Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices

Almaz Meseret Gezahegn; Bizuwork Tafes Desta; Sisay Eshetu

doi:doi:10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices

Almaz Meseret Gezahegn, Bizuwork Tafes Desta, Sisay Eshetu

Published in Advances (Volume 2, Issue 1)

Received: 8 February 2021 Accepted: 17 March 2021 Published: 30 March 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Declining land productivity associated with diminishing farm size is a significant issue for intensive and sustainable crop production in Ethiopia. An intercropping of cereals such as wheat with grain legumes may provide a farm wide production system that achieves both economic and environmental concerns. Therefore, a field trial was carried out to evaluate the effect of different crop combinations of wheat-haricot bean on the productivity of wheat and haricot bean under two tillage practices at Alem Tena during 2016-2017 cropping seasons. The experiment was conducted by using split-plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised of two tillage practices (conventional and minimum tillage) assigned as the main plot and five wheat-haricot bean intercropping combinations (1:0, 1:1, 2:1, 1:2 and 0:1) assigned as the subplot. The results showed that tillage practices had a significant effect on growth and yield parameters of wheat, but not on growth and yield parameters of haricot bean. Minimum tillage increased biomass and grain yield of wheat over conventional tillage. Intercropping combination had a significant effect on both growth and yield parameters of both crops. The highest yield of wheat (3396 kg/ha) and haricot bean (4257.1 kg/ha) were observed in sole wheat and sole haricot bean, followed by 2:1 and 1:2 wheat-haricot bean combination, respectively. However, competitive indices showed that wheat-haricot bean in any of the combinations found to be more profitable and productive compared to sole wheat and haricot bean. Among intercropping combinations, 1:2 wheat-haricot bean gave the highest LER, ATER, MAI, IER. Therefore, 1:2 wheat-haricot bean intercropping combinations with a minimum tillage may provide a new opportunity in a low-input small grain production system for the study area, one that accomplishes both environmental and economic benefits through higher land productivity, improved grain and biomass productions.

Published in	Advances (Volume 2, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11
Page(s)	1-8
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Intercropping, Haricot Bean, Tillage, Wheat, Yield

References

[1]	Kiss, I. (2011). Significance of wheat production in world economy and position of Hungary in it. Abstract:
[2]	Applied studies in agribusiness and commerce [Thesis]. University of Debrecen.
[3]	CSA (Central Statistical Agency). (2018). Agricultural Sample Survey 2017/2018, report on area and production of major crops, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[4]	Minot, N., Warner, J., Lemma, S., Kasa, L., Gashaw, A., & Rashid, S. (2015). The wheat supply chain in Ethiopia: Patterns, trends, and policy options. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
[5]	Ayyappan, S., & Arunachalam, A. (2014, November). Crop diversification for social security of farmer in India. In Souvenir of the National Symposium onAgricultural Diversification for Sustainable Livelihood and Environmental Security’ held on (pp. 18-20).
[6]	Behera, U. K., & France, J. (2016). Integrated farming systems and the livelihood security of small and marginal farmers in India and other developing countries. In Advances in Agronomy (Vol. 138, pp. 235-282). Academic Press.
[7]	Vanlauwe, B., Coyne, D., Gockowski, J., Hauser, S., Huising, J., Masso, C.,... & Van Asten, P. (2014). Sustainable intensification and the African smallholder farmer. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 8 (0), 15-22.
[8]	Jensen, E. S., Peoples, M. B., Boddey, R. M., Gresshoff, P. M., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Alves, B. J., & Morrison, M. J. (2012). Legumes for mitigation of climate change and the provision of feedstock for biofuels and biorefineries. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 32 (2), 329-364.
[9]	Stagnari, F., Maggio, A., Galieni, A., & Pisante, M. (2017). Multiple benefits of legumes for agriculture sustainability: an overview. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 4 (1), 2.
[10]	Tenaw, W. (1990, October). Review of Agronomic Studies on Haricot Bean in the Southern Zone of Ethiopia. In Research on Haricot Bean in Ethiopia: an Assessment of Status, Progress, Priorities and Strategies, Proceedings of a National Workshop held in Addis Ababa.
[11]	Maitra, S., Palai, J. B., Manasa, P., & Kumar, D. P. (2019). Potential of Intercropping System in Sustaining Crop Productivity. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 12 (1), 39-45.
[12]	Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., B. Jornsgaard, J. Kinane, and E. S. Jensen. 2007. Grain legume-cereal intercropping: The practical application of diversity, competition and facilitation in arable and organic cropping systems. Renew. Agr. Food Syst. 23 (1): 3-12.
[13]	Lithourgidis, A. S., C. A. Dordas, C. A. Damalas, and D. N. Vlachostergios. 2011. Annual intercrops: an alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 5 (4): 396-410.
[14]	Thurston, D. 1996. Slash/mulch systems: Sustainable methods for tropical agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA.
[15]	Inal, A., A. Gunes, F. Zhang, and I. Cacmak. 2007. Peanut/maize inter-cropping induced changes in rhizosphere and nutrient concentrations in shoots. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 45: 350-356.
[16]	Cornelis, W. M., Araya, T., Wildermeersch, J., Mloza-Banda, M. K., Waweru, G., Obia, A.,... & Boever, D. (2013). Building resilience against drought: the soil-water perspective. Desertification and Land degradation: Processes and Mitigation, 1-15.
[17]	Kassie, B. T., Hengsdijk, H., Rötter, R., Kahiluoto, H., Asseng, S., & Van Ittersum, M. (2013). Adapting to climate variability and change: experiences from cereal-based farming in the Central Rift and Kobo Valleys, Ethiopia. Environmental Management, 52 (5), 1115-1131.
[18]	Desta, B. T., Gezahegn, A. M., & Tesema, S. E. (2020). Planting Time Effects on the Productivity of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Varieties in Ethiopia. American Journal of Life Sciences, 8 (3), 34-40.
[19]	Willey, R., & Osiru, D. (1972). Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. Journal of Agricultural Science, 79 (03), 517-529.
[20]	Hiebsch, C., & McCollum, R. (1987). Area-time equivalency ratio: a method for evaluating the productivity of intercrops. Agronomy Journal, 79 (1), 15-22.
[21]	Ghosh, P., Bandyopadhyay, K., Manna, M., Mandal, K., Misra, A., & Hati, K. (2004). Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping systems in vertisols of semi-arid tropics. II. Dry matter yield, nodulation, relative chlorophyll content and enzyme activity. Bioresource Technology, 95 (1), 85-93.
[22]	Ghaffarzadeh, M. (1979). Economic and biological benefits of intercropping Berseem clover with oat in corn-soybean-oat rotations. Journal of Production Agriculture, 10, 314-319.
[23]	Gezahegn, A. M., Desta, B. T., Takele, A., & Eshetu, S. (2019). Productivity of tef [Eragrostis tef] under conservation tillage practices in central Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 5 (1), 1707038.
[24]	Das, A. K., Khaliq, Q. A., & Haider, M. L. (2012). Efficiency of wheat-haricot bean and wheat-chickpea intercropping systems at different planting configurations. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production, 7 (1), 25-33.
[25]	Singh, A., Kumar, R., & Kaur, M (2019). Effect of haricot bean intercropping on growth, yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Journal of pharmacology and Photochemistry, 4, 152-156.
[26]	Wue, J., Cai, L. Q., Luo, Z. Z., Li, L. L., & Zhang, R. Z. (2014). Effects of conservation tillage on soil physical properties of rainfed field of the Loess Plateau in Central of Gansu. J. Soil Water Conserv, 28, 112-117.
[27]	Peng, Z. K., Li, L. L., Xie, J. H., Kang, C. R., Essel, E., Wang, J. B., & Shen, J. C. (2018). Effects of conservational tillage on water characteristics in dryland farm of central Gansu, Northwest China. Ying yong sheng tai xue bao=The journal of applied ecology, 29 (12), 4022-4028.
[28]	Cai, L. Q., Luo, Z. Z., Zhang, R. Z., Huang, G. B., Li, L. L., & Xie, J. H. (2012). Effect of different tillage methods on soil water retention and infiltration capability of rainfed field. J. Desert Res, 32, 1362-1368.
[29]	Shao, Y., Xie, Y., Wang, C., Yue, J., Yao, Y., Li, X.,... & Guo, T. (2016). Effects of different soil conservation tillage approaches on soil nutrients, water use and wheat-maize yield in rainfed dry-land regions of North China. European Journal of Agronomy, 81, 37-45.
[30]	Pittelkow, C. M., Liang, X., Linquist, B. A., Van Groenigen, K. J., Lee, J., Lundy, M. E.,... & Van Kessel, C. (2015). Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature, 517 (7534), 365-368.
[31]	Chapagain, T., & Riseman, A. (2014). Intercropping wheat and beans: effects on agronomic performance and land productivity. Crop Science, 54 (5), 2285-2293.
[32]	Yahuza, I. (2011). Wheat/faba bean intercropping system in perspective. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES), 1 (6), 69-92.
[33]	Scott, L. C. (2012). Basic environmental photobiology. Wahington State university, US.
[34]	Temesgen, J., Kufa, T., & Wondimu, Z. (2015). Effect of Plant Density of Hybrid Maize and Common Bean Varieties on the Productivity of Intercropping System at Jimma, South West Ethiopia. Global Journal of Life Science and Biological Research, 1 (1), 7-17.
[35]	Almaz, M. G., Halim, R. A., & Martini, M. Y. (2017). Effect of Combined Application of Poultry Manure and Inorganic Fertiliser on Yield and Yield Components of Maize Intercropped with Soybean. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, 40 (1).
[36]	Alemayehu, D., Shumi, D., & Afeta, T. (2018). Effect of variety and time of intercropping of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with maize (Zea mays L.) on yield components and yields of associated crops and productivity of the system at mid-land of Guji, Southern Ethiopia. Adv. Crop Sci. Tech, 6, 324.
[37]	Getahun, A., & Abady, S. (2016). Effect of Maize (Zea may L.) on Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield and its components in Maize-Bean intercropping. International Journal of Science and Research, 5, 126-133.
[38]	Çiftçi, V., Toğay, N., Toğay, Y., & Doğan, Y. (2006). The effects of intercropping sowing systems with dry bean and maize on yield and some yield components. Journal of Agronomy, 5 (1), 5.
[39]	Nassary, E. K., Baijukya, F., & Ndakidemi, P. A. (2020). Productivity of intercropping with maize and common bean over five cropping seasons on smallholder farms of Tanzania. European Journal of Agronomy, 113, 125964.
[40]	Liu, B., Liu X. B., Wang, C., Jin, J., Harbert, S. J., and Hashemi, M. (2010). Response of soybean yield and yield components to light enrichment and planting density. International Journal of Plant Production, 4 (1): 1-10.
[41]	Abera, R., Worku, W., & Beyene, S. (2017). Performance variation among improved common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under sole and intercropping with maize (Zea mays L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 12 (6), 397-405.
[42]	Worku W (2008). Evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotype of diverse growth habit under sole and intercropping with maize (Zea mays L.) in southern Ethiopia. Journal of Agronomy, 7 (4): 306-313.
[43]	Sahota, T. S., & Malhi, S. S. (2012). Intercropping barley with pea for agronomic and economic considerations in northern Ontario. Agric. Sci. 3: 889–895.
[44]	Willey, R. (1979). Intercropping-its importance and research needs: Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. In Field crop abstracts (Vol. 32, pp. 1-10).
[45]	Aasim, M., Umer, E. M., & Karim, A. (2008). Yield and competition indices of intercropping cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using different planting patterns. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14 (4), 326-333.
[46]	Tamado, T., & Eshetu, M. (2000). Evaluation of sorghum, maize and common bean cropping systems in East Hararghe, Eastern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 17 (1-2), 33-45.
[47]	Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B. K., & Ghose, S. S. (2006). Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy, 24 (4), 325-332.
[48]	Bhatt, B. K., Dixit, S. K., & Darji, V. B. (2010). Monetary evaluation of sesame based intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 44 (2), 146-149.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Almaz Meseret Gezahegn, Bizuwork Tafes Desta, Sisay Eshetu. (2021). Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices. Advances, 2(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Almaz Meseret Gezahegn; Bizuwork Tafes Desta; Sisay Eshetu. Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices. Advances. 2021, 2(1), 1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Almaz Meseret Gezahegn, Bizuwork Tafes Desta, Sisay Eshetu. Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices. Advances. 2021;2(1):1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11,
  author = {Almaz Meseret Gezahegn and Bizuwork Tafes Desta and Sisay Eshetu},
  title = {Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices},
  journal = {Advances},
  volume = {2},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-8},
  doi = {10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.advances.20210201.11},
  abstract = {Declining land productivity associated with diminishing farm size is a significant issue for intensive and sustainable crop production in Ethiopia. An intercropping of cereals such as wheat with grain legumes may provide a farm wide production system that achieves both economic and environmental concerns. Therefore, a field trial was carried out to evaluate the effect of different crop combinations of wheat-haricot bean on the productivity of wheat and haricot bean under two tillage practices at Alem Tena during 2016-2017 cropping seasons. The experiment was conducted by using split-plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised of two tillage practices (conventional and minimum tillage) assigned as the main plot and five wheat-haricot bean intercropping combinations (1:0, 1:1, 2:1, 1:2 and 0:1) assigned as the subplot. The results showed that tillage practices had a significant effect on growth and yield parameters of wheat, but not on growth and yield parameters of haricot bean. Minimum tillage increased biomass and grain yield of wheat over conventional tillage. Intercropping combination had a significant effect on both growth and yield parameters of both crops. The highest yield of wheat (3396 kg/ha) and haricot bean (4257.1 kg/ha) were observed in sole wheat and sole haricot bean, followed by 2:1 and 1:2 wheat-haricot bean combination, respectively. However, competitive indices showed that wheat-haricot bean in any of the combinations found to be more profitable and productive compared to sole wheat and haricot bean. Among intercropping combinations, 1:2 wheat-haricot bean gave the highest LER, ATER, MAI, IER. Therefore, 1:2 wheat-haricot bean intercropping combinations with a minimum tillage may provide a new opportunity in a low-input small grain production system for the study area, one that accomplishes both environmental and economic benefits through higher land productivity, improved grain and biomass productions.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices
AU  - Almaz Meseret Gezahegn
AU  - Bizuwork Tafes Desta
AU  - Sisay Eshetu
Y1  - 2021/03/30
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11
T2  - Advances
JF  - Advances
JO  - Advances
SP  - 1
EP  - 8
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7200
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11
AB  - Declining land productivity associated with diminishing farm size is a significant issue for intensive and sustainable crop production in Ethiopia. An intercropping of cereals such as wheat with grain legumes may provide a farm wide production system that achieves both economic and environmental concerns. Therefore, a field trial was carried out to evaluate the effect of different crop combinations of wheat-haricot bean on the productivity of wheat and haricot bean under two tillage practices at Alem Tena during 2016-2017 cropping seasons. The experiment was conducted by using split-plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised of two tillage practices (conventional and minimum tillage) assigned as the main plot and five wheat-haricot bean intercropping combinations (1:0, 1:1, 2:1, 1:2 and 0:1) assigned as the subplot. The results showed that tillage practices had a significant effect on growth and yield parameters of wheat, but not on growth and yield parameters of haricot bean. Minimum tillage increased biomass and grain yield of wheat over conventional tillage. Intercropping combination had a significant effect on both growth and yield parameters of both crops. The highest yield of wheat (3396 kg/ha) and haricot bean (4257.1 kg/ha) were observed in sole wheat and sole haricot bean, followed by 2:1 and 1:2 wheat-haricot bean combination, respectively. However, competitive indices showed that wheat-haricot bean in any of the combinations found to be more profitable and productive compared to sole wheat and haricot bean. Among intercropping combinations, 1:2 wheat-haricot bean gave the highest LER, ATER, MAI, IER. Therefore, 1:2 wheat-haricot bean intercropping combinations with a minimum tillage may provide a new opportunity in a low-input small grain production system for the study area, one that accomplishes both environmental and economic benefits through higher land productivity, improved grain and biomass productions.
VL  - 2
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Almaz Meseret Gezahegn

Department of Agronomy and Crop Physiology, Ethiopian Institute of Agriculture Research, Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia
Bizuwork Tafes Desta

Department of Agronomy and Crop Physiology, Ethiopian Institute of Agriculture Research, Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia
Sisay Eshetu

Department of Agronomy and Crop Physiology, Ethiopian Institute of Agriculture Research, Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Almaz Meseret Gezahegn, Bizuwork Tafes Desta, Sisay Eshetu. (2021). Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices. Advances, 2(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Almaz Meseret Gezahegn; Bizuwork Tafes Desta; Sisay Eshetu. Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices. Advances. 2021, 2(1), 1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Almaz Meseret Gezahegn, Bizuwork Tafes Desta, Sisay Eshetu. Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices. Advances. 2021;2(1):1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11,
  author = {Almaz Meseret Gezahegn and Bizuwork Tafes Desta and Sisay Eshetu},
  title = {Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices},
  journal = {Advances},
  volume = {2},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-8},
  doi = {10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.advances.20210201.11},
  abstract = {Declining land productivity associated with diminishing farm size is a significant issue for intensive and sustainable crop production in Ethiopia. An intercropping of cereals such as wheat with grain legumes may provide a farm wide production system that achieves both economic and environmental concerns. Therefore, a field trial was carried out to evaluate the effect of different crop combinations of wheat-haricot bean on the productivity of wheat and haricot bean under two tillage practices at Alem Tena during 2016-2017 cropping seasons. The experiment was conducted by using split-plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised of two tillage practices (conventional and minimum tillage) assigned as the main plot and five wheat-haricot bean intercropping combinations (1:0, 1:1, 2:1, 1:2 and 0:1) assigned as the subplot. The results showed that tillage practices had a significant effect on growth and yield parameters of wheat, but not on growth and yield parameters of haricot bean. Minimum tillage increased biomass and grain yield of wheat over conventional tillage. Intercropping combination had a significant effect on both growth and yield parameters of both crops. The highest yield of wheat (3396 kg/ha) and haricot bean (4257.1 kg/ha) were observed in sole wheat and sole haricot bean, followed by 2:1 and 1:2 wheat-haricot bean combination, respectively. However, competitive indices showed that wheat-haricot bean in any of the combinations found to be more profitable and productive compared to sole wheat and haricot bean. Among intercropping combinations, 1:2 wheat-haricot bean gave the highest LER, ATER, MAI, IER. Therefore, 1:2 wheat-haricot bean intercropping combinations with a minimum tillage may provide a new opportunity in a low-input small grain production system for the study area, one that accomplishes both environmental and economic benefits through higher land productivity, improved grain and biomass productions.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effect of Wheat-Haricot Bean Intercropping on Performance of Component Crops and System Productivity Under Two Tillage Practices
AU  - Almaz Meseret Gezahegn
AU  - Bizuwork Tafes Desta
AU  - Sisay Eshetu
Y1  - 2021/03/30
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11
T2  - Advances
JF  - Advances
JO  - Advances
SP  - 1
EP  - 8
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7200
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20210201.11
AB  - Declining land productivity associated with diminishing farm size is a significant issue for intensive and sustainable crop production in Ethiopia. An intercropping of cereals such as wheat with grain legumes may provide a farm wide production system that achieves both economic and environmental concerns. Therefore, a field trial was carried out to evaluate the effect of different crop combinations of wheat-haricot bean on the productivity of wheat and haricot bean under two tillage practices at Alem Tena during 2016-2017 cropping seasons. The experiment was conducted by using split-plot design with three replications. The treatments comprised of two tillage practices (conventional and minimum tillage) assigned as the main plot and five wheat-haricot bean intercropping combinations (1:0, 1:1, 2:1, 1:2 and 0:1) assigned as the subplot. The results showed that tillage practices had a significant effect on growth and yield parameters of wheat, but not on growth and yield parameters of haricot bean. Minimum tillage increased biomass and grain yield of wheat over conventional tillage. Intercropping combination had a significant effect on both growth and yield parameters of both crops. The highest yield of wheat (3396 kg/ha) and haricot bean (4257.1 kg/ha) were observed in sole wheat and sole haricot bean, followed by 2:1 and 1:2 wheat-haricot bean combination, respectively. However, competitive indices showed that wheat-haricot bean in any of the combinations found to be more profitable and productive compared to sole wheat and haricot bean. Among intercropping combinations, 1:2 wheat-haricot bean gave the highest LER, ATER, MAI, IER. Therefore, 1:2 wheat-haricot bean intercropping combinations with a minimum tillage may provide a new opportunity in a low-input small grain production system for the study area, one that accomplishes both environmental and economic benefits through higher land productivity, improved grain and biomass productions.
VL  - 2
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download