Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Performance Assessment of Some Count Data Models to Immunization Coverage Data

Received: 11 July 2024     Accepted: 21 October 2024     Published: 22 November 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This research evaluates the performance of various count data models, including Poisson Regression (PR), Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression (ZIP), Zero-Truncated Poisson Regression (ZTP), Truncated Negative Binomial Poisson Regression (TNBP), and Negative Binomial Poisson Regression (NBP), using immunization coverage data from the National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA). The study focuses on children under 12 months, assessing model fit using Likelihood Ratio (LR), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) criteria. Analysis conducted with STATA indicates that the Truncated Negative Binomial Poisson Regression (TNBP) outperformed other models in fit and efficiency. Both the ZTeeP and TNBP models demonstrated the best fit, with lower AIC (1959.107) and BIC (2037.649) values and higher Pseudo R-squared values (0.0677 for ZTP and 0.0590 for TNBP), compared to standard models. Age was identified as a significant predictor, negatively associated with immunization status, implying that older infants in the under-12-month category are less likely to receive all vaccinations. The ZTP model showed significant positive effects for antigens such as HepB0, OPV0, BCG, and Measles, with age having a significant negative association. The findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate statistical models for accurate public health data analysis, enhancing decision-making in immunization programs.

Published in International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications (Volume 10, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijsd.20241004.12
Page(s) 89-100
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

PR, ZIP, TPR, NB, NBR, AIC, BIC, LR

References
[1] Abdulkabir, M., Udokang, A. E., Raji, S. T., and Bello L. K. (2015), An empirical study of generalized linear model for count data Applied & Computational Mathematics 2015, 4:5
[2] Agresti, A. (2007), An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, Second Edition, Wiley, Inc., New York.
[3] Atkins, D. C., Baldwin, S. A., Zheng, C., Gallop, R. J. and Neighbors, C., (2013). "A tutorial on count regression and zero-altered count models for longitudinal substance use data": Correction to Atkins et al. (2012). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(2), 379.
[4] Cameron, A. C., and Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[5] Cameron, A. C.; Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression Analysis of Count Data Book (Second ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-66727-3.
[6] Everitt B. S. (2002): The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[7] Famoye, F. and Singh, K. P., (2006). Zero-inflated generalized Poisson regression model with an application to domestic violence data. Journal of Data Science, 4(1), pp. 117-130.
[8] Famoye, F., Wulu, J. T. and Singh, K. P., (2004). On the generalized Poisson regression model with an application to accident data. Journal of Data Science, 2(2004), pp. 287-295.
[9] Greene, C. B. (1994). Testing for over dispersion in Poisson and binomial regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87(418): 451-57.
[10] Greene, W. H. (2003), Econometric Analysis; New York University, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Fifth Edition.
[11] Hardin J. W., and Hilbe, J. M. (2007) Generalized Linear Models and Extensions, Second Edition. 2nd ed. Stata Press; 2007.
[12] Ijomah, M. A., Biu, E. O., and Mgbeahurike, C. (2018) Assessing Logistic and Poisson Regression Model in Analyzing Count Data. International Journal of Applied Science and Mathematical Theory ISSN 2489-009X Vol. 4 No. 1 2018.
[13] Karazsia, B. T. and Van Dulmen, M. H., (2008). Regression models for count data: Illustrations using longitudinal predictors of childhood injury. Journal of pediatric psychology, 33(10), pp. 1076-1084.
[14] Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34(1), pp. 1-14.
[15] Yang, S., Harlow, L. I., Puggioni, G., & Redding, C. A. (2017). A comparison of different methods of zero-inflated data analysis and an application in health surveys. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 16(1), 518-543.
[16] Long, J. S., and Freese, J. (2005) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, Second Edition. 2nd ed. Stata Press; 2005.
[17] Mamun, M. A. A., (2014). Zero-inflated regression models for count data: an application to under-5 deaths (Master thesis, Ball State University) Muncie, Indiana.
[18] Mwalili, S. M., Lesaffre, E. and Declerck, D., (2008). The zero-inflated negative binomial regression model with correction for misclassification: an example in caries research. Statistical methods in medical research, 17(2), pp. 123-139.
[19] Peng, J. (2013). Count Data Models for Injury Data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).
[20] Piza, E. L. (2012): Using Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models to Measure the Influence of Risk on Crime incident Counts. Rutgers Center on Public Security.
[21] Poston Jr, D. L. and McKibben, S. L., (2003). Using zero-inflated count regression models to estimate the fertility of US women. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 2(2), p. 10.
[22] Shaw, D. (1988), 'On-site samples' regression problems of non-negative integers, truncation, and endogenous stratification', Journal of Econometrics, 37, 211-223; 2005.
[23] Slymen, D., Ayala, G., Arredondo, E., and Elder, J., (2006), A demonstration of modeling count data with an application to physical activity. Epidemiologic Perspectives and Innovations 3: 1-9.
[24] Yang, S., (2014). A comparison of different methods of zero-inflated data analysis and its application in health surveys (Master thesis, Rhode Island University).
[25] Yang, S., Harlow, L. L., Puggioni, G. and Redding, C. A., 2017. A Comparison of Different Methods of Zero-Inflated Data Analysis and an Application in Health Surveys. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 16(1), p. 29.
[26] Zorn, C. J. W. (1996). Evaluating zero-inflated and hurdle Poisson specifications. Midwest Political Science Association, 1-16.
[27] Zuur, A., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. and Smith, G. M., (2009). Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer Science & Business Media.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Aliyu, U., Usman, U., Bashar, A. U., Faruk, D. U. (2024). Performance Assessment of Some Count Data Models to Immunization Coverage Data. International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, 10(4), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsd.20241004.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Aliyu, U.; Usman, U.; Bashar, A. U.; Faruk, D. U. Performance Assessment of Some Count Data Models to Immunization Coverage Data. Int. J. Stat. Distrib. Appl. 2024, 10(4), 89-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsd.20241004.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Aliyu U, Usman U, Bashar AU, Faruk DU. Performance Assessment of Some Count Data Models to Immunization Coverage Data. Int J Stat Distrib Appl. 2024;10(4):89-100. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsd.20241004.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijsd.20241004.12,
      author = {Usman Aliyu and Umar Usman and Abubakar Umar Bashar and Daha Umar Faruk},
      title = {Performance Assessment of Some Count Data Models to Immunization Coverage Data
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {89-100},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijsd.20241004.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsd.20241004.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsd.20241004.12},
      abstract = {This research evaluates the performance of various count data models, including Poisson Regression (PR), Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression (ZIP), Zero-Truncated Poisson Regression (ZTP), Truncated Negative Binomial Poisson Regression (TNBP), and Negative Binomial Poisson Regression (NBP), using immunization coverage data from the National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA). The study focuses on children under 12 months, assessing model fit using Likelihood Ratio (LR), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) criteria. Analysis conducted with STATA indicates that the Truncated Negative Binomial Poisson Regression (TNBP) outperformed other models in fit and efficiency. Both the ZTeeP and TNBP models demonstrated the best fit, with lower AIC (1959.107) and BIC (2037.649) values and higher Pseudo R-squared values (0.0677 for ZTP and 0.0590 for TNBP), compared to standard models. Age was identified as a significant predictor, negatively associated with immunization status, implying that older infants in the under-12-month category are less likely to receive all vaccinations. The ZTP model showed significant positive effects for antigens such as HepB0, OPV0, BCG, and Measles, with age having a significant negative association. The findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate statistical models for accurate public health data analysis, enhancing decision-making in immunization programs.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Performance Assessment of Some Count Data Models to Immunization Coverage Data
    
    AU  - Usman Aliyu
    AU  - Umar Usman
    AU  - Abubakar Umar Bashar
    AU  - Daha Umar Faruk
    Y1  - 2024/11/22
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsd.20241004.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsd.20241004.12
    T2  - International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications
    JF  - International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications
    JO  - International Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications
    SP  - 89
    EP  - 100
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-3509
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsd.20241004.12
    AB  - This research evaluates the performance of various count data models, including Poisson Regression (PR), Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression (ZIP), Zero-Truncated Poisson Regression (ZTP), Truncated Negative Binomial Poisson Regression (TNBP), and Negative Binomial Poisson Regression (NBP), using immunization coverage data from the National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA). The study focuses on children under 12 months, assessing model fit using Likelihood Ratio (LR), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) criteria. Analysis conducted with STATA indicates that the Truncated Negative Binomial Poisson Regression (TNBP) outperformed other models in fit and efficiency. Both the ZTeeP and TNBP models demonstrated the best fit, with lower AIC (1959.107) and BIC (2037.649) values and higher Pseudo R-squared values (0.0677 for ZTP and 0.0590 for TNBP), compared to standard models. Age was identified as a significant predictor, negatively associated with immunization status, implying that older infants in the under-12-month category are less likely to receive all vaccinations. The ZTP model showed significant positive effects for antigens such as HepB0, OPV0, BCG, and Measles, with age having a significant negative association. The findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate statistical models for accurate public health data analysis, enhancing decision-making in immunization programs.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Statistics, Waziri Umar Federal Polytechnic, Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria

  • Department of Statistics, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria

  • Department of Statistics, Waziri Umar Federal Polytechnic, Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria

  • Department of Mathematics, Federal University, Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria

  • Sections