into network vision capability, network constructing capability, and network management capability and constructs a model with explorative innovation and exploitative innovation being the mediating variables to analyze the influence of the three dimensions of network capabilities on innovation performance. We obtain 257 effective samples through questionnaire and verify every influencing path. Our findings show that the three dimensions of network capability have a positive effect on innovation performance, clear innovation strategy helps to improve innovation performance, different network capability structures result in different innovation strategy forms, and false innovation strategy forms weaken the effect of network capability on innovation performance.

Published in American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business (Volume 2, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajtab.20160203.11
Page(s) 13-19
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Analysis Network Capability, Explorative Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, Innovation Performance

References
[1] Joe Tidd. Meeting the Innovation Challenge: Leadership for Transformation and Growth [M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
[2] Walter A, Auer M, Ritter T. The Impact of Network Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Orientation on University Spin-off Performance [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21 (4): 541-567.
[3] Judith Behrens. A Lack of Insight: An Experimental Analysis of R&D Managers’ Decision Making in Innovation Portfolio Management [J]. R&D Managers’ Decision Making in Innovation Portfolio Mnagement, 2016, 25(2): 239-250.
[4] Kristian Moller, Arto Rajala, Senja Svahn. Strategic Business Nets: their Type and Management [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2005, 58(3): 1274-1284.
[5] Elsebeth Holmen, Ann charlott Pedersen. Strategizing through Analyzing and Influencing The Network Horizon [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2003, 32(7): 409-418.
[6] Brian Uzzi. A social network's changing statistical properties and the quality of human innovation [J]. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 2008, 41(22): 481-505.
[7] Gautam Ahuja. Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45(3): 425-437.
[8] Ritter W.. Measuring Network Competence: Some International Evidence [J]. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2002, 17(2/3): 119-138.
[9] Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H. R., Tsai W.. Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(2): 795-817.
[10] Stefan Kirchner. Linking institutions and firm-level outcomes: the roles of diverse innovative capability profiles in Germany's economy [J]. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2016, (3): 462-480.
[11] Gert Human. Measuring network competence in buyer-supplier relationships [J]. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 2009, 12(4): 429-447.
[12] Ritter T., Hans George Gemünden. Inter-organizational Relationships and Networks: An Overview [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2003, 56(8): 691-697.
[13] Jansen P, Van Den Bosch J, Volberda W. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators [J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(11): 1661-1674.
[14] Sharon Belenzon, Mark Schankerman. Motivation and Sorting of Human Capital in Open Innovation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(9): 795-820.
[15] He Z, Wong P. Exploration and exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis [J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(4): 481-494.
[16] Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(2): 238-256.
[17] Atuahene Gima K, Murray J Y. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China [J]. J ournal of International Marketing, 2007, 15(2):1-29.
[18] Ha Hoang, Frank T. Rothaermel. Leveraging internal and external experience: Exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(7): 734–758.
[19] Juha Uotila, Markku Maula, Thomas Keil, Shaker A. Zahra. Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 30(2): 221–231.
[20] Koka B. R., Prescott J. E.. Designing alliance networks: The influence of network Position, environmental change, and strategy on firm Performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(6): 639-661.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    He Jianhong, Bai Yusong, Zhang Shiyun. (2016). Network Capability, Innovation Strategy, and Innovation Performance. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business, 2(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20160203.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    He Jianhong; Bai Yusong; Zhang Shiyun. Network Capability, Innovation Strategy, and Innovation Performance. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Bus. 2016, 2(3), 13-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20160203.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    He Jianhong, Bai Yusong, Zhang Shiyun. Network Capability, Innovation Strategy, and Innovation Performance. Am J Theor Appl Bus. 2016;2(3):13-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20160203.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajtab.20160203.11,
      author = {He Jianhong and Bai Yusong and Zhang Shiyun},
      title = {Network Capability, Innovation Strategy, and Innovation Performance},
      journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business},
      volume = {2},
      number = {3},
      pages = {13-19},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajtab.20160203.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20160203.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtab.20160203.11},
      abstract = {Based on a literature review, this paper classifies network capability into network vision capability, network constructing capability, and network management capability and constructs a model with explorative innovation and exploitative innovation being the mediating variables to analyze the influence of the three dimensions of network capabilities on innovation performance. We obtain 257 effective samples through questionnaire and verify every influencing path. Our findings show that the three dimensions of network capability have a positive effect on innovation performance, clear innovation strategy helps to improve innovation performance, different network capability structures result in different innovation strategy forms, and false innovation strategy forms weaken the effect of network capability on innovation performance.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Network Capability, Innovation Strategy, and Innovation Performance
    AU  - He Jianhong
    AU  - Bai Yusong
    AU  - Zhang Shiyun
    Y1  - 2016/11/25
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20160203.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtab.20160203.11
    T2  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
    JF  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
    JO  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
    SP  - 13
    EP  - 19
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-7842
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20160203.11
    AB  - Based on a literature review, this paper classifies network capability into network vision capability, network constructing capability, and network management capability and constructs a model with explorative innovation and exploitative innovation being the mediating variables to analyze the influence of the three dimensions of network capabilities on innovation performance. We obtain 257 effective samples through questionnaire and verify every influencing path. Our findings show that the three dimensions of network capability have a positive effect on innovation performance, clear innovation strategy helps to improve innovation performance, different network capability structures result in different innovation strategy forms, and false innovation strategy forms weaken the effect of network capability on innovation performance.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, P.R.China

  • School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, P.R.China

  • School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, P.R.China

  • Sections