Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Long-Term Evaluation of a Short Training Program for the Unemployed: Exploring Administrative Data

Received: 23 November 2023    Accepted: 21 December 2023    Published: 11 January 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Training programs can promote lifelong learning and facilitate the mobility of workers towards growing sectors. However, such interventions may require significant time investments from participants and financial investments for governments. Since most active labor market policies (ALMP) studies focus on short-run effects, consistently finding small or negative short-run effects and rarely evaluating if positive long-run effects occur, this study aims to surpass this gap. We evaluate both the short and long-run impact of a Portuguese short training program for the unemployed, launched in 2012, named Vida Ativa. We assess its sociological and economic effects on post program, unemployment duration and probability of recurrence. The study draws on four comprehensive administrative databases of the Portuguese Public Employment Services (IEFP), providing individual information over the period of December 2012 to October 2019. The method used is an OLS regression, and each (short and long run) effect is evaluated with different treatment variables and sample restrictions. We found that ALMP participation increases initial unemployment duration but decreases the re-unemployment probability. Furthermore, lock-in effects were found to decrease from the first to the third month and turn insignificant after that period. This result indicates that ALMP may be subject to important time trade-offs and that exclusively short-run analyses may significantly underestimate the effects of ALMP.

Published in Journal of Human Resource Management (Volume 12, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.jhrm.20241201.11
Page(s) 1-16
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

ALMP, Long Run Effects, Policy Evaluation, Training, Unemployment

References
[1] Arellano, F. A. (2010). Do Training Programmes Get the Unemployed Back To Work? A Look at The Spanish Experience. Revista de Economía Aplicada Número. Vol. 53.
[2] Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of political economy, 70(5, Part 2), 9-49.
[3] Becker, G. S. (1975). Investment in human capital: effects on earnings. In Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, Second Edition (pp. 13-44). NBER.
[4] Betcherman, G., Olivas, K. & Dar, A. (2004) Social Protection Discussion Paper Series Impacts of Active Labor Market Programs: New Evidence from Evaluations with Particular Attention to Developing and Transition Countries. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series - The World Bank.
[5] Brodkin, E. Z. & Larsen, F. (2013). Changing boundaries: The policies of workfare in the US and Europe. Poverty & Public Policy, 5(1), 37-47.
[6] Brown, A. J. G., & Koettl, J. (2012). Active Labor Market Programs: Employment Gain or Fiscal Drain? IZA Journal of Labor Economics (2015) 4: 12. DOI 10.1186/s40172-015-0025-5.
[7] Caliendo, M., Kunn, S. & Schmidl, R. (2011). Fighting Youth Unemployment: The Effects of Active Labor Market Policies. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6222.
[8] Caliendo, M. & Schmidl, R. (2016). Youth unemployment and active labor market policies in Europe. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 5(1), 1-30.
[9] Card, D., Kluve, J. & Weber, A. (2010). Active Labour Market Policy Evaluations: A Meta-Analysis. The Economic Journal 120 (548). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02387.x
[10] Card, D., Kluve, J. & Andrea, A. (2015). What Works? A Meta Analysis of Recent Active Labor Market Program Evaluations. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
[11] Costa Dias, M. & Varejão, J. (2012). Estudo De Avaliação Das Políticas Ativas De Emprego. FEP - Faculdade de Economia Da Universidade Do Porto.
[12] Damaske, S., Frech, A., & Wething, H. (2023). The Life Course of Unemployment: The Timing and Relative Degree of Risk. Work and Occupations, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231162949
[13] Crépon, B., Ferracci, M. & Fougère, D. (2007). Training the Unemployed in France: How Does It Affect Unemployment Duration and Recurrence? IZA Discussion Paper No. 3215. DOI: 10.2307/23646576.
[14] Esping-Andersen, G. (1994). After the Golden Age: The future of the welfare state in the new global order, UNRISD Occasional Paper: World Summit for Social Development, No. 7, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Geneva
[15] Fitzenberger, B., Osikominu, A. & Völter, R. (2008). Get Training or Wait? Long-Run Employment Effects of Training Programs for the Unemployed in West Germany. Annales d'Économie et de Statistique, No. 91/92, 321-355.
[16] Gambetta, D. (2011). Signaling. In Bearman P and Hedström P (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, Oxford Handbooks. online edn. 168–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.013.8,
[17] Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3 (Nov., 1985). 481-510.
[18] Heath, A. & Swann, T. (1999). Reservation Wages and the Duration of Unemployment. Research Discussion paper 1999-02. Economic Research Department. Reserve Bank of Australia. https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/1999/pdf/rdp1999-02.pdf
[19] Hemerijck, A. (2018). Social investment as a policy paradigm. Journal of European public policy, 25(6), 810-827.
[20] IEFP (2011). Síntese da Execução dos Programas e Medidas de Emprego e Formação Profissional.https://www.iefp.pt/documents/10181/277125/SinteseEF+dezembro+2011.pdf/ca1e887b-9837-4043-9ebd-28877972482a
[21] IEFP (2013). Vida Ativa - Regulamento Específico. Available at: https://www.iefp.pt/documents/10181/10763895/Ficha+s%C3%ADntese+Medida+Vida+Ativa.pdf/e9cae134-a55a-4e1b-a2e0-0d8dbcfd62de
[22] IEFP (2015). Políticas Ativas do Mercado de Trabalho em Portugal - Relatório 2011-2015. Available at: https://www.etf.europa.eu/sites/default/files/event/IEFP_Active%20Employment%20Measures2_14112017_PT.pdf
[23] IEFP (2018). Vida Ativa - Regulamento Específico. 4ª Revisão. Available at: https://www.iefp.pt/documents/10181/7942815/Regulamento+Espec%C3%ADfico+Vida+Ativa+4%C2%AA%20Revis%C3%A3o
[24] IEFP (2019). Relatório de Execução Física e Financeira 2019. Available at: https://www.iefp.pt/documents/10181/9300317/Relatorio+de+Execu%C3%A7%C3%A3o+Financeira+dezembro+2019.pdf/df8bd1ae-f327-439e-9c69-9ea1efe5c837
[25] IEFP (2022). IEFP - Instituição 2022. Available at: https://www.iefp.pt/instituicao
[26] ILO (2018). Decent Work in Portugal 2008–18: From Crisis to Recovery. Available at: www.ilo.org/publns.
[27] Jenkins, A. (2004). Women, lifelong learning and employment. (No. 39). Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics and Political Science.
[28] Kluve, J. (2010). The Effectiveness of European Active Labor Market Programs. Labour Economics 17 (6): 904–18.
[29] Lalive, R., van Ours, J. C. & Zweimüller, J. (2008). The Impact of Active Labour Market Programmes on the Duration of Unemployment in Switzerland. Economic Journal 118 (525): 235–57.
[30] Lechner, M., & Conny, W. (2009). Are Training Programs More Effective When Unemployment Is High? Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 653-692.
[31] Martin, J. P. & Grubb, D. (2001). What Works and for Whom: A Review of OECD Countries’ Experiences With Active Labour Market. Working Paper, No. 2001: 14. Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU), Uppsala
[32] Martins, P. S. & Pessoa e Costa, S. (2014). Reemployment and Substitution Effects from Increased Activation: Evidence from Times of Crisis. Discussion Paper No 8600, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
[33] McTier, A. & McGregor, A. (2018). Influence of work–welfare cycling and labour market segmentation on employment histories of young long-term unemployed. Work, Employment and Society, 32(1), 20-37.
[34] Meghnagi, M. & Tuccio, M. (2022). The recognition of prior learning: Validating general competences, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 270, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2d9fb06a-en.
[35] Mincer J (1958) Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of political economy, 66(4), 281-302.
[36] OECD (2010). Economic Outlook No 88. OECP. Paris.
[37] OECD (2017). Labour Market Reforms In Portugal 2011-2015 A Preliminary Assessment. Available at:. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264269576-en
[38] OECD (2022a). Short-Term Labour Market Statistics - 2022. Available at: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DatasetCode=STLABOUR#.
[39] OECD (2022b). Public Spending on Labour Markets (Indicator) - 2022. Available at: https://data.oecd.org/chart/6UmI.
[40] Pedroso, P. (2014). Portugal and the Global Crisis: The Impact of Austerity on the Economy, the Social Model and the Performance of the State. Ed. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung | Western Europe /North America. Available at: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/10722-20220207.pdf
[41] Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital: Reply. The American Economic Review, 51(5), 1035–1039. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1813848
[42] Segurança Social (2022). Coordenação Internacional de Legislações - 2021. Available at: https://www.seg-social.pt/coordenacao-internacional-de-legislacoes
[43] Smelser, N. J. (2013). The sociology of economic life. Reprint. Quid Pro Books.
[44] Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signalling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, No 87, pp. 355–374.
[45] Taylor, P. & Urwin, P. (2001). Age and Participation in Vocational Education and Training. Work, Employment and Society, 15(4), 763–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/095001701400438198
[46] Vooren, M., Haelermans, C., Groot, W., & van den Brink, H. M. (2019). The effectiveness of active labor market policies: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(1), 125-149. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12269
[47] Wunsch, C. (2016). How to minimize lock-in effects of programs for unemployed workers. IZA World of Labor 2016: 288. DOI: 10.15185/izawol.288.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Baião, M., Guedes, I., Martins, P. (2024). Long-Term Evaluation of a Short Training Program for the Unemployed: Exploring Administrative Data. Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20241201.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Baião, M.; Guedes, I.; Martins, P. Long-Term Evaluation of a Short Training Program for the Unemployed: Exploring Administrative Data. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2024, 12(1), 1-16. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20241201.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Baião M, Guedes I, Martins P. Long-Term Evaluation of a Short Training Program for the Unemployed: Exploring Administrative Data. J Hum Resour Manag. 2024;12(1):1-16. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20241201.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jhrm.20241201.11,
      author = {Miguel Baião and Isabel Guedes and Pedro Martins},
      title = {Long-Term Evaluation of a Short Training Program for the Unemployed: Exploring Administrative Data},
      journal = {Journal of Human Resource Management},
      volume = {12},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-16},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jhrm.20241201.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20241201.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jhrm.20241201.11},
      abstract = {Training programs can promote lifelong learning and facilitate the mobility of workers towards growing sectors. However, such interventions may require significant time investments from participants and financial investments for governments. Since most active labor market policies (ALMP) studies focus on short-run effects, consistently finding small or negative short-run effects and rarely evaluating if positive long-run effects occur, this study aims to surpass this gap. We evaluate both the short and long-run impact of a Portuguese short training program for the unemployed, launched in 2012, named Vida Ativa. We assess its sociological and economic effects on post program, unemployment duration and probability of recurrence. The study draws on four comprehensive administrative databases of the Portuguese Public Employment Services (IEFP), providing individual information over the period of December 2012 to October 2019. The method used is an OLS regression, and each (short and long run) effect is evaluated with different treatment variables and sample restrictions. We found that ALMP participation increases initial unemployment duration but decreases the re-unemployment probability. Furthermore, lock-in effects were found to decrease from the first to the third month and turn insignificant after that period. This result indicates that ALMP may be subject to important time trade-offs and that exclusively short-run analyses may significantly underestimate the effects of ALMP.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Long-Term Evaluation of a Short Training Program for the Unemployed: Exploring Administrative Data
    AU  - Miguel Baião
    AU  - Isabel Guedes
    AU  - Pedro Martins
    Y1  - 2024/01/11
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20241201.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jhrm.20241201.11
    T2  - Journal of Human Resource Management
    JF  - Journal of Human Resource Management
    JO  - Journal of Human Resource Management
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 16
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0715
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20241201.11
    AB  - Training programs can promote lifelong learning and facilitate the mobility of workers towards growing sectors. However, such interventions may require significant time investments from participants and financial investments for governments. Since most active labor market policies (ALMP) studies focus on short-run effects, consistently finding small or negative short-run effects and rarely evaluating if positive long-run effects occur, this study aims to surpass this gap. We evaluate both the short and long-run impact of a Portuguese short training program for the unemployed, launched in 2012, named Vida Ativa. We assess its sociological and economic effects on post program, unemployment duration and probability of recurrence. The study draws on four comprehensive administrative databases of the Portuguese Public Employment Services (IEFP), providing individual information over the period of December 2012 to October 2019. The method used is an OLS regression, and each (short and long run) effect is evaluated with different treatment variables and sample restrictions. We found that ALMP participation increases initial unemployment duration but decreases the re-unemployment probability. Furthermore, lock-in effects were found to decrease from the first to the third month and turn insignificant after that period. This result indicates that ALMP may be subject to important time trade-offs and that exclusively short-run analyses may significantly underestimate the effects of ALMP.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Economic and Organizational Sciences, Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal; Research Centre in Economic and Organisational Sociology (SOCIUS) - Research in Social Sciences and Management (CSG), Lisbon School of Economics and Management (ISEG), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

  • Nova School of Business and Economics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa - Campus de Carcavelos, Carcavelos, Portugal

  • Nova School of Business and Economics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa - Campus de Carcavelos, Carcavelos, Portugal

  • Sections