Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning

Yuhu Sun

doi:doi:10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning

Yuhu Sun

Published in Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 3)

Received: 17 April 2023 Accepted: 17 May 2023 Published: 29 May 2023

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This paper abandons the usual thinking pattern of “arguing between righteousness and profit” under the study of Mencius’ general level of good of “benevolence and righteousness”, attempts to take the path of “motivation”, which is less concerned by the academic circle, from the first chapter of Mencius with “benevolence and justice” to show the tension of argumentation brought by the propositions within it, according to the times, Confucian thinking mode and the general review of foreign motivation theory and so on, and briefly responds to the disadvantages of the opposition of “motivation theory and effect theory”. Based on the existence of human meaning, this paper redefines the connotation and direction of Mencius’ “benevolence and righteousness” in motivation theory, and holds that Mencius’ “benevolence and righteousness” motivation theory is the transcendence of moral ideals or values over moral argumentation. Mencius put the moral motivation of Confucianism above the external utilitarian demand, which is the internal reflection of Mencius’ basic thought of “good human nature”. This motivation can be regarded as the high recognition and expectation of the existence in human nature on the basis of the Confucian concept of virtue. Therefore, we can say with certainty that Mencius’ “motivation theory” has a value of guiding people to “follow the good”.

Published in	Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11
Page(s)	70-74
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Mencius, Motivation Theory, “Benevolence and Righteousness”, Comprehensive Implication

References

[1]	Mencius (Zhanguo), Mencius, trans. by Zhao Zhentao et al, (Jinan: Shandong Friendship Press, 1993).
[2]	Chen Lai, Bamboo and Silk “Five Elements” and Bamboo and Silk Research, (Beijing: Sanlian Bookstore, 2009).
[3]	Mou Chung-san, Theory of Perfect Good, (Taipei: Lianjing Publishing Co., Ltd., 1985).
[4]	Xu Qianxue (Qing), Postscript of Zi Zhi Tong Jian, Vol. 70, (Photocopy of Imperial Siku Quanshu), p. 17.
[5]	Sima Qian (Han), Records of the Historian, (Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1959), p. 2343.
[6]	Zhu Yiting, A Dictionary of Ethics, (Shanghai: Shanghai Dictionary Press, 2002), p. 12.
[7]	Zhu Yiting, A Dictionary of Ethics, (Shanghai: Shanghai Dictionary Press, 2002), p. 13.
[8]	Confucius (Chunqiu) et al, Analects of Confucius, the Great Learning and the Doctrine of the Mean, trans. by Gu Hongming, (Beijing: Beijing University of Technology Press, 2017).
[9]	Zhu Xi (Song), Notes to the Analects of Confucius, Vol. 8, edited by Guo Wanjin, (Beijing: Commercial Press, 2015), p. 246.
[10]	Mozi (Zhanguo), Mozi, trans. and noted by Fang Yong, (Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2022).
[11]	Xunzi (Zhanguo), Xunzi, trans. and noted by Fang Yong, Li Bo, (Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2011).
[12]	Wang Anshi (Song), Linchuan Gentleman Anthology, (Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1959), p. 773.
[13]	Cheng Hao (Song), Cheng Yi (Song), The Anthology of Two-Cheng, Vol. 11, commented by Wang Xiaoyu, (Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1981), p. 124.
[14]	Zhu Xi (Song), Zhuzi Quanshu, Vol. 21, edited by Zhu Jieren et al, (Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Press; Hefei: Anhui Education Press, 2010), p. 1082.
[15]	Dong Zhongshu (Han), Chunqiu Fanlu, noted by Zeng Zhenyu, (Zhengzhou: Henan University Press, 2009), p. 252.
[16]	Huang Zongxi (Qing), Learning Note of Song and Yuan Dynasties, Vol. 56, (Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1986), p. 1850.
[17]	Chung-ying Cheng, Ma sang, The Apocalypse of Neo Confucianism: the Ontological World of Mr. Chung-ying Cheng, (Beijing: Commercial Press, 2008), p. 108.
[18]	Ye Shi (Song), Xixue Jiyan, Vol. 23, (Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Press, 1992), p. 201.
[19]	Li Zhi (Ming), Collected works of Li Zhi, Vol. 32, edited by Zhang Jianye, (Beijing: Social Science Literature Press, 2000), p. 626.
[20]	David Hume (Britain), Theory of Human Nature, trans. by Guan Wenyun, (Beijing: Commercial Press, 2013), p. 508.
[21]	David Hume (Britain), Theory of Human Nature, trans. by Guan Wenyun, (Beijing: Commercial Press, 2013), p. 348.
[22]	Samuel Enoch Stumpf (America), James Fieser (America), History of Western Philosophy, trans. by Deng Xiaomang, (Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2005), p. 443.
[23]	Immanuel Kant (Germany), Complete Works of Kant, Vol. 5, trans. by Li Qiuling, (Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2006), p. 53.
[24]	Samuel Enoch Stumpf (America), James Fieser (America), History of Western Philosophy, trans. by DengXiaomang, (Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2005), p. 445.
[25]	Mou Chung-san, Heart Ontology and Nature Ontology, (Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Books Press, 1999), p. 119.
[26]	Dobin CHOI (Korea), Moral Artisanship in Mengzi 6A7, Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 17 (2018): 331-348.
[27]	Rex A. Wright (America), “Motivation Theory Essentials: Understanding Motivations and Their Conversion into Effortful Goal Pursuit”, Motivation and Emotion 40 (2016): 16-21.
[28]	Mark T. Nelson (America), “What the Utilitarian Cannot Think”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (2015): 717-729.
[29]	Wen Haiming, Illuminating Intentionality Through the Zhouyi: New Explorations in the Philosophy of the Book of Changes, (Beijing: Peking University Press, 2019).
[30]	Yang Guorong, Become Self and Become Object: The Generation of the World of Meaning, (Shanghai: East China Normal University Press, 2022), p. 314.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yuhu Sun. (2023). Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning. Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3), 70-74. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yuhu Sun. Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2023, 11(3), 70-74. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yuhu Sun. Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning. Humanit Soc Sci. 2023;11(3):70-74. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11,
  author = {Yuhu Sun},
  title = {Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning},
  journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
  volume = {11},
  number = {3},
  pages = {70-74},
  doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20231103.11},
  abstract = {This paper abandons the usual thinking pattern of “arguing between righteousness and profit” under the study of Mencius’ general level of good of “benevolence and righteousness”, attempts to take the path of “motivation”, which is less concerned by the academic circle, from the first chapter of Mencius with “benevolence and justice” to show the tension of argumentation brought by the propositions within it, according to the times, Confucian thinking mode and the general review of foreign motivation theory and so on, and briefly responds to the disadvantages of the opposition of “motivation theory and effect theory”. Based on the existence of human meaning, this paper redefines the connotation and direction of Mencius’ “benevolence and righteousness” in motivation theory, and holds that Mencius’ “benevolence and righteousness” motivation theory is the transcendence of moral ideals or values over moral argumentation. Mencius put the moral motivation of Confucianism above the external utilitarian demand, which is the internal reflection of Mencius’ basic thought of “good human nature”. This motivation can be regarded as the high recognition and expectation of the existence in human nature on the basis of the Confucian concept of virtue. Therefore, we can say with certainty that Mencius’ “motivation theory” has a value of guiding people to “follow the good”.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning
AU  - Yuhu Sun
Y1  - 2023/05/29
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11
T2  - Humanities and Social Sciences
JF  - Humanities and Social Sciences
JO  - Humanities and Social Sciences
SP  - 70
EP  - 74
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8184
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11
AB  - This paper abandons the usual thinking pattern of “arguing between righteousness and profit” under the study of Mencius’ general level of good of “benevolence and righteousness”, attempts to take the path of “motivation”, which is less concerned by the academic circle, from the first chapter of Mencius with “benevolence and justice” to show the tension of argumentation brought by the propositions within it, according to the times, Confucian thinking mode and the general review of foreign motivation theory and so on, and briefly responds to the disadvantages of the opposition of “motivation theory and effect theory”. Based on the existence of human meaning, this paper redefines the connotation and direction of Mencius’ “benevolence and righteousness” in motivation theory, and holds that Mencius’ “benevolence and righteousness” motivation theory is the transcendence of moral ideals or values over moral argumentation. Mencius put the moral motivation of Confucianism above the external utilitarian demand, which is the internal reflection of Mencius’ basic thought of “good human nature”. This motivation can be regarded as the high recognition and expectation of the existence in human nature on the basis of the Confucian concept of virtue. Therefore, we can say with certainty that Mencius’ “motivation theory” has a value of guiding people to “follow the good”.
VL  - 11
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Yuhu Sun

Department of Philosophy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yuhu Sun. (2023). Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning. Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3), 70-74. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yuhu Sun. Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2023, 11(3), 70-74. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yuhu Sun. Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning. Humanit Soc Sci. 2023;11(3):70-74. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11,
  author = {Yuhu Sun},
  title = {Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning},
  journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
  volume = {11},
  number = {3},
  pages = {70-74},
  doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20231103.11},
  abstract = {This paper abandons the usual thinking pattern of “arguing between righteousness and profit” under the study of Mencius’ general level of good of “benevolence and righteousness”, attempts to take the path of “motivation”, which is less concerned by the academic circle, from the first chapter of Mencius with “benevolence and justice” to show the tension of argumentation brought by the propositions within it, according to the times, Confucian thinking mode and the general review of foreign motivation theory and so on, and briefly responds to the disadvantages of the opposition of “motivation theory and effect theory”. Based on the existence of human meaning, this paper redefines the connotation and direction of Mencius’ “benevolence and righteousness” in motivation theory, and holds that Mencius’ “benevolence and righteousness” motivation theory is the transcendence of moral ideals or values over moral argumentation. Mencius put the moral motivation of Confucianism above the external utilitarian demand, which is the internal reflection of Mencius’ basic thought of “good human nature”. This motivation can be regarded as the high recognition and expectation of the existence in human nature on the basis of the Confucian concept of virtue. Therefore, we can say with certainty that Mencius’ “motivation theory” has a value of guiding people to “follow the good”.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Exploration of Mencius’ Motivation Theory of “Benevolence and Righteousness” Based on the Existence of Human Meaning
AU  - Yuhu Sun
Y1  - 2023/05/29
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11
T2  - Humanities and Social Sciences
JF  - Humanities and Social Sciences
JO  - Humanities and Social Sciences
SP  - 70
EP  - 74
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8184
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.11
AB  - This paper abandons the usual thinking pattern of “arguing between righteousness and profit” under the study of Mencius’ general level of good of “benevolence and righteousness”, attempts to take the path of “motivation”, which is less concerned by the academic circle, from the first chapter of Mencius with “benevolence and justice” to show the tension of argumentation brought by the propositions within it, according to the times, Confucian thinking mode and the general review of foreign motivation theory and so on, and briefly responds to the disadvantages of the opposition of “motivation theory and effect theory”. Based on the existence of human meaning, this paper redefines the connotation and direction of Mencius’ “benevolence and righteousness” in motivation theory, and holds that Mencius’ “benevolence and righteousness” motivation theory is the transcendence of moral ideals or values over moral argumentation. Mencius put the moral motivation of Confucianism above the external utilitarian demand, which is the internal reflection of Mencius’ basic thought of “good human nature”. This motivation can be regarded as the high recognition and expectation of the existence in human nature on the basis of the Confucian concept of virtue. Therefore, we can say with certainty that Mencius’ “motivation theory” has a value of guiding people to “follow the good”.
VL  - 11
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download