Contemporary philosophy has been always examining new methods of philosophising and approaching social, political and cultural discourse. However, the global climate change and new geopolitical orders call for a new critical analysis. The essay explores horizon of ethical philosophising, questioning validity of traditional scholarly knowledge. Addressing Bruno Latour’s idea of actor-networking theory and Puig de la Bellacasa’s reflection on care, it aims to bring forth the concept of “thinking-with-care” and the role of the Anthropocene, advocating decentralized thinking and bringing new meanings to phenomena and experiences which have not been taken into consideration by, for instance, academic philosophy. The text tackles new research approaches based in the practice of ethical thinking and writing. It ponders questions of care the way they are discussed in works of Joan C. Tronto, Donna J. Haraway, and Maria Puig de la Bellacasa, and it sketches possible new paths of ethical thinking, i. e. thinking with the other and thinking for the other. The challenge of this essay is to reflect whether we can implement “thinking-with” in philosophical writing and questing in current conditions of war, natural disasters, and changing political regimes. It concludes that thinking-with-care and thinking-for can bring an importance of social responsiveness into the practice of philosophising, accentuating that ethics should be situated in the interconnected net-work of the world.
| Published in | Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.hss.20231104.16 |
| Page(s) | 163-168 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Care, Ethics, Thinking with Care, Actor-Networking Theory, Agency, Others
| [1] | Arias-Maldonado, Manuel. (2015). The Anthropocene Turn: Theorizing Sustainability in a Postnatural Age. Sustainability, Vol 8 (1), No. 19 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288073114_The_Anthropocenic_Turn_Theorizing_Sustainability_in_a_Postnatural_Age. |
| [2] | Bellacasa, Maria Puig de. (2017). Matters of Care. Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. |
| [3] | Blustein, Jeffrey. (1991). Care and Commitment. Oxford University Press. Haraway, J. Donna, Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, 2016. |
| [4] | Haraway, J. Donna. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press. |
| [5] | Haraway, J. Donna. (1997). Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge. |
| [6] | Gilligan, Carol. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts. |
| [7] | Latour, Bruno. (2021). After Lockdown: A Metamorphosis. Cambridge: Polity Press. |
| [8] | Latour, Bruno. (2018). Dawn to Earth: Politics in the New Climate Regime. Polity Press: Cambridge. |
| [9] | Latour, Bruno. (2010). An Attempt at a “Compositionist Manifesto”. New Literary History. Vol. 41, 471–490. |
| [10] | Latour, Bruno. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Action-Network Theory. Oxford University Press: New York. |
| [11] | Latour, Bruno. (2002). Rejoicing or the Torments of Religious Speech. Polity Press: Cambridge. |
| [12] | Latour, Bruno. (1994). On Technical Mediation – Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy. Common Knowledge. Vol. 3, 29–64. |
| [13] | Nagel, Thomas. (1986). The View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press: New York. |
| [14] | Nodding, Nel. (1986). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press. |
| [15] | Tompkins, Peter and Bird, Christopher. (2002). The Secret Life of Plants: A Fascinating Account of the Physical, Emotional, and Spiritual Relations Between Plants and Man. New York: Harper. |
| [16] | Tronto, Joan. C. (1994). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. London: Routledge. |
APA Style
Irina Poleshchuk. (2023). Care Ethics and Actor-Networking Theory as Challenges to the Ethics of Philosophical Thinking. Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(4), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231104.16
ACS Style
Irina Poleshchuk. Care Ethics and Actor-Networking Theory as Challenges to the Ethics of Philosophical Thinking. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2023, 11(4), 163-168. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20231104.16
AMA Style
Irina Poleshchuk. Care Ethics and Actor-Networking Theory as Challenges to the Ethics of Philosophical Thinking. Humanit Soc Sci. 2023;11(4):163-168. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20231104.16
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.hss.20231104.16,
author = {Irina Poleshchuk},
title = {Care Ethics and Actor-Networking Theory as Challenges to the Ethics of Philosophical Thinking},
journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
volume = {11},
number = {4},
pages = {163-168},
doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20231104.16},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231104.16},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20231104.16},
abstract = {Contemporary philosophy has been always examining new methods of philosophising and approaching social, political and cultural discourse. However, the global climate change and new geopolitical orders call for a new critical analysis. The essay explores horizon of ethical philosophising, questioning validity of traditional scholarly knowledge. Addressing Bruno Latour’s idea of actor-networking theory and Puig de la Bellacasa’s reflection on care, it aims to bring forth the concept of “thinking-with-care” and the role of the Anthropocene, advocating decentralized thinking and bringing new meanings to phenomena and experiences which have not been taken into consideration by, for instance, academic philosophy. The text tackles new research approaches based in the practice of ethical thinking and writing. It ponders questions of care the way they are discussed in works of Joan C. Tronto, Donna J. Haraway, and Maria Puig de la Bellacasa, and it sketches possible new paths of ethical thinking, i. e. thinking with the other and thinking for the other. The challenge of this essay is to reflect whether we can implement “thinking-with” in philosophical writing and questing in current conditions of war, natural disasters, and changing political regimes. It concludes that thinking-with-care and thinking-for can bring an importance of social responsiveness into the practice of philosophising, accentuating that ethics should be situated in the interconnected net-work of the world.},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Care Ethics and Actor-Networking Theory as Challenges to the Ethics of Philosophical Thinking AU - Irina Poleshchuk Y1 - 2023/08/22 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231104.16 DO - 10.11648/j.hss.20231104.16 T2 - Humanities and Social Sciences JF - Humanities and Social Sciences JO - Humanities and Social Sciences SP - 163 EP - 168 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8184 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231104.16 AB - Contemporary philosophy has been always examining new methods of philosophising and approaching social, political and cultural discourse. However, the global climate change and new geopolitical orders call for a new critical analysis. The essay explores horizon of ethical philosophising, questioning validity of traditional scholarly knowledge. Addressing Bruno Latour’s idea of actor-networking theory and Puig de la Bellacasa’s reflection on care, it aims to bring forth the concept of “thinking-with-care” and the role of the Anthropocene, advocating decentralized thinking and bringing new meanings to phenomena and experiences which have not been taken into consideration by, for instance, academic philosophy. The text tackles new research approaches based in the practice of ethical thinking and writing. It ponders questions of care the way they are discussed in works of Joan C. Tronto, Donna J. Haraway, and Maria Puig de la Bellacasa, and it sketches possible new paths of ethical thinking, i. e. thinking with the other and thinking for the other. The challenge of this essay is to reflect whether we can implement “thinking-with” in philosophical writing and questing in current conditions of war, natural disasters, and changing political regimes. It concludes that thinking-with-care and thinking-for can bring an importance of social responsiveness into the practice of philosophising, accentuating that ethics should be situated in the interconnected net-work of the world. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: