One of Ethiopia's the chief uncertainties with the livestock industry is the year-round scarcity of optimum quality animal feed. To overcame the supply of quality feed cultivation of tropically adapted forage species, which gives a reasonable yield under rain deficit and unstable climatic conditions. Napier grass accessions were evaluated at Pawe and Jawi localtions for their adaptionn and yield performance. Ten Napier accessions with three replications were used in the randomized complete block design of the study. Mean comparisons between accessions were made using the least significant differences and the general linear model was used to analyze data for growth parameters and nutritional quality traits, such as tillering performance, plant height, forage dry matter, leaf and stem fractions, and nutritional quality. Sixty days following the establishment, in September, the first cut was made; forty days later, in October, the second cut was made. For most variables, there was a substantial (P<0.05) difference between accessions, locations, cuts, years, and the interaction impact of location by accessions. While the leaf-to-stem ratio is significant at p<0.05 and the combined mean square for the number of tillers per plant, fresh biomass yield t/ha, and nutritional quality parameters did indicate substantial (p<0.001) variation among Napier accessions, plant height is not significant (p>0.05). In terms of fresh and dry matter yield t/ha, accessions 14984, 15743, and 16791 perform better. Accessions 14984 and local responses (64.72 and 64.95) were the most significant (p<0.001) differences in in vitro dry matter digestibility, followed by 16813 and 15743 (63.5 and 63.3). According to the findings, the ILRI-14984, 15743, and 16791 accessions produced results that were comparable to the standard checks for superior yield and nutritional quality. So we recommended the demonstration of selected accessions for Metekel and Awi mid and low land areas and other comparable agro-ecologies in the country at farmer level was essintal.
Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 13, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12 |
Page(s) | 7-17 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Morphology, Nutritional, Quality, Trait, Parameter, Performance
Parameter | Research location | |
---|---|---|
Pawe | Jawi | |
Latitude | 11°19'N | 11o33’22.68” |
Longitude | 36°24'E | 36o29’17.58” |
Altitude (m.a.s.l) | 1100 | 700-1500 |
Distance to Addis Ababa (km) | 567 | 602 |
Annual rainfall (mm) | 900-1587 | 1250mm |
Daily minimum temperature (°C) | 16.3Co | 16Co |
Daily maximum temperature (°C) | 32.6Co | 32C0 |
Soil type | Loam | Loam |
Texture class | Clay | Clay loam |
PH (1:2.5 H2O) | 5.51 | 5.79 |
Organic matter (%) | 3.58 | 3.57 |
Total nitrogen (%) | 0.149 | 0.153 |
Organic Carbon (%) | 2.079 | 2.075 |
Sources | Mean square for parameters | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DF | NT | PH | LSR | FBY t/ha | DMY t/ha | |
Year | 1 | 74 | 931 | 9.5*** | 0.63 | 551.8*** |
Location | 1 | 13749*** | 4047*** | 2* | 8865.8*** | 343.3*** |
Cut | 1 | 31519.5*** | 326.8 | 0.45 | 7011.9*** | 3414*** |
Genotype | 11 | 1521*** | 5293.3*** | 0.34 | 819.36*** | 23.9** |
Genotype*location | 23 | 1024.5*** | 3569*** | 0.34 | 25.8*** | 5.87*** |
Error | 273 | 102.2 | 541.6 | 0.32 | 104.3 | 6.9 |
Grand Mean | 30.7 | 136.5 | 1.18 | 25.8 | 5.87 | |
LSD | 5.7 | 13.2 | 0.32 | 5.8 | 1.5 | |
R2 | 0.67 | 0.33 | 0.15 | 0.43 | 0.38 |
Year | Parameters | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NT | PH cm | LSR | FBY t/ha | DMY t/ha | DM | Ash | CP | NDF | ADF | ADL | IVDMD% | |
2020/21 | 27.3b | 138.69 | 1.38a | 24.4 | 7a | 93.4a | 7.78a | 14.3a | 66.2b | 34.3b | 2.49b | 63.27a |
2021/22 | 34.1a | 134.37 | 0.98b | 27.2 | 4.73b | 93.2b | 5.69b | 12.4b | 67.3a | 34.8a | 2.63a | 62.49b |
GM | 30.7 | 136.5 | 1.18 | 25.8 | 5.87 | 93.3 | 6.7 | 13.3 | 66.7 | 34.5 | 2.5 | 62.8 |
LSD | 3.9 | 6.4 | 0.13 | 0.36 | 0.71 | 0.14 | 0.56 | 0.38 | 0.65 | 0.45 | 0.12 | 0.61 |
P-value | *** | NS | *** | NS | *** | * | *** | *** | ** | * | * | * |
Locations | Parameters | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NT | PH cm | LSR | FBY t/ha | DMY t/ha | DM | Ash | CP | NDF | ADF | ADL | IVDMD% | |
Pawe | 35a | 143.4a | 1.2a | 30.2a | 6.7a | 92.9b | 5.1b | 13b | 67.4a | 34.2b | 2.5 | 64.6a |
Jawi | 26.4b | 129.5b | 1.08b | 21.4b | 5b | 93.6a | 8.3a | 13.6a | 66.1b | 34.8a | 2.6 | 61.1b |
GM | 30.7 | 136.5 | 1.18 | 25.8 | 5.87 | 93.3 | 6.7 | 13.3 | 66.7 | 34.5 | 2.5 | 62.8 |
LSD | 2.3 | 5.4 | 0.31 | 2.3 | 0.69 | 0.11 | 0.47 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.11 | 0.4 |
P-value | *** | *** | * | *** | *** | ** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | *** |
Cuts | Parameters | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NT | PH cm | LSR | FBY t/ha | DMY t/ha | DM | Ash | CP | NDF | ADF | ADL | IVDMD% | |
Cut-I | 18.4b | 136.8 | 1.33a | 20.8b | 5.2b | 93.2b | 6.66 | 14a | 66.9 | 34.98a | 2.64a | 63.5b |
Cut-II | 38.1a | 136.3 | 1.08b | 28.7a | 6.2a | 93.37a | 6.7 | 12.9b | 66.6 | 34.33b | 2.5b | 62.5b |
GM | 30.7 | 136.5 | 1.18 | 25.8 | 5.87 | 93.3 | 6.7 | 13.3 | 66.7 | 34.5 | 2.5 | 62.8 |
LSD | 2.4 | 5.5 | 0.14 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.11 | 0.49 | 0.41 | 0.64 | 0.42 | o.11 | 0.42 |
P-value | *** | NS | * | *** | ** | * | NS | ** | NS | ** | ** | ** |
Accessions | Parameters | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NT | PH cm | LSR | FBY t/ha | DMY t/ha | |
14983 | 47.4a | 132.7cde | 1.16ab | 24.94d | 5.57cd |
14984 | 31.1bc | 121.9ef | 1.11b | 30.89bc | 6.4abc |
15743 | 20.4e | 123.1ef | 1.46a | 31.3abc | 6.3abcd |
16783 | 31.7bc | 149.2b | 0.97b | 17.97e | 4.68d |
16791 | 23.2de | 151.8b | 1.22ab | 31.9ab | 7.4ab |
16792 | 23.5de | 168.1a | 1.1b | 25.53cd | 5.79bcd |
16794 | 42.98a | 139bcd | 1.14ab | 24.77d | 5.68cd |
16813 | 29.6bc | 115.29f | 1.25ab | 20.9de | 4.72cd |
16815 | 29.9bc | 129.5de | 1.25ab | 21.23de | 5.11cd |
16817 | 26.4cd | 131.2de | 1.13ab | 20.5de | 5.33cd |
16819 | 34.6b | 131.59cde | 1.23ab | 22.48de | 5.48cd |
Local | 26.6cd | 144.6bc | 1.12b | 37.4a | 7.9a |
GM | 30.73 | 136.5 | 1.18 | 25.8 | 5.87 |
LSD | 5.7 | 13.2 | 0.33 | 5.79 | 1.7 |
P-value | *** | NS | * | *** | ** |
Accessions | Parameters | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DM% | Ash% | CP% | NDF% | ADF% | ADL% | IVDMD% | |
14983 | 93.45ab | 7.56a | 14.37a | 66.06de | 34.53bc | 2.59bcd | 62.44cd |
14984 | 93.13c | 7.02abc | 13.59abcd | 65.57e | 33.29d | 2.25e | 64.72a |
15743 | 93.22bc | 7.48a | 13bcde | 66.34cde | 35.12ab | 2.56cd | 63.3bc |
16783 | 93.38abc | 5.93c | 12.62de | 68.86a | 35.64a | 2.87a | 61.1f |
16791 | 93.25abc | 6.3bc | 12.66cde | 67.93ab | 34.66ab | 2.33de | 63.04bcd |
16792 | 93.4abc | 6.09bc | 13.75ab | 67.36abcd | 34.8ab | 2.85ab | 62.75bcd |
16794 | 93.38abc | 7.03abc | 13.89ab | 67.33bcd | 35.4ab | 2.7abc | 62.76bcd |
16813 | 93.19bc | 7.18ab | 13.64abc | 65.28e | 34.49bc | 2.39de | 63.55b |
16815 | 93.25abc | 5.88c | 12.48e | 66.09cde | 33.59bc | 2.78abc | 62.37cde |
16817 | 93.5a | 7.12ab | 13.34bcde | 66.08cde | 35.31ab | 2.74abc | 61.43ef |
16819 | 93.38abc | 6.78abc | 13.29bcde | 67.59abc | 34.75ab | 2.5cd | 62.15de |
Local | 93.13c | 6.48abc | 13.67ab | 66.73bcde | 33.35d | 2.21e | 64.95a |
GM | 93.31 | 6.74 | 13.36 | 66.77 | 34.58 | 2.5 | 62.88 |
LSD | 0.28 | 1.17 | 0.99 | 1.52 | 1 | 0.28 | 0.99 |
P-value | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
ADF | Acidic Detergent Fiber |
ADL | Acidic Detergent Liginin |
CP | Crude Protien |
DM | Dry Matter |
ILRI | International livestock Research Institute |
IVDMD | In-vitro Dry Matter Digestibility |
NDF | Neutral Detergent Fiber |
OMD | Organic Matter Digestibility |
TPP | Tiller Per Plant |
[1] | Alemayehu Mengistu, Gezahagn Kebede, Fekede Feyissa and Getenet Assefa. 2017. Review on major feed resources in Ethiopia, conditions, challenges and opportunities. Academic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Research. 5(3): 176-185pp. |
[2] | Keftasa D (1996) Effects of Nitrogen Application and Stage of Development on Yield and Nutritional Value of Rhodes Grass (Chloris gayana). Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. |
[3] | McDonald, P., R. A. Edwards, J. F. D. Greenhalgh, C. A. Morgan, L. A. Sinclair and R. G. Wilkinson. 2010. Animal Nutrition (7th ed.). Prentice Hall, Harlow, England, London. 714p. |
[4] | Seyoum B, Zinash S, Tadesse T, AND Liyusew A. 1998. Evaluation of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and Pennisetum Hybrids (Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum typhoides) in the central highlands of Ethiopia. In: Fifth National Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production. 15-17 May 1997, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[5] | Tessema Zewdu. 2005. Variation in growth, yield, chemical composition, and in-vitro dry matter digestibility of Napier grass varieties (Pennisetum purpureum). Trop. Sci. 45: 67- 73. |
[6] | Feyissa, F., G. Assefa, L. Hiwot, M. Minta and T. Tsadik, 2005. Evaluation of Napier grass-vetch mixture to improve total herbage yield in the central highlands. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP), August 25-26, 2005, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp: 155-163. |
[7] | Getnet Assefa and Gezahagn Kebede. 2012. Seed Research and Development of Perennial Forage Crops in the Central Highlands. In: Getnet Assefa, Mesfin Dejene, Jean Hanson, Getachew Anemut, Solomon Mengistu and Alemayehu Mengistu (eds.). Forage Seed Research and Development in Ethiopia. Proceedings of a workshop held on 12-14 May 2011 at EIAR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[8] | Anderson WF, Dien BS, Brandon SK, Peterson JD (2008) Assessment of Bermuda grass and bunch grasses as feedstocks for conversion to ethanol. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 145: 13-21: |
[9] | AOAC., 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA., Pages: 684. |
[10] | Van Soest, P. J. and J. B. Robertson, 1985. Analysis of Forages and Fibrous Foods. Cornell University Press, New York, USA. |
[11] | Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A, 1963. A two-stage technique for in-vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 104. |
[12] | SAS (Statistical Analysis System). (2003). SAS/STAT guide to personal computers (9th ed., pp. 245–477). Prentice Hall. |
[13] | Ansa, J. E. O. 1, Garjila, Y. A, 2019. Effect of Cutting Frequency on Forage Growth and Yield in Elephant Grass in the Southern Rainforest of Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research, 5(7). |
[14] | Wen Y., and Jiang H., 2005. Cutting effects on growth characteristics, yield composition, and population relationships of perennial ryegrass and white clover in mixed pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 48: 349-358. |
[15] | Gemechu Keneni, (2012): Genetic potential and limitations of Ethiopian chickpea (Cicer arietinumal) germplasm for improving attributes of symbiotic nitrogen fixation, phosphorus uptake and use efficiency, and adzuki bean beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.) resistance. PhD. Thesis. Addis Ababa University faculty of life science, Ethiopia. |
[16] | Gamachu, N. and G. Wekgari, 2017. Adaptation study of improved elephant grasses (Pennisetum purpureum) and Oats (Avena sativa L.) at Haro Sabu, Kelem Wollega zone, Ethiopia. J. Biol. Agric. Healthcare, 7(17): 51-60. |
[17] | Anindo, D. O. and H. L. Potter, 1994. Seasonal variation in productivity and nutritive value of Napier grass at Muguga, Kenya. East Afr. Agric. For. J., 59: 177-185. |
[18] | Tessema Z, Baars R, Alemu Y, Dawit N (2003) Effect of plant height at cutting and fertilizer on growth of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach.) Tropical Sci 43: 57-61. |
[19] | Mamaru, T., 2018. Evaluation of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach) accessions for agronomic traits under acidic soil conditions of Nejo Area, Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. Biosci., 7: 30-35. |
[20] | Tessema Tesfaye, Getachew Gudero, Milkias Fanta, Getinet Kebede, 2022. Yield Dynamics and Nutrient Quality of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) Varieties under Consecutive Harvests, Ethiopian Journal of Science and Sustainable Development, 9(1). |
[21] | Haryani, H., Norlindawati, A. P., Norfadzrin, F., Aswanimiyuni, A. and Azman, A., 2018. Yield and nutritive values of six Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) cultivars at different cutting ages. Malaysian J. Vet. Res, 9, pp. 6-12. |
[22] | Getiso A, Mijena D (2021) Performance Evaluation of Napier Grass (Penisetum Purpuruem (L.) Schumach) accessions under rain fed and Irrigation System at Wondo Genet. Glob J Ecol 6(1): 028-033. |
[23] | Gezahagn Kebede, Fekede Feyissa, Getnet Assefa, Mengistu Alemayehu, Alemayehu Mengistu, Aemiro Kehaliew, Kassahun Melese, Solomon Mengistu, Estifanos Tadesse, Shewangizaw Wolde & Mergia Abera 2-016. Evaluation of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach) Accessions for Agronomic Traits under Different Environmental Conditions of Ethiopia. International Journal of Advanced Research, 4(4); 1029-1035. |
[24] | Mureithi JG, Thorpe W (1996) The effects of herbaceous legume intercropping and mulching on the productivity of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and total forage yield in coastal lowland Kenya. In: Jean Ndikumana and Peterde Leeuw (eds.) Sustainable Feed Production and Utilization for Smallholder Livestock Enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Feed Resources Network (AFRNET) Workshop held in Harare, Zimbabwe, 6-10 December, 1993. AFRNET, Nairobi, Kenya 45-50. |
[25] | Muinga RW, Thorpe W, Topps JH (1992) Voluntary food intake, live weight change and lactation performance of crossbred dairy cows given ad libitum Pennisetum purpureum (Napier grass var. Bana) supplemented with leucaena forage in the lowland semi-humid tropics. Anim Prod 55: 331-337. |
[26] | Xie, X. M., X. Q. Zhang, Z. X. Dong and H. R. Guo, 2011. Dynamic changes of lignin contents of MT-1 elephant grass and its closely related cultivars. Biomass Bioenergy, 35: 1732-1738. |
[27] | Skerman, P. J. and F. Riveros, 1990. Tropical Grasses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp: 83. |
[28] | Gemiyo, D., A. Jimma and S. Wolde, 2017. Biomass yield and nutritive value of ten Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) accessions at Areka, Southern Ethiopia. World J. Agric. Sci., 13: 185-190. |
[29] | McDowell, L. R. and Valle, G., 2000. Major minerals in forages. Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition, pp. 373-397. |
[30] | Kabuga, J. D. and C. A. Darko, 1993. In Saco degradation of dry matter and nitrogen in oven, dried and fresh tropical grasses and some relations to in vitro dry matter digestibility. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 40: 191-205. |
[31] | Humphreys L R. (1991): Tropical pasture utilization. Camb. University Press. Great Britain. |
[32] | Denbela Hidosa and Sintayehu Kibiret, 2020. Evaluation of Pennisetum perpureum Grass Variety to Improve Feed Availability in South Omo. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 15: 193-200. |
[33] | Singh, G. P. and S. J. Oosting, 1992. A model for describing the energy value of straws. Indian dairyman XLI: 322-327. |
[34] | Van Soest, P. J., 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd Edn, Cornell University Press, London, UK., Pages: 476. |
APA Style
Shitaneh, E., Arega, H., Fentahun, T. (2025). Assessing Various Accessions of Napier (Pennisetum Purpureum) Grass in North Western Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 13(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12
ACS Style
Shitaneh, E.; Arega, H.; Fentahun, T. Assessing Various Accessions of Napier (Pennisetum Purpureum) Grass in North Western Ethiopia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2025, 13(1), 7-17. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12, author = {Esubalew Shitaneh and Habtie Arega and Temesgen Fentahun}, title = {Assessing Various Accessions of Napier (Pennisetum Purpureum) Grass in North Western Ethiopia}, journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry}, volume = {13}, number = {1}, pages = {7-17}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20251301.12}, abstract = {One of Ethiopia's the chief uncertainties with the livestock industry is the year-round scarcity of optimum quality animal feed. To overcame the supply of quality feed cultivation of tropically adapted forage species, which gives a reasonable yield under rain deficit and unstable climatic conditions. Napier grass accessions were evaluated at Pawe and Jawi localtions for their adaptionn and yield performance. Ten Napier accessions with three replications were used in the randomized complete block design of the study. Mean comparisons between accessions were made using the least significant differences and the general linear model was used to analyze data for growth parameters and nutritional quality traits, such as tillering performance, plant height, forage dry matter, leaf and stem fractions, and nutritional quality. Sixty days following the establishment, in September, the first cut was made; forty days later, in October, the second cut was made. For most variables, there was a substantial (P0.05). In terms of fresh and dry matter yield t/ha, accessions 14984, 15743, and 16791 perform better. Accessions 14984 and local responses (64.72 and 64.95) were the most significant (p<0.001) differences in in vitro dry matter digestibility, followed by 16813 and 15743 (63.5 and 63.3). According to the findings, the ILRI-14984, 15743, and 16791 accessions produced results that were comparable to the standard checks for superior yield and nutritional quality. So we recommended the demonstration of selected accessions for Metekel and Awi mid and low land areas and other comparable agro-ecologies in the country at farmer level was essintal.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessing Various Accessions of Napier (Pennisetum Purpureum) Grass in North Western Ethiopia AU - Esubalew Shitaneh AU - Habtie Arega AU - Temesgen Fentahun Y1 - 2025/02/17 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 7 EP - 17 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20251301.12 AB - One of Ethiopia's the chief uncertainties with the livestock industry is the year-round scarcity of optimum quality animal feed. To overcame the supply of quality feed cultivation of tropically adapted forage species, which gives a reasonable yield under rain deficit and unstable climatic conditions. Napier grass accessions were evaluated at Pawe and Jawi localtions for their adaptionn and yield performance. Ten Napier accessions with three replications were used in the randomized complete block design of the study. Mean comparisons between accessions were made using the least significant differences and the general linear model was used to analyze data for growth parameters and nutritional quality traits, such as tillering performance, plant height, forage dry matter, leaf and stem fractions, and nutritional quality. Sixty days following the establishment, in September, the first cut was made; forty days later, in October, the second cut was made. For most variables, there was a substantial (P0.05). In terms of fresh and dry matter yield t/ha, accessions 14984, 15743, and 16791 perform better. Accessions 14984 and local responses (64.72 and 64.95) were the most significant (p<0.001) differences in in vitro dry matter digestibility, followed by 16813 and 15743 (63.5 and 63.3). According to the findings, the ILRI-14984, 15743, and 16791 accessions produced results that were comparable to the standard checks for superior yield and nutritional quality. So we recommended the demonstration of selected accessions for Metekel and Awi mid and low land areas and other comparable agro-ecologies in the country at farmer level was essintal. VL - 13 IS - 1 ER -