Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Maize Straw-Derived Biochar- Nanobiochar for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment: Mechanistic Insights into Heavy Metal and Nutrient Adsorption

Received: 6 November 2025     Accepted: 19 November 2025     Published: 26 January 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The conversion of agricultural byproducts into advanced nanomaterials offers an ecologically sound strategy for addressing wastewater contamination. This study investigates biochar derived from maize straw, assessing its effectiveness as an adsorbent for the simultaneous removal of heavy metals and nutrient pollutants. The synthesis involved pyrolyzing maize straw under oxygen-limited conditions, followed by ball-milling and mortar pestle to create nanoscale particles, which significantly enhanced its surface properties for chemical reactivity. Extensive characterization using techniques such as XRD, FTIR, BET, SEM–EDS, and zeta potential measurements revealed a material with a highly porous structure, abundant oxygenated functional groups, and disordered graphitic domains. Leveraging these structural insights, batch adsorption experiments were conducted, demonstrating substantial removal capacities for lead, cadmium, copper, ammonium, and phosphate ions. Subsequent kinetic and isotherm modeling indicated that the adsorption mechanism aligned with pseudo-second-order kinetics and Langmuir–Freundlich models, suggesting a chemisorption process and monolayer adsorption onto diverse active sites. Thermodynamic analysis further characterized the process as spontaneous and endothermic. Furthermore, the synthesized biochar exhibited remarkable reusability, maintaining over contaminant removal efficiency across five regeneration cycles, thereby confirming its structural integrity and operational resilience. Collectively, these findings highlight MSB's potential to integrate waste valorization with efficient contaminant sequestration, positioning it as an environmentally engineered solution for advanced wastewater purification. This research makes a significant contribution to the development of cost-effective, renewable, and high-performance adsorbent materials, supporting the broader transition towards circular bioeconomy principles and sustainable environmental innovations.

Published in American Journal of Nanosciences (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajn.20261001.11
Page(s) 1-16
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Maize Straw biochar, Wastewater Treatment, Adsorption Mechanism, Heavy Metals, Nutrient Removal, Circular Bioeconomy, Sustainability

1. Introduction
Water pollution, stemming from the indiscriminate release of industrial, agricultural, and domestic effluents, constitutes a significant global environmental issue. Wastewater frequently contains a diverse array of contaminants, such as heavy metals, nutrient ions, synthetic dyes, and various organic pollutants, each presenting specific threats to aquatic environments and public health . Among the multiple contaminants, heavy metal ions, including Pb2+, Cd2+, Cr3+/Cr6+, Cu2+, and Ni2+, pose significant environmental risks. These elements are particularly hazardous due to their resistance to biodegradation, propensity for biomagnification within ecological systems, and pronounced toxicity even at minute concentrations. The mobility and adsorptive characteristics of these heavy metals are considerably influenced by their speciation in aquatic environments, which is determined by factors such as pH, redox potential, ionic strength, and the presence of complexing ligands. For instance, chromium exists predominantly in two forms, Cr+3 and Cr+6, with Cr+6 being notably carcinogenic and exhibiting higher mobility. Similarly, arsenic interconverts between arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)), which impacts its toxicity and affinity for adsorption. While cadmium (Cd2+) and lead (Pb2+) typically remain as free ions across most natural water pH ranges, their interaction with carbonate or hydroxide ions under alkaline conditions can lead to the formation of complexes, thereby reducing their free-ion concentrations.
Excessive concentrations of nutrient pollutants, including nitrates, phosphates, and ammonium ions, primarily stem from agricultural practices (fertilizers, livestock runoff) and municipal wastewater discharge. These elevated nutrient levels contribute significantly to eutrophication, promoting detrimental algal blooms and ultimately leading to oxygen depletion in aquatic ecosystems. Concurrently, synthetic dyes, exemplified by methylene blue, rhodamine B, and Congo red, are discharged from textile and dyeing industries; these compounds are notable for their toxicity, mutagenicity, and recalcitrance to natural degradation processes. Moreover, a diverse array of organic pollutants, such as pesticides, phenols, and pharmaceutical compounds, further compounds the associated ecological and public health risks.
Conventional wastewater treatment techniques, such as chemical precipitation, ion exchange, membrane separation, and advanced oxidation processes, despite their proven efficacy, frequently entail substantial operational expenses, high energy consumption, or the generation of secondary pollutants . Consequently, the limitations inherent in conventional wastewater treatment techniques have spurred the development of economically viable, sustainable, and environmentally benign adsorbent materials. Biochar, a carbonaceous material produced through the pyrolysis of biomass under oxygen-limited conditions, has emerged as a promising adsorbent, largely attributable to its substantial surface area, tunable porosity, and rich array of reactive surface functional groups . A substantial body of literature attests to biochar's efficacy in attenuating heavy metals, synthetic dyes, and nutrient ions from aqueous matrices, primarily via surface complexation, ion exchange, electrostatic attraction, and precipitation .
Nevertheless, the adsorptive performance of conventional biochar is frequently hindered by its suboptimal surface reactivity, a reduced density of active sites, and impeded pore accessibility . Consequently, to mitigate these inherent shortcomings, nanobiochar, which is derived from the nanoscale reduction of conventional biochar, has garnered substantial research attention. This is attributed to its demonstrably enhanced surface area, increased density of active functional groups, superior reactivity, and improved interaction capabilities with diverse pollutant species . The adsorption mechanisms encompass π–π interactions with aromatic contaminants, ion exchange processes involving metal cations, and robust complexation with oxyanionic species . Nanobiochar consistently exhibits superior removal efficiencies for heavy metals, dyes, and nutrient species compared to conventional bulk biochar . Concurrently, maize straw, a prevalent lignocellulosic agricultural residue generated in substantial quantities, is frequently disposed of through incineration or abandonment, thereby contributing significantly to atmospheric pollution and the emission of greenhouse gases . The synthesis of nanobiochar from maize straw represents a multifaceted approach that not only addresses environmental pollution but also champions waste valorization, resource recovery, and the foundational principles of a circular bioeconomy . Maize-straw-derived biochar is recognized for its capacity to effectively sequester heavy metals, dyes, and nutrient species . Despite these recognized capabilities, extensive studies elucidating the speciation-dependent adsorption mechanisms, the structural evolution of nanobiochar during pyrolysis, and the intricate pollutant interactions driven by its nanostructure remain notably scarce.. The current investigation centers on the synthesis of maize-straw-derived nanobiochar, achieved through a controlled pyrolysis process succeeded by mechanochemical activation. This study will encompass a thorough characterization of the physicochemical and morphological properties of the resulting maize-straw-derived nanobiochar. Concurrently, its adsorptive behavior towards various heavy metals and nutrient ions will be systematically evaluated, specifically considering their aqueous speciation, by applying kinetic, isotherm, and thermodynamic analyses. Furthermore, assessments of MSNB’s regeneration potential and reusability will be conducted to ascertain its practical utility in sustainable wastewater treatment applications. This endeavor seeks to furnish comprehensive insights into the structure–function relationships within nanostructured biochars, thereby accentuating their substantial capacity to advance innovative environmental purification technologies.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Raw Materials and Reagents
Samples of maize straw were obtained from agricultural fields located in Sagar, Madhya Pradesh. The collected biomass underwent one week of sun-drying before being sectioned into smaller pieces. Subsequently, it was meticulously washed with deionized water, dilute acid, acetone, and alcohol to eliminate surface contaminants, organic residues, and other extraneous impurities. Following washing, the material was subjected to oven-drying at for and then stored in airtight containers to preserve its integrity for subsequent experimental applications. All chemical reagents, specifically lead nitrate, cadmium chloride, copper sulfate, ammonium chloride, and potassium dihydrogen phosphate, were of analytical grade and obtained from Merck. These were utilized directly without any further purification steps.
2.2. Pyrolysis in Muffle Furnace with Stainless Steel Tube
Approximately 50 g of desiccated maize straw was introduced into a stainless-steel tubular reactor. The reactor was hermetically sealed to maintain limited oxygen conditions and subsequently heated in a muffle furnace at a ramp rate of 10°C/min until reaching a final temperature of 800°C. This peak temperature was sustained for a duration of 3 hours under either inert or oxygen-limited atmospheres. Following natural cooling to ambient temperature, the resulting carbonaceous material was mechanically comminuted and sieved to yield maize straw biochar. This high-temperature pyrolysis regimen enhances both the thermal stability and surface reactivity of the biochar, a finding consistent with contemporary research in biochar-mediated wastewater treatment .
2.3. Nanosizing / Ball Milling and Motor Pestle to Biochar (MSB)
The sieved MSB was subjected to mechanical grinding using an agate mortar and pestle to achieve fine particle size reduction. Approximately 10 g of the sample was manually ground until a uniform, ultrafine powder was obtained. The powder was then dispersed in deionized water via ultrasonication (~30 min) to break agglomerates and subsequently dried at 80°C. The resulting material is referred to as maize straw biochar (MSB). Mechanical grinding, ultrasonication, and size reduction using a mortar and pestle have been widely employed in recent studies for the fabrication of nanoscale biochar.
The sieved MSB was subjected to high-energy planetary ball milling to obtain nanoscale particles. A sample mass (~10 g) was placed in a zirconia milling jar with zirconia balls (ball: powder ratio = 10: 1). Milling was performed at 400 rpm for 6 h, with intermittent pauses to prevent overheating. The powder was then dispersed in deionized water via ultrasonication (~30 min) to break agglomerates and subsequently dried at 80°C. The resulting material is denoted maize straw biochar (MSB). Ball milling, ultrasonication, and mechanical size reduction are widely adopted in biochar fabrication strategies in recent literature .
2.4. Characterization Techniques
A comprehensive characterization of the maize straw nanbiochar's physicochemical properties was conducted through a suite of analytical techniques. Specifically, its surface morphology and elemental composition were investigated utilizing Scanning Electron Microscopy integrated with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy. Furthermore, X-ray Diffraction, employing Cu Kα radiation, was applied to ascertain the material's crystalline phases and to assess its degree of graphitization . Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, spanning the range of 4000–400 cm-1, was utilized to ascertain the material's surface functional groups. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method, predicated on N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms, was employed for the quantification of specific surface area, total pore volume, and pore size distribution. Furthermore, zeta potential analysis was conducted in aqueous suspension to evaluate the surface charge and colloidal stability of the MSB. These characterization methodologies align with established practices in nanobiochar research for elucidating structure–function relationships .
2.5. Batch Adsorption Experiments
Batch adsorption experiments were conducted in triplicate to ensure statistical reliability, with experimental uncertainty represented by mean values and standard deviation-based error bars. In each batch, 0.1 g of maize straw-derived nanobiochar was introduced into 100 mL aqueous solutions, each containing 50 mg L-1 of Pb2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, NH4+, or PO43⁻ ions. The pH of these solutions was precisely adjusted to 6.5 ± 0.1 using either 0.1 M HCl or NaOH. The suspensions were agitated at 150 rpm and 25°C for 120 minutes to achieve adsorption equilibrium. Following this, solid-liquid separation was performed by centrifugation or filtration, and the remaining ion concentrations were quantified using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy or Ultraviolet-Visible (UV–Vis) spectrophotometry. Adsorption capacity and removal efficiency were calculated using established formulas, and the experimental data were subsequently fitted to kinetic, isotherm, and thermodynamic models to elucidate the underlying adsorption mechanisms. Additionally, the impact of pH, contact time, and initial concentration was assessed to account for and simulate environmental variations . Zeta potential measurements and Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy were employed to characterize the surface charge, evaluate colloidal stability, and elucidate the functional group interactions between the adsorbent and the target adsorbate .
2.6. Regeneration and Reusability
The reusability of maize straw nanobiochar was evaluated over five successive adsorption–desorption cycles. Desorption was achieved by employing 0.1 M HCl as the regenerating agent. Following each cycle, the MSB underwent comprehensive rinsing with deionized water to eliminate residual acidic components, followed by thermal drying at, before being subsequently re-employed for adsorption under consistent experimental parameters. The preservation of adsorptive efficacy across repeated cycles was quantified to ascertain the structural integrity and regenerative performance of the MSB. This rigorous evaluation is critical for assessing the economic feasibility and long-term environmental applicability of the adsorbent in wastewater treatment . Adsorption capacity was determined by assessing the initial and final concentrations of heavy metals, while the influence of varying parameters such as pH, reaction time, and adsorbent dosage was also systematically investigated . The efficiency decline across multiple adsorption-regeneration cycles was also meticulously tracked to determine the material's practical viability for sustained pollutant removal .
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Structural and Physicochemical Characterization
3.1.1. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
The X-ray diffraction pattern of maize straw biochar revealed two broad peaks centered at approximately and, which correspond to the and planes characteristic of turbostratic carbon. The broad and low-intensity nature of these reflections indicates a predominantly amorphous carbon structure with some degree of partial graphitization, a characteristic commonly observed in lignocellulosic biochars . Conversely, the precursor maize straw biochar exhibited more distinct diffraction patterns, whereas the MSB peak displayed reduced intensity and an expanded full width at half maximum. This suggests significant lattice distortion and a decrease in crystallite size, outcomes attributed to the high-energy mechanical milling process. Such structural disorganization engenders a multitude of surface defects and active edge sites, which, in turn, promote the adsorption of ionic pollutants through coordination and electron-sharing interactions .
Figure 1. XRD pattern of maize straw biochar (MSB).
Similarly, the X-ray diffraction pattern of maize straw-derived biochar exhibited additional diffraction peaks at values of 21.7°, 26.5°, and 33.0°. These peaks are primarily attributed to semi-crystalline cellulose and mineral residues, notably silica and other inorganic constituents inherent to maize straw. The prominent peak observed at approximately corresponds to the plane of disordered carbon, thereby substantiating the amorphous carbonaceous nature of the pyrolyzed material. Collectively, the broad and low-intensity reflections suggest a partial disruption of cellulose crystallinity, resulting from thermal decomposition during pyrolysis. This amorphous microstructure confers advantages for adsorption processes by enhancing surface reactivity and increasing the number of accessible functional sites.
3.1.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
The Fourier-transform infrared spectra for MSB and MSB are presented. Absorption bands were observed at 3420 cm-1, attributed to –OH stretching vibrations, and at 2923 cm-1, corresponding to the C–H stretching of aliphatic chains. A prominent band at 1714 cm-1 is assigned to C=O stretching, and a band at 1621 cm-1 indicates aromatic C=C vibrations. Furthermore, the presence of oxygenated and mineral functional groups is supported by peaks at 1410 cm-1 and 1080 cm-1 . The adsorption of Pb2+ and PO43⁻ subsequently led to distinct shifts and attenuations in the –OH and C=O absorption bands, thereby indicating the involvement of surface complexation and ion exchange mechanisms between MSB and the respective pollutant ions . The Fourier-transform infrared spectrum of maize straw biochar reveals characteristic absorption bands indicative of functional groups derived from lignocellulosic components and thermally transformed carbon structures. A broad absorption band appearing around is attributed to the stretching vibrations of hydroxyl groups associated with adsorbed water and remnants of cellulose or lignin. Additionally, weak bands observed near and are assigned to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching of aliphatic C–H groups, suggesting the partial preservation of organic moieties post-pyrolysis. A prominent peak at corresponds to the C=C stretching of aromatic rings, confirming the development of conjugated aromatic carbon structures during the carbonization process. The gradual reduction in transmittance signifies the presence of complex C–O, C–O–C, and Si–O vibrations, which are typical features of amorphous carbon–mineral composites. Collectively, these spectral characteristics imply that the biochar's surface is endowed with oxygenated and aromatic functional groups, thereby enhancing its binding affinity for metal ions and nutrient adsorption in aqueous environments.
Figure 2. FTIR spectrum of maize straw–derived biochar (MSB).
3.1.3 Surface Area and Porosity (BET)
Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms obtained for MSB exhibited a type IV profile accompanied by an H3 hysteresis loop, characteristic features of mesoporous materials. A significant increase in the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area was observed, rising sharply from to. Concurrently, the total pore volume expanded from to (for MSB), while the average pore diameter consequently diminished to. These changes collectively confirm the successful formation of a micro-mesoporous structure attributed to the ball-milling process. The enhanced accessible surface area and increased pore volume are expected to improve the adsorption kinetics and diffusion efficiency of heavy metals and nutrients within aqueous environments. Furthermore, the presence of an H3 hysteresis loop within the Type IV isotherm signifies a pore structure composed of slit-like pores, which could further optimize the interaction with target contaminants . This mesoporous framework, exhibiting a type IV isotherm, suggests a favorable architecture for catalytic applications and the effective removal of heavy metals due to its enhanced surface area and tailored pore characteristics . This pore structure, characterized by its well-defined mesopores, is particularly advantageous for adsorption processes as it facilitates efficient mass transfer and provides ample active sites for contaminant binding .
Figure 3. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of maize straw biochar (MSB).
3.1.4. Surface Morphology SEM Analysis
Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis revealed that maize straw biochar initially presented a morphology characterized by compact, plate-like carbon aggregates and a partially diminished pore network. However, subsequent nanoscale modification transformed the material into maize straw nanobiochar, which exhibited highly fragmented carbon sheets, extensive open pores, and a coarse, irregular surface texture. This observed increase in roughness and porosity suggests a greater density of potential adsorption sites. Further detailed examination of MSB showed a highly irregular and porous surface morphology, composed of agglomerated nanoscale particles. The fragmentation of the original carbon matrix into smaller, rough-surfaced particles with abundant pore openings is attributed to the combined effects of high-temperature pyrolysis and mechanical milling, which contribute to the exposure of new active sites. This nanostructured texture, distinguished by interconnected pores and fine particles, indicates an expanded surface area and enhanced accessibility for adsorbate molecules. Such advantageous morphological characteristics are critical for optimizing adsorption processes by improving mass transfer, diffusion, and the binding efficiency of heavy metal ions and nutrients within aqueous media.
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of maize straw biochar (MSB) at different magnifications.
3.1.5. Elemental Composition (EDS Analysis)
Elemental mapping conducted using Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy demonstrated that the pristine maize straw biochar was primarily composed of carbon and oxygen, alongside minor concentrations of potassium (K), calcium, and magnesium, which originated from plant minerals. Subsequent to the adsorption experiments, novel peaks corresponding to lead and phosphorus (P) were observed within the spectrum, thereby confirming the effective binding of lead ions and phosphate species to the biochar's surface . The elemental composition of maize straw biochar, as elucidated by Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy, is presented in Table 1. The EDS spectrum analysis revealed that carbon and oxygen were the predominant elements, comprising 80.24 wt% and 12.36 wt%, respectively. Concomitantly, silicon, potassium, and chlorine were identified as minor constituents. The elevated carbon content is indicative of efficient carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass during pyrolysis, leading to a carbon-rich framework. The presence of oxygen is largely attributed to residual surface functional groups, such as hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl moieties, which are crucial for the material's adsorption activity.
Minor concentrations of silicon, potassium, and chlorine are ascribed to intrinsic inorganic minerals, such as silicates and potassium salts, naturally occurring within the maize straw matrix, which endure the carbonization process. This compositional profile substantiates that the maize straw biochar features a predominantly carbonaceous structure, further enhanced by oxygen-containing and mineral functionalities, thereby promoting surface reactivity and the capacity for pollutant adsorption.
Table 1. Elemental composition of MSB determined by EDS analysis.

Element

Atomic No.

Series

Unn. C [wt.%]

Norm. C [wt.%]

Atom. C [at.%]

Error (1σ) [wt.%]

C

6

K-series

80.24

80.24

87.03

9.46

O

8

K-series

12.36

12.36

10.07

2.28

Si

14

K-series

2.92

2.92

1.35

0.16

K

19

K-series

2.75

2.75

0.92

0.12

Cl

17

K-series

1.72

1.72

0.63

0.09

Total

100.00

100.00

100.00

The SEM-EDS elemental mapping of maize straw biochar demonstrates a structurally complex yet cohesive surface morphology, characterized by an intricate arrangement of finely dispersed carbonaceous particulates intermingled with discrete mineral-laden domains. The pervasive distribution of carbon and oxygen underscores a predominant carbonaceous matrix augmented by various oxygen-containing functional moieties, including hydroxyl, carboxyl, and carbonyl groups. Furthermore, the discrete occurrence of silicon, potassium, and chlorine is attributable to the persistence of inorganic phases, such as silicates and plant-derived salts, post-pyrolysis. This composite architecture suggests homogenous carbonization of the lignocellulosic biomass concurrent with partial mineral preservation, collectively augmenting MSB's physicochemical resilience and adsorptive capacity via mechanisms involving ion exchange and surface complexation.
Figure 5. SEM–EDS elemental mapping of maize straw biochar (MSB).
Analysis of the maize straw nanobiochar using Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy revealed its elemental composition. The spectrum prominently displayed carbon (C) and oxygen (O), confirming the biochar's primary carbonaceous matrix, which is characteristic of materials derived from maize straw biomass. Additionally, silicon, chlorine, and potassium (K) were detected, indicating the persistence of inherent mineral components from the feedstock even after pyrolysis and activation processes. These identified elements are crucial as they influence the MSB's surface reactivity and ion-exchange capacity, consequently improving its ability to adsorb heavy metals and nutrients.
Figure 6. EDS spectrum of maize straw biochar (MSB).
3.1.6. Surface Charge (Zeta Potential)
The maize straw biochar consistently demonstrated negative zeta potential values, spanning from –16.8 mV to –41.2 mV across a pH range of 2–10. Its isoelectric point was determined to be below pH 3.0, indicating that the MSB surface maintained a negative charge under most environmentally pertinent pH conditions. This inherent negative surface charge promotes the electrostatic adsorption of cationic pollutants. Conversely, the interaction of phosphate anions with the MSB surface occurs via ligand exchange mechanisms, primarily involving metal-oxide or protonated hydroxyl sites. Zeta potential analysis was conducted on MSB to comprehensively evaluate its colloidal stability and surface charge characteristics in an aqueous medium. Further analysis, encompassing electrophoretic light scattering plots and mobility distribution curves, revealed a prominent peak centered at −17.84 mV, thereby corroborating the presence of a negatively charged surface on the MSB particles. This observed negative zeta potential is attributed to the prevalence of oxygenated functional groups, such as hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl moieties, which are formed on the MSB surface during the pyrolysis and subsequent ball-milling processes. This zeta potential value suggests that the biochar suspension exhibits moderate electrostatic stability, effectively impeding particle aggregation, particularly in neutral pH environments. Although zeta potential magnitudes exceeding |30| mV are commonly linked to high colloidal stability, the moderately negative potential recorded for MSB is sufficient to ensure uniform dispersion in an aqueous medium, consequently enhancing surface accessibility. Measurements of electrophoretic mobility and conductivity further support the existence of mobile charged species and an active interfacial layer encapsulating the biochar particles. A slight discrepancy in zeta potential between the upper and lower cell surfaces indicated minor heterogeneity in charge distribution, a common characteristic in biochar-derived nanomaterials. The diluent parameters, including temperature, refractive index, viscosity, and dielectric constant, were consistent with those of deionized water, the medium in which the measurements were performed.
Figure 7. Zeta potential and electrophoretic mobility distribution of maize straw biochar (MSB).
The particle size distribution of maize straw nanobiochar is illustrated in Figure 8. Analysis of the intensity, volume, and number distribution plots reveals that MSB particles display a multimodal size distribution, primarily falling within the 600 to 3500 nm range, with an average hydrodynamic diameter of 6959 nm. A polydispersity index of 2.305 indicates a broad size dispersion and notable particle aggregation, a characteristic frequently observed in biochar-derived nanomaterials due to surface heterogeneity and interparticle interactions. Additionally, the observed diffusion constant and high scattering intensity corroborate the nanoscale dispersion behavior of these particles in aqueous environments. These intrinsic particle attributes contribute to enhanced surface reactivity, improved suspension stability, and optimized adsorption–desorption kinetics for heavy metal ions in water treatment applications.
Figure 8. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis of maize straw biochar (MSB).
3.2. Adsorptive Performance and Mechanistic Insights
3.2.1. Adsorption Efficiency
Batch experiments, conducted in triplicate, meticulously characterized the adsorptive capacity of MSB across diverse pollutant categories, specifically heavy metals and nutrient ions, under precisely controlled conditions. Under optimal operational parameters, MSB demonstrated considerable efficacy in removing Pb2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, NH4+, and PO43⁻. The determined adsorption affinity sequence, which places Pb2+ > Cd2+ > Cu2+ > PO43⁻ > NH4+, suggests underlying physicochemical interactions influenced by factors such as ionic radius, electronegativity, hydration energy, and specific surface complexation mechanisms. The observed superior adsorption for heavy metals is attributable to their elevated charge density, which facilitates stronger interactions with the functional groups present on the adsorbent's surface. Concurrently, the uptake of phosphate primarily occurs via ligand exchange and inner-sphere complexation. Conversely, the comparatively reduced adsorption of ammonium can be attributed to its pH-dependent interconversion between its ionic and gaseous forms, thereby decreasing the concentration of the readily adsorbable species. Collectively, these findings highlight MSB's notable selectivity and substantial potential for remediation of multiple pollutants in environmental applications .
Figure 9. Comparative adsorption efficiency of maize straw biochar (MSB) toward various ions.
3.2.2. Effect of pH on Adsorption
Solution pH significantly impacted the adsorption efficacy of MSB, primarily by modulating both its surface charge characteristics and the speciation of pollutants. Optimal adsorption of heavy metals, including Pb2+, Cd2+, and Cu2+, was observed around neutral pH. This phenomenon is attributed to the deprotonation of surface functional groups, which consequently amplifies electrostatic attraction and facilitates surface complexation. These pH-dependent adsorption patterns for metal ions are consistent with observations across various biochar-based adsorbent systems. In contrast, phosphate demonstrated enhanced uptake under mildly acidic conditions. This is primarily due to increased surface protonation, which facilitates ligand exchange and inner-sphere complexation, aligning with previous observations regarding phosphate interaction with modified biochars. The adsorption of NH4+ was observed to decline at elevated pH levels, primarily owing to its conversion into gaseous NH₃, a phenomenon consistently reported in studies investigating nitrogen adsorption .
Figure 10. Effect of pH on Ion Adsorption by Maize Straw Biochar (MSB).
3.2.3. Effect of Contact Time
The adsorption kinetics of MSB revealed a swift initial uptake of pollutants within the initial 0–20 minutes, primarily facilitated by the abundance of active sites that enable rapid diffusion and attachment of adsorbates. Subsequently, as these surfaces became progressively occupied, the rate of adsorption gradually decelerated, approaching an equilibrium state between 60 and 100 minutes. This distinct two-phase pattern is characteristic of chemisorption-driven processes and demonstrates a strong correlation with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Comparable kinetic behavior has been observed and reported in numerous metal–biochar systems, including the utilization of cassava-husk biochar for the removal of Pb2+ and Cd2+ .
Figure 11. Influence of Contact Time on the Adsorption Efficiency of MSB.
3.2.4. Effect of Adsorbent Dose
An elevation in MSB dosage from 0.1 to 1.0 g·L-1 led to a substantial increase in removal efficiency, primarily attributable to the augmented availability of active sites and functional groups for pollutant sequestration. Nevertheless, beyond this concentration, the removal efficiency reached a plateau, which can be attributed to factors such as particle aggregation, saturation of adsorption sites, and insufficient pollutant concentration to sustain further uptake. Comparable dose-dependent saturation effects are widely documented in biochar adsorption studies involving heavy metals and nutrients .
Figure 12. Effect of Adsorbent Dose on the Removal Performance of MSB.
Figure 13. Temperature Influence on the Adsorption Behavior of MSB.
3.2.5. Effect of Temperature
The investigation into temperature's influence indicated a modest rise in adsorption capacity as temperatures elevated, thereby affirming the endothermic characteristics inherent to the adsorption mechanism. This observed increase in capacity is ascribed to heightened ion mobility, the thermal expansion of micropores, and an intensified activation of surface functional groups. Furthermore, thermodynamic assessments of biochar-metal adsorption systems typically disclose a positive enthalpy change, a negative Gibbs free energy change, and a positive entropy change, collectively indicative of an endothermic and spontaneous adsorption process. Such trends are congruent with findings documented in analogous biochar applications .
3.2.6. Kinetics and Isotherms
Kinetic analysis revealed that the adsorption process closely adhered to a pseudo-second-order model, indicative of chemisorption driven by electron exchange between pollutant ions and the surface's functional groups. Furthermore, equilibrium studies demonstrated a strong fit to the Langmuir–Freundlich model, thereby proposing monolayer adsorption on heterogeneous active sites. The derived maximum monolayer adsorption capacities were determined to be 249.3 mg g-1 for Pb2+, 192.6 mg g-1 for Cd2+, and 146.4 mg g-1 for PO43⁻, values that considerably exceed those reported for a substantial number of extant biochar materials. This enhanced capacity can be attributed to the optimized physiochemical properties of the modified biochar, including increased surface polarity and functional groups, which were significantly improved following KOH modification. The observed improvement in adsorption capacity and kinetics after KOH treatment is consistent with prior findings that link chemical treatments to enhanced specific surface area and cation exchange capacity .
Table 1. Kinetic and Isotherm Parameters for Pb2+, Cd2+, and PO43⁻ Adsorption.

Model / Parameter

Pb2+

Cd2+

PO43

Kinetic model

Pseudo-second-order

Pseudo-second-order

Pseudo-second-order

Pseudo-second-order parameters

k₂ (g·mg-1·min-1)

2.50 × 10⁻3

2.00 × 10⁻3

1.20 × 10⁻3

qₑ (mg·g-1)

248.9

191.8

145.6

R2 (kinetic fit)

0.9987

0.9979

0.9958

Isotherm model

Langmuir–Freundlich

Langmuir–Freundlich

Langmuir–Freundlich

Isotherm parameters

qₘₐₓ (mg·g-1)

249.3

192.6

146.4

Kₗₓ (L·mg-1)

1.05

0.82

0.65

N (heterogeneity factor)

1.30

1.20

1.12

R2 (isotherm fit)

0.9965

0.9948

0.9912

Figure 14. Effect of contact time on the adsorption capacity of MSB.
3.2.7. Thermodynamics and Reusability
Thermodynamic data revealed a negative Gibbs free energy and a positive enthalpy, affirming the spontaneous and endothermic nature of the adsorption. This endothermic characteristic indicates that the adsorption process is favored at elevated temperatures, where the increased thermal energy facilitates the overcoming of activation barriers. The negative values for the Gibbs free energy (ΔG°) consistently across various temperatures indicate that the adsorption is thermodynamically favorable and occurs spontaneously. . Investigations into reusability revealed that MSB maintained over 86% of its original adsorptive capacity after five sequential adsorption-desorption cycles utilizing a 0.1 M HCl eluent. This, coupled with minimal structural degradation, corroborates its robust operational stability for subsequent wastewater applications. The positive change in entropy further underscores that the adsorption process is entropy-driven, with the disorder at the solid-liquid interface increasing upon pollutant binding .
Figure 15. Reusability of MSB for successive adsorption–desorption cycles.
3.2.8. Proposed Adsorption Mechanism
The comprehensive adsorption mechanism, illustrated in Figure 12, encompasses several synergistic processes:
1) Cationic species are electrostatically attracted to the negatively charged surfaces of MSBs.
2) Ion exchange phenomena transpire between surface hydroxyl and carboxyl groups and dissolved ionic species.
3) Surface complexation reactions facilitate the formation of robust inner-sphere complexes.
4) Ligand exchange occurs between phosphate and oxygen-containing surface moieties associated with calcium/magnesium oxides. This synergistic framework is corroborated by discernible shifts in FTIR peaks, elemental mapping via EDS, and alterations in zeta potential measurements conducted before and after the adsorption process .
Figure 16. Proposed adsorption mechanism of heavy metals and phosphate ions on maize straw biochar (MSB).
3.3. Environmental Implications
The exceptional surface reactivity, significant adsorption capacity, and inherent recyclability of Maize Straw biochar highlight its potential as an economical and sustainable adsorbent for treating industrial and agricultural wastewaters. This transformation of maize straw waste into biochar offers a dual benefit by simultaneously addressing biomass disposal challenges and mitigating water pollution, thereby promoting the principles of a circular bioeconomy. Further modifications, such as coprecipitation, ball milling, and impregnation with clay materials, can substantially improve the biochar's sorption capabilities. These modifications create a porous structure that effectively captures micro- and nanoparticles, while enhancing stability and adsorption capacity. This often leads to an increase in specific surface area, the introduction of novel functional groups, and alterations in pore size distribution, all of which contribute to augmented pollutant removal efficiencies .
4. Conclusion
The biochar synthesized from maize straw in this investigation displayed physicochemical attributes closely resembling those of nanobiochar. These included a significantly increased specific surface area, well-developed mesoporosity, and a broad spectrum of oxygenated functional groups, all stemming from carefully controlled pyrolysis and mechanical refinement. Such nanoscale properties, coupled with a negatively charged surface and highly accessible active sites, substantially boosted the material's adsorption capability for metal ions and nutrient contaminants. The adsorption process was primarily governed by factors such as pH, contact time, adsorbent dosage, and temperature, with peak uptake observed under conditions that fostered beneficial electrostatic interactions and supported the endothermic nature of the reaction. Kinetic modeling confirmed pseudo-second-order behavior, while equilibrium data were most accurately represented by the Langmuir–Freundlich isotherm, indicating chemisorption on heterogeneous surfaces. In summary, the findings suggest that although initially produced as a biochar, its structural and functional features justify its designation as a nanobiochar, thereby emphasizing its considerable potential as a sustainable and highly efficient adsorbent for sophisticated wastewater treatment applications.
Abbreviations

MSB

Maize Straw Biochar

EDS

Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy

Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Acknowledgments
The author sincerely thanks Dr. Santosh Narayan Chadar for his valuable guidance and supervision throughout the research work. The author also acknowledges Government Auto Girls P. G. College, Sagar (M. P.) for providing the necessary infrastructure and support.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; et al. Biochar for the Treatment of Wastewater: A Critical Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 404, 126934.
[2] Zhang, H.; Zhao, X.; et al. Application of Modified Biochar for Wastewater Treatment: A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 313, 114955.
[3] Ahmed, M. J.; et al. Adsorption of Heavy Metals Using Agricultural Waste-Derived Biochar: A Review. Environ. Res. 2022, 206, 112275.
[4] Meena, R. et al. Biochar in Wastewater Treatment and Its Role in the Circular Bioeconomy. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 17, 100925.
[5] Mohan, A. et al. Biochar Production and Applications in Environmental Remediation: A Review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54(13), 847–862. `
[6] Jiang, H.; Chen, H.; Duan, Z.; Huang, Z.; Wei, K. Research Progress and Trends of Biochar in the Field of Wastewater Treatment by Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes (EAOPs): A Bibliometric Analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2023, 10, 100305.
[7] Saravanan, A.; Senthil Kumar, P. Biochar Derived Carbonaceous Material for Various Environmental Applications: Systematic Review. Environ. Res. 2022, 214 (Part 1), 113857.
[8] Zhang, D.; et al. Limitations and Challenges of Conventional Biochar in Wastewater Treatment. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 310, 119802.
[9] Singh, P.; Bhatnagar, S., biochar: A Sustainable material for Environmental Remediation. Today, 2021, 39, 101233.
[10] Zhang, R.; et al., Biochar for Removal of Emerging Pollutants: Mechanisms and Perspectives. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 440, 129856.
[11] Li, S. et al. Enhanced Adsorption of Metal Ions on Structured Biochar. Chemosphere 2022, 300, 134544.
[12] Ninkuu, V.; Liu, Z.; Qin, A.; Xie, Y.; Song, X.; Sun, X. Impact of Straw Returning on Soil Ecology and Crop Yield: A Review. Heliyon 2025, 11 (2), e41651.
[13] Fakhar, A.; Canatoy, R. C.; Galgo, S. J. C.; Rafique, M.; Sarfraz, R. Advancements in Modified Biochar Production Techniques and Soil Application: A Critical Review. Fuel 2025, 400, 135745.
[14] Guo, J. et al. Influence of Pyrolysis Temperature on Structure and Adsorption Behavior of Maize-Straw Biochar. PLoS One 2020, 15(10), e0238105.
[15] Emamverdian, A.; Khalofah, A.; Pehlivan, N.; Ghorbani, A. Utilizing Nano-Biochar and Biochar for Sustainable Heavy Metal Remediation and Enhanced Crop Tolerance: Innovative Approaches in Nano-Biosensing and Environmental Health. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 234, 121462.
[16] Zhang, X. S.; et al. Advances in Heavy Metal Wastewater Treatment with Biochar. Bioengineered 2024, 15(1), 2418675.
[17] Trivedi, Y.; et al. Biochar Potential for Pollutant Removal during Wastewater Treatment. Chemosphere 2025, 359, 146897.
[18] Ighalo, J. O.; Conradie, J.; Ohoro, C. R.; Amaku, J. F.; Oyedotun, K. O.; Maxakato, N. W.; Akpomie, K. G.; Okeke, E. S.; Olisah, C.; Malloum, A.; Adegoke, K. A. Biochar from Coconut Residues: An Overview of Production, Properties, and Applications. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 204 (Part A), 117300.
[19] Jiang, M. et al. Nanobiochar for the Remediation of Contaminated Soil and Water. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 345, 118630.
[20] Sani, M. N. H.; et al. Waste-Derived Nanobiochar: A New Avenue towards Sustainable Applications. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 905, 167251.
[21] Singh, N.; Khandelwal, N.; Tiwari, E.; et al. Interaction of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles with Microplastics: Impact of Weathering under Riverine Conditions. Water Res. 2020, 189, 116622.
[22] Chu, B.; Lou, Y.; Tan, Y.; Lin, J.; Liu, X. Nitrogen-Doped Mesoporous Activated Carbon from Lentinus Edodes Residue: An Optimized Adsorbent for Pharmaceuticals in Aqueous Solutions. Front. Chem. 2024, 12, 1419287.
[23] Zhang, X.; Lv, D.; Li, B.; et al. Polydopamine-Functionalized Magnetic Algae Composite for Efficient Removal of Polystyrene Microplastics: Mechanistic Insights and Performance. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2025, 137594.
[24] Li, Z.; Ruiyan, N.; Yu, J.; Yu, L.; Cao, D. Removal of Cadmium from Aqueous Solution by Magnetic Biochar: Adsorption Characteristics and Mechanism. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 31(4), 6543.
[25] Sisay, G. B.; Mekonnen, M. L. Mg Modified Nanobiochar from Spent Coffee Grounds: Evaluation of the Phosphate Removal Efficiency and Its Application as a Phosphorus Release Fertilizer. Res. Square 2022.
[26] Narwal, N.; Katyal, D.; Bathi, J. R. Green Synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Using Momordica Charantia: Kinetics of Removal of Heavy Metal and Microplastic Pollutants. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2025, 104189.
[27] Feng, J.; Dong, Y.; Li, H.; Tu, J.; Chen, Y. Engineered Magnetic Metal–Organic Frameworks for Efficient and Broad-Spectrum Adsorption of Micro/Nanoplastics in Beverages. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 495, 139040.
[28] Xiang, W.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Zou, W.; He, F.; Hu, X.; Tsang, D.; Ok, Y. S.; Gao, B. Biochar Technology in Wastewater Treatment: A Critical Review. Chemosphere 2020, 252, 126539.
[29] Li, S. et al. Biochar-Supported Nanocomposites for Efficient Pollutant Removal from Water. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 401, 125586.
[30] Jha, S.; Gaur, R.; Shahabuddin, S.; Tyagi, I. Biochar as Sustainable Alternative and Green Adsorbent for the Remediation of Noxious Pollutants: A Comprehensive Review. Toxics 2023, 11 (2), 117.
[31] Hefny, R.; Ibrahim, M.; Morad, D. Study of Adsorption Performance of Biochar for Heavy Metals Removal. J. Eng. Res. Rep. 2020, 19, 27–40.
[32] Gogoi, D.; Shah, A. K.; Qureshi, M.; Golder, A. K.; Peela, N. R. Silver Grafted Graphitic-Carbon Nitride Ternary Heterojunction Ag/g-C₃N4 (Urea)-g-C₃N4 (Thiourea) with Efficient Charge Transfer for Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Green H2 Production.
[33] Hasan, G. G.; et al. Nanostructured Mn@NiO Composite for Addressing Multi-Pollutant Challenges in Petroleum-Contaminated Water. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31(31), 44254.
[34] Niu, Y.; Yu, W.; Yang, S.; Wan, Q. Understanding the Relationship between Pore Size, Surface Charge Density, and Cu2+ Adsorption in Mesoporous Silica. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14(1).
[35] Zhang, S.; Wang, R.; Zhu, J.; Xie, X.; Luo, M.; Peng, H.; Liu, Y.; Feng, F.; Shi, R.; Yin, W. Two-Step Synthesis of Coconut Shell Biochar-Based Ternary Composite to Efficiently Remove Organic Pollutants by Photocatalytic Degradation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12 (3), 112963.
[36] Bhagat, R. M.; et al. Tailoring the Pore Structure of Mesoporous Composite Agro-Based Adsorbents for Enhanced Removal of Cu (II) and Ni (II) Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewater. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2025.
[37] Elbasiouny, H.; Elbehiry, F.; Al Anany, F.; Almashad, A.; Khalifa, A.; Khalil, A.; Elramady, H.; Brevik, E. Contaminate Remediation with Biochar and Nanobiochar Focusing on Food Waste Biochar: A Review. Egypt. J. Soil Sci. 2023, 63 (4), 641–658.
[38] Chaubey, A. K.; et al. Definitive Review of Nanobiochar. ACS Omega 2024, 9(15), 10289–10304.
[39] Nthwane, Y. B.; Fouda-Mbanga, B. G.; Thwala, M.; Pillay, K. J. E. T. A Comprehensive Review of Heavy Metals (Pb2+, Cd2+, Ni2+) Removal from Wastewater Using Low-Cost Adsorbents and Possible Revalorisation of Spent Adsorbents in Blood Fingerprint Application. Environ. Technol. 2025, 46 (3), 414–430.
[40] Jagadeesh, N.; Sundaram, B. Adsorption of Pollutants from Wastewater by Biochar: A Review. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2023, 9, 100226.
[41] García-Rollán, M.; Sanz-Santos, E.; Belver, C.; Bedia, J. Key Adsorbents and Influencing Factors in the Adsorption of Micro- and Nanoplastics: A Review. J. Environ. Manage. 2025, 383, 125394.
[42] Shakya, A.; Vithanage, M.; Agarwal, T. Influence of Pyrolysis Temperature on Biochar Properties and Cr (VI) Adsorption from Water with Groundnut Shell Biochars: Mechanistic Approach. Environ. Res. 2022, 215 (Pt 1), 114243.
[43] Lodhi, N.; Narayan Chadar, S.; Singh Thakur, D.; Raikwar, A. A Comprehensive Study on Biochar-Based Nanocomposites in the Removal of Organic Pollutants from Wastewater. J. Water Environ. Nanotechnol. 2024, 9(3), 302–317.
[44] Fu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guan, T. High-Value Utilization of Corn Straw: From Waste to Wealth. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14618.
[45] Zhang, Y.; et al. Highly Efficient Removal of Pb (II) from Water by Mesoporous Amino-Functionalized Silica Aerogels: Experimental, DFT Investigations, and Life Cycle Assessment. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022, 345, 112280.
[46] Kanthasamy, A.; Almatrafi, E.; Ali, I.; Sait, H. H.; Zwawi, M.; Abnisa, F.; Peng, L. C.; Ayodele, B. V. Biochar Production from Valorization of Agricultural Wastes: Data-Driven Modelling Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Fuel 2023, 351, 128948.
[47] Mohan, P. Effective Acrylamide Adsorption in Aqueous Environments Using Maize Straw Nanobiochar (MNBC). Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2024, 9, Article 377.
[48] Li, Z. et al. Biochar-Derived Carbon Materials for Energy and Environmental Applications. Fuel 2024, 339, 127440.
[49] Singh Thakur, D.; Narayan Chadar, S. The Role of Nanobiochar in Enhancing Phytoremediation: A New Frontier in Environmental Sustainability. J. Water Environ. Nanotechnol. 2025, 10(2), 200–226.
[50] Ashfaq, M.; Chauhan, D.; Talreja, N. Nanobiochar: An Emerging Material for the Environment, Energy, and Biomedical Applications. In 2024, pp 1–16.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Thakur, D. S., Chadar, S. N. (2026). Maize Straw-Derived Biochar- Nanobiochar for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment: Mechanistic Insights into Heavy Metal and Nutrient Adsorption. American Journal of Nanosciences, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajn.20261001.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Thakur, D. S.; Chadar, S. N. Maize Straw-Derived Biochar- Nanobiochar for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment: Mechanistic Insights into Heavy Metal and Nutrient Adsorption. Am. J. Nanosci. 2026, 10(1), 1-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ajn.20261001.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Thakur DS, Chadar SN. Maize Straw-Derived Biochar- Nanobiochar for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment: Mechanistic Insights into Heavy Metal and Nutrient Adsorption. Am J Nanosci. 2026;10(1):1-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ajn.20261001.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajn.20261001.11,
      author = {Deshraj Singh Thakur and Santosh Narayan Chadar},
      title = {Maize Straw-Derived Biochar- Nanobiochar for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment: Mechanistic Insights into Heavy Metal and Nutrient Adsorption},
      journal = {American Journal of Nanosciences},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-16},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajn.20261001.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajn.20261001.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajn.20261001.11},
      abstract = {The conversion of agricultural byproducts into advanced nanomaterials offers an ecologically sound strategy for addressing wastewater contamination. This study investigates biochar derived from maize straw, assessing its effectiveness as an adsorbent for the simultaneous removal of heavy metals and nutrient pollutants. The synthesis involved pyrolyzing maize straw under oxygen-limited conditions, followed by ball-milling and mortar pestle to create nanoscale particles, which significantly enhanced its surface properties for chemical reactivity. Extensive characterization using techniques such as XRD, FTIR, BET, SEM–EDS, and zeta potential measurements revealed a material with a highly porous structure, abundant oxygenated functional groups, and disordered graphitic domains. Leveraging these structural insights, batch adsorption experiments were conducted, demonstrating substantial removal capacities for lead, cadmium, copper, ammonium, and phosphate ions. Subsequent kinetic and isotherm modeling indicated that the adsorption mechanism aligned with pseudo-second-order kinetics and Langmuir–Freundlich models, suggesting a chemisorption process and monolayer adsorption onto diverse active sites. Thermodynamic analysis further characterized the process as spontaneous and endothermic. Furthermore, the synthesized biochar exhibited remarkable reusability, maintaining over contaminant removal efficiency across five regeneration cycles, thereby confirming its structural integrity and operational resilience. Collectively, these findings highlight MSB's potential to integrate waste valorization with efficient contaminant sequestration, positioning it as an environmentally engineered solution for advanced wastewater purification. This research makes a significant contribution to the development of cost-effective, renewable, and high-performance adsorbent materials, supporting the broader transition towards circular bioeconomy principles and sustainable environmental innovations.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Maize Straw-Derived Biochar- Nanobiochar for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment: Mechanistic Insights into Heavy Metal and Nutrient Adsorption
    AU  - Deshraj Singh Thakur
    AU  - Santosh Narayan Chadar
    Y1  - 2026/01/26
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajn.20261001.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajn.20261001.11
    T2  - American Journal of Nanosciences
    JF  - American Journal of Nanosciences
    JO  - American Journal of Nanosciences
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 16
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-4858
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajn.20261001.11
    AB  - The conversion of agricultural byproducts into advanced nanomaterials offers an ecologically sound strategy for addressing wastewater contamination. This study investigates biochar derived from maize straw, assessing its effectiveness as an adsorbent for the simultaneous removal of heavy metals and nutrient pollutants. The synthesis involved pyrolyzing maize straw under oxygen-limited conditions, followed by ball-milling and mortar pestle to create nanoscale particles, which significantly enhanced its surface properties for chemical reactivity. Extensive characterization using techniques such as XRD, FTIR, BET, SEM–EDS, and zeta potential measurements revealed a material with a highly porous structure, abundant oxygenated functional groups, and disordered graphitic domains. Leveraging these structural insights, batch adsorption experiments were conducted, demonstrating substantial removal capacities for lead, cadmium, copper, ammonium, and phosphate ions. Subsequent kinetic and isotherm modeling indicated that the adsorption mechanism aligned with pseudo-second-order kinetics and Langmuir–Freundlich models, suggesting a chemisorption process and monolayer adsorption onto diverse active sites. Thermodynamic analysis further characterized the process as spontaneous and endothermic. Furthermore, the synthesized biochar exhibited remarkable reusability, maintaining over contaminant removal efficiency across five regeneration cycles, thereby confirming its structural integrity and operational resilience. Collectively, these findings highlight MSB's potential to integrate waste valorization with efficient contaminant sequestration, positioning it as an environmentally engineered solution for advanced wastewater purification. This research makes a significant contribution to the development of cost-effective, renewable, and high-performance adsorbent materials, supporting the broader transition towards circular bioeconomy principles and sustainable environmental innovations.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Materials and Methods
    3. 3. Results and Discussion
    4. 4. Conclusion
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Funding
  • Acknowledgments
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information