Clinical decision-making in pediatric wound care has unique challenges due to limited research, complex terminology, and the large number of available wound products. These challenges are particularly evident in the neonatal and infant populations, whose skin physiology differs considerably from that of adults. These physiological differences include less cohesiveness at the epidermal-dermal junction and overall structural immaturity, resulting in increased permeability, an increased susceptibility to mechanical injury, along with being thinner as compared to adult skin. The common practice of adopting adult wound care practice standards to serve pediatric patients with wounds remains evident and the need for product evaluation and evidence-based guidelines specific to these populations is clear. This review aims to support clinicians making safer, age-appropriate dressing decisions by addressing this paucity of pediatric-specific standards by examining some current wound care dressings and products used in the pediatric and neonatal populations, while also providing clinical expertise that emphasizes the importance of developmental considerations for dressing selection. This review will also explore some current research on products that are used for treatment on common pediatric injuries such as burns, diaper dermatitis, extravasation injuries, and pressure injuries from medical devices. This overview reinforces the need for more specific research, product review, and evidence-based guidelines to support safe, effective, and developmentally appropriate wound care products for neonatal and pediatric patients.
| Published in | American Journal of Pediatrics (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajp.20251104.16 |
| Page(s) | 237-243 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Pediatric, Neonatal, Wound, Skin, Dressings, Infant, and Child
| [1] | Baharestani M. An Overview of Neonatal and Pediatric Wound Care knowledge and Considerations. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007; 53: 34-55. |
| [2] | King A, Stellar J, Blevins A, Shah K. Dressings and Products in Pediatric Wound Care. Adv Wound care (New Rochelle). 2014; 1: 32-334. |
| [3] | Althammer A, Pruckner S, Gehring G, et al. Systematic review of age brackets in pediatric emergency medicine literature and the development of a universal age classification for pediatric emergency patients - the Munich Age Classification System (MACS). BMC Emergency Medicine 23, (77) 2023. |
| [4] | Odom B. Chapter 8. Hamm RL, eds. In: Hamm RL, Text and Atlas of Wound Diagnosis and Treatment, 3rd ed. McGraw Hill; 2024: 241-264. |
| [5] | Pediatric Drug Development: Regulatory Considerations-Complying with the Pediatric Research Equity Act and Qualifying for Pediatric Exclusivity Under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act Guidance for Industry. Published in May 2023 Accessed on November 14th, 2024. |
| [6] | Sinha SN, Free B, Ladlow O. The art and science of selecting appropriate dressings for acute open wounds in general practice. AJGP. 2022; 51(11) |
| [7] | Dhivya S, Padma VV, Santhini E. Wound dressings- a review. BioMedicine. 2015; 5: 24-28. |
| [8] | Sussman G. Management of the Wound Environment with Dressings and Topical Agents. In: Sussman C, ed., Bates-Jensen B, ed. Wound Care: A Collaborative Practice Manual for Health Professionals. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012: 258. |
| [9] | Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS). CMS Manual System, Pub. 100-02, Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 15, Section 100, 100-03, National Coverage Determinations Manual, Chapter 1, Sections 270.4 & 270.5. Accessed Nov 14th, 2024. |
| [10] | Weir D. Wound Dressings. In: Hamm RL, 3rd ed. Text and Atlas of Wound Diagnosis and Treatment. China: McGraw-Hill Education; 2024: 434-435. |
| [11] | Odom BH, Yates C, Lowe L, VanHoose L. Pediatric Tracheostomy Wound Healing: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2020 Jan; 33(1): 36-42. |
| [12] | Weller CD, Team V, Sussman G. First-line interactive Wound dressing update: a comprehensive review of the evidence. Front Pharacol. 2020; 11: 155. |
| [13] | Sood A, Granick M, Tomaselli N. Wound Dressings and Comparative Effective Data. Adv Wound Care. 2014; 3: 511-529. |
| [14] | Xie L. Hydrocolloid dressing in preventing nasal trauma secondary to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. World J Emerg Med. 2014; 5: 218-222. |
| [15] | Irving V. Wound Care for Preterm Infants. Infant. 2006; 2(2): 102-106. |
| [16] | Vowden K, Vowden P. Wound dressings: principles and practice. Surgery. 2017; 35: 489-494. |
| [17] | Lau CT, Wong K, Tam P. Silver containing hydrofiber dressing promotes wound healing in paediatric patients with partial thickness burns. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016; 32(6): 577-581. |
| [18] | Oquendo M, Agrawal V, Reyna R, et al. Silver-impregnated hydrofiber dressing followed by delayed surgical closure for management of infants born with giant omphaloceles. J Pediatr Surg. 2015; 50(10): 1668-72. |
| [19] | Brenner M, Hilliard C, Peel G, et al. Management of pediatric skin-graft donor sites: a randomized controlled trial of three wound care products. J Burn Care Res. 2015; 36(1): 159-66. |
| [20] | Baranoski S, Ayello E, McIntosh A, Galvan, L, Scarborough P. Wound treatment options. In: Jowalak j, ed. Munden J, ed. Wound Care Essentials: Practice Principles. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA; Wolters Kluwer/ Lippeincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008: 136-171. |
| [21] | Britto EJ, Nezwek TA, Popowicz P, Robins, et al. Wound Dressings. [Updated 2024 Jan 23]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: |
| [22] | Zheng X, Li J. Comparison of the treatment of hydrocolloid and saline gauze for pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8: 20869-20875. |
| [23] | Lawrence JC. Dressings and Wound infection. Am J Surg. 1994: 167 (Suppl 1A): 1S. |
| [24] | Irving V, Bethell E, Burton F. Neonatal wound care: minimizing trauma and pain. Wounds UK. 2006; 2(1): 33-41. |
| [25] | Yusof NL, Wee A, Lim LY, Khor E, et al. Flexible chitin films as potential wound dressing materials: Wound model studies. Journal of Biomedical materials research. 2003; 66: 224-232. |
| [26] | Pawar HV, Tetteh J, Boateng. Preparation, optimization and characterization of novel wound healing film dressings loaded with streptomycin and diclofenac. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013; 102: 102-10. |
| [27] | Molan P, Rhodes T. Honey: A Biologic Wound Dressing. Wounds. 2015; 27(6): 141-151. |
| [28] | Smaropoulos E, Cremers N. The pro-healing effects of medical grade honey supported by a pediatric case series. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2019; 45: 14-18. |
| [29] | Jordan KC, Di Gennaro J, Arnim A, Stewart B. Global trends in pediatric burn injuries and care capacity from the World Health Organization Global Burn Registry. Front Pediatr. 2022. 10: 954995. |
| [30] | Gorski LA. Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infus Nurs. 2016; 39(suppl 1): S1-S159. |
| [31] | Irving V. Managing extravasation injuries in preterm neonates. Nurs Times. 2001; 97(35): 40, 43-46. |
| [32] | Stellar JJ, et al. Medical device-related pressure injuries in infants and children. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020; 47(5): 459-469. |
| [33] | Gibbs K, Dick S. Chapter 17. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. In: Hamm RL. Text and Atlas of Wound Diagnosis and Treatment, 3rd ed. McGraw Hill; 2024: 508-509. |
APA Style
Odom, B. H., Yates, C., Lowe, L. (2025). Pediatric Wound Dressings Overview and Considerations for Management. American Journal of Pediatrics, 11(4), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20251104.16
ACS Style
Odom, B. H.; Yates, C.; Lowe, L. Pediatric Wound Dressings Overview and Considerations for Management. Am. J. Pediatr. 2025, 11(4), 237-243. doi: 10.11648/j.ajp.20251104.16
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajp.20251104.16,
author = {Brian Heath Odom and Charlotte Yates and Leah Lowe},
title = {Pediatric Wound Dressings Overview and Considerations for Management},
journal = {American Journal of Pediatrics},
volume = {11},
number = {4},
pages = {237-243},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajp.20251104.16},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20251104.16},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajp.20251104.16},
abstract = {Clinical decision-making in pediatric wound care has unique challenges due to limited research, complex terminology, and the large number of available wound products. These challenges are particularly evident in the neonatal and infant populations, whose skin physiology differs considerably from that of adults. These physiological differences include less cohesiveness at the epidermal-dermal junction and overall structural immaturity, resulting in increased permeability, an increased susceptibility to mechanical injury, along with being thinner as compared to adult skin. The common practice of adopting adult wound care practice standards to serve pediatric patients with wounds remains evident and the need for product evaluation and evidence-based guidelines specific to these populations is clear. This review aims to support clinicians making safer, age-appropriate dressing decisions by addressing this paucity of pediatric-specific standards by examining some current wound care dressings and products used in the pediatric and neonatal populations, while also providing clinical expertise that emphasizes the importance of developmental considerations for dressing selection. This review will also explore some current research on products that are used for treatment on common pediatric injuries such as burns, diaper dermatitis, extravasation injuries, and pressure injuries from medical devices. This overview reinforces the need for more specific research, product review, and evidence-based guidelines to support safe, effective, and developmentally appropriate wound care products for neonatal and pediatric patients.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Pediatric Wound Dressings Overview and Considerations for Management AU - Brian Heath Odom AU - Charlotte Yates AU - Leah Lowe Y1 - 2025/12/17 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20251104.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ajp.20251104.16 T2 - American Journal of Pediatrics JF - American Journal of Pediatrics JO - American Journal of Pediatrics SP - 237 EP - 243 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-0909 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajp.20251104.16 AB - Clinical decision-making in pediatric wound care has unique challenges due to limited research, complex terminology, and the large number of available wound products. These challenges are particularly evident in the neonatal and infant populations, whose skin physiology differs considerably from that of adults. These physiological differences include less cohesiveness at the epidermal-dermal junction and overall structural immaturity, resulting in increased permeability, an increased susceptibility to mechanical injury, along with being thinner as compared to adult skin. The common practice of adopting adult wound care practice standards to serve pediatric patients with wounds remains evident and the need for product evaluation and evidence-based guidelines specific to these populations is clear. This review aims to support clinicians making safer, age-appropriate dressing decisions by addressing this paucity of pediatric-specific standards by examining some current wound care dressings and products used in the pediatric and neonatal populations, while also providing clinical expertise that emphasizes the importance of developmental considerations for dressing selection. This review will also explore some current research on products that are used for treatment on common pediatric injuries such as burns, diaper dermatitis, extravasation injuries, and pressure injuries from medical devices. This overview reinforces the need for more specific research, product review, and evidence-based guidelines to support safe, effective, and developmentally appropriate wound care products for neonatal and pediatric patients. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Central Arkansas, Conway Arkansas, the United States
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Central Arkansas, Conway Arkansas, the United States
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Central Arkansas, Conway Arkansas, the United States
Information