Athletic performance depends on athletic ability as well as body build. Training is a crucial factor for success. For this training, knowledge of initial levels of fitness as well as body build both is important. Physical training alters body build as well as internal physiological system in athletes. The main purpose of this study is to provide categorization of different lung capacities in trained athletes according to their body build. One hundred forty eight trained male athletes participated whose age was between 10-20 years. They were classified into endomorph, mesomorph and ectomorph. Different lung capacities were measured. One way ANOVA was done to compare three body types. Scheffe’s post hoc test was also performed. Lung variables such as SVC, FVC, FEV1 and PEFR are found to be significantly different among endomorph, mesomorph and ectomorph. SVC and FEV1 was found to be significantly highest in ectomorph and lowest in endomorphs. It might be due to least amount of abdominal fat and stature. FVC and PEFR were found to be highest in mesomorph and lowest in endomorphs. Mesomorphs possess maximum muscle mass and so highest FVC. Significant differences in SVC, FVC, FEV1 and PEFR indicates somatotypes have definite role in different lung capacities among trained athletes. It reflects that somatotypes should also be considered during assessments of different lung capacities in trained athletes. Endomorphs have poorest lung capacities. It might be due to more fat accumulation in their body.
| Published in | American Journal of Sports Science (Volume 7, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajss.20190702.14 |
| Page(s) | 72-77 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Morphometric, Professional Players, Lung Parameters
| [1] | Silvestre R, Kraemer WJ, West C, Judelson DA, Spiering BA, Vingren JL, Hatfield DL, Anderson JM, MareshCM. Body composition and physical performance during a National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I men's soccer season. J Strength Cond Res. 2006 Nov; 20 (4): 962-70. |
| [2] | Matiegka J. The testing of physical efficiency. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. (1921); 4 (3): 223–230. |
| [3] | Sheldon WH (1940). The Varieties of Human Physique. New York: Harper and Brothers. |
| [4] | Gutnik B, Zuoza A, Zuozienė I, Alekrinskis A, Nash D, Scherbina S. Body physique and dominant somatotype in elite and low-profile athletes with different specializations. Medicina. (2015); 51 (4): 247–252. |
| [5] | Ponds V, Riera J, Galilea PA, Drobnic F, Banquells M, Ruiz, O. Anthropometric characteristics, body composition, and somatotype sports. (2015); 50 (186): 65–72. |
| [6] | Singh HD. Ventilatory Function tests, Normal Standards in Male Adults. Ind J Med Prof 1959; 5: 2483-2486. 7. |
| [7] | Jain SK, Ramaiah TJ. Normal Standard of Pulmonary Function Tests for healthy Indians 15- 40 years old, comparison of different prediction equations. Ind J Med Res 1969; 57: 1433-1466. |
| [8] | Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Chaganti S, Jindal SK. Diurnal variation in peak expiratory flow in healthy young adults. The Indian J Chest Dis & Allied Sci 2000; 42: 15–19. |
| [9] | Gupta P, Gupta L, Ajmer RL. Lung Functions in Rajasthan Subjects. Ind J. Physiol. Pharmacol 1979; 23 (1): 9-14. |
| [10] | Boutellier U, Büchel R, Kundert A, Spengler C. The respiratory system as an exercise limiting factor in normal trained subjects. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 1992; 65 (4): 347-353. |
| [11] | Harms CA, Wetter TJ, St Croix CM, Pegelow DF, Dempsey JA. Effects of respiratory muscle work on exercise performance. Journal of Applied Physiology 2000; 89 (1): 131-138. |
| [12] | Hildebrean JN, Georice I, Clements JA. Surfactant release in exercised rat lung stimulated by air inflation. Journal of Applied Physiology 1981; 51: 905-910. |
| [13] | Wassreman K, Gitt A, Weyde I, Eckel HE. Lung function changes and exercise-induced ventilatory responses to external restive loads in normal subjects. Respiration 1995; 62 (4): 177-84. |
| [14] | Twick IW, Staal BJ, Brinknian MN, Kemper HC, Van Mechelen W. Tracking of lung function parameters and the longitudinal relationship with lifestyle. EurResp J 1998; 1 2 (3): 627-34. |
| [15] | Heath, B. H., & Carter, J. E. L. (1967). A modified somatotype method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 27, 57-74. |
| [16] | Bhatti U, Rani K, Memon MQJ Ayub Med CollAbbottabad. Variation in lung volumes and capacities among young males in relation to height. 2014 Apr-Jun; 26 (2): 200-2. |
| [17] | Myrianthefs P, Grammatopoulou I, Katsoulas T, Baltopoulos G. Spirometry may underestimate airway obstruction in professional Greek athletes. ClinRespir J. 2014; 8 (2): 240–7. |
| [18] | Myrianthefs P, Baltopoulos G. A higher tidal volume may be used for athletes according to measured FVC. Scientific World Journal. 2013; 2013: 526138. |
| [19] | Lemaitre F, Coquart JB, Chavallard F, Castres I, Mucci P, Costalat G, et al. Effect of additional respiratory muscle endurance training in young well-trained swimmers. J Sports Sci Med. 2013; 12 (4): 630–8. |
| [20] | Rong C, Bei H, Yun M, Yuzhu W, Mingwu Z. Lung function and cytokine levels in professional athletes. J Asthma. 2008; 45 (4): 343–8. |
| [21] | Park JE, Chung JH, Lee KH, et al. The effect of body composition on pulmonary function. TubercRespir Dis 2012; 72: 433–40. |
| [22] | Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. ATS/ERS Task force: standardization of spirometry. EurRespir J 2005; 26: 319–38. |
| [23] | Galanis N, Farmakiotis D, Kouraki K, et al. Forced expiratory volume in one second and peak expiratory flow rate values in non-professional male tennis players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2006; 46: 128–31. |
| [24] | Guenette JA, Witt JD, McKenzie DC, et al. Respiratory mechanics during exercise in endurance-trained men and women. J Physiol 2007; 581: 1309–22. |
| [25] | Khosravi M, Tayebi SM, Safari H. Single and concurrent effects of endurance and resistance training on pulmonary function. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2013; 16: 628–34. |
| [26] | Maiolo C, Mohamed EI, Carbonelli MG. Body composition and respiratory function. Acta Diabetol2003; 40 (Suppl 1): s32–s38. |
| [27] | Ian Gregg and A. J. Nunn. Peak Expiratory Flow in Normal Subjects. Br Med J. 1973 Aug 4; 3 (5874): 282–284. |
APA Style
Pritha Chatterjee, Anupam Bandyopadhyay, Priyam Chatterjee, Priya Nandy. (2019). Assessment and Comparative Analysis of Different Lung Capacities in Trained Athletes According to Somatotype. American Journal of Sports Science, 7(2), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20190702.14
ACS Style
Pritha Chatterjee; Anupam Bandyopadhyay; Priyam Chatterjee; Priya Nandy. Assessment and Comparative Analysis of Different Lung Capacities in Trained Athletes According to Somatotype. Am. J. Sports Sci. 2019, 7(2), 72-77. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20190702.14
AMA Style
Pritha Chatterjee, Anupam Bandyopadhyay, Priyam Chatterjee, Priya Nandy. Assessment and Comparative Analysis of Different Lung Capacities in Trained Athletes According to Somatotype. Am J Sports Sci. 2019;7(2):72-77. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20190702.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajss.20190702.14,
author = {Pritha Chatterjee and Anupam Bandyopadhyay and Priyam Chatterjee and Priya Nandy},
title = {Assessment and Comparative Analysis of Different Lung Capacities in Trained Athletes According to Somatotype},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Science},
volume = {7},
number = {2},
pages = {72-77},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajss.20190702.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20190702.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajss.20190702.14},
abstract = {Athletic performance depends on athletic ability as well as body build. Training is a crucial factor for success. For this training, knowledge of initial levels of fitness as well as body build both is important. Physical training alters body build as well as internal physiological system in athletes. The main purpose of this study is to provide categorization of different lung capacities in trained athletes according to their body build. One hundred forty eight trained male athletes participated whose age was between 10-20 years. They were classified into endomorph, mesomorph and ectomorph. Different lung capacities were measured. One way ANOVA was done to compare three body types. Scheffe’s post hoc test was also performed. Lung variables such as SVC, FVC, FEV1 and PEFR are found to be significantly different among endomorph, mesomorph and ectomorph. SVC and FEV1 was found to be significantly highest in ectomorph and lowest in endomorphs. It might be due to least amount of abdominal fat and stature. FVC and PEFR were found to be highest in mesomorph and lowest in endomorphs. Mesomorphs possess maximum muscle mass and so highest FVC. Significant differences in SVC, FVC, FEV1 and PEFR indicates somatotypes have definite role in different lung capacities among trained athletes. It reflects that somatotypes should also be considered during assessments of different lung capacities in trained athletes. Endomorphs have poorest lung capacities. It might be due to more fat accumulation in their body.},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment and Comparative Analysis of Different Lung Capacities in Trained Athletes According to Somatotype AU - Pritha Chatterjee AU - Anupam Bandyopadhyay AU - Priyam Chatterjee AU - Priya Nandy Y1 - 2019/06/29 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20190702.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajss.20190702.14 T2 - American Journal of Sports Science JF - American Journal of Sports Science JO - American Journal of Sports Science SP - 72 EP - 77 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8540 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20190702.14 AB - Athletic performance depends on athletic ability as well as body build. Training is a crucial factor for success. For this training, knowledge of initial levels of fitness as well as body build both is important. Physical training alters body build as well as internal physiological system in athletes. The main purpose of this study is to provide categorization of different lung capacities in trained athletes according to their body build. One hundred forty eight trained male athletes participated whose age was between 10-20 years. They were classified into endomorph, mesomorph and ectomorph. Different lung capacities were measured. One way ANOVA was done to compare three body types. Scheffe’s post hoc test was also performed. Lung variables such as SVC, FVC, FEV1 and PEFR are found to be significantly different among endomorph, mesomorph and ectomorph. SVC and FEV1 was found to be significantly highest in ectomorph and lowest in endomorphs. It might be due to least amount of abdominal fat and stature. FVC and PEFR were found to be highest in mesomorph and lowest in endomorphs. Mesomorphs possess maximum muscle mass and so highest FVC. Significant differences in SVC, FVC, FEV1 and PEFR indicates somatotypes have definite role in different lung capacities among trained athletes. It reflects that somatotypes should also be considered during assessments of different lung capacities in trained athletes. Endomorphs have poorest lung capacities. It might be due to more fat accumulation in their body. VL - 7 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: