Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation

Seweryn Krzyżewski

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16

| Peer-Reviewed

Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation

Seweryn Krzyżewski

Published in Social Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 1)

Received: 20 January 2022 Accepted: 16 February 2022 Published: 25 February 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The political instrumentalization of religion / Church is - it seems - a fact. However, if any doubts arise in this respect, they can be dealt with by articulating what is constant / variable in the content of the idea (i.e. the idea of political instrumentalization of a religion / church) in terms characteristic of phenomenology, and then by reconstructing, analyzing and discussion of dimensions used for characterization: all politics-religion / state-church relations, political instrumentalization as a specific form of these relations and its internal differentiation (typology). All this must be preceded by reflection on the perspectives and limitations of unambiguous identification of the actual presence of instrumentalization and its form. This is done by recalling unclear, ambiguous cases (Pascal's bet and the authentic statement of the mother of a Jewish child...). In this context, heuristically particularly valuable are two forms of political instrumentalization of religion / church - self-instrumentalization and religiously motivated "black" PR of political opponents - and the attempts to use them together. These phenomena are illustrated by the reinterpretation of cases of political instrumentalization of religion / church present in the literature on the subject.

Published in	Social Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16
Page(s)	40-46
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Highlighted Figures of Instrumentalization, Idea Content - Constant and Variable, Political Instrumentalization, Religion/Church, Strong/Week Form of Instrumentalization, Typology of Political Instrumentalization

References

[1]	Dylus, A. (2016). Politykawperspektywieetycznejireligijnej, Warszawa.
[2]	Fishelov, D. (1991). GenreTheoryandFamilyResemblance - Revisited, Poetics vol. 20.
[3]	Frost, R., Mask of Reason, doi: https://www.fadedpage.com/showbook.php?pid=20141250,pdf, 12.01.2022.
[4]	Gąsienica-Makowski, A. [1997]. Suwerennośćojczyznyzagrożona, Głos Narodu Polskiego, 25 III.
[5]	Heidegger M. (1977). Budować, mieszkać, myśleć. Esejewybrane, transl. by K. Michalski, K. Pomian, M. J. Siemek, J. Tischner, K. Wolicki, Warszawa.
[6]	Husserl E., (2013). Doświadczenieisąd. Badanianadgenealogiąlogiki, preface and transl. by B. Baran, Warszawa, pp. 337-241.
[7]	Ingarden, R. (1962). Spóroistnienieświata, vol. II, 2nd edition, Warszawa.
[8]	Kołakowski, L. (1988). JeśliBoganiema, Kraków.
[9]	Kołakowski, L. (2002/2019). LeibniziHiob. Metafizykazłaidoświadczeniezła, [in:] Kołakowski, L. (2019). Chrześcijaństwo, Kraków, pp. 922-932.
[10]	Kołakowski, L. (2019). Chrześcijaństwo, Kraków.
[11]	Krzyżewski, S. (2016). Polityczna instrumentalizacja Kościoła katolickiego w Polsce po roku 1989 – próba ujęcia teoretycznego, [in:] Czynnik religijny w polityce wewnątrzpaństwowej i międzynarodowej na przełomie drugiego i trzeciego tysiąclecia. Wybrane problemy, [ed.] M. Marczewska-Rytko, Wydawnictwo UMCS, Lublin, pp. 205-214.
[12]	Przyczyna, W., Szewczyk, L. [eds] (2015). Polityka na ambonie?, Kraków.
[13]	Ratzinger, J. (2005). Europa. Jej podwaliny dzisiaj i jutro, transl., S. Czerwik, Kielce.
[14]	Scruton, R. V. (2015). Oblicze Boga, transl. J. Grzegorczyk, Poznań.
[15]	Tornielli, A., Valente, G.. (2019). Dzień sądu. Nadużycia, skandale, walka o władzę. Co naprawdę dzieje się w Kościele?,transl. Tomaszek J., Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków.
[16]	Trzebiński, J. (1980). Twórczość a struktura pojęć, PWN, Warszawa.
[17]	Twardowski, K. (1911). O czynnościach i wytworach. Kilka uwag z pogranicza psychologii, gramatyki i logiki, Kraków.
[18]	Unia Pracy. Zasługujesz na więcej, election campaign brochure 1997, chapt. III Polska XXI wieku, p. 13 [unauthorized text], Archiwum APP ISP PAN, Warszawa.
[19]	Weksler-Waszkinel, R. J., Nie chciałem być Żydem, https://wyborcza.pl/magazyn/1,124059,4850742.html, doi: 10. 10. 2020).
[20]	Węgrzecki, A. (1996). Zarys fenomenologii podmiotu, Kraków.
[21]	Węgrzecki, J. (2019). W obronie rozumu politycznego. Myśl Josepha Ratzingera/Benedykta XVI, Warszawa.
[22]	Wiśniewski, L. (2018). Nigdy nie układaj się ze złem. Pięćdziesiąt lat zmagań o Kościół i Polskę, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków, p. 177-178.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Seweryn Krzyżewski. (2022). Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation. Social Sciences, 11(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Seweryn Krzyżewski. Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation. Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(1), 40-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Seweryn Krzyżewski. Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation. Soc Sci. 2022;11(1):40-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16,
  author = {Seweryn Krzyżewski},
  title = {Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation},
  journal = {Social Sciences},
  volume = {11},
  number = {1},
  pages = {40-46},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20221101.16},
  abstract = {The political instrumentalization of religion / Church is - it seems - a fact. However, if any doubts arise in this respect, they can be dealt with by articulating what is constant / variable in the content of the idea (i.e. the idea of political instrumentalization of a religion / church) in terms characteristic of phenomenology, and then by reconstructing, analyzing and discussion of dimensions used for characterization: all politics-religion / state-church relations, political instrumentalization as a specific form of these relations and its internal differentiation (typology). All this must be preceded by reflection on the perspectives and limitations of unambiguous identification of the actual presence of instrumentalization and its form. This is done by recalling unclear, ambiguous cases (Pascal's bet and the authentic statement of the mother of a Jewish child...). In this context, heuristically particularly valuable are two forms of political instrumentalization of religion / church - self-instrumentalization and religiously motivated "black" PR of political opponents - and the attempts to use them together. These phenomena are illustrated by the reinterpretation of cases of political instrumentalization of religion / church present in the literature on the subject.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation
AU  - Seweryn Krzyżewski
Y1  - 2022/02/25
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16
T2  - Social Sciences
JF  - Social Sciences
JO  - Social Sciences
SP  - 40
EP  - 46
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-988X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16
AB  - The political instrumentalization of religion / Church is - it seems - a fact. However, if any doubts arise in this respect, they can be dealt with by articulating what is constant / variable in the content of the idea (i.e. the idea of political instrumentalization of a religion / church) in terms characteristic of phenomenology, and then by reconstructing, analyzing and discussion of dimensions used for characterization: all politics-religion / state-church relations, political instrumentalization as a specific form of these relations and its internal differentiation (typology). All this must be preceded by reflection on the perspectives and limitations of unambiguous identification of the actual presence of instrumentalization and its form. This is done by recalling unclear, ambiguous cases (Pascal's bet and the authentic statement of the mother of a Jewish child...). In this context, heuristically particularly valuable are two forms of political instrumentalization of religion / church - self-instrumentalization and religiously motivated "black" PR of political opponents - and the attempts to use them together. These phenomena are illustrated by the reinterpretation of cases of political instrumentalization of religion / church present in the literature on the subject.
VL  - 11
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Seweryn Krzyżewski

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Seweryn Krzyżewski. (2022). Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation. Social Sciences, 11(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Seweryn Krzyżewski. Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation. Soc. Sci. 2022, 11(1), 40-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Seweryn Krzyżewski. Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation. Soc Sci. 2022;11(1):40-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16,
  author = {Seweryn Krzyżewski},
  title = {Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation},
  journal = {Social Sciences},
  volume = {11},
  number = {1},
  pages = {40-46},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20221101.16},
  abstract = {The political instrumentalization of religion / Church is - it seems - a fact. However, if any doubts arise in this respect, they can be dealt with by articulating what is constant / variable in the content of the idea (i.e. the idea of political instrumentalization of a religion / church) in terms characteristic of phenomenology, and then by reconstructing, analyzing and discussion of dimensions used for characterization: all politics-religion / state-church relations, political instrumentalization as a specific form of these relations and its internal differentiation (typology). All this must be preceded by reflection on the perspectives and limitations of unambiguous identification of the actual presence of instrumentalization and its form. This is done by recalling unclear, ambiguous cases (Pascal's bet and the authentic statement of the mother of a Jewish child...). In this context, heuristically particularly valuable are two forms of political instrumentalization of religion / church - self-instrumentalization and religiously motivated "black" PR of political opponents - and the attempts to use them together. These phenomena are illustrated by the reinterpretation of cases of political instrumentalization of religion / church present in the literature on the subject.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Highlighted Figures of Political Instrumentalization of Religion / Church - Contribution to the Issue of Its Nature and Internal Differentiation
AU  - Seweryn Krzyżewski
Y1  - 2022/02/25
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16
T2  - Social Sciences
JF  - Social Sciences
JO  - Social Sciences
SP  - 40
EP  - 46
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2326-988X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20221101.16
AB  - The political instrumentalization of religion / Church is - it seems - a fact. However, if any doubts arise in this respect, they can be dealt with by articulating what is constant / variable in the content of the idea (i.e. the idea of political instrumentalization of a religion / church) in terms characteristic of phenomenology, and then by reconstructing, analyzing and discussion of dimensions used for characterization: all politics-religion / state-church relations, political instrumentalization as a specific form of these relations and its internal differentiation (typology). All this must be preceded by reflection on the perspectives and limitations of unambiguous identification of the actual presence of instrumentalization and its form. This is done by recalling unclear, ambiguous cases (Pascal's bet and the authentic statement of the mother of a Jewish child...). In this context, heuristically particularly valuable are two forms of political instrumentalization of religion / church - self-instrumentalization and religiously motivated "black" PR of political opponents - and the attempts to use them together. These phenomena are illustrated by the reinterpretation of cases of political instrumentalization of religion / church present in the literature on the subject.
VL  - 11
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download