| Peer-Reviewed

Polymer Injection as a Development Strategy to Improve Oil Recovery in the BKH Layer of YDP Field

Received: 22 April 2023    Accepted: 15 May 2023    Published: 25 May 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

There are still have a potential oil to be produced, the reduced reservoir pressure due to continuous oil production at a high rate, and the high water cut value are the background for the polymer injection process in the BKH Layer of YDP Oil Field. Due to a high water cut value, the study then conducted using a polymer injection method. Screening criteria for polymers injection was conducted to see the suitability of the reservoir, and then carry out an advanced scenarios using polymers of various concentrations to be compared, and see a cumulative incremental oil production and recovery factor. The stages including collecting and preparing data, processing and analyzing RCAL, SCAL, and PVT data, input data to simulation model with actual conditions. The reservoir simulation performed including initialization, history matching and PI matching, carry out polymer injection scenarios with certain polymer concentrations, then predict and analyze the scenario results, and finally determine the best polymer injection scenario to be applied in the BKH layer of YDP field. Based on the results of the study, it is shows that the scenario IV-A is the best scenario for polymer injection compared to other scenarios. Scenario IV-A performed by injection of polymer with a peripheral pattern with an additional 5 (five) injection wells, injection pressure of 1200 psi, injection rate of 300 bbl/d, polymer concentration of 0.6 lb/bbl, incremental recovery factor of 2.01%, and oil production cumulative obtained until December 2035 is 5087 MSTB.

Published in International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering (Volume 11, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ogce.20231103.11
Page(s) 53-63
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Polymer Injection, Oil Production, Water Cut, Polymer Concentration

References
[1] Chang, H. L., (1978). Polymer Flooding Technology-Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. SPE-AIME, Cities Service Oil Co.
[2] Kristanto, D., Abdassah, D., Rukmana, D., Cahyoko, A. D., (2020). Enhanced Oil Recovery, Pohon Cahaya Publisher Co., Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
[3] Sheng, J. J., (2013). Chapter 3 - Polymer Flooding: Fundamentals and Field Cases. Enhanced Oil Recovery Field Case Stud 2013: 63–82.
[4] Al-Qattan, A., et. al. (2018). Low Salinity Waterflood and Low Salinity Polymer Injection in the Wara Reservoir of the Greater Burgan Field. SPE 190481 MS.
[5] Arina, P., and Kasmungin, S., (2015). Study of Increasing Oil Production with Polymer Injection Method in View of Various Formation Water Salinities. National Seminar of Scholars.
[6] Widiyarso, A., Swadesi, B., Wibowo., Wisnu, A., and Sudarmoyo., (2006). Laboratory Study of the Effect of Polymer Injection with Various Concentrations on Increasing Oil Recovery in Carbonate Reservoirs. IATMI 2006-TS-20.
[7] Sheng J. J., Leonhardt, B., and Azri, N., (2015). Status of Polymer-Flooding Technology. J Can Pet Technol 54: Issue 02.
[8] Yang, F., Wang, D., Wenxiang, W., Junzheng, W., Weijie, L., Chunling, K., and Qinghai, C., (2006). A Pilot Test of High-Concentration Polymer Flooding to Further Enhance Oil Recovery. SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, April 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/99354-MS.
[9] Wicaksono, H., Sutijan., and Yuliansyah, A. T., (2015). Characterization of HPAM KYPAM Polymer Solution for Injection in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR). Journal of Process Engineering Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 9-15.
[10] Burnett, D. B., and Dann, M. W., (1981). Screening Tests for Enhanced Oil Recovery Projects, SPE Paper 9710, SPE Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Symposium, Midland, Texas.
[11] Bourdarot, G., and Ghedan, S., (2011). Modified EOR Screening Criteria as Applied to a Group of Offshore Carbonate Oil Reservoirs. SPE 148323.
[12] Shaw, R. A., Stright, D. H., (1975). Performance of the Taber South Polymer Flood. Paper CIM 75–41 presented at the CIM 26th Annual Technical Meeting, Banff, June 11–13, 1975.
[13] Crichlow, H. B., (1972). Modern Reservoir Engineering – A Simulation Approach. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall inc. Chapter 9 (P. 248-272).
[14] Economidies, M. J., and Nolte, K. G., (2000). Reservoir Stimulation. 3rd Edition. Houston: Schlumberger Educational Services.
[15] Rukmana, D., Kristanto, D., and Cahyoko A. D. (2018). Reservoir Engineering (Theory and Application), 2nd Edition, Pohon Cahaya Publishing Co., Yogyakarta, Indonesia, p. 142-152; 213-221.
[16] Dandona, A. K., Alston, R. B., and Braun, R. W., (1992). Defining Data Requirements for a Simulation Study, SPE Paper 22357, SPE International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, Beijing, China.
[17] Forrest F. C., (1971). The reservoir Engineering Aspects of Waterflooding. American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, you Petroleum Engineers, Inc.
[18] Darmawan, J. K., Kasmungin, S., and Yanti, W., (2020). Reservoir Simulation Study to Determine the Appropriate Well Injection Pattern in Field X. Petro Journal 2020.
[19] Tobing, E. M. L., (2011). Polymer Surfactant Injection with Quartered Five Spot Pattern on Oil Reservoir. Research and Development Center for Oil and Gas Technology "LEMIGAS".
[20] Nugroho, S. B., Kristanto, D., and Cahyoko Aji, V. D., (2010). Pattern Selection Planning for Chemical Flooding Pilot Project of Block Q-51 (S Layer) Limau Field Pertamina EP Based on Integrating Production Analysis, 2nd Annual Intelligent Fields Summit 2010, Kuala Lumpur - Malaysia, 25-26 May.
[21] Weisman, I. J, et. al. (2020). Characterization of the Rayoso Formation: The Importance of the 3D Modeling in Decision- Making for a Polymer Injection Project. SPE 198988 MS.
[22] Sukubo, I. et. al. (2016). An Integrated Approach to Water Diagnostic Analysis in a Mature Field: SPDC Case Study, SPE-184274-MS, SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Lagos, Nigeria.
[23] Hilmy, M. F., Widyaningsih, I., Kaesti, E. Y., and Arta, A. B., (2020). Reservoir Simulation Modeling with Polymer Injection in Naturally Fractured Carbonate Reservoir. LPPM UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta Conference Series.
[24] Sugar, A., Torrealba, V., Buttner, U., and Hussein, H., (2020). Assessment of Polymer-Induced Formation Damage Using Microfluidics. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/201626-MS.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Bambang Bintarto, Dedy Kristanto, Hariyadi, Yovi Dwinata Pranajaya. (2023). Polymer Injection as a Development Strategy to Improve Oil Recovery in the BKH Layer of YDP Field. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering, 11(3), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20231103.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Bambang Bintarto; Dedy Kristanto; Hariyadi; Yovi Dwinata Pranajaya. Polymer Injection as a Development Strategy to Improve Oil Recovery in the BKH Layer of YDP Field. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2023, 11(3), 53-63. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20231103.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Bambang Bintarto, Dedy Kristanto, Hariyadi, Yovi Dwinata Pranajaya. Polymer Injection as a Development Strategy to Improve Oil Recovery in the BKH Layer of YDP Field. Int J Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2023;11(3):53-63. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20231103.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ogce.20231103.11,
      author = {Bambang Bintarto and Dedy Kristanto and Hariyadi and Yovi Dwinata Pranajaya},
      title = {Polymer Injection as a Development Strategy to Improve Oil Recovery in the BKH Layer of YDP Field},
      journal = {International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering},
      volume = {11},
      number = {3},
      pages = {53-63},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ogce.20231103.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20231103.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ogce.20231103.11},
      abstract = {There are still have a potential oil to be produced, the reduced reservoir pressure due to continuous oil production at a high rate, and the high water cut value are the background for the polymer injection process in the BKH Layer of YDP Oil Field. Due to a high water cut value, the study then conducted using a polymer injection method. Screening criteria for polymers injection was conducted to see the suitability of the reservoir, and then carry out an advanced scenarios using polymers of various concentrations to be compared, and see a cumulative incremental oil production and recovery factor. The stages including collecting and preparing data, processing and analyzing RCAL, SCAL, and PVT data, input data to simulation model with actual conditions. The reservoir simulation performed including initialization, history matching and PI matching, carry out polymer injection scenarios with certain polymer concentrations, then predict and analyze the scenario results, and finally determine the best polymer injection scenario to be applied in the BKH layer of YDP field. Based on the results of the study, it is shows that the scenario IV-A is the best scenario for polymer injection compared to other scenarios. Scenario IV-A performed by injection of polymer with a peripheral pattern with an additional 5 (five) injection wells, injection pressure of 1200 psi, injection rate of 300 bbl/d, polymer concentration of 0.6 lb/bbl, incremental recovery factor of 2.01%, and oil production cumulative obtained until December 2035 is 5087 MSTB.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Polymer Injection as a Development Strategy to Improve Oil Recovery in the BKH Layer of YDP Field
    AU  - Bambang Bintarto
    AU  - Dedy Kristanto
    AU  - Hariyadi
    AU  - Yovi Dwinata Pranajaya
    Y1  - 2023/05/25
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20231103.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ogce.20231103.11
    T2  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    JF  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    JO  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    SP  - 53
    EP  - 63
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7677
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20231103.11
    AB  - There are still have a potential oil to be produced, the reduced reservoir pressure due to continuous oil production at a high rate, and the high water cut value are the background for the polymer injection process in the BKH Layer of YDP Oil Field. Due to a high water cut value, the study then conducted using a polymer injection method. Screening criteria for polymers injection was conducted to see the suitability of the reservoir, and then carry out an advanced scenarios using polymers of various concentrations to be compared, and see a cumulative incremental oil production and recovery factor. The stages including collecting and preparing data, processing and analyzing RCAL, SCAL, and PVT data, input data to simulation model with actual conditions. The reservoir simulation performed including initialization, history matching and PI matching, carry out polymer injection scenarios with certain polymer concentrations, then predict and analyze the scenario results, and finally determine the best polymer injection scenario to be applied in the BKH layer of YDP field. Based on the results of the study, it is shows that the scenario IV-A is the best scenario for polymer injection compared to other scenarios. Scenario IV-A performed by injection of polymer with a peripheral pattern with an additional 5 (five) injection wells, injection pressure of 1200 psi, injection rate of 300 bbl/d, polymer concentration of 0.6 lb/bbl, incremental recovery factor of 2.01%, and oil production cumulative obtained until December 2035 is 5087 MSTB.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Petroleum Engineering Department, Faculty of Mineral Technology, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

  • Petroleum Engineering Department, Faculty of Mineral Technology, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

  • Petroleum Engineering Department, Faculty of Mineral Technology, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

  • Petroleum Engineering Department, Faculty of Mineral Technology, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

  • Sections