Review Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Maxillary Sinus Lift Surgery: “Description and Comparison of the Different Techniques” Clinical Case of Sinus Lift and Placement of Phibo TSH and TSA Implants

Received: 6 June 2024     Accepted: 31 July 2024     Published: 29 November 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

A bibliographic review was carried out on the different procedures and most common materials for augmentation or elevation of the maxillary sinus for the posterior or joint placement of endosseous implants. The objective of this work is to present a clinical case and review the existing literature. The topic has been widely discussed by different specialists, describing the different techniques, and also that it is a procedure with a high success rate. On the other hand, it can usually be performed in an outpatient clinic, respecting the concepts of asepsis that must be considered in oral surgery procedures: correct preparation of the equipment, sterilization of instruments and disinfection of the surgical field. That is, all instruments in previously sterilized airtight bags, surgical fields and sterile gloves, table and equipment, all properly disinfected. In addition, both the care team and the surgeon must have disposable sterile surgical caps and gowns. It is important to highlight that when handling bone fillers, they must also be packaged with the maximum sterilization protocols for their use.

Published in International Journal of Dental Medicine (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijdm.20241002.12
Page(s) 31-39
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Maxillary Sinus, Maxillary Sinus Elevation, Bone Graft

References
[1] Atiq T, Iqbal S, Rashid W, Ain QT, Asghar I, Javed T. Comparison of Implant Success Rate Between Direct And Indirect Sinus Lift Procedure. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci 2022; 18(4): 295-9.
[2] Ortega-Mejia H, Estrugo-Devesa A, Saka-Herrán C, Ayuso- Montero R, López-López J, Velasco-Ortega E. Platelet-Rich Plasma in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: Systematic Review. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13(3): 622.
[3] Bhalla N, Dym H. Update on Maxillary Sinus Augmentation. Dent Clin North Am 2021; 65: 197-210.
[4] Velasco-Ortega E, Sierra-Baztan A, Jiménez-Guerra A, España- López A, Ortiz-Garcia I, Núñez-Márquez E, et al. Long-Term Clinical Study of Implants Placed in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 9975.
[5] Woo I, Le BT. Maxillary sinus floor elevation: review of anatomy and two techniques. Implant Dent 2004; 13: 28-32.
[6] Draenert GF, Eisenmenger W. A new technique for the transcrestal sinus floor elevation and alveolar ridge augmentation with press-fit bone cylinders: a technical note. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007; 35: 201-6.
[7] Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg.1980; 38: 613-6.
[8] Balaji SM. Direct v/s Indirect sinus lift in maxillary dental implants. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2013; 3: 148-53.
[9] Elangovan S. Dental Implant Survival in the Bone Augmented by Direct Sinus Lift Is Comparable to Implants Placed in the Native Bone. J Evid Based Dent Practice 2020; 20: 101410.
[10] Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part 2--The ridge expansion osteotomy (REO) procedure. Compendium Contin Educ Dent 1994 Apr; 15(4): 422, 424, 426.
[11] Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part 3--Less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium Conin Educ Dent 1994 Jun; 15(6): 698, 700, 702-4.
[12] Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part 4--Future site development. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995; 16: 1090, 1092 26.
[13] Misch C. Maxillary sinus augmentation for endostal implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987; 4: 49-57.
[14] Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonça MR, Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2016; 47: 8-17.
[15] Weerapong K, Sirimongkolwattana S, Sastraruji T, Khongkhunthian P. Comparative study of immediate loading on short dental implants and conventional dental implants in the posterior mandible: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019; 34: 141–9.
[16] Abdulwahed A, Mustafa M, Karobari MI, Alomran A, Alasimi K, Alsayeg A, et al. Anatomical Evaluation of Posterior Maxillary Roots in Relation to the Maxillary Sinus Floor in a Saudi Sub-Population: A Cross-Sectional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11: 150.
[17] Castillo E, Andercia M, Guerra J. Elvation of the maxillary sinus and its relationship with the maxillary artery., About a case. Periodontics and Osseointegration, 2008; 18: 4.
[18] Psillas G, Papaioannou D, Petsali S, Dimas GG, Constantinidis J. Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis: A comprehensive review. J Dent Sci 2021; 16: 474-81.
[19] l Salam el Askary A. A multidisciplinary approach to enhance implant esthetics: case report. Implant Dent 2003; 12: 18-23.
[20] González-Valls G, Roca-Millan E, Céspedes-Sánchez JM, González-Navarro B, Torrejon-Moya A, López-López J. Narrow Diameter Dental Implants as an Alternative Treatment for Atrophic Alveolar Ridges. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Materials (Basel) 2021; 14: 3234.
[21] Farina R, Franzini C, Trombelli L, Simonelli A. Minimal invasiveness in the transcrestal elevation of the maxillary sinus floor: A systematic review. Periodontol 2000 2023; Feb; 91(1): 145-166.
[22] Lase DV, Dricot RG, Lasserre JF, Toma S, Brecx MC. Combination of a Hydraulic Device and Nanohydroxylapatite Paste for Minimally Invasive Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation: Procedure and 4-Year Results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2021; 36: 587-97.
[23] Nasser Nassr K, Indirect maxillary sinus elevation in implant treatment. MISE technique. Final Degree Project Seville, 2020.
[24] Pjetursson BE, Lang NP. Sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach. Periodontology 2000 2014; 66(1): 59-71.
[25] Levi I, Halperin-Sternfeld M, Horwitz J, Zigdon-Giladi H, Machtei EE. Dimensional changes of the maxillary sinus following tooth extraction in the posterior maxilla with and without socket preservation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19(5): 952-8.
[26] Tatum H. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstruction. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30: 207-29.
[27] Jiménez Guerra A, Monsalve Guil L, Ortiz García I, España López A, Segura Egea JJ, Velasco Ortega E. Elevation of the maxillary sinus in treatment with dental implants. A 4-year study. Av Periodon Implantol 2015; 27, 3: 145-54.
[28] Rosenlicht JL, Tarnow DP. Human histologic evidence of integration of functionally loaded hydroxyapatite-coated implants placed simultaneously with sinus augmentation: a case report 2 1/2 years postplacement. J Oral Implantol 1999; 25: 7-10.
[29] Coatoam GW, Krieger JT. A four-year study examining the results of indirect sinus augmentation procedures. J Oral Implantol. 1997; 23: 117-27.
[30] Wallas SS, Froum SJ, Tarmow DP. Histologic evaluation of sinus elevation procedure: a clinicat 1 eport. lnt J Periodont Restar Dent- 1996; 1 6: 46-51.
[31] Boyne P, James R. Grafting of the maxillary floor with autogenous marrow and bone. j Oral Surg 1 980; 38: 613-6.
[32] QUISPE D, CASTRO C, MENDOZA G, Surgical complications of maxillary sinus elevation in implantology. -ODOVTOS-Int J Dental 2020; 22: 61-70.
[33] Molina A, Sanz-Sánchez I, Sanz-Martín I, Ortiz-Vigón A, Sanz M. Complications in sinus lifting procedures: Classification and management. Periodontol 2000. 2022; 88: 103-15.
[34] Schlund M, Meeus J, Politis C, Ferri J. Management of sinus graft infection-a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022; 51: 690-8.
[35] Pesce P, Menini M, Canullo L, Khijmatgar S, Modenese L, Gallifante G, et al. Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Biomaterials Used for Lateral Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review on the Effect of Residual Bone.
[36] Height and Vertical Graft Size on New Bone Formation and Graft Shrinkage. J Clin Med 2021; Oct 27, 10: 4996.
[37] Evaluation of dimensional changes in width and height of the alveolar bone ridge using the Osseodensification Technique in posterior areas of the maxilla. Case series report. Int. J. Odontostomat 2023; 17(1): 55-63.
[38] Soltan M, Smiler DG. Antral membrane balloon elevation. J Oral Implantol 2005; 31: 85-90.
[39] Sinus lift grafting materials and immediate implant placement: A systematic review June 2015 International Dental Journal of Students' Research 3(2): 66-71.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Lloret, A. M., Rogel, C. P. (2024). Maxillary Sinus Lift Surgery: “Description and Comparison of the Different Techniques” Clinical Case of Sinus Lift and Placement of Phibo TSH and TSA Implants. International Journal of Dental Medicine, 10(2), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20241002.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Lloret, A. M.; Rogel, C. P. Maxillary Sinus Lift Surgery: “Description and Comparison of the Different Techniques” Clinical Case of Sinus Lift and Placement of Phibo TSH and TSA Implants. Int. J. Dent. Med. 2024, 10(2), 31-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdm.20241002.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Lloret AM, Rogel CP. Maxillary Sinus Lift Surgery: “Description and Comparison of the Different Techniques” Clinical Case of Sinus Lift and Placement of Phibo TSH and TSA Implants. Int J Dent Med. 2024;10(2):31-39. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdm.20241002.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijdm.20241002.12,
      author = {Antonio Macías Lloret and Carlos Parra Rogel},
      title = {Maxillary Sinus Lift Surgery: “Description and Comparison of the Different Techniques” Clinical Case of Sinus Lift and Placement of Phibo TSH and TSA Implants
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Dental Medicine},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {31-39},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijdm.20241002.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20241002.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijdm.20241002.12},
      abstract = {A bibliographic review was carried out on the different procedures and most common materials for augmentation or elevation of the maxillary sinus for the posterior or joint placement of endosseous implants. The objective of this work is to present a clinical case and review the existing literature. The topic has been widely discussed by different specialists, describing the different techniques, and also that it is a procedure with a high success rate. On the other hand, it can usually be performed in an outpatient clinic, respecting the concepts of asepsis that must be considered in oral surgery procedures: correct preparation of the equipment, sterilization of instruments and disinfection of the surgical field. That is, all instruments in previously sterilized airtight bags, surgical fields and sterile gloves, table and equipment, all properly disinfected. In addition, both the care team and the surgeon must have disposable sterile surgical caps and gowns. It is important to highlight that when handling bone fillers, they must also be packaged with the maximum sterilization protocols for their use.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Maxillary Sinus Lift Surgery: “Description and Comparison of the Different Techniques” Clinical Case of Sinus Lift and Placement of Phibo TSH and TSA Implants
    
    AU  - Antonio Macías Lloret
    AU  - Carlos Parra Rogel
    Y1  - 2024/11/29
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20241002.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijdm.20241002.12
    T2  - International Journal of Dental Medicine
    JF  - International Journal of Dental Medicine
    JO  - International Journal of Dental Medicine
    SP  - 31
    EP  - 39
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-1387
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20241002.12
    AB  - A bibliographic review was carried out on the different procedures and most common materials for augmentation or elevation of the maxillary sinus for the posterior or joint placement of endosseous implants. The objective of this work is to present a clinical case and review the existing literature. The topic has been widely discussed by different specialists, describing the different techniques, and also that it is a procedure with a high success rate. On the other hand, it can usually be performed in an outpatient clinic, respecting the concepts of asepsis that must be considered in oral surgery procedures: correct preparation of the equipment, sterilization of instruments and disinfection of the surgical field. That is, all instruments in previously sterilized airtight bags, surgical fields and sterile gloves, table and equipment, all properly disinfected. In addition, both the care team and the surgeon must have disposable sterile surgical caps and gowns. It is important to highlight that when handling bone fillers, they must also be packaged with the maximum sterilization protocols for their use.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department Implantology and Oral Rehabilitation, Universidad Intercontinental, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Department Oral Surgery, Periodontics, Spain, Digital Prosthodontics and Implants, University of Malaga, Madrid, Spain

  • Sections