Objective: To evaluate the effect of risk management of nursing in diabetic retinopathy patient. Methods: 98 patients diagnosed as diabetic retinopathy from January 2018 to January 2019, they were randomly assigned to control group and intervention group, we use the different nursing measure to both of groups. Our researchers collected the data of negative patient reaction and result of serum inflammatory cytokines in before treatment and after treatment. Additionally, we collected the information associated with quality of life on participants by the short form-36 (SF-36). Result: The results of intervention group were better than the results of control group in negative patient reaction [n (%), 1 (2.0%) vs 6 (12.2%), p < 0.005]. In addition, the serum inflammatory cytokines and quality of life were improved after treatment, the improvements of intervention group were better than outcome of control group, most result of them had statistical significance (p < 0.005). Conclusion: The risk management of nursing improved the outcome of diabetic retinopathy treatment. Although improvement of negative patient reaction was non-significant in result, other aspect of patient had significantly improvement which were serum inflammatory cytokines and quality of life.
Published in | International Journal of Diabetes and Endocrinology (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijde.20200501.12 |
Page(s) | 6-8 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Diabetic Retinopathy, Risk Management, Nursing
[1] | American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes 2018. January, vol. 41; 2018. Suppl. 1. |
[2] | Chatterjee S, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet Lond Engl. 2017, 389, 10085, 2239–2251. |
[3] | International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 8th ed. Brussels. Belgium: International Diabetes Federation. 2017. |
[4] | wanga FS, Njelekela MA, Diamond MB, et al. Urban and rural prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes and risk factors associated with diabetes in Tanzania and Uganda. Glob Health Action. 2016, 23 (9), 31440. |
[5] | Agarwal P, Jindal A, Sainiv K, Jindal S. Advances in diabetic retinopathy [J]. Indian J Endoainol Metab, 2014, 18 (6), 772-777. |
[6] | Sayin N, Kara N, Pekel G. Ocular complications of diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2015, 6 (1), 92-108. |
[7] | Mohamed Q, Gillies MC, Wong TY. Management of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc. 2007, 298 (8), 902-916. |
[8] | Singh R, Ramasamy K, Abraham C, et al. Diabetic retinopathy: an update. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008, 56 (3), 178-188. |
[9] | National Eye Institute. Diabetic retinopathy. https://nei.nih.gov/eyedata/diabetic. Accessed 15 July 2017. |
[10] | Takahashi H, Tampo H, Arai Y, Inoue Y, Kawashima H. Applying artificial intelligence to disease staging: deep learning for improved staging of diabetic retinopathy. PLoS One. 2017, 12, 87-90. |
[11] | Solomon SD, Chew E, Duh EJ, Sobrin L, Sun JK, VanderBeek BL, et al. Diabetic retinopathy: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2017, 40, 412-418. |
[12] | Ip MS, Domalpally A, Sun JK, Ehrlich JS. Long-term effects of therapy with ranibizumab on diabetic retinopathy severity and baseline risk factors for worsening retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2015, 122, 367-74. |
[13] | Ware JE. SF-36 health survey update. Spine. 2000, 25, 3130–3139. |
[14] | Jorge R, Costa RA, Comt DC, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for persistent new vessels in diabetic retinopathy (IBEPE Study). Retina. 2006, 26, 1006-1013. |
[15] | Malaguarnera G, Gagliano C, Bucolo C, et al. Lipoprotein (a) in cardiovascular diseases. BioMed Res Int. 2013, 1-5. |
[16] | Tan GS, Gan A, Sabanayagam C, et al. Ethnic differences in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy: the singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study. Ophthalmology. 2018, 125 (4), 529–536. |
[17] | Tomita M, Kabeya Y, Okisugi M, Katsuki T, Oikawa Y, Atsumi Y, et al. Diabetic microangiopathy is an independent predictor of incident diabetic foot ulcer. J Diabet Res. 2016, 5938540. |
APA Style
Junnan Lin, Ye Li, Lishi Luo. (2020). Effect of Risk Management in Diabetic Retinopathy. International Journal of Diabetes and Endocrinology, 5(1), 6-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijde.20200501.12
ACS Style
Junnan Lin; Ye Li; Lishi Luo. Effect of Risk Management in Diabetic Retinopathy. Int. J. Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 5(1), 6-8. doi: 10.11648/j.ijde.20200501.12
AMA Style
Junnan Lin, Ye Li, Lishi Luo. Effect of Risk Management in Diabetic Retinopathy. Int J Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;5(1):6-8. doi: 10.11648/j.ijde.20200501.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijde.20200501.12, author = {Junnan Lin and Ye Li and Lishi Luo}, title = {Effect of Risk Management in Diabetic Retinopathy}, journal = {International Journal of Diabetes and Endocrinology}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, pages = {6-8}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijde.20200501.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijde.20200501.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijde.20200501.12}, abstract = {Objective: To evaluate the effect of risk management of nursing in diabetic retinopathy patient. Methods: 98 patients diagnosed as diabetic retinopathy from January 2018 to January 2019, they were randomly assigned to control group and intervention group, we use the different nursing measure to both of groups. Our researchers collected the data of negative patient reaction and result of serum inflammatory cytokines in before treatment and after treatment. Additionally, we collected the information associated with quality of life on participants by the short form-36 (SF-36). Result: The results of intervention group were better than the results of control group in negative patient reaction [n (%), 1 (2.0%) vs 6 (12.2%), p < 0.005]. In addition, the serum inflammatory cytokines and quality of life were improved after treatment, the improvements of intervention group were better than outcome of control group, most result of them had statistical significance (p < 0.005). Conclusion: The risk management of nursing improved the outcome of diabetic retinopathy treatment. Although improvement of negative patient reaction was non-significant in result, other aspect of patient had significantly improvement which were serum inflammatory cytokines and quality of life.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Risk Management in Diabetic Retinopathy AU - Junnan Lin AU - Ye Li AU - Lishi Luo Y1 - 2020/01/21 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijde.20200501.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijde.20200501.12 T2 - International Journal of Diabetes and Endocrinology JF - International Journal of Diabetes and Endocrinology JO - International Journal of Diabetes and Endocrinology SP - 6 EP - 8 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1371 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijde.20200501.12 AB - Objective: To evaluate the effect of risk management of nursing in diabetic retinopathy patient. Methods: 98 patients diagnosed as diabetic retinopathy from January 2018 to January 2019, they were randomly assigned to control group and intervention group, we use the different nursing measure to both of groups. Our researchers collected the data of negative patient reaction and result of serum inflammatory cytokines in before treatment and after treatment. Additionally, we collected the information associated with quality of life on participants by the short form-36 (SF-36). Result: The results of intervention group were better than the results of control group in negative patient reaction [n (%), 1 (2.0%) vs 6 (12.2%), p < 0.005]. In addition, the serum inflammatory cytokines and quality of life were improved after treatment, the improvements of intervention group were better than outcome of control group, most result of them had statistical significance (p < 0.005). Conclusion: The risk management of nursing improved the outcome of diabetic retinopathy treatment. Although improvement of negative patient reaction was non-significant in result, other aspect of patient had significantly improvement which were serum inflammatory cytokines and quality of life. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -