Science Journal of Public Health

| Peer-Reviewed |

An Unhealthy, Obesogenic Lifestyle: A Case Study of Urban Primary School Children in Kwekwe, Zimbabwe

Received: 16 January 2017    Accepted: 1 April 2017    Published: 17 January 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics of 9-11 years old children in relation to their tuck-shop purchasing habits. Methods: A cross-sectional research design using a pre-designed questionnaire was administered to Grades 3, 4 & 5 children and two tuck shop managers from group A schools. Weight and height were measured through standardized techniques and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. BMI was interpreted in relation to tuck-shop purchasing habits. The distributions of blood pressure by anthropometric characteristics were examined. Mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Chi square were used for statistical analysis using SPSS 20.0 software. Results: The sample comprised 53.01% females (n = 334) and 46.98% males (n = 296). The children’s mean age was 9.8 (± 0.44) years, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 20.5 (± 4.6) kg/m2 for girls and 19.7 (± 4.9) kg/m2 for boys. Basing on BMI, 27% of the male subjects were predominantly overweight, whereas 28.4% of the female subjects were more prone to obesity. Out of the total population, 26.4% of the children reported that they frequently purchase from the tuckshop. There was a positive significant (p <0.013) association existed between the BMI and the frequency of purchasing from the tuckshop. Purchasing times continued to be unassociated to perceived health status despite that items purchased and age were inversely associated students’ food consumption (Item purchased: OR= 1.12, CI= 1.03 – 1.13, p = 0.001; Age OR= 1.06, CI= 1.02 – 1.12, p = 0.001) An average of USD$0.50 or ZAR5 is spent by children at the tuck-shop on a daily basis. Conclusion: Poor tuck-shop purchasing practices by primary school children contribute to the development of childhood overweight and obesity. Despite, schools covering nutrition in their educational curriculum, their tuck shops stocked poor nutritional quality items which were used to generate revenue/profit. Therefore, school management has a vital role in imposing restrictions over trading of unhealthy items to school children. Also, there is need to improve the nutrition educational curriculum in lower grade levels to ensure that they adopt healthier purchasing practices.

DOI 10.11648/j.sjph.20180602.11
Published in Science Journal of Public Health (Volume 6, Issue 2, March 2018)
Page(s) 35-42
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Overweight, Childhood Obesity, Body Mass Index, Group a Schools, Tuck-Shop Purchasing Practices

References
[1] Mufunda E and Makuyana L Obesity: A Potential Pandemic for the 21st Century among the Youths in Zimbabwe. Journal of Diabetes Mellitus, 2016: 6; 136-145 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jdm.2016.62014
[2] Abrahams Z, De Villiers A, Steyn NP, et al. What’s in the lunchbox? Dietary behaviour of learners from disadvantaged schools in the Western Cape, South Africa. Public Health Nutrit. 2011; 14 (10): 1752-1758.
[3] Cassim SB. Food and beverage marketing to children in South Africa: mapping the terrain. S Afr J Clin Nutr. 2010; 23 (4): 181-185.
[4] Du Toit G, Van der Merwe MT. The epidemic of childhood obesity. S Afr Med J. 2003; 93 (1): 49-50.
[5] Zimbabwe (2014) Nutrition Country Profile: Economics and Demography Child Anthropometry Adolescent and Adult Nutrition Status. www.globalnutritionreport.org
[6] Prell, H. “Promoting dietary change. Intervening in school and recognizing health messages in commercials,” working paper, Faculty of Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. 2010. 7 May.
[7] Downs SM, Farmer A, Quintanilha M, Berry TR, Mager DR, Willows ND, McCargar LJ. From paper to practice: barriers to adopting nutrition guidelines in schools. JNEB 2012; 44 (2): 114-122.
[8] International Association for the Study of Obesity [homepage on the Internet]. c2011. Available from: www.iaso.org
[9] Wang Y, Lobstein T. Worldwide trends in childhood overweight and obesity. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2006; 1 (1): 11-25.
[10] Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev. 2004; 5 Suppl 1: 4-104.
[11] Armstrong MEG, Lambert MI, Sharwood KA, Lambert EV. Obesity and overweight in South African primary school children: the Health of the Nation Study. S Afr Med J. 2006; 96 (5): 439-444
[12] Kruger R, Kruger HS, Macintyre UE. The determinants of overweight and obesity among 10-to- 15-year-old schoolchildren in the North West Province, South Africa-the THUSA BANA (Transitional and Health during Urbanisation of South Africans; BANA, children) study. Publ Health Nutr. 2005; 9 (3): 351–358
[13] St-Onge MP, Keller KL, Heymsfield SB. Changes in childhood food consumption patterns: a cause for concern in light of increasing body weights. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 78 (6): 1068-1073.
[14] Birch LL, Ventura AK. Preventing childhood obesity: what works? In J Obes (Lond). 2009; 33 Suppl 1: S74-S81.
[15] Story M. The third school nutrition dietary assessment study: findings and policy implications for improving the health of US children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109 (2 Suppl): S7-S13.
[16] Kraak V, Pelletier D. The influence of commercialism on the food purchasing behavior of children and teenage youth. Family Economics and Nutrition Review. 1998; 11: 15-24.
[17] Gidding SS, Dennison BA, Birch LL, et al. Dietary recommendations for children and adolescents: a guide for practitioners: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2005; 112 (13): 2061-2075.
[18] Hoelscher DM, Day S, Lee ES, et al. Measuring the prevalence of overweight in Texas school children. Am J Pub Health. 2004; 94 (6): 1002-1008.
[19] DeVault N, Kennedy T, Hermann J, et al. It’s all about kids: preventing overweight in elementary school children in Tulsa, OK. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109 (4): 680-687.
[20] World Health Organization. Growth reference data for 5-19 years. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011 [homepage on the Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/growthref/en/
[21] Finch M, Sutherland R, Harrison M, Collins C. Canteen purchasing practices of year 1-6 primary school children and association with SES and weight status. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006; 30 (3): 247-251
[22] Wiles NL, Greeny JM, Veldman FJ Tuck-shop purchasing practices of Grade 4 learners in Pietermaritzburg and childhood overweight and obesity. S Afr J Clin Nutr 2013; 26 (1) 37-42
[23] Feeley A, Musenge E, Pettifor JM, Norris SA. Changes in dietary habits and eating practices in adolescents living in urban South Africa: the birth to twenty cohort. Nutrition. 2012; 28 (7-8): e1-e6.
[24] Templeton S. Competitive foods increase the intake of energy and decrease the intake of certain nutrients by adolescents consuming school lunch. J Am Diet Assoc 2005; 105: 215–220
[25] Temple NJ, Steyn NP, Myburgh NG, Nel JH. Food items consumed by students attending schools in different socioeconomic areas in Cape Town, South Africa. Nutrition. 2006; 22 (3): 252-258.
[26] WHO. Milestones in Health promotion: Statements from Global conferences. Geneva: World Health Organisation. [Online] 2009 [access 2015, March 27]; Available: http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/Milestones_Health_Promotion_05022010.pdf.
[27] Dorfman L, Wallack L. Moving nutrition upstream: the case for reframing obesity. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behaviour 2007; 39: S45-S50
[28] Lissau I, Poulsen J Nutrition policy, food and drinks at school and after school care. International Journal of Obesity 2005; 29: S58-S61
[29] Vereecken C, Bobelijn K, Maes L. School food policy at primary and secondary schools in Belgium-Flanders: does it influence young people's food habits? Eur J Clin Nutr 2005; 59: 271–277.
[30] Steyn NP, Lambert EV, Parker W, Mchiza Z, De Villiers A. A review of school nutrition interventions globally as an evidence base for the development of the Health kick programme in the Western Cape, South Africa. SAJCN 2009; 22 (3): 145-152.
[31] Kubik MY, Lytle LA, Hanan PJ, Perry CL, Story M The association of the school food environment with dietary behaviours of young adolescents. American Journal of Public Health 2003; 93: 1168-1173
[32] Wang D, Stewart D. The implementation and effectiveness of school based nutrition promotion programmes using a health promoting schools approach: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2012; 31: 1-19.
[33] WHO. Creating an Environment for Emotional and Social Well-Being: An Important Responsibility of a Health-Promoting and Child Friendly School. [Online] 2003 [access 2015, March 25; Available on: www.who.int/school_youth_health/media/en/sch_childfriendly_03.pdf
[34] Ransley JK, Taylor EF, Radwan Y, Kitchen MS, Greenwood DC, Cade JE. Does nutrition education in primary schools make a difference to children’s fruit and vegetable consumption? Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13 (11): 1898-1904.
[35] Sarkar S, Taylor WC, Lai D, Shegog R, Paxton RJ (2016) Perceived Health, Sedentary Time, Body Mass Index, and Breaks from Prolonged sitting in the Workplace. Int J Sports Exerc Med 2.044
[36] Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1995: 854: 1-452.
[37] The obesity prevention Source: globalization. Harvard School of Public Health [homepage on the Internet]. c2013. Available from: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/obesity-prevention-source/obesity-causes/globalization-and-obesity/
[38] Kyallo F, Makokha A, Mwangi A. M. Overweight and obesity among public and private primary school children in Nairobi, Kenya. Health 2013: (5); 85-90
[39] Waters, E., Ashbolt, R., Gibbs, L., Booth, M., Magarey, A., Gold, L. Kai Lo, S., Gibbons, K., Green, J., O’connor, T., Garrard, J. and Swinburn, B. Double disad- vantage: The influence of ethnicity over socioeconomic position on childhood overweight and obesity: Findings from an inner urban population of primary school chil- dren. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 2008: 3; 196- 204. http://dx.doi.org: 10.1080/17477160802141846
[40] Veugelers, P. J. and Fitzgerald, A. L. Prevalence of and risk factors for childhood overweight and obesity. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2005: 173; 607-613. http://dx.doi.org:: 10.1503/cmaj.050445
[41] Pék E, Mártai I, Marton J, Betlehem J Health survey of ambulance workers with a generic questionnaire (SF-36). Orv Hetil 2013: 154: 1865-1872.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Dube Adiele, Gundani Patrick Morgan, Lunga Mande Carolyne. (2018). An Unhealthy, Obesogenic Lifestyle: A Case Study of Urban Primary School Children in Kwekwe, Zimbabwe. Science Journal of Public Health, 6(2), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20180602.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Dube Adiele; Gundani Patrick Morgan; Lunga Mande Carolyne. An Unhealthy, Obesogenic Lifestyle: A Case Study of Urban Primary School Children in Kwekwe, Zimbabwe. Sci. J. Public Health 2018, 6(2), 35-42. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20180602.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Dube Adiele, Gundani Patrick Morgan, Lunga Mande Carolyne. An Unhealthy, Obesogenic Lifestyle: A Case Study of Urban Primary School Children in Kwekwe, Zimbabwe. Sci J Public Health. 2018;6(2):35-42. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20180602.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sjph.20180602.11,
      author = {Dube Adiele and Gundani Patrick Morgan and Lunga Mande Carolyne},
      title = {An Unhealthy, Obesogenic Lifestyle: A Case Study of Urban Primary School Children in Kwekwe, Zimbabwe},
      journal = {Science Journal of Public Health},
      volume = {6},
      number = {2},
      pages = {35-42},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sjph.20180602.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20180602.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjph.20180602.11},
      abstract = {Objectives:  To determine the socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics of 9-11 years old children in relation to their tuck-shop purchasing habits. Methods:  A cross-sectional research design using a pre-designed questionnaire was administered to Grades 3, 4 & 5 children and two tuck shop managers from group A schools. Weight and height were measured through standardized techniques and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. BMI was interpreted in relation to tuck-shop purchasing habits. The distributions of blood pressure by anthropometric characteristics were examined. Mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Chi square were used for statistical analysis using SPSS 20.0 software. Results:  The sample comprised 53.01% females (n = 334) and 46.98% males (n = 296). The children’s mean age was 9.8 (± 0.44) years, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 20.5 (± 4.6) kg/m2 for girls and 19.7 (± 4.9) kg/m2 for boys. Basing on BMI, 27% of the male subjects were predominantly overweight, whereas 28.4% of the female subjects were more prone to obesity. Out of the total population, 26.4% of the children reported that they frequently purchase from the tuckshop. There was a positive significant (p <0.013) association existed between the BMI and the frequency of purchasing from the tuckshop. Purchasing times continued to be unassociated to perceived health status despite that items purchased and age were inversely associated students’ food consumption (Item purchased: OR= 1.12, CI= 1.03 – 1.13, p = 0.001; Age OR= 1.06, CI= 1.02 – 1.12, p = 0.001) An average of USD$0.50 or ZAR5 is spent by children at the tuck-shop on a daily basis. Conclusion: Poor tuck-shop purchasing practices by primary school children contribute to the development of childhood overweight and obesity. Despite, schools covering nutrition in their educational curriculum, their tuck shops stocked poor nutritional quality items which were used to generate revenue/profit. Therefore, school management has a vital role in imposing restrictions over trading of unhealthy items to school children. Also, there is need to improve the nutrition educational curriculum in lower grade levels to ensure that they adopt healthier purchasing practices.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - An Unhealthy, Obesogenic Lifestyle: A Case Study of Urban Primary School Children in Kwekwe, Zimbabwe
    AU  - Dube Adiele
    AU  - Gundani Patrick Morgan
    AU  - Lunga Mande Carolyne
    Y1  - 2018/01/17
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20180602.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sjph.20180602.11
    T2  - Science Journal of Public Health
    JF  - Science Journal of Public Health
    JO  - Science Journal of Public Health
    SP  - 35
    EP  - 42
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7950
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20180602.11
    AB  - Objectives:  To determine the socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics of 9-11 years old children in relation to their tuck-shop purchasing habits. Methods:  A cross-sectional research design using a pre-designed questionnaire was administered to Grades 3, 4 & 5 children and two tuck shop managers from group A schools. Weight and height were measured through standardized techniques and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. BMI was interpreted in relation to tuck-shop purchasing habits. The distributions of blood pressure by anthropometric characteristics were examined. Mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Chi square were used for statistical analysis using SPSS 20.0 software. Results:  The sample comprised 53.01% females (n = 334) and 46.98% males (n = 296). The children’s mean age was 9.8 (± 0.44) years, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 20.5 (± 4.6) kg/m2 for girls and 19.7 (± 4.9) kg/m2 for boys. Basing on BMI, 27% of the male subjects were predominantly overweight, whereas 28.4% of the female subjects were more prone to obesity. Out of the total population, 26.4% of the children reported that they frequently purchase from the tuckshop. There was a positive significant (p <0.013) association existed between the BMI and the frequency of purchasing from the tuckshop. Purchasing times continued to be unassociated to perceived health status despite that items purchased and age were inversely associated students’ food consumption (Item purchased: OR= 1.12, CI= 1.03 – 1.13, p = 0.001; Age OR= 1.06, CI= 1.02 – 1.12, p = 0.001) An average of USD$0.50 or ZAR5 is spent by children at the tuck-shop on a daily basis. Conclusion: Poor tuck-shop purchasing practices by primary school children contribute to the development of childhood overweight and obesity. Despite, schools covering nutrition in their educational curriculum, their tuck shops stocked poor nutritional quality items which were used to generate revenue/profit. Therefore, school management has a vital role in imposing restrictions over trading of unhealthy items to school children. Also, there is need to improve the nutrition educational curriculum in lower grade levels to ensure that they adopt healthier purchasing practices.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Emergency Medical Care, Emergency Medical Ambulances Services, Kwekwe, Zimbabwe

  • Department of Sports Science and Coaching, Faculty of Applied Sciences, National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe

  • Department of Journalism and Media Studies, Faculty of Communication and Information Sciences, National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe

  • Sections