Background; Vaginal Birth After cesarean section (VBAC) is considered a viable and safe option for many women who have previously undergone a cesarean section, particularly when the initial cesarean section was performed for a non-recurring indication. Studies indicates that VBAC can lead to lower rates of maternal complications and faster recovery times with success rate of 60-80% compared to elective repeat cesarean deliveries. Objective; to assess success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section and factors associated with VBAC in woman who gave birth at AHMC in 2024. Method; institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted at AHMC involving 208 mothers who had undergone one previous cesarean section. Data were collected using a structured checklist that was pretested prior to the study. The collected data were entered and cleaned using Epi-data version 3.7 and analyzed with SPSS version 24 to determine frequency distributions, means, and standard deviations. Bivariate and Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section and to identify factors associated with VBAC. A 95% confidence interval and 5% level precision were used to determine the presence of associations between and independent variables in the final model. Result; the total number of mothers with one previous cesarean section who were offered trial of labor and included in this study were 208. Out of these 86 (41.3%) with CI (34.59%-48.09%) had successful vaginal birth. Independent variables history of pervious VBAC (AOR=6.306 [1.143-34.802]), rupture of membrane at admission [AOR=5.758 [2.588-12.812] and Low station at admission [AOR=6.807 [2.34-19.796] are highly associated with VBAC. Conclusion; The study concluded that the overall success rate of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC) in this research is consistent with findings from earlier studies conducted in Ethiopia. Key factors identified as predictors of VBAC success include a prior history of vaginal delivery following a cesarean section (C/S) scar, low fetal station, and membrane rupture. These elements play a significant role in determining the likelihood of a successful VBAC.
Published in | European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20251102.11 |
Page(s) | 16-23 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Success Rate, Previous C/S, Vaginal Birth, VBAC, AHMC
[1] | (ACOG) American collage of obstetrician and gynaecologist. Vaginal birth after previous caesarean delivery clinical management guide line. Int J GynecalObster. 2004; 54: 197. |
[2] | Burrows LJ ML, Weber AM,. Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103(1): 907-12. |
[3] | Kwong FL HI. Postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after Caesarean section: A case report. Case Rep Womens Health 2020. |
[4] | DagneAddisuNAG, ShimelesBiru&YismawYimamBelachew. Vaginalbirthaftercesarean section and its as sociated factors in Ethiopia: asystematicreviewand meta‑analysis. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13: 7882. |
[5] | YeabsiraGirma ZM, AlemnewDestaw,. Vaginal delivery after caesarean section and its associated factors in MizanTepi University Teaching Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Heliyon 2021; 7. |
[6] | Adikpe E E, James Bitrus, Okeke C. Nnawike, Onyeji John1, SamailaMikah,. Obstetric outcomes of vaginal birth after caesarean section in Bingham University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria InternationalJournalofReproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology Edugbe AE et al Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2023 12(10): 2911-5. |
[7] | YiTing Chen Y-CH, Hung Shen, Chin-Ho Cheng, Kuang-Han Lee, Pao-Ling Torng. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: Experience from a regional hospital. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2022; 61: 422-6. |
[8] | JohnEdwardCSL. Success of Vaginal Birth after Cesare an Section (VBAC) based onPrevious Cesarean Delivery Indication in a Tertiary University Hospital: A Five Year Retrospective Study. Obstetrics and Gynecology Research. 2023; 6: 63-70. |
[9] | Dr. IbtihalJumaah ABD Ali DDANaDMNH. Successful vaginal birth after caesarian section and maternal outcome. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2019; 8(7): 428-33. |
[10] | Gebrehiwot. MBaY. Factors associated with success of vaginal birth after one caesare an section (VBAC) at three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case control study BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013; 13: 31. |
[11] | Pooja Kiran KPP, Mrityunjay C Metgud, MallayyaKenchaveeraiah Swamy. Prediction of Vagina lBirth after Cesarean Section UsingScoring System at the Time of Admission for Trial of Labor: A One-year Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020; 12(4). |
[12] | Tessmer-Tuck JA E-NS, Racek AR, Lohse CM, Famuyide AO, Wick MJ,. Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: a cohort study. GynecolObstet Invest 2014; 77: 121-6. |
[13] | Boulvain M. Trial of labor after caesarean section in sub- Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis. BJOG 1997; 104: 1385–91. |
[14] | Narjes Noori MG, Alireza Dashipour, Mitra Dastgerdi and GhazalehParnian. Outcome of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section (VBAC) Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2022 24(3). |
[15] | Fwazia A RA, Sarah M, Thawab A, Burooj A. A retrospective study about the outcome of vaginal delivery after cesarean section in Madinah, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Medicine in Developing Countries. 2020; 4(2): 291–5. |
APA Style
Bekele, T. D., Charkos, T. G., Ararsa, H. (2025). Success Rate of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section and Associated Factors Among Women Who Gave Birth at Adama Hoapital Medical College. European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, 11(2), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20251102.11
ACS Style
Bekele, T. D.; Charkos, T. G.; Ararsa, H. Success Rate of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section and Associated Factors Among Women Who Gave Birth at Adama Hoapital Medical College. Eur. J. Clin. Biomed. Sci. 2025, 11(2), 16-23. doi: 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20251102.11
@article{10.11648/j.ejcbs.20251102.11, author = {Tayachew Desalegn Bekele and Tesfaye Getachew Charkos and Heran Ararsa}, title = {Success Rate of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section and Associated Factors Among Women Who Gave Birth at Adama Hoapital Medical College }, journal = {European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences}, volume = {11}, number = {2}, pages = {16-23}, doi = {10.11648/j.ejcbs.20251102.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20251102.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejcbs.20251102.11}, abstract = {Background; Vaginal Birth After cesarean section (VBAC) is considered a viable and safe option for many women who have previously undergone a cesarean section, particularly when the initial cesarean section was performed for a non-recurring indication. Studies indicates that VBAC can lead to lower rates of maternal complications and faster recovery times with success rate of 60-80% compared to elective repeat cesarean deliveries. Objective; to assess success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section and factors associated with VBAC in woman who gave birth at AHMC in 2024. Method; institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted at AHMC involving 208 mothers who had undergone one previous cesarean section. Data were collected using a structured checklist that was pretested prior to the study. The collected data were entered and cleaned using Epi-data version 3.7 and analyzed with SPSS version 24 to determine frequency distributions, means, and standard deviations. Bivariate and Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section and to identify factors associated with VBAC. A 95% confidence interval and 5% level precision were used to determine the presence of associations between and independent variables in the final model. Result; the total number of mothers with one previous cesarean section who were offered trial of labor and included in this study were 208. Out of these 86 (41.3%) with CI (34.59%-48.09%) had successful vaginal birth. Independent variables history of pervious VBAC (AOR=6.306 [1.143-34.802]), rupture of membrane at admission [AOR=5.758 [2.588-12.812] and Low station at admission [AOR=6.807 [2.34-19.796] are highly associated with VBAC. Conclusion; The study concluded that the overall success rate of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC) in this research is consistent with findings from earlier studies conducted in Ethiopia. Key factors identified as predictors of VBAC success include a prior history of vaginal delivery following a cesarean section (C/S) scar, low fetal station, and membrane rupture. These elements play a significant role in determining the likelihood of a successful VBAC. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Success Rate of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section and Associated Factors Among Women Who Gave Birth at Adama Hoapital Medical College AU - Tayachew Desalegn Bekele AU - Tesfaye Getachew Charkos AU - Heran Ararsa Y1 - 2025/03/21 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20251102.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ejcbs.20251102.11 T2 - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences JF - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences JO - European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences SP - 16 EP - 23 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5005 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejcbs.20251102.11 AB - Background; Vaginal Birth After cesarean section (VBAC) is considered a viable and safe option for many women who have previously undergone a cesarean section, particularly when the initial cesarean section was performed for a non-recurring indication. Studies indicates that VBAC can lead to lower rates of maternal complications and faster recovery times with success rate of 60-80% compared to elective repeat cesarean deliveries. Objective; to assess success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section and factors associated with VBAC in woman who gave birth at AHMC in 2024. Method; institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted at AHMC involving 208 mothers who had undergone one previous cesarean section. Data were collected using a structured checklist that was pretested prior to the study. The collected data were entered and cleaned using Epi-data version 3.7 and analyzed with SPSS version 24 to determine frequency distributions, means, and standard deviations. Bivariate and Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section and to identify factors associated with VBAC. A 95% confidence interval and 5% level precision were used to determine the presence of associations between and independent variables in the final model. Result; the total number of mothers with one previous cesarean section who were offered trial of labor and included in this study were 208. Out of these 86 (41.3%) with CI (34.59%-48.09%) had successful vaginal birth. Independent variables history of pervious VBAC (AOR=6.306 [1.143-34.802]), rupture of membrane at admission [AOR=5.758 [2.588-12.812] and Low station at admission [AOR=6.807 [2.34-19.796] are highly associated with VBAC. Conclusion; The study concluded that the overall success rate of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC) in this research is consistent with findings from earlier studies conducted in Ethiopia. Key factors identified as predictors of VBAC success include a prior history of vaginal delivery following a cesarean section (C/S) scar, low fetal station, and membrane rupture. These elements play a significant role in determining the likelihood of a successful VBAC. VL - 11 IS - 2 ER -