Unstable surfaces have been used in resistance training, but there are no studies that compared energy cost between stable and unstable surfaces in circuit weight training. This study compared energy cost, post-exercise peak blood lactate and perceived exertion rate between stable surface and unstable surface. Twenty healthy men (24.65 ± 3.48 years, 1.79 ± 0.08 m, 80.61 ± 9.14 kg and 11.86 ± 3.49% body fat) participated in the study. Test and retest of 15 maximum repetitions were performed on stable and unstable surfaces to define workload. The circuit weight training consisted of one set of 15 repetitions at 80% of 15 maximum repetitions in bench press, back squat, rowing bent prone, dead-lift, shoulder press, elbow extension and elbow flexion. Energy cost was measured by indirect calorimetry during and post-circuit weight training. Peak blood lactate and perceived exertion rate were measured post-exercise. Total energy cost was higher on unstable surface compared to stable surface (70.7 ± 10.0 vs. 66.6 ± 7.8 kcal; p = 0.01), as was perceived exertion rate (8.1 ± 0.9 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3; p = 0.02). However, peak blood lactate was higher on stable than unstable surfaces (13.6 ± 2.6 vs. 12.5 ± 1.9 mmol·L−1; p = 0.05). In conclusion, circuit weight training on unstable surfaces can be performed with less weight in comparison to stable surfaces, thereby lowering mechanical stress on joints and bones, while still providing a higher metabolic impact.
| Published in | American Journal of Sports Science (Volume 6, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajss.20180604.12 |
| Page(s) | 137-143 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Circuit Method, Resistance Training, Energy Expenditure
| [1] | S. Buitrago, N. Wirtz, U. Flenker, and H. Kleinoder. Physiological and metabolic responses as function of the mechanical load in resistance exercise. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, vol. 39, pp. 345-350, March 2014. |
| [2] | D. N. Vandenbrink, N. J. Petrella, E. V. Neufeld, B. A. Dolezal, and D. P. Maclennan. Metabolic responses to a loaded movement training workout. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, vol. 58, pp. 35-42, January 2018. |
| [3] | M. J. Benton, G. T. Waggener, and P. D. Swan. Effect of Training Status on Oxygen Consumption in Women After Resistance Exercise. J Strength Cond Res, vol. 30, pp. 800-806, March 2016. |
| [4] | R. L. Da Silva, M. A. Brentano, and L. F. Kruel. Effects of different strength training methods on postexercise energetic expenditure. J Strength Cond Res, vol. 24, pp. 2255-2260, August 2010. |
| [5] | R. S. Pinto, R. Lupi, and M. A. Brentano. Metabolic responses to strength training: An emphasis on energy expenditure. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum, vol. 13, pp. 150-157, October 2011. |
| [6] | P. Panza, J. M. Vianna, V. O. Damasceno, L. C. Aranda, C. M. Bentes, and J. Novaes. Energy cost, number of maximum repetitions, and rating of perceived exertion in resistance exercise with stable and unstable platforms. JEPonline, vol. 17, pp. 77-87, August 2014. |
| [7] | A. R. Kelleher, K. J. Hackney, T. J. Fairchild, S. Keslacy, and L. L. Ploutz-Snyder. The metabolic costs of reciprocal supersets vs. traditional resistance exercise in young recreationally active adults. J Strength Cond Res, vol. 24, pp. 1043-1051, April 2010. |
| [8] | J. M. Kohler, S. P. Flanagan, and W. C. Whiting. Muscle activation patterns while lifting stable and unstable loads on stable and unstable surfaces. J Strength Cond Res, vol. 24, pp. 313-321, February 2010. |
| [9] | E. Zemkova. Instability resistance training for health and performance. J Tradit Complement Med, vol. 7, pp. 245-250, June 2016. |
| [10] | S. Romero-Arenas, M. Martínez-Pascual, and P. E. Alcaraz. Impact of Resistance Circuit Training on Neuromuscular, Cardiorespiratory and Body Composition Adaptations in the Elderly. Aging Dis, vol. 4, pp. 256-263, October 2013. |
| [11] | P. E. Alcaraz, J. Perez-Gomez, M. Chavarrias, and A. J. Blazevich. Similarity in adaptations to high-resistance circuit vs. traditional strength training in resistance-trained men. J Strength Cond Res, vol. 25, pp. 2519-2527, September 2011. |
| [12] | V. M. Reis, R. S. Junior, A. Zajac, and D. R. Oliveira, Energy cost of resistance exercises: an uptade. J Hum Kinet, vol. 29, pp. 33-39, September 2011. |
| [13] | R. R. Aniceto, R. M. Ritti-Dias, C. B. Scott, F. F. M. D. Lima, T. M. P. Prazeres, and W. L. D. Prado. Acute effects of different weight training methods on energy expenditure in trained men. Rev Bras Med Esporte, vol. 19, pp. 181-185, June 2013. |
| [14] | B. L. Skidmore, M. T. Jones, M. Blegen, and T. D. Matthews. Acute effects of three different circuit weight training protocols on blood lactate, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion in recreationally active women. J Sports Sci Med, vol. 11, pp. 660-668, December 2012. |
| [15] | P. Marshall, and B. Murphy. Changes in muscle activity and perceived exertion during exercises performed on a swiss ball. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, vol. 31, pp. 376-383, August 2006. |
| [16] | R. F. Bacurau, G. A. Monteiro, C. Ugrinowitsch, V. Tricoli, L. F. Cabral, and M. S. Aoki. Acute effect of a ballistic and a static stretching exercise bout on flexibility and maximal strength. J Strength Cond Res, vol. 23, pp. 304-308, January 2009. |
| [17] | A. Cohen-Solal, T. Laperche, D. Morvan, M. Geneves, B. Caviezel, and R. Gourgon. Prolonged kinetics of recovery of oxygen consumption after maximal graded exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. Analysis with gas exchange measurements and NMR spectroscopy. Circulation, vol. 91, pp. 2924-2932, June 1995. |
| [18] | C. B. Scott, B. H. Leighton, K. J. Ahearn, and J. J. McManus. Aerobic, anaerobic, and excess postexercise oxygen consumption energy expenditure of muscular endurance and strength: 1-set of bench press to muscular fatigue. J Strength Cond Res, vol. 25, pp. 903-908, April 2011. |
| [19] | R. J. Robertson, F. L. Goss, N. F. Boer, J. A. Peoples, A. J. Foreman, I. M. Dabayebeh, and T. Thompkins. Children's OMNI scale of perceived exertion: mixed gender and race validation. Med Sci Sports Exerc, vol. 32, pp. 452-458, February 2000. |
| [20] | R. J. Robertson, F. L. Goss, J. Rutkowski, B. Lenz, C. Dixon, J. Timmer, and J. Andreacci. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, vol. 35, pp. 333-341, February 2003. |
| [21] | M. R. Rhea. Determining the magnitude of treatment effects in strength training research through the use of the effect size. J Strength Cond Res, vol. 18, pp. 918-920, November 2004. |
| [22] | P. J. Benito, M. Alvarez-Sanchez, V. Diaz, E. Morencos, A. B. Peinado, R. Cupeiro, and N. Maffulli. Cardiovascular Fitness and Energy Expenditure Response during a Combined Aerobic and Circuit Weight Training Protocol. PLoS One, vol. 11, pp. 1-14, November 2016. |
| [23] | Peinado, P. J. B., Sánchez, M. Á., Martínez, E. M., Coto, R. C., Molina, V. D., Lozano, A. B. P., & Montero, F. J. C. Aerobic and anaerobic energy expenditure in a circuit with loads at six different intensities. Rev Int Cienc Deporte, vol. 7, pp. 174-190, July 2011. |
| [24] | K. M. Lagally, J. Cordero, J. Good, D. D. Brown, and S. T. McCaw. Physiologic and metabolic responses to a continuous functional resistance exercise workout. J Strength Cond Res, vol. 23, pp. 373-379, March 2009. |
| [25] | L. A. Gotshalk, R. A. Berger, and W. J. Kraemer. Cardiovascular responses to a high-volume continuous circuit resistance training protocol. J Strength Cond Res, vol. 18, pp. 760-764, November 2004. |
| [26] | C. E. Garber, B. Blissmer, M. R. Deschenes, B. A. Franklin, M. J. Lamonte, I. M. Lee, and D. P. Swain. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc, vol. 43, pp. 1334-1359, July 2011. |
APA Style
Liliane Cunha Aranda, Jeferson Macedo Vianna, Elder Sousa Dutra, Francisco Zacaron Werneck, Jefferson da Silva Novaes, et al. (2018). Circuit Weight Training on Stable and Unstable Surfaces: Differences in Energy Cost, Blood Lactate and Rate of Perceived Exertion. American Journal of Sports Science, 6(4), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20180604.12
ACS Style
Liliane Cunha Aranda; Jeferson Macedo Vianna; Elder Sousa Dutra; Francisco Zacaron Werneck; Jefferson da Silva Novaes, et al. Circuit Weight Training on Stable and Unstable Surfaces: Differences in Energy Cost, Blood Lactate and Rate of Perceived Exertion. Am. J. Sports Sci. 2018, 6(4), 137-143. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20180604.12
AMA Style
Liliane Cunha Aranda, Jeferson Macedo Vianna, Elder Sousa Dutra, Francisco Zacaron Werneck, Jefferson da Silva Novaes, et al. Circuit Weight Training on Stable and Unstable Surfaces: Differences in Energy Cost, Blood Lactate and Rate of Perceived Exertion. Am J Sports Sci. 2018;6(4):137-143. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20180604.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajss.20180604.12,
author = {Liliane Cunha Aranda and Jeferson Macedo Vianna and Elder Sousa Dutra and Francisco Zacaron Werneck and Jefferson da Silva Novaes and Jorge Roberto Perrout de Lima and Victor Manuel Machado de Ribeiro dos Reis},
title = {Circuit Weight Training on Stable and Unstable Surfaces: Differences in Energy Cost, Blood Lactate and Rate of Perceived Exertion},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Science},
volume = {6},
number = {4},
pages = {137-143},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajss.20180604.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20180604.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajss.20180604.12},
abstract = {Unstable surfaces have been used in resistance training, but there are no studies that compared energy cost between stable and unstable surfaces in circuit weight training. This study compared energy cost, post-exercise peak blood lactate and perceived exertion rate between stable surface and unstable surface. Twenty healthy men (24.65 ± 3.48 years, 1.79 ± 0.08 m, 80.61 ± 9.14 kg and 11.86 ± 3.49% body fat) participated in the study. Test and retest of 15 maximum repetitions were performed on stable and unstable surfaces to define workload. The circuit weight training consisted of one set of 15 repetitions at 80% of 15 maximum repetitions in bench press, back squat, rowing bent prone, dead-lift, shoulder press, elbow extension and elbow flexion. Energy cost was measured by indirect calorimetry during and post-circuit weight training. Peak blood lactate and perceived exertion rate were measured post-exercise. Total energy cost was higher on unstable surface compared to stable surface (70.7 ± 10.0 vs. 66.6 ± 7.8 kcal; p = 0.01), as was perceived exertion rate (8.1 ± 0.9 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3; p = 0.02). However, peak blood lactate was higher on stable than unstable surfaces (13.6 ± 2.6 vs. 12.5 ± 1.9 mmol·L−1; p = 0.05). In conclusion, circuit weight training on unstable surfaces can be performed with less weight in comparison to stable surfaces, thereby lowering mechanical stress on joints and bones, while still providing a higher metabolic impact.},
year = {2018}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Circuit Weight Training on Stable and Unstable Surfaces: Differences in Energy Cost, Blood Lactate and Rate of Perceived Exertion AU - Liliane Cunha Aranda AU - Jeferson Macedo Vianna AU - Elder Sousa Dutra AU - Francisco Zacaron Werneck AU - Jefferson da Silva Novaes AU - Jorge Roberto Perrout de Lima AU - Victor Manuel Machado de Ribeiro dos Reis Y1 - 2018/10/11 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20180604.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajss.20180604.12 T2 - American Journal of Sports Science JF - American Journal of Sports Science JO - American Journal of Sports Science SP - 137 EP - 143 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8540 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20180604.12 AB - Unstable surfaces have been used in resistance training, but there are no studies that compared energy cost between stable and unstable surfaces in circuit weight training. This study compared energy cost, post-exercise peak blood lactate and perceived exertion rate between stable surface and unstable surface. Twenty healthy men (24.65 ± 3.48 years, 1.79 ± 0.08 m, 80.61 ± 9.14 kg and 11.86 ± 3.49% body fat) participated in the study. Test and retest of 15 maximum repetitions were performed on stable and unstable surfaces to define workload. The circuit weight training consisted of one set of 15 repetitions at 80% of 15 maximum repetitions in bench press, back squat, rowing bent prone, dead-lift, shoulder press, elbow extension and elbow flexion. Energy cost was measured by indirect calorimetry during and post-circuit weight training. Peak blood lactate and perceived exertion rate were measured post-exercise. Total energy cost was higher on unstable surface compared to stable surface (70.7 ± 10.0 vs. 66.6 ± 7.8 kcal; p = 0.01), as was perceived exertion rate (8.1 ± 0.9 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3; p = 0.02). However, peak blood lactate was higher on stable than unstable surfaces (13.6 ± 2.6 vs. 12.5 ± 1.9 mmol·L−1; p = 0.05). In conclusion, circuit weight training on unstable surfaces can be performed with less weight in comparison to stable surfaces, thereby lowering mechanical stress on joints and bones, while still providing a higher metabolic impact. VL - 6 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: