Objective: study the contribution of elastosonography in the characterization of breast masses. Methods: a prospective and descriptive study took place over a period of 6 months from February to July 2020 in the department of radiology of the Sylvanus Olympio teaching hospital in Lomé. Patients presenting a breast mass diagnosed by the conventional ultrasound were invited to take part in the study. Result: in total, fifty-four patients met our selection criteria, for an overall frequency of 2.9%. The average age of our patients was 24.2 years old with the 20-29 years age group being the most represented. The mean lesion size was 18.8mm with extremes of 5 and 35mm. The lesions classified as Birads 3 were the most prevalent (40.4%) and they all had an elasticity score of less than 3. 75% of the lesions classified as Birads 4 also had an elasticity score less than 3. All lesions classified as Birads 5 had an elasticity score greater than 4. We obtained a statistically significant relationship between the Birads classification and the elastographic score and also by differentiating the mammary masses into benign and malignant lesions by these two modalities. Conclusion: elastosonography is a diagnostic imaging method that allows rapid and easy evaluation of breast lesions and it provides a valuable addition to the ultrasound data in real-time. It provides complementary diagnostic information that could potentially assist in the characterization of breast lesions by B-mode ultrasound.
Published in | International Journal of Medical Imaging (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.15 |
Page(s) | 123-129 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Elastosonography, Breast Masses, Elasticity Score, Blacks, Togo
[1] | Globocan 2020. Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2020. [http://gco.iarc.fr/today/fact-sheets-populations]. Visited on 4 January, 2020. |
[2] | [https://www.who.int/fr/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer]. Visited on 30 May, 2020. |
[3] | Darré T, Amegbor K, Sonhaye L, Kouyate M, Aboubaraki A, N’timon B et al. Histo-epidemiological profile of breast cancers a report of 450 cases observed in the university teaching hospital of Lome. Médecine d’Afrique Noire 2013; 60 (2): 53-58. |
[4] | Bassowa A, Ketevi A, Douaguibe B, Faiagnon K, Sedoh T, Ajavon D et al. Death from breast cancer at Sylvanus Olympio Teatching Hospital of Lome: advocacy for systematic screening for patients at risk in Togo. J Rech Sci Univ Lomé 2018; 20 (2): 271-276. |
[5] | Baeta S, Nyame AT, Nyame AN, Tete KVS, Kolani K, Akpadza KS. Survie globale des patientes traitées pour cancer du sein au CHU de Lomé (Togo). J. rech. Sci. Univ. Lomé (Togo) 2006; 8 (1): 51-59. |
[6] | Tardivon A, El Khoury C, Thibault F, Wyler A, Barreau B, Neuenschwander S. Elastography of the breast: a prospective study of 122 lesions. J Radiol 2007; 88 (5 Pt 1): 657-662. |
[7] | Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196 (1): 123-134. |
[8] | Sarvazyan A, Skovorodan AR, Emelianov S, Fowlkes JB. Biophysical bases of elasticity imaging. Acoustical Imaging 1995; 21: 223-241. |
[9] | Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrasound Imaging 1991; 13 (2): 111-134. |
[10] | Mohamed RE, Abo-Dewan KA. Incremental value of real time elastography in differentiating breast masses. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2014; 45 (2): 605-618. |
[11] | Demay M-LH, Monghal C, Bertrand P, Vildé A, Brunereau L. An assessment of the performance of elastography for the investigation of BI-RADS 4 and BI-RADS 5 breast lesions: Correlations with pathological anatomy findings. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 2012; 93 (10): 757-766. |
[12] | Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, Sigal-Zafrani B, Bercoff J, Deffieux T et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging--preliminary results. Radiology. 2010; 256 (1): 297-303. |
[13] | Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB, Svensson WE, Balleyguier C, Smith C. Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31 (2): 281-287. |
[14] | Barr RG, Nakashima K, Amy D, Cosgrove D, Farrokh A, Schafer F et al. « WFUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography: Part 2: Breast ». Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41 (5): 1148 1160. |
[15] | Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Hall TJ, Bamber JC, Barr RG et al. «WFUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography: Part 1: Basic Principles and Terminology ». Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41 (5): 1126 1147. |
[16] | Tan SM, Teh HS, Mancer JFK, Poh WT. Improving B-mode ultrasound evaluation of breast lesions with real-time ultrasound elastography: a clinical approach. Breast 2008; 17 (3): 252-257. |
[17] | Zhu QL, Jiang YX, Liu JB, Liu H, Sun Q, Dai Q et al. Real-time ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of breast lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 1232-1238. |
[18] | Navarro B, Úbeda B, Vallespí M, Wolf C, Casas L, Browne JL. Role of elastography in the assessment of breast lesions. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 313-321. |
[19] | Graziano L, Bitencourt AGV, Cohen MP, Guatelli CS, Poli MRB, Souza JA et al. Elastographic evaluation of indeterminate breast masses on ultrasound. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017; 39: 72-79. |
[20] | Gest J. Cancer du sein: étiologie et histoire naturelle. EMC Paris Gynécologie obstétrique 1975; 4: 865. |
[21] | Atabey AO, Aribal E, Ergelen R, Kaya H. Value of strain elastography ultrasound in differentiation of breast masses and histopathologic correlation. J Breast Health 2014; 10: 234-238. |
[22] | Youk JH, Son EJ, Gweon HM, Kim H, Park YJ, Kim J-A. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with b-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014; 40 (10): 2336-2344. |
[23] | Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239 (2): 341-350. |
[24] | Poplack SP, Carney PA, Weiss JE, Titus-Ernstoff L, Goodrich ME, Tosteson AN. Screening mammography: costs and use of screening-related services. Radiology 2005; 234: 79-85. |
[25] | Bojanic K, Katavic N, Smolic M, Pacovski M, Stimac D, Ivanac G. Implementation of elastography score and strain ratio in combination with B-mode ultrasound avoids unnecesssary biopsies of breast lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 2017; 43 (4): 804-816. |
[26] | Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications. Theranostics. 2017; 7 (5): 1303-1329. doi: 10.7150/thno.18650. |
[27] | Wojcinski S, Boehme E, Farrokh A. Ultrasound real time elastography can predict malignancy in BI-RADS US - 3 lesions. BMC Cancer. 2013; 13: 159. |
[28] | Menezes R, Sardessai S, Furtado R, Sardessai M. Correlation of strain elastography with conventional sonography and FNAC/biopsy. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2016; 10 (7): TC05-TC10. |
[29] | Balu-Maestro C, Caramella T. L’élastographie du sein peut-elle modifier nos stratégies? Technologie, impact et limites. Gynécologie obstétrique et fertilité, 2015; 43 (1): 71–77. |
[30] | Fleury EFC, Rinaldi JF, Piato S, Fleury JC, Roveda JD. Features of cystic breast lesions at ultrasound elastography. Radiol Bras 2008; 41 (3): 167-172. |
[31] | Kim MY, Cho N, Yi A, Koo HR, Yun BL, Moon WK. Sonoelastography in distinguishing benign from malignant complex breast mass and making the decision to biopsy. Korean J Radiol 2013; 14 (4): 559-567. |
[32] | Sravani N, Ramesh A, Sureshkumar S, et al. Diagnostic role of shear wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses. SA J Radiol. 2020; 24 (1): 1999. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v24i1.1999. |
APA Style
Tchaou Mazamaesso, Ndakne Motchelaho Laurence Agnes, Gbande Pihou, Dagbe Massaga, Agoda-Koussema Lama Kegedigoma, et al. (2021). Elastosonography in the Characterization of Breast Masses in Black Women in Lomé (Togo). International Journal of Medical Imaging, 9(2), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.15
ACS Style
Tchaou Mazamaesso; Ndakne Motchelaho Laurence Agnes; Gbande Pihou; Dagbe Massaga; Agoda-Koussema Lama Kegedigoma, et al. Elastosonography in the Characterization of Breast Masses in Black Women in Lomé (Togo). Int. J. Med. Imaging 2021, 9(2), 123-129. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.15
AMA Style
Tchaou Mazamaesso, Ndakne Motchelaho Laurence Agnes, Gbande Pihou, Dagbe Massaga, Agoda-Koussema Lama Kegedigoma, et al. Elastosonography in the Characterization of Breast Masses in Black Women in Lomé (Togo). Int J Med Imaging. 2021;9(2):123-129. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.15
@article{10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.15, author = {Tchaou Mazamaesso and Ndakne Motchelaho Laurence Agnes and Gbande Pihou and Dagbe Massaga and Agoda-Koussema Lama Kegedigoma and Adjenou Komlanvi}, title = {Elastosonography in the Characterization of Breast Masses in Black Women in Lomé (Togo)}, journal = {International Journal of Medical Imaging}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {123-129}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmi.20210902.15}, abstract = {Objective: study the contribution of elastosonography in the characterization of breast masses. Methods: a prospective and descriptive study took place over a period of 6 months from February to July 2020 in the department of radiology of the Sylvanus Olympio teaching hospital in Lomé. Patients presenting a breast mass diagnosed by the conventional ultrasound were invited to take part in the study. Result: in total, fifty-four patients met our selection criteria, for an overall frequency of 2.9%. The average age of our patients was 24.2 years old with the 20-29 years age group being the most represented. The mean lesion size was 18.8mm with extremes of 5 and 35mm. The lesions classified as Birads 3 were the most prevalent (40.4%) and they all had an elasticity score of less than 3. 75% of the lesions classified as Birads 4 also had an elasticity score less than 3. All lesions classified as Birads 5 had an elasticity score greater than 4. We obtained a statistically significant relationship between the Birads classification and the elastographic score and also by differentiating the mammary masses into benign and malignant lesions by these two modalities. Conclusion: elastosonography is a diagnostic imaging method that allows rapid and easy evaluation of breast lesions and it provides a valuable addition to the ultrasound data in real-time. It provides complementary diagnostic information that could potentially assist in the characterization of breast lesions by B-mode ultrasound.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Elastosonography in the Characterization of Breast Masses in Black Women in Lomé (Togo) AU - Tchaou Mazamaesso AU - Ndakne Motchelaho Laurence Agnes AU - Gbande Pihou AU - Dagbe Massaga AU - Agoda-Koussema Lama Kegedigoma AU - Adjenou Komlanvi Y1 - 2021/06/07 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.15 T2 - International Journal of Medical Imaging JF - International Journal of Medical Imaging JO - International Journal of Medical Imaging SP - 123 EP - 129 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-832X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.15 AB - Objective: study the contribution of elastosonography in the characterization of breast masses. Methods: a prospective and descriptive study took place over a period of 6 months from February to July 2020 in the department of radiology of the Sylvanus Olympio teaching hospital in Lomé. Patients presenting a breast mass diagnosed by the conventional ultrasound were invited to take part in the study. Result: in total, fifty-four patients met our selection criteria, for an overall frequency of 2.9%. The average age of our patients was 24.2 years old with the 20-29 years age group being the most represented. The mean lesion size was 18.8mm with extremes of 5 and 35mm. The lesions classified as Birads 3 were the most prevalent (40.4%) and they all had an elasticity score of less than 3. 75% of the lesions classified as Birads 4 also had an elasticity score less than 3. All lesions classified as Birads 5 had an elasticity score greater than 4. We obtained a statistically significant relationship between the Birads classification and the elastographic score and also by differentiating the mammary masses into benign and malignant lesions by these two modalities. Conclusion: elastosonography is a diagnostic imaging method that allows rapid and easy evaluation of breast lesions and it provides a valuable addition to the ultrasound data in real-time. It provides complementary diagnostic information that could potentially assist in the characterization of breast lesions by B-mode ultrasound. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -