The issue of mutual understanding of cultures is today more relevant than ever and requires careful, deep and comprehensive consideration. This issue does not lie in the plane of one knowledge's direction, but is located in the interdisciplinary field in a complex interweaving of different scientific directions. Today it is an obvious fact that cultures touch each other by ideas and the way of worldview. The world picture of any cultural community is built on clots of ideas. Ideas arise in the human psychic field and are reflected in language through a special mechanism created by a culture, which stores and transmits the way of its worldview for the next generations. The psychic field, unlike the external environment, which consists of a multitude of random factors, is a field of certainty. In the field of certainty, the first sacred-value links between man and the world around him began to emerge and to be established at the dawn of the culture's origin. The first connections were unprecedented, because they formed basic thought-forms and served as an impetus for the creation of a mechanism for their fixation and transmission. This mechanism is based on thought forms, thought images, mental templates and language. If thought-forms are universal for any culture, then the filling of thought-forms with thought images and the formation of mental templates on their basis, as samples for perception and understanding of the culture's value reality, occurs individually in each culture. Acting together they create a special way of worldview, which is represented in any form of culture: language, painting etc. All subsequent ideas in a culture are realised through the way of worldview created by it and arise on the basis of the world's value picture, which was built on the first sacral-value relations. In non-written languages, ideas are not conceptualised. They may exist disparately, but within a value picture of the world. Ideas are conceptualised in written language, which leads to the emergence of the ideology's prototype. The first written languages, while extending to cultures that were in contact proximity, or that were part of one large community, it was not able to fully conceptualise the value systems already existing within the culture. Written language was able to absorb such meanings, but was unable to assimilate or change the mental templates, and the value picture of the world built on them, of these cultures. Mental templates and ways of worldview are not influenced from outside and individualise cultures.
Published in | International Journal of Education, Culture and Society (Volume 9, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.11 |
Page(s) | 246-257 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Way of Worldview, Sacral-value Relations, Mental Templates, Mechanism of Formation and Display of Relations, Cultural Language
[1] | Albert, Lucas, Derks Charles, Manea Alexandru I. (2016). On the Emergence of Mental Space in Psychology: Interview. European Journal of Psychology. Volume 12. Issue 2. Pp. 304–308. |
[2] | Al-Isfahani, Al-Ragheb (2013). A dictionary of the words of the Holy Qur’an. Dar Al Kotob Al Ilmiyah. |
[3] | Al Shuaibi, Imad M. K. (2015). Hadiths in the Fayrouzabad Dictionary - a modern linguistic study. Global Message Foundation. |
[4] | Bartlett. Frederic Ch. (1995). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press. |
[5] | Bazyma, Boris. (2005). Psychology of color. Theory and practice. Moscow: Rech. |
[6] | Belin, Victor, Petrov, Maxim (2016). Fractal model of constructing a picture of the world and its disruption in patients with schizophrenia. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Volume 2 (16). Pp. 16-26. |
[7] | Bekoeva, Diana (2022). Neuropsychology of thinking and artificial intelligence. Pedagogy and psychology of education. Volume 3. Pp. 175-183. |
[8] | Benedict, Ruth (2024). Models of culture. St. Petersburg: Alma Mater. |
[9] | Brown, Peneloppe (2002). Language as a Model for Culture. Anthropology Beyond Culture. Oxfordshire: Routledge. |
[10] | Chang, Yi-Fang. (2020). Three Dimensional Body-Mind-Spirit Words on Human Society and Parapsychology, and Preliminary Classification. |
[11] | Chernavsky, Dmitry. (2009). Synergetics and information. Moscow: LIBROCOM. |
[12] | Chiao, Joan I (2009). Cultural neuroscience: a once and future discipline. Progress in Brain Research. |
[13] | Chiao Joan I (2020). Philosophy of Computational Cultural Neuroscience. New York. Routledge. |
[14] | Chuang, Gao, Shiyin, Kang, Delidaer, Anran, Ma, Ya Liu (2023). The geometry of mental space. |
[15] | Dahl, Vladimir (1882). Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian language. St. Petersburg – Moscow. |
[16] | Domínguez D JF, Lewis ED, Turner R, Egan GF. (2009). The brain in culture and culture in the brain: a review of core issues in neuroanthropology. Progress in Brain Research. |
[17] | Ducasse, D., Van Gordon, W., Courtet, P., Ollie, E. (2019). Self-injury and self-concept. Journal of Affective Disorders. Volume 258. Pp. 115–116. |
[18] | Gelman, Susan A., Roberts, Stefan O. (2017). How language shapes the cultural heritage of categories. |
[19] | Hartocollis, Peter (2006). Space and mind. International Congress. Volume 1286. Pp. 133-138. |
[20] |
Jiao Li (2010). A review of research on teaching Chinese cultural words -
https://core.ac.uk/outputs/41439562/?utm_source=pdf&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=pdf-decoration-v1 |
[21] | Han, Shihui. Northoff, Georg, Vogeley, Kai, Wexler, Bruce E, Kitayama, Shinobu, Varnum, Michael E.W. (2013). A Cultural Neuroscience Approach to the Biosocial Nature of the Human Brain. Annual Reviews of Psychology. University of Ottawa. |
[22] | Li Shu-Chen (2009). Brain in macro experiential context: biocultural co-construction of lifespan neurocognitive development. Progress in Brain Research. Volume 178. Pp. 17-29. |
[23] | Linguistic dictionary. |
[24] | Luria, Alexander. (1979). Language and consciousness. Moscow. Moscow University Publishing House. |
[25] | Pavlyuk, Nikolai. (2012). Electronic connotative dictionaries and connotative system. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Volume1. Pp. 117-121. |
[26] | Piaget, Jean. (1983). Action patterns and language acquisition. Semiotics. Moscow: Raduga. |
[27] | Piaget, Jean. (1984). Genetic aspect of language and thinking. Psycholinguistics. Moscow: Nauka. |
[28] | Ruige, Wang. (2021). Cognitive semantic analysis of Chinese “meaning”. Educational Research. Volume 4. Issue 7. Pp. 118-119. |
[29] | Righteousness. Baidu Encyclopedia |
[30] | Steels, Luc (2011). Modeling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Reviews. Volume 8. Issue 4. Pp. 339-356. |
[31] | Tversky, Barbara. (2001). Structures of Mental Spaces. |
[32] |
Voronov Mikhail. (2002). Fractal model of the human psyche.
https://spkurdyumov.ru/biology/fraktalnaya-model-psixiki-cheloveka/ |
[33] | Yuan, Jin (1987). Mind is a field, a certainty field. Journal of Social and Biological Structures. Volume 10. Issue 3. Pp. 283-299. |
[34] | Yuan, Jin. (1987). Exploration of human knowledge. For the additional conductive role in the process of creation, accumulation, abstraction and thinning of mental connections. Journal of Social and Biological Systems. |
APA Style
Leontyeva, O. (2024). The Mechanism of Formation and Display of Sacral-value Relations in the Language of Culture. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 9(6), 246-257. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.11
ACS Style
Leontyeva, O. The Mechanism of Formation and Display of Sacral-value Relations in the Language of Culture. Int. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2024, 9(6), 246-257. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.11
AMA Style
Leontyeva O. The Mechanism of Formation and Display of Sacral-value Relations in the Language of Culture. Int J Educ Cult Soc. 2024;9(6):246-257. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.11, author = {Oksana Leontyeva}, title = {The Mechanism of Formation and Display of Sacral-value Relations in the Language of Culture }, journal = {International Journal of Education, Culture and Society}, volume = {9}, number = {6}, pages = {246-257}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijecs.20240906.11}, abstract = {The issue of mutual understanding of cultures is today more relevant than ever and requires careful, deep and comprehensive consideration. This issue does not lie in the plane of one knowledge's direction, but is located in the interdisciplinary field in a complex interweaving of different scientific directions. Today it is an obvious fact that cultures touch each other by ideas and the way of worldview. The world picture of any cultural community is built on clots of ideas. Ideas arise in the human psychic field and are reflected in language through a special mechanism created by a culture, which stores and transmits the way of its worldview for the next generations. The psychic field, unlike the external environment, which consists of a multitude of random factors, is a field of certainty. In the field of certainty, the first sacred-value links between man and the world around him began to emerge and to be established at the dawn of the culture's origin. The first connections were unprecedented, because they formed basic thought-forms and served as an impetus for the creation of a mechanism for their fixation and transmission. This mechanism is based on thought forms, thought images, mental templates and language. If thought-forms are universal for any culture, then the filling of thought-forms with thought images and the formation of mental templates on their basis, as samples for perception and understanding of the culture's value reality, occurs individually in each culture. Acting together they create a special way of worldview, which is represented in any form of culture: language, painting etc. All subsequent ideas in a culture are realised through the way of worldview created by it and arise on the basis of the world's value picture, which was built on the first sacral-value relations. In non-written languages, ideas are not conceptualised. They may exist disparately, but within a value picture of the world. Ideas are conceptualised in written language, which leads to the emergence of the ideology's prototype. The first written languages, while extending to cultures that were in contact proximity, or that were part of one large community, it was not able to fully conceptualise the value systems already existing within the culture. Written language was able to absorb such meanings, but was unable to assimilate or change the mental templates, and the value picture of the world built on them, of these cultures. Mental templates and ways of worldview are not influenced from outside and individualise cultures. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Mechanism of Formation and Display of Sacral-value Relations in the Language of Culture AU - Oksana Leontyeva Y1 - 2024/11/21 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.11 T2 - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society JF - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society JO - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society SP - 246 EP - 257 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3363 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.11 AB - The issue of mutual understanding of cultures is today more relevant than ever and requires careful, deep and comprehensive consideration. This issue does not lie in the plane of one knowledge's direction, but is located in the interdisciplinary field in a complex interweaving of different scientific directions. Today it is an obvious fact that cultures touch each other by ideas and the way of worldview. The world picture of any cultural community is built on clots of ideas. Ideas arise in the human psychic field and are reflected in language through a special mechanism created by a culture, which stores and transmits the way of its worldview for the next generations. The psychic field, unlike the external environment, which consists of a multitude of random factors, is a field of certainty. In the field of certainty, the first sacred-value links between man and the world around him began to emerge and to be established at the dawn of the culture's origin. The first connections were unprecedented, because they formed basic thought-forms and served as an impetus for the creation of a mechanism for their fixation and transmission. This mechanism is based on thought forms, thought images, mental templates and language. If thought-forms are universal for any culture, then the filling of thought-forms with thought images and the formation of mental templates on their basis, as samples for perception and understanding of the culture's value reality, occurs individually in each culture. Acting together they create a special way of worldview, which is represented in any form of culture: language, painting etc. All subsequent ideas in a culture are realised through the way of worldview created by it and arise on the basis of the world's value picture, which was built on the first sacral-value relations. In non-written languages, ideas are not conceptualised. They may exist disparately, but within a value picture of the world. Ideas are conceptualised in written language, which leads to the emergence of the ideology's prototype. The first written languages, while extending to cultures that were in contact proximity, or that were part of one large community, it was not able to fully conceptualise the value systems already existing within the culture. Written language was able to absorb such meanings, but was unable to assimilate or change the mental templates, and the value picture of the world built on them, of these cultures. Mental templates and ways of worldview are not influenced from outside and individualise cultures. VL - 9 IS - 6 ER -