Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Causes and Effects of Academic Staff Turnover Intentions on Organizational Performance: Comparative Studies on Ambo and Haramaya Universities

Received: 28 August 2024     Accepted: 14 September 2024     Published: 18 October 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the causes of academic staff turnover intentions and their impact on the performance of Ambo and Haramaya Universities. The study primarily focused on factors such as socio-demographic characteristics, job satisfaction, compensation, work environment, and leadership style as determinants of academic staff turnover. A stratified sampling method was used to determine the sample population, while a convenience sampling technique was employed to collect data from the sample. Out of a total population of 1,672 academic staff members, a sample size of 143 was determined using Yamane's sampling formula. Of the 143 distributed questionnaires, 133 were returned, with 10 remaining uncollected. Both primary and secondary data sources were utilized, with primary data gathered through questionnaires. The research was designed as a descriptive and explanatory study to both describe relevant statistical data and explain the causes and effects observed in the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, and numerical values, as well as inferential statistics, such as correlation analyses and multiple regression models. University performance was measured through various indicators, including stakeholder engagement and satisfaction, revenue generation from business entities, quality of education, research and community services, the expansion of universities with modern facilities, and the number of academic programs offered. The findings revealed that the causes of academic staff turnover have a positive relationship with university performance, while turnover itself has a negative relationship with university performance. This implies that if universities effectively manage the causes of academic staff turnover, their overall performance is likely to improve.

Published in European Business & Management (Volume 10, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ebm.20241004.12
Page(s) 69-75
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Causes, Effects, Turnover, Universities, Performance

References
[1] Meaghan, W. (2002). The retention of intellectual employees in knowledge-based organizations: A case study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 113-122.
[2] Abbasi, S. M., & Hollman, K. W. (2000). Turnover: The real bottom line. Public Personnel Management, 29(3), 333-342.
[3] Beam, D. (2009). The cost of employee turnover. Human Resource Management Review, 19(1), 40-50.
[4] Rampur, N. (2009). Performance appraisals and employee turnover. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3), 255-268.
[5] Hatch, M. J., & Dyer, W. G. (2004). Human resource management and organizational performance: Evidence from the public sector. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 44-55.
[6] Mwadiani, B. (2002). The role of academic staff in universities' success. Journal of Higher Education, 10(1), 1-14.
[7] Pienaar, J. (2008). The impact of leadership style on staff retention in the higher education sector. Leadership and Management Review, 4(2), 87-100.
[8] Teferra, D., & Altbach, P. G. (2004). Higher education and development: The role of universities. World Bank Technical Paper Series.
[9] Samuel, M. O., & Chipunza, C. (2009). Employee retention and turnover: Using motivational theories to understand the turnover process. African Journal of Business Management, 3(5), 142-148.
[10] Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., & Nijs, S. (2009). The impact of different types of job satisfaction on turnover intentions. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(4), 971-989.
[11] Nawaz, A., Rahman, K., & Siraji, M. (2009). The relationship between employee turnover and organizational performance. Journal of Business Studies, 15(2), 132-145.
[12] Osamu, K. (1994). Satisfaction and turnover intentions: A balance theory perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(2), 200-216.
[13] Premack, S., & Davis, D. (1992). Expectations and job satisfaction: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(5), 569-585.
[14] Morrell, K. (2006). The unfolding model of employee turnover: A retrospective classification of voluntary turnover. Employee Relations, 28(3), 282-296.
[15] Ut Lon, I. M. (2010). Compensation and turnover: A comprehensive review. Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(3), 233-247.
[16] Rosse, J. G. (2010). Leadership styles and their impact on employee turnover. Journal of Leadership Studies, 14(2), 1-10.
[17] Abdali, H. (2011). Factors affecting employee turnover in a higher education institution in Malaysia. Journal of Human Resource Management, 1(1), 23-30.
[18] Swanepoel, B. (2008). Leadership and its effect on employee retention. Journal of Business Research, 18(2), 1-10.
[19] Lambert, E. G. (2006). The impact of work environment on job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(1), 50-63.
[20] Altbach, P. G. (2012). The costs and benefits of academic staff turnover. Higher Education Review, 44(2), 23-45.
[21] Parker, C., & Skitmore, M. (2003). Socio-demographic influences on employee turnover. Personnel Review, 32(3), 232-246.
[22] Aziri, B. (2011). Job satisfaction: A literature review. Management Research and Practice, 3(4), 77-86.
[23] Randhawa, G. (2007). Human resource management. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers & Distributors.
[24] Feng, X., & Angeline, J. (2010). The relationship between job satisfaction and turnover intention. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(5), 1137-1153.
[25] Judge, T. A., Hulin, C. L., & Dalal, R. S. (2009). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1036-1053.
[26] Shamsuzzoha, A. (2003). The role of compensation in reducing employee turnover. Human Resource Management Journal, 13(2), 27-42.
[27] Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tolossa, A. T. (2024). Causes and Effects of Academic Staff Turnover Intentions on Organizational Performance: Comparative Studies on Ambo and Haramaya Universities. European Business & Management, 10(4), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ebm.20241004.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tolossa, A. T. Causes and Effects of Academic Staff Turnover Intentions on Organizational Performance: Comparative Studies on Ambo and Haramaya Universities. Eur. Bus. Manag. 2024, 10(4), 69-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ebm.20241004.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tolossa AT. Causes and Effects of Academic Staff Turnover Intentions on Organizational Performance: Comparative Studies on Ambo and Haramaya Universities. Eur Bus Manag. 2024;10(4):69-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ebm.20241004.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ebm.20241004.12,
      author = {Abebe Techan Tolossa},
      title = {Causes and Effects of Academic Staff Turnover Intentions on Organizational Performance: Comparative Studies on Ambo and Haramaya Universities
    },
      journal = {European Business & Management},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {69-75},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ebm.20241004.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ebm.20241004.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ebm.20241004.12},
      abstract = {The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the causes of academic staff turnover intentions and their impact on the performance of Ambo and Haramaya Universities. The study primarily focused on factors such as socio-demographic characteristics, job satisfaction, compensation, work environment, and leadership style as determinants of academic staff turnover. A stratified sampling method was used to determine the sample population, while a convenience sampling technique was employed to collect data from the sample. Out of a total population of 1,672 academic staff members, a sample size of 143 was determined using Yamane's sampling formula. Of the 143 distributed questionnaires, 133 were returned, with 10 remaining uncollected. Both primary and secondary data sources were utilized, with primary data gathered through questionnaires. The research was designed as a descriptive and explanatory study to both describe relevant statistical data and explain the causes and effects observed in the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, and numerical values, as well as inferential statistics, such as correlation analyses and multiple regression models. University performance was measured through various indicators, including stakeholder engagement and satisfaction, revenue generation from business entities, quality of education, research and community services, the expansion of universities with modern facilities, and the number of academic programs offered. The findings revealed that the causes of academic staff turnover have a positive relationship with university performance, while turnover itself has a negative relationship with university performance. This implies that if universities effectively manage the causes of academic staff turnover, their overall performance is likely to improve.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Causes and Effects of Academic Staff Turnover Intentions on Organizational Performance: Comparative Studies on Ambo and Haramaya Universities
    
    AU  - Abebe Techan Tolossa
    Y1  - 2024/10/18
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ebm.20241004.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ebm.20241004.12
    T2  - European Business & Management
    JF  - European Business & Management
    JO  - European Business & Management
    SP  - 69
    EP  - 75
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-5811
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ebm.20241004.12
    AB  - The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the causes of academic staff turnover intentions and their impact on the performance of Ambo and Haramaya Universities. The study primarily focused on factors such as socio-demographic characteristics, job satisfaction, compensation, work environment, and leadership style as determinants of academic staff turnover. A stratified sampling method was used to determine the sample population, while a convenience sampling technique was employed to collect data from the sample. Out of a total population of 1,672 academic staff members, a sample size of 143 was determined using Yamane's sampling formula. Of the 143 distributed questionnaires, 133 were returned, with 10 remaining uncollected. Both primary and secondary data sources were utilized, with primary data gathered through questionnaires. The research was designed as a descriptive and explanatory study to both describe relevant statistical data and explain the causes and effects observed in the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, and numerical values, as well as inferential statistics, such as correlation analyses and multiple regression models. University performance was measured through various indicators, including stakeholder engagement and satisfaction, revenue generation from business entities, quality of education, research and community services, the expansion of universities with modern facilities, and the number of academic programs offered. The findings revealed that the causes of academic staff turnover have a positive relationship with university performance, while turnover itself has a negative relationship with university performance. This implies that if universities effectively manage the causes of academic staff turnover, their overall performance is likely to improve.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections