Up till now, there have been numerous articles and papers concerning the issue of Point of View in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily”, most of which are focused on the analysis of narrator’s function in the construction of narrative structure or the presentation of thematic meanings. Despite some articles’ application of linguistic/stylistic research methods to the study of the story, few of them involves the analysis of point of view. Therefore, by clarifying and combining theories relevant to point of view proposed by both narratologists and stylists, the paper focuses on the analysis of point of view in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” from both narratological and stylistic perspective through the exploration of three aspects: uniqueness of first-person point of view, transition and transgression of point of view, and omission of point of view, with the findings that the use of first-person plural narrator “we” serves the narrative function and involves community issues and racial problems deep in the south after the civil war, that the transition of teller-character to reflector-character influences narrative structure as well narrative distance of the story, which are closely related to the narrator’s authority and reliability, that the oscillation between third-person limited perspective and focal characters’ perspective helps to achieve the effect of omniscience within limitation, that the transgression of the narrator’s limited point of view into the realm of omniscient point of view creates double-layer effects of foreshadowing and self-exposure, and that the omitted point of view of Emily, Homer, and the negro servant are in close relation with the social, historical, and cultural background at the south in the first half of 20th century. Generally speaking, the paper verifies that the integrated theories of narratology and stylistics concerning point of view are of significance and innovativeness to the understanding of aesthetic effects and thematic meanings of fiction.
Published in | English Language, Literature & Culture (Volume 6, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ellc.20210603.16 |
Page(s) | 91-96 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
William Faulkner, A Rose for Emily, Narratology, Stylistics, Point of View
[1] | Dilworth, Thomas. (1999) A Romance to Kill for: Homicidal Complicity in Faulkner's “A Rose for Emily” [J]. Studies in Short Fiction, Vol. 36 (3), Summer, 251-262. |
[2] | Helen E. Nebeker. (1970) Emily's Rose of Love: Thematic Implications of Point of View in Faulkner's “A Rose for Emily” [J]. Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association Vol. 24, Number, 3-13. |
[3] | Kim, Ji-won. (2011) Narrator as Collective ‘We’: The Narrative Structure of “A Rose for Emily” [J]. English Language & Literature Teaching, 17 (4), 141-156. |
[4] | Sullivan, Ruth. (1971) The Narrator in “A Rose for Emily” [J]. The Journal of Narrative Technique, Vol. 1 (3), Sept., 159-178. |
[5] | Song, Zijiao. (2013) Transitivity Analysis of A Rose for Emily [J]. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 3 (12), December, 2291-2295. |
[6] | Tezcan, Tuncay. (2014) A Stylistic Analysis of A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner and its Turkish Translation [J]. Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 158, 364-369. |
[7] | Petry, Alice Hall. (1986) Faulkner’s a Rose for Emily [J]. The Explicator, Vol. 44 (3), 52-54. |
[8] | Prince, Gerald. (1987) A Dictionary of Narratology [M]. Lincoln& London: University of Nebraska Press, P73. |
[9] | Genette, Gérard. (1983) The Narrative Discourse [M]. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, P31. |
[10] | Friedman, Norman. (1955) Point of View in Fiction: The Development of a Critical Concept [J]. PMLA, Vol. 70 (5), 1160–1184. |
[11] | Genette, Gérard. (1983) The Narrative Discourse Cornell University Press, P189-190. |
[12] | Shen, Dan.(2018) Narrative, Style and Subtext: Rereading British and American Classic Short Stories Beijing: Peking University Press, P101-102. |
[13] | Halliday, M. A. K. (1971) Linguistic Function and Literary Style: an Inquiry into the Language of William Golding's The Inheritors. [J]. Literary Style: A Symposium, edited by Seymour Chatman. London and New York: Oxford University Press, P330-368. |
[14] | Simpson, Paul. (2004) Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students [M]. London: Routledge. P126-127. |
[15] | Leech, Geoffrey; Short, Mick. (2007) Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose [M]. Pearson ESL, P142. |
[16] | Faulkner, William. (1930) A Rose for Emily [J]. The Forum, P233-238. |
[17] | Stanzel, Franz K. (1981) Teller-Characters and Reflector-Characters in Narrative Theory [J]. Poetics Today, Vol. (2), P5-15. |
[18] | Ferguson, M. W., Salter, M. J., Stallworthy, J. (2004) The Norton Anthology of Poetry [M]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, P1430. |
[19] | Jakobson, R. (1960) Closing statement: linguistics and poetics [A]. In Style in language [C], (ed) T. A. Sebeok. Cambridge: MIT Press. |
APA Style
Wang Xiaokang. (2021). Narratological and Stylistic Analysis of Point of View in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily”. English Language, Literature & Culture, 6(3), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ellc.20210603.16
ACS Style
Wang Xiaokang. Narratological and Stylistic Analysis of Point of View in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily”. Engl. Lang. Lit. Cult. 2021, 6(3), 91-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ellc.20210603.16
AMA Style
Wang Xiaokang. Narratological and Stylistic Analysis of Point of View in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily”. Engl Lang Lit Cult. 2021;6(3):91-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ellc.20210603.16
@article{10.11648/j.ellc.20210603.16, author = {Wang Xiaokang}, title = {Narratological and Stylistic Analysis of Point of View in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily”}, journal = {English Language, Literature & Culture}, volume = {6}, number = {3}, pages = {91-96}, doi = {10.11648/j.ellc.20210603.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ellc.20210603.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ellc.20210603.16}, abstract = {Up till now, there have been numerous articles and papers concerning the issue of Point of View in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily”, most of which are focused on the analysis of narrator’s function in the construction of narrative structure or the presentation of thematic meanings. Despite some articles’ application of linguistic/stylistic research methods to the study of the story, few of them involves the analysis of point of view. Therefore, by clarifying and combining theories relevant to point of view proposed by both narratologists and stylists, the paper focuses on the analysis of point of view in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” from both narratological and stylistic perspective through the exploration of three aspects: uniqueness of first-person point of view, transition and transgression of point of view, and omission of point of view, with the findings that the use of first-person plural narrator “we” serves the narrative function and involves community issues and racial problems deep in the south after the civil war, that the transition of teller-character to reflector-character influences narrative structure as well narrative distance of the story, which are closely related to the narrator’s authority and reliability, that the oscillation between third-person limited perspective and focal characters’ perspective helps to achieve the effect of omniscience within limitation, that the transgression of the narrator’s limited point of view into the realm of omniscient point of view creates double-layer effects of foreshadowing and self-exposure, and that the omitted point of view of Emily, Homer, and the negro servant are in close relation with the social, historical, and cultural background at the south in the first half of 20th century. Generally speaking, the paper verifies that the integrated theories of narratology and stylistics concerning point of view are of significance and innovativeness to the understanding of aesthetic effects and thematic meanings of fiction.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Narratological and Stylistic Analysis of Point of View in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” AU - Wang Xiaokang Y1 - 2021/08/31 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ellc.20210603.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ellc.20210603.16 T2 - English Language, Literature & Culture JF - English Language, Literature & Culture JO - English Language, Literature & Culture SP - 91 EP - 96 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-2413 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ellc.20210603.16 AB - Up till now, there have been numerous articles and papers concerning the issue of Point of View in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily”, most of which are focused on the analysis of narrator’s function in the construction of narrative structure or the presentation of thematic meanings. Despite some articles’ application of linguistic/stylistic research methods to the study of the story, few of them involves the analysis of point of view. Therefore, by clarifying and combining theories relevant to point of view proposed by both narratologists and stylists, the paper focuses on the analysis of point of view in Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” from both narratological and stylistic perspective through the exploration of three aspects: uniqueness of first-person point of view, transition and transgression of point of view, and omission of point of view, with the findings that the use of first-person plural narrator “we” serves the narrative function and involves community issues and racial problems deep in the south after the civil war, that the transition of teller-character to reflector-character influences narrative structure as well narrative distance of the story, which are closely related to the narrator’s authority and reliability, that the oscillation between third-person limited perspective and focal characters’ perspective helps to achieve the effect of omniscience within limitation, that the transgression of the narrator’s limited point of view into the realm of omniscient point of view creates double-layer effects of foreshadowing and self-exposure, and that the omitted point of view of Emily, Homer, and the negro servant are in close relation with the social, historical, and cultural background at the south in the first half of 20th century. Generally speaking, the paper verifies that the integrated theories of narratology and stylistics concerning point of view are of significance and innovativeness to the understanding of aesthetic effects and thematic meanings of fiction. VL - 6 IS - 3 ER -