Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump

Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl; Mohamed Mohamed Doma

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump

Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl, Mohamed Mohamed Doma

Published in American Journal of Sports Science (Volume 4, Issue 5)

Received: 29 July 2016 Accepted: 5 August 2016 Published: 21 August 2016

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine the biomechanical indicators of jump height among varied techniques of vertical jump and examine if the rate of force development is a valid indicator for vertical jump height or not. Fifteen male high level athletes participated in this study performed three techniques of the vertical jump. Motion data were recorded by a high-speed camera at a frequency of 250 Hz, video point v 2.5 2D motion analyses for kinematic variables, and force platform (MP4060®, Bertec Corporation, Columbus, OH, USA) which measured the ground reaction force at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. The RFD was calculated as the Peak Force divided by the time taken to achieve the Peak Force, the integration was calculated by OriginPro 8.5 to calculate impulse and work. The results showed a significant difference between techniques in all analyzed variables, a positive significant correlation between vertical velocity, impulse, work, temporal variables with flight height, and the negative significant correlation between the rate of force development with flight height and jump techniques. In Conclusion, this results emphasized the importance of velocity, impulse, and work as indicators when evaluating the vertical jump.

Published in	American Journal of Sports Science (Volume 4, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11
Page(s)	77-83
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Biomechanics, Arm Swing, Jumping, Rate of Force Development

References

[1]	A.-R. Akl, “A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Vertical Jump Techniques with and Without Arm Swing,” International Journal of Sports and Physical Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14-22, 2015.
[2]	P. Floria, and A. J. Harrison, “The influence of range of motion versus application of force on vertical jump performance in prepubescent girls and adult females,” Eur J Sport Sci, vol. 14 Suppl 1, pp. S197-204, 2014.
[3]	M. H. Stone, H. S. O'Bryant, L. McCoy, R. Coglianese, M. Lehmkuhl, and B. Schilling, “Power and maximum strength relationships during performance of dynamic and static weighted jumps,” J Strength Cond Res, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 140-7, Feb, 2003.
[4]	P. Klavora, “Vertical-jump tests: a critical review,” Strength & Conditioning Journal, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 70, 2000.
[5]	S. P. Sayers, D. V. Harackiewicz, E. A. Harman, P. N. Frykman, and M. T. Rosenstein, “Cross-validation of three jump power equations,” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 572-577, 1999.
[6]	A.-R. Akl, “The role of biomechanical parameters and muscle activity during eccentric and concentric contractions in vertical jump performance ” Journal of Physical Education and Sport, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 430-437, 2013.
[7]	A.-R. Akl, “A comparison of biomechanical parameters between two methods of countermovement jump,” International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 123-128, 2013.
[8]	M. Adamson, N. Macquaide, J. Helgerud, J. Hoff, and O. J. Kemi, “Unilateral arm strength training improves contralateral peak force and rate of force development,” Eur J Appl Physiol, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 553-9, Jul, 2008.
[9]	J. Cronin, and G. Sleivert, “Challenges in understanding the influence of maximal power training on improving athletic performance,” Sports Med, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 213-34, 2005.
[10]	G. Papaiakovou, “Kinematic and kinetic differences in the execution of vertical jumps between people with good and poor ankle joint dorsiflexion,” J Sports Sci, vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 1789-96, 2013.
[11]	J. J. González-Badillo, and M. C. Marques, “Relationship between kinematic factors and countermovement jump height in trained track and field athletes,” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 3443-3447, 2010.
[12]	R. Arteaga, C. Dorado, J. Chavarren, and J. A. Calbet, “Reliability of jumping performance in active men and women under different stretch loading conditions,” J Sports Med Phys Fitness, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 26-34, Mar, 2000.
[13]	A. Richter, S. Räpple, G. Kurz, and H. Schwameder, “Countermovement jump in performance diagnostics: Use of the correct jumping technique,” European Journal of Sport Science, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 231-237, 2012.
[14]	K. A. Moran, and E. S. Wallace, “Eccentric loading and range of knee joint motion effects on performance enhancement in vertical jumping,” Hum Mov Sci, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 824-40, Dec, 2007.
[15]	J. D. Pupo, D. Detanico, and S. G. Santos, “Kinetic parameters as determinants of vertical jump performance,” Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41-51, 2012.
[16]	C. Mebes, A. Amstutz, G. Luder, H. R. Ziswiler, M. Stettler, P. M. Villiger, and L. Radlinger, “Isometric rate of force development, maximum voluntary contraction, and balance in women with and without joint hypermobility,” Arthritis Rheum, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 1665-9, Nov 15, 2008.
[17]	G. Moir, R. Sanders, C. Button, and M. Glaister, “The influence of familiarization on the reliability of force variables measured during unloaded and loaded vertical jumps,” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 140-145, 2005.
[18]	A. Lees, J. Vanrenterghem, and D. D. Clercq, “Understanding how an arm swing enhances performance in the vertical jump,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 37, pp. 1929–1940, 2004.
[19]	W. G. Hopkins, E. J. Schabort, and J. A. Hawley, “Reliability of power in physical performance tests,” Sports medicine, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 211-234, 2001.
[20]	C. McLellan, D. Lovell, and G. Gass, “The role of rate of force development on vertical jump performance,” J Strength Cond Res, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 379–385, 2011.
[21]	J. Garhammer, “A Review of Power Output Studies of Olympic and Powerlifting: Methodology, Performance Prediction, and Evaluation Tests,” The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 76-89, 1993.
[22]	M. C. Marques, and M. Izquierdo, “Kinetic and kinematic associations between vertical jump performance and 10-m sprint time,” J Strength Cond Res, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 2366-71, Aug, 2014.
[23]	A. Vanezis, and A. Lees, “A biomechanical analysis of good and poor performers of the vertical jump,” Ergonomics, vol. 48, no. 11-14, pp. 1594-1603, 2005/09/15, 2005.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl, Mohamed Mohamed Doma. (2016). Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump. American Journal of Sports Science, 4(5), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl; Mohamed Mohamed Doma. Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump. Am. J. Sports Sci. 2016, 4(5), 77-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl, Mohamed Mohamed Doma. Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump. Am J Sports Sci. 2016;4(5):77-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11,
  author = {Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl and Mohamed Mohamed Doma},
  title = {Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump},
  journal = {American Journal of Sports Science},
  volume = {4},
  number = {5},
  pages = {77-83},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajss.20160405.11},
  abstract = {The purpose of the present study was to determine the biomechanical indicators of jump height among varied techniques of vertical jump and examine if the rate of force development is a valid indicator for vertical jump height or not. Fifteen male high level athletes participated in this study performed three techniques of the vertical jump. Motion data were recorded by a high-speed camera at a frequency of 250 Hz, video point v 2.5 2D motion analyses for kinematic variables, and force platform (MP4060®, Bertec Corporation, Columbus, OH, USA) which measured the ground reaction force at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. The RFD was calculated as the Peak Force divided by the time taken to achieve the Peak Force, the integration was calculated by OriginPro 8.5 to calculate impulse and work. The results showed a significant difference between techniques in all analyzed variables, a positive significant correlation between vertical velocity, impulse, work, temporal variables with flight height, and the negative significant correlation between the rate of force development with flight height and jump techniques. In Conclusion, this results emphasized the importance of velocity, impulse, and work as indicators when evaluating the vertical jump.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump
AU  - Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl
AU  - Mohamed Mohamed Doma
Y1  - 2016/08/21
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11
T2  - American Journal of Sports Science
JF  - American Journal of Sports Science
JO  - American Journal of Sports Science
SP  - 77
EP  - 83
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8540
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11
AB  - The purpose of the present study was to determine the biomechanical indicators of jump height among varied techniques of vertical jump and examine if the rate of force development is a valid indicator for vertical jump height or not. Fifteen male high level athletes participated in this study performed three techniques of the vertical jump. Motion data were recorded by a high-speed camera at a frequency of 250 Hz, video point v 2.5 2D motion analyses for kinematic variables, and force platform (MP4060®, Bertec Corporation, Columbus, OH, USA) which measured the ground reaction force at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. The RFD was calculated as the Peak Force divided by the time taken to achieve the Peak Force, the integration was calculated by OriginPro 8.5 to calculate impulse and work. The results showed a significant difference between techniques in all analyzed variables, a positive significant correlation between vertical velocity, impulse, work, temporal variables with flight height, and the negative significant correlation between the rate of force development with flight height and jump techniques. In Conclusion, this results emphasized the importance of velocity, impulse, and work as indicators when evaluating the vertical jump.
VL  - 4
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl

Faculty of Physical Education (Abo Qir), Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Mohamed Mohamed Doma

Faculty of Physical Education (Abo Qir), Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl, Mohamed Mohamed Doma. (2016). Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump. American Journal of Sports Science, 4(5), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl; Mohamed Mohamed Doma. Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump. Am. J. Sports Sci. 2016, 4(5), 77-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl, Mohamed Mohamed Doma. Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump. Am J Sports Sci. 2016;4(5):77-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11,
  author = {Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl and Mohamed Mohamed Doma},
  title = {Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump},
  journal = {American Journal of Sports Science},
  volume = {4},
  number = {5},
  pages = {77-83},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajss.20160405.11},
  abstract = {The purpose of the present study was to determine the biomechanical indicators of jump height among varied techniques of vertical jump and examine if the rate of force development is a valid indicator for vertical jump height or not. Fifteen male high level athletes participated in this study performed three techniques of the vertical jump. Motion data were recorded by a high-speed camera at a frequency of 250 Hz, video point v 2.5 2D motion analyses for kinematic variables, and force platform (MP4060®, Bertec Corporation, Columbus, OH, USA) which measured the ground reaction force at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. The RFD was calculated as the Peak Force divided by the time taken to achieve the Peak Force, the integration was calculated by OriginPro 8.5 to calculate impulse and work. The results showed a significant difference between techniques in all analyzed variables, a positive significant correlation between vertical velocity, impulse, work, temporal variables with flight height, and the negative significant correlation between the rate of force development with flight height and jump techniques. In Conclusion, this results emphasized the importance of velocity, impulse, and work as indicators when evaluating the vertical jump.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Biomechanical Indicators of Jump Height Among Varied Techniques of Vertical Jump
AU  - Abdel-Rahman Ibrahim Akl
AU  - Mohamed Mohamed Doma
Y1  - 2016/08/21
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11
T2  - American Journal of Sports Science
JF  - American Journal of Sports Science
JO  - American Journal of Sports Science
SP  - 77
EP  - 83
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8540
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20160405.11
AB  - The purpose of the present study was to determine the biomechanical indicators of jump height among varied techniques of vertical jump and examine if the rate of force development is a valid indicator for vertical jump height or not. Fifteen male high level athletes participated in this study performed three techniques of the vertical jump. Motion data were recorded by a high-speed camera at a frequency of 250 Hz, video point v 2.5 2D motion analyses for kinematic variables, and force platform (MP4060®, Bertec Corporation, Columbus, OH, USA) which measured the ground reaction force at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. The RFD was calculated as the Peak Force divided by the time taken to achieve the Peak Force, the integration was calculated by OriginPro 8.5 to calculate impulse and work. The results showed a significant difference between techniques in all analyzed variables, a positive significant correlation between vertical velocity, impulse, work, temporal variables with flight height, and the negative significant correlation between the rate of force development with flight height and jump techniques. In Conclusion, this results emphasized the importance of velocity, impulse, and work as indicators when evaluating the vertical jump.
VL  - 4
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download