| Peer-Reviewed

Philosophy of Hidden Curriculum in the Crossroad Between Professionals’ Thinking and Action: Adult Education Curriculum

Received: 9 June 2021    Accepted: 23 June 2021    Published: 30 June 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Theoretical background: An awareness of the operation of factors of the hidden curriculum is a precondition for an effective and professional adult education practice. A hidden curriculum comes to bear on the work process, content, procedures and routines, it can also be understood as the “battleground” of various competing influences and ideologies that appears in a hidden manner. Method: We use the meta-synthesis research design. The main goal of a meta-synthesis was building theory by refining or extending existing theory and generating a new theory. Results: On the basis of the research findings, we develop guidelines for researching and directing the hidden curriculum and subjective theories that are based on action research, evaluation research and research following the method of the deconstruction and redefinition of the personal thinking and beliefs that guide the individual’s professional activity on the basis of processes of critical awareness and reflection. Conclusion: Deconstruction and redefinition of the personal thinking and beliefs that direct the individual’s professional operation and action are very important processes of individual professionalism. We should be aware that the researching and directing the factors of hidden curriculum can help and improve the quality of adult education and practice, professional work and operation in the education process and outcomes for practitioners.

Published in Education Journal (Volume 10, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.edu.20211003.16
Page(s) 107-113
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Hidden Curriculum, Adult Education, Reflection, Adult Practice

References
[1] Apple, W. M., (1979). Ideology and Curriculum. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[2] Apple, W. M., (1992). Šola, učitelj in oblast. Ljubljana: Znanstveno in publicistično središče.
[3] Chisholm, M. E. (2016). Book Review: Hegemony and Education Under Neoliberalism: Insights From Gramsci, by P. Mayo. Adult Education Quarterly, 67 (3), 243-245.
[4] Chretien, C. K. (2013). Teaching and learning moments: the other hidden curriculum. Acad Med, 288 (2), 289.
[5] Corbett, J. (1992). Careful teaching: researching a special career. British Educational Journal, 18 (2), 235-243.
[6] Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.
[7] Derrida, J., Caputo, D. J. (1997). Deconstruction in a Nutshell: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida. New York: Fordham University Press.
[8] Dweck, S. C., Chiu, C., Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit Theories: elaboration and Extension of the Model. Psyichological Inquiry, 6 (4), 322-333.
[9] Eccles, M., Mason, J. (2001). How to developed cost-conscious guidelines. Health Technol Assess, 5 (16), 14-26.
[10] Gerbner, G. (1974). Media and symbols: the forms of expression, communication and education. The seventy-third yearbook of the national society for the study of education. Chicago: University of Chicago.
[11] Ginsburg, B. M. (1986). Reproduction, Contradictions, and Conceptions of Curriculum in Preservice teacher Education. Curriculum Inquiry, 16 (3), 283-309.
[12] Higashi, T. R., Tillack, A., Steinman, A. M., Johnston, C. B., Harper, G. M. (2013). The 'worthy' patient: rethinking the 'hidden curriculum' in medical education. Anthropol Med, 20 (1), 13-23.
[13] Howells, C. (1999). Deconstruction from Phenomenology to Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
[14] Jackson, P. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[15] Jug Došler, A. (2012). Dvig kakovosti vzgojno-izobraževalnega dela z raziskovanjem in usmerjanjem prikritega kurikuluma. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.
[16] Jug Došler, A., Mivšek, A. P., Petročnik, P., Škodič Zakšek, T. (2015). Subjektivne teorije in stališča kot kazalnika procesne ravni kakovosti v zdravstvu in socialnem delu. Socialno delo, 54 (6), 329-340.
[17] Katz, S., Sutherland, S., Earl, L. (2005). Towards an evaluation habit of mind: Mapping the journey. Teachers College Record, 107 (10), 2326-2350.
[18] Kecmanović, D. (2011). Conceptual discord in psychiatry: Origin, implications and failed attempts to resolve it. Psychiatria Danubina 23 (3), 210-222.
[19] Kelly, A. V. (2004). The Curriculum, Theory and Practice. London: SAGE Publications.
[20] King, N. (1986). Recontextualizing the Curriculum. Theory into Practice, 25 (1), 36-40.
[21] Kroflič, R. (2002). Izbrani pedagoški spisi. Ljubljana: Zavod SR za šolstvo.
[22] Mac Naughton, G. (2005). Doing Foucault in Early Childhood Studies. Applying poststructural ideas. London, NY: Routledge, Taylor &Francis Group.
[23] Moore, J., Crozier, K., Kite, K. (2012). An action research approach for developing research and innovation in nursing and midwifery practice: building research capacity in one NHS foundation trust. Nurse Educ Today, 32 (1), 39-45.
[24] Moss, P., Dillon, J., Statham, J. (2000). The “child in need” and “rich child”: discourses, constructions and practice. Critical Social Policy 20 (2), 233-254.
[25] Mossop, L., Dennick, R., Hammond, R., Robbé, I. (2013). Analysing the hidden curriculum: use of a cultural web. Med Educ, 47 (2), 134-143.
[26] Norris, C. (2004). Deconstruction. London, NY: Routledge, Taylor&Francis Group.
[27] Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers' Beliefs and Educational Research, Cleaning up a Messy Construct. Rewiew of Educational Research 62 (3), 307-332.
[28] Rose, A. D. (2016). Book Review: Global Perspectives on Adult Education and Learning Policy, by M. Milana and T. Nesbit (Eds.). Adult Education Quarterly, 67 (1), 66-68.
[29] Quigley, B. A., Holsinger, E. (1993). "Happy Consciousness": Ideology and Hidden Curricula In Literacy Education. Adult Education Quarterly, 44 (1), 17-33.
[30] Stenhouse, L. (1988). Case study methods. In: John, P. K. (ed.). Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook. Sydney: Pergamon Press.
[31] Sternberg, J. R. (1999). Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice: Researcher and Practitioner Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[32] Sandlin, J. A., (2000). The Politics of Consumer Education Materials Used in Adult Literacy Classrooms. Adult Education Quarterly, 50 (4), 289-307.
[33] Tuden, D., Gidora, H., Quick, D. P., Ebdon, N., Glover., K., Harmer, S., Miller Taylor, M., Borycki, M. E. (2013). Developing a strategy for studying critical thinking in a nurse telehealth setting: a participatory approach. Stud Health Technol Inform, 183 (1), 68-73.
[34] Shorey, M. J. (2013). Signal versus noise on the wards: what "messages" from the hidden curriculum do medical students perceive to be importantly meaningful?. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc, 124 (1), 36-45.
[35] Turnšek, N. (2008). Subjektivne teorije o otroštvu in vzgoji. Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta UL.
[36] Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Anita Jug Došler. (2021). Philosophy of Hidden Curriculum in the Crossroad Between Professionals’ Thinking and Action: Adult Education Curriculum. Education Journal, 10(3), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211003.16

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Anita Jug Došler. Philosophy of Hidden Curriculum in the Crossroad Between Professionals’ Thinking and Action: Adult Education Curriculum. Educ. J. 2021, 10(3), 107-113. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20211003.16

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Anita Jug Došler. Philosophy of Hidden Curriculum in the Crossroad Between Professionals’ Thinking and Action: Adult Education Curriculum. Educ J. 2021;10(3):107-113. doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20211003.16

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.edu.20211003.16,
      author = {Anita Jug Došler},
      title = {Philosophy of Hidden Curriculum in the Crossroad Between Professionals’ Thinking and Action: Adult Education Curriculum},
      journal = {Education Journal},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {107-113},
      doi = {10.11648/j.edu.20211003.16},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211003.16},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.edu.20211003.16},
      abstract = {Theoretical background: An awareness of the operation of factors of the hidden curriculum is a precondition for an effective and professional adult education practice. A hidden curriculum comes to bear on the work process, content, procedures and routines, it can also be understood as the “battleground” of various competing influences and ideologies that appears in a hidden manner. Method: We use the meta-synthesis research design. The main goal of a meta-synthesis was building theory by refining or extending existing theory and generating a new theory. Results: On the basis of the research findings, we develop guidelines for researching and directing the hidden curriculum and subjective theories that are based on action research, evaluation research and research following the method of the deconstruction and redefinition of the personal thinking and beliefs that guide the individual’s professional activity on the basis of processes of critical awareness and reflection. Conclusion: Deconstruction and redefinition of the personal thinking and beliefs that direct the individual’s professional operation and action are very important processes of individual professionalism. We should be aware that the researching and directing the factors of hidden curriculum can help and improve the quality of adult education and practice, professional work and operation in the education process and outcomes for practitioners.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Philosophy of Hidden Curriculum in the Crossroad Between Professionals’ Thinking and Action: Adult Education Curriculum
    AU  - Anita Jug Došler
    Y1  - 2021/06/30
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211003.16
    DO  - 10.11648/j.edu.20211003.16
    T2  - Education Journal
    JF  - Education Journal
    JO  - Education Journal
    SP  - 107
    EP  - 113
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2327-2619
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20211003.16
    AB  - Theoretical background: An awareness of the operation of factors of the hidden curriculum is a precondition for an effective and professional adult education practice. A hidden curriculum comes to bear on the work process, content, procedures and routines, it can also be understood as the “battleground” of various competing influences and ideologies that appears in a hidden manner. Method: We use the meta-synthesis research design. The main goal of a meta-synthesis was building theory by refining or extending existing theory and generating a new theory. Results: On the basis of the research findings, we develop guidelines for researching and directing the hidden curriculum and subjective theories that are based on action research, evaluation research and research following the method of the deconstruction and redefinition of the personal thinking and beliefs that guide the individual’s professional activity on the basis of processes of critical awareness and reflection. Conclusion: Deconstruction and redefinition of the personal thinking and beliefs that direct the individual’s professional operation and action are very important processes of individual professionalism. We should be aware that the researching and directing the factors of hidden curriculum can help and improve the quality of adult education and practice, professional work and operation in the education process and outcomes for practitioners.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections