Sweet and bitter lupin bean were processed by traditional common processing methods soaking, cooking, fermenting and germinating techniques. The proximate, mineral and alkaloid content of unprocessed, soaked, fermented, germinated and cooked sweet as well as bitter lupin were determined. According to the results crude protein and carbohydrate were significantly highest in soaked and cooked than in fermented and germinated lupin bean. Fiber content, fat content and total ash were significantly reduced in cooked, soaked and fermented bean, but fiber and total ash significantly increased for the germinated sweet and bitter lupin. In the sweet lupin K, Zn, Fe levels were significantly reduced in soaked, fermented and cooked bean, but Na level was significantly highest in germinated, soaked and cooked except in fermented lupin bean. For the bitter lupin K level was significantly increased in soaked, cooked, fermented and germinated bean. But Ca and Na level significantly increased in cooked bean only. Fe and Zn significantly reduced in, cooked, soaked, fermented and germinated. Alkaloid content of the bean was significantly reduced in soaked, cooked, fermented and germinated, but it was highly influenced by cooking and soaking methods. The results indicated that cooking and soaking enhanced the nutrient contents and drastically reduced the lupin bean alkaloid content.
Published in | International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry (Volume 2, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijbc.20170204.13 |
Page(s) | 174-179 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Nutrients, Processing, Alkaloid, Lupin Bean
[1] | Belteky B, Kovacs I: Lupin the New Break. Bradford on Avon: Panagri; 1984. |
[2] | Moneret-Vautrin D-A, Guerin L, Kanny G, Flabbee J, Fremont S, Morisset M: Cross allergenicity of peanut and lupine: The risk of lupine allergy in patients allergic to peanuts. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999, 104: 883-888. |
[3] | Gladstones JS: Lupins as crop plants. Field Crop Abstracts 1970, 23: 123-148. |
[4] | Aurelie Solange Ntso Agume, Nicolas Yanou Njintang and Carl Moses F. Mbofung, 2017. Effect of Soaking and Roasting on the Physicochemical and Pasting Properties of Soybean Flour. Foods 2017, 6, 12; doi: 10.3390/foods6020012. |
[5] | Parul Bora, 2014. Anti- nutritional factors in Foods and Their Effects, J. Aced. Indu. Res. ISSN: 2278-5213. |
[6] | Yu-Wei Luo & Wei-Hua Xie (2013) Effect of different processing methods on certain antinutritional factors and protein digestibility in green and white faba bean (Vicia faba L.), Cy TA - Journal of Food, 11: 1, 43-49, DOI: 10.1080/19476337.2012.681705. |
[7] | Agume, N. A. S.; Njintang, Y. N.; Mbofung, C. M. F. Physicochemical and pasting properties of maize flour as a function of the interactive effect of natural-fermentation and roasting. Food Meas. 2016. |
[8] | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2013. FAOSTAT online statistical service. FAO, Rome. Available via http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed on 20th October 2014. |
[9] | Aisha M. Nakitto, John H. Muyonga & Dorothy Nakimbugwe, Effects of combined traditional processing methods on the nutritional quality of beans. Food Science & Nutrition 2015; 3(3): 233–24. |
[10] | Khokhar, S. and Chauhan, B. M. 1986. Anti-nutritional factors in moth beans (Vigna aconitifolia): Varietal difference and effects of methods of domestic processing and cooking. J. Food Sci. 51(3): 591-594. |
[11] | Myrene, R. and D’souza (2013). Effect of Traditional processing Methods on nutritional quality of field bean. Adv. Biores. 4: 29-33. |
[12] | Hallen E, Ibanoglu S and Ainsworth P. 2004. Effect of fermented/germinated cowpea flour addition on the rheological and baking properties of wheat flour. J. Food Engr. 63: 177-84. |
[13] | AOAC, (2005). Official Methods of Analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th Edition. Pp. 114-222. Washington, DC, USA. |
[14] | Harborne JB (1973). Phytochemical Methods, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 11-21. |
[15] | Herbourne, J. B. 1989. Biosynthesis and functions of anti-nutritional factors in plants. Aspects Appl. Biol. 19: 21-28. |
[16] | Jones JR, Benton J and Vernon CW. 1990. Sampling handling and analyzing plant tissue samples. In soil testing and plant analysis. 3rd ed. Wesbermann. R. L., Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Inc. Madison Wisconsinum, USA: 389-428. |
[17] | SAS. Statistical Analysis System, 2004. Users guide Statistics. (Carry, W. C, SAS Institute. |
[18] | Aurelie Solange Ntso Agume, Nicolas Yanou Njintang and Carl Moses F. Mbofung, 2017. Effect of Soaking and Roasting on the Physicochemical and Pasting Properties of Soybean Flour. Foods 2017, 6, 12; doi: 10.3390/foods6020012. |
[19] | Baik, B.-K.; Han, H. I. Cooking, Roasting, and Fermentation of Chickpeas, Lentils, Peas, and Soybeans for Fortification of Leavened Bread. Cereal Chem. 2012, 89, 269–275. |
[20] | Son, S.-J.; Lee, S.-P. Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Roasted Soybean Flour, Barley, and Carrot Juice Mixture Fermented by Solid-state Fermentation Using Bacillus subtilis HA. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 20, 1509–1515. |
[21] | Tchikoua, R. Application des Bactéries Lactiques Isolées du mais en Fermentation à L’amélioration de la Qualité Sanitaire et Physicochimique du Kutukutu. Ph. D. Thesis, National School of Agroindustrial Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere, Cameroon, 2016; p. 233. |
[22] | Rojan, P. J.; Nampoothiri, K. M.; Pandey, A. Solid-state fermentation for lactic acid production from agro wastes using Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Process Biochem. 2006, 41, 759–763. |
[23] | Cuevas-Rodriguez, E. O.; MiIan-Carrillo, J.; Mora-Escobedo, R.; Cardenas-Valenzuela, O. G.; Reyes-Moreno, C. Quality protein maize (Zea mays L.) tempeh flour through solid state fermentation process. LWT Food Sci. Techno l. 2004, 37, 59–67. |
[24] | El Maki, H. B., S. M. Abdel Rahaman, W. H. Idris, A. B. Hassan, E. E. Babiker, and A. H. El tinay. 2007. Content of anti-nutritional factors and HCl-extractability of minerals from white beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris) cultivars: influence of soaking and/or cooking food. Food Chem., 100: 362–368. |
[25] | Duhan, A., N. Khetarpaul, and S. Bishnoi. 2002. Changes in phytates and HCl-extractability of calcium, phosphorus and iron of soaked, dehulled, cooked, and sprouted pigeon pea cultivar. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 57: 275–284. |
[26] | Duhan, A., N. Khetarpaul, and S. Bishnoi. 2004. HCl extractability of zinc and copper as affected by soaking, dehulling, cooking and germination of high yielding pigeon pea cultivars. J. Food Compos. Anal. 17: 597–604. |
[27] | Ghavidel, R. A., and J. Prakash. 2007. The impact of germination and dehulling on nutrients, anti-nutrients, in vitro iron and calcium bioavailability and in vitro starch and protein digestibility of some legume seeds. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 40: 1292–1299. |
[28] | Oke OL (1966). Chemical studies on some Nigerian Vegetables. Trop. Sci. Trop. Sci. 8(3): 128-132. |
[29] | S. O. Omoikhoje, Determination of the Nutrient and Anti-nutrient Components of Raw, Soaked, Dehulled and Germinated Bambara ground nut Seeds J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 5(11): 1022-1025, 2006. |
APA Style
Yadesa Abeshu, Biadge Kefale. (2017). Effect of Some Traditional Processing Methods on Nutritional Composition and Alkaloid Content of Lupin Bean. International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry, 2(4), 174-179. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20170204.13
ACS Style
Yadesa Abeshu; Biadge Kefale. Effect of Some Traditional Processing Methods on Nutritional Composition and Alkaloid Content of Lupin Bean. Int. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2017, 2(4), 174-179. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbc.20170204.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijbc.20170204.13, author = {Yadesa Abeshu and Biadge Kefale}, title = {Effect of Some Traditional Processing Methods on Nutritional Composition and Alkaloid Content of Lupin Bean}, journal = {International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry}, volume = {2}, number = {4}, pages = {174-179}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijbc.20170204.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20170204.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbc.20170204.13}, abstract = {Sweet and bitter lupin bean were processed by traditional common processing methods soaking, cooking, fermenting and germinating techniques. The proximate, mineral and alkaloid content of unprocessed, soaked, fermented, germinated and cooked sweet as well as bitter lupin were determined. According to the results crude protein and carbohydrate were significantly highest in soaked and cooked than in fermented and germinated lupin bean. Fiber content, fat content and total ash were significantly reduced in cooked, soaked and fermented bean, but fiber and total ash significantly increased for the germinated sweet and bitter lupin. In the sweet lupin K, Zn, Fe levels were significantly reduced in soaked, fermented and cooked bean, but Na level was significantly highest in germinated, soaked and cooked except in fermented lupin bean. For the bitter lupin K level was significantly increased in soaked, cooked, fermented and germinated bean. But Ca and Na level significantly increased in cooked bean only. Fe and Zn significantly reduced in, cooked, soaked, fermented and germinated. Alkaloid content of the bean was significantly reduced in soaked, cooked, fermented and germinated, but it was highly influenced by cooking and soaking methods. The results indicated that cooking and soaking enhanced the nutrient contents and drastically reduced the lupin bean alkaloid content.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Some Traditional Processing Methods on Nutritional Composition and Alkaloid Content of Lupin Bean AU - Yadesa Abeshu AU - Biadge Kefale Y1 - 2017/08/30 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20170204.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijbc.20170204.13 T2 - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry JF - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry JO - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry SP - 174 EP - 179 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9392 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20170204.13 AB - Sweet and bitter lupin bean were processed by traditional common processing methods soaking, cooking, fermenting and germinating techniques. The proximate, mineral and alkaloid content of unprocessed, soaked, fermented, germinated and cooked sweet as well as bitter lupin were determined. According to the results crude protein and carbohydrate were significantly highest in soaked and cooked than in fermented and germinated lupin bean. Fiber content, fat content and total ash were significantly reduced in cooked, soaked and fermented bean, but fiber and total ash significantly increased for the germinated sweet and bitter lupin. In the sweet lupin K, Zn, Fe levels were significantly reduced in soaked, fermented and cooked bean, but Na level was significantly highest in germinated, soaked and cooked except in fermented lupin bean. For the bitter lupin K level was significantly increased in soaked, cooked, fermented and germinated bean. But Ca and Na level significantly increased in cooked bean only. Fe and Zn significantly reduced in, cooked, soaked, fermented and germinated. Alkaloid content of the bean was significantly reduced in soaked, cooked, fermented and germinated, but it was highly influenced by cooking and soaking methods. The results indicated that cooking and soaking enhanced the nutrient contents and drastically reduced the lupin bean alkaloid content. VL - 2 IS - 4 ER -