The urban developmental process depicts transformation of the landscape through spatial changes in zones closer to towns and cities across the world. This is evident in the spatio-temporal and sectorial changes in demographic, social, economic, technological and environmental aspects. Bamenda City is experiencing rapid growth in population and continues expansion of built-up land use, resulting in the reduction of agricultural and forest lands. There is continuous haphazard densification of buildings and uncontrolled urban sprawl. The aim of this article is to examine the dynamic trends and drivers of urban development anchored on the premise that urban development trends are directly related to population growth in Bamenda City. The methodology uses historical survey and correlational designs of field investigations to administer 300 questionnaires to the target population with a spatial picture reflected on the three municipalities (Bamenda I. Bamenda II and Bamenda III) for comparative analysis. Landsat Images were processed to show the spatio-temporal changes in land uses from 2000-2024. This was complemented by field observations and secondary data sources from institutions. Findings revealed that urban development is manifested in significant increase in infrastructures (22.7%) and peri-urban growth (18.2%). The trend is increasing in spatial rates seen in Bamenda I (47%), Bamenda II (42%) and Bamenda III (45%). Farmland use has reduced from 124.36 km2 (44.6%) in 2000 to 119.17 km2 (42.7%) in 2024 while built-up land has increased from 28.16 km2 (10.1%) 62.99 km2 (22.6%) in 2024. Population increase has been most dominant driver of urban development (Bamenda II (31%), Bamenda I (30%) and Bamenda III (28.8%). This replicates an inseparable nexus between population growth and urban. The study recommends the need for controlled land use planning to mitigate the increasing duplication of land uses and planned urban development.
Published in | International Journal of Sustainable Development Research (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20251101.12 |
Page(s) | 12-24 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Drivers, Land Use, Population, Trends, Urban Development
Major urban development indicators | Bamenda I | Bamenda II | Bamenda III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Freq | % | Freq | % | Freq | % | |
Significant increase in infrastructures | 5 | 22.7 | 26 | 16.7 | 20 | 9.01 |
Increasing population | 2 | 9.1 | 34 | 21.8 | 15 | 12.3 |
Overcrowding | 1 | 4.5 | 16 | 10.3 | 8 | 6.6 |
Connection to services | 2 | 9.1 | 12 | 7.7 | 10 | 8.2 |
Access to improved water sanitation | 1 | 4.5 | 10 | 6.4 | 6 | 4.9 |
Durable structure | 0 | 00 | 6 | 3.8 | 12 | 9.8 |
Land use changes | 3 | 13.6 | 19 | 12.2 | 19 | 15.6 |
Peri-urban growth | 4 | 18.2 | 12 | 7.7 | 11 | 9.01 |
Increased urban-rural linkages | 2 | 9.1 | 10 | 7.8 | 6 | 4.9 |
Increased service provision | 2 | 9.1 | 11 | 7.1 | 5 | 4.1 |
Total | 22 | 100 | 156 | 100 | 122 | 100 |
Land cover | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 | 2024 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area (km2) | Area (km2) | Area (km2) | Area (km2) | Area (km2 | Area (km2) | |
Built up | 28.16 | 33.40 | 36.51 | 47.09 | 55.31 | 62.99 |
Farmland | 124.36 | 123.70 | 119.93 | 119.40 | 119.31 | 119.17 |
Montane forest | 13.18 | 12.36 | 11.56 | 9.99 | 6.41 | 6.39 |
Gallery forest | 54.18 | 54.28 | 53.86 | 53.87 | 51.71 | 48.3 |
Rangeland | 32.04 | 31.10 | 30.91 | 29.62 | 27.98 | 26.48 |
Wetlands | 26.93 | 24.01 | 23.08 | 19.88 | 18.10 | 15.52 |
Water | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
Total | 279.02 | 279.02 | 279.02 | 279.02 | 279.02 | 279.02 |
Land cover | 2000 | 2005 | % changes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area (km2) | % | Area (km2) | % | ||
Built up | 28.16 | 10.1 | 33.40 | 12 | +1.9 |
Farmland | 124.36 | 44.6 | 123.70 | 44.3 | -0.3 |
Montane forest | 13.18 | 4.7 | 12.36 | 4.4 | -0.3 |
Gallery forest | 54.18 | 19.4 | 54.28 | 19.5 | +0.1 |
Rangeland | 32.04 | 11.5 | 31.10 | 11.1 | -0.4 |
Wetlands | 26.93 | 9.7 | 24.01 | 8.6 | -1.1 |
Water | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 00 |
Total | 279.02 | 100 | 279.02 | 100 | // |
Land cove | 2010 | 2015 | % changes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area (km2) | % | Area (km2) | % | ||
Built up | 36.51 | 13.1 | 47.09 | 16.9 | +3.8 |
Farmland | 119.93 | 43 | 119.40 | 42.8 | -0.2 |
Montane forest | 11.56 | 4.1 | 9.99 | 3.6 | -0.5 |
Gallery forest | 53.86 | 19.3 | 53.87 | 19.3 | 00 |
Rangeland | 30.91 | 11.1 | 29.62 | 10.6 | -0.5 |
Wetlands | 23.08 | 8.3 | 19.88 | 7.1 | -1.2 |
Water | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 00 |
Total | 279.02 | 100 | 279.02 | 100 | // |
Land cover | 2020 | 2024 | % changes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area (km2) | % | Area (km2) | % | ||
Built up | 55.31 | 19.8 | 62.99 | 22.6 | +2.8 |
Farmland | 119.31 | 42.8 | 119.17 | 42.7 | -0.1 |
Montane forest | 6.41 | 2.3 | 6.39 | 2.3 | 00 |
Gallery forest | 51.71 | 18.5 | 48.3 | 17.3 | -1.2 |
Rangeland | 27.98 | 10 | 26.48 | 9.5 | -0.5 |
Wetlands | 18.10 | 6.5 | 15.52 | 5.6 | -0.9 |
Water | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 00 |
Total | 279.02 | 100 | 279.02 | 100 | // |
Sub-Division | 2005 | 2015 | 2024 | % change between 2005 and 2024 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bamenda I | 19180 | 59348 | 67778 | 71.7 |
Bamenda II | 89654 | 312000 | 771704 | 88.3 |
Bamenda III | 37187 | 241173 | 440422 | 91.6 |
Total | 146021 | 612521 | 1279904 | 88.6 |
Spatial unit | Surface area (km2) | Population density in persons/km2 (2005) | Population density in persons/km2 (2024) | Net pop. change (2005 & 2024) | % change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bamenda I | 110 | 538 | 616 | +78 | 12.7 |
Bamenda II | 165.6 | 541 | 4660 | +4119 | 88.4 |
Bamenda III | 22.9 | 1623 | 19232 | +17609 | 91.6 |
Total | 298.5 | 489 | 4287 | +3798 | 88.6 |
Municipality | Transport (major streets, vehicle and bike parks) | Electricity (transformers) | Water (tanks and public taps) | Waste (disposal sites and public toilets) | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | % | No | % | No | % | No | % | ||
Bamenda I | 12 | 16.2 | 13 | 26.5 | 705 | 12.4 | 22 | 22.4 | 752 |
Bamenda II | 43 | 58.1 | 21 | 49 | 2909 | 51.3 | 56 | 57.1 | 3029 |
Bamenda III | 19 | 25.7 | 15 | 30.6 | 2057 | 36.3 | 20 | 20.4 | 2111 |
Total | 74 | 100 | 49 | 100 | 5671 | 100 | 98 | 100 | 5892 |
NIS | National Institute of Statistics |
LU/LC | Land Use/ Land Cover |
DEM | Digital Elevation Model |
[1] | Yoingco, J. (2024). Emerging sub-urban trends in 2024. Walzel Properties, LLC. 25P. |
[2] | Kimengsi J. N., Balgah S. N. and Achia S. N. (2017). Peri-urban land use dynamics and development implications in the Bamenda III Municipality of Cameroon. Sustainability in Environement, 2(3), 273-288. |
[3] | Margaritis E and Kang J (2017) Relationship between green space-related morphology and noise pollution. Ecological Indicators 72: 921–933. |
[4] | Akkoyunlu S. (2015). The Potential of Rural-Urban Linkages for Sustainable Development and Trade. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Policy. 4(8), 20–40. |
[5] | Rutstein, S., K. Johnson, and D. Gwatkin. 2022. Poverty, health inequality, and its health and demographic effects. Paper presented at the 2022 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, California. |
[6] | Dutta, V. (2012). Land Use Dynamics and Peri-urban Growth Characteristics: Reflections on Master Plan and Urban Suitability from a Sprawling North Indian City. Environment and Urbanization Asia September 2012, 3(2), 277-301. |
[7] | Zorrilla-Miras, P., Palomo, I., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2014). Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: A case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain). Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 160-174. |
[8] | Zhao P, Lu¨ B and de Roo G (2020) Urban expansion and transportation: the impact of urban form on commuting patterns on the city fringe of Beijing. Environment and Planning A 42(10): 2467–2486. |
[9] | Kombe, W. J. (2003). Land use dynamics in peri-urban areas and their implications on the urban growth and form: The case of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Habitat International, 29(1), 113-135. |
[10] | Schlimmer S. (2021). Land governance in the Outskirts of Africa Cities: Socio-Economic Challenges of Growing Peri-Urban Land Markets”, Briefings de l`Ifri, July 19, 2021. |
[11] | Trefon T. (2009). Hinges and Fringes: Conceptualising the peri-urban in Central Africa. In F. Locatelli and P. Nugent (Eds., 2009): African Cities. Competing Claims on Urban Spaces (Leiden), 15–36. |
[12] | OECD (2020). Africa’s urbanisation dynamics 2020. OECD Studies on Water, OECD Publishing, Paris, 93p. |
[13] | Fombe L. F. And Balgah S. N. (2012) The urbanisation process in Cameroon: patterns, implications and prospects. Nova Science Inc. New York; USA. |
[14] |
Gwan A. S. and Kimengsi J. N. (2020). Urban Expansion and the Dynamics of Farmers’ Livelihoods: Evidence from Bamenda, Cameroon Sustainability. Available at
www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Accessed on the 20/8/2023. |
[15] | Fombe F. L. and Acha M. E (2020). Land use dynamics and variations in sprawl across the municipalities in the Bamenda Urban space from 1996-2018. Journal of sustainable development. 13(4), 224-234. |
[16] | Acha M. E. and Fombe L. F. (2023). Gentrification patterns, trends and development implications of the Bamenda Metropolis from 1972-2022. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review, 06(03), 139-153. |
[17] | Chirisa I. (2010). Peri urban dynamics and regional planning in Africa: Implications for healthy cities. Journal of African studies and development, 2(6), 15-26. |
[18] | National Institute of Statistics (2023). Regional agency for the north west 2018 Edition. 313p. |
[19] | National Institute of Statistics (2017). Geodata Base of Cameroon. 402p. |
[20] | Nyambod E. M. (2010). Environmental Consequences of Rapid Urbanization: Bamenda City. of Cameroon. Journal of environmental protection, 1, 15-23. |
[21] | Sietchiping, R. (2003). Geographic information systems and cellular automata based model of informal settlement growth. 257 pp. PhD Dissertation, University of Melbourne. |
[22] | Rukiye G. O. K. and Hatice S. C. (2023). Dynamics and land transformations on the emerging of rurban areas in Bartin, Turkey. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press. 210p. |
[23] | Ravetz, J., Fertner, C., & Nielsen, T. S. (2013). Peri-Urban Futures: Scenarios and Models For Land Use Change In Europe. In K. Nilsson, S. Pauliet, S. Bell, C. Aalbers, & T. S. Nielsen (Eds.), Remaking Cities Contradictions of the Recent Urban Environment. New York, USA and Canada: Routledge Publications. |
[24] | Etxebarria, A., & Astorkiza, I. (2012). Are Land Use Policies Preserving Farmland from Urban Sprawl? Review of European Studies. Response Assessment. United Nations Environmental Programme, GRID-Arendal. |
[25] | Ndi, H. N., Ebai, E. and Enow, O. (2017). Urbanisation and market growth trends in the Yaounde Metropolis. Journal of Geography and Geology. 6(3), 27-42. |
[26] | World Bank. (2022). World development report 2020: Infrastructure for Development. New York: Oxford University Press. |
[27] | UN-HABITAT. (2019). United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) ‘A better quality of life for all in an urbanizing world’ The Strategic Plan 2020-2030. |
[28] | Mbanga, L. A (2018). Human settlement dynamics in the Bamenda III Municipality, North West Region, Cameroon. Center for research and urbanism, Journal of settlements and Spatial planning. 9(1), 47-58. |
[29] | Bureau Centrale de Recensement et d’Etude de la Population-BUCREP. (2005). Rapport de présentation des resultants définitifs. 66p. |
[30] | Siti A., Rio Y. M, (2023). Sociological perspectives on urban gentrification and its social implications. Journal of Current SDocial and Political Issues 1(2), 72-77. |
APA Style
Kinyui, N. C., Niba, M. L. F., Fon, F. L. (2025). Dynamic Trends and Patterns of Urban Development in Bamenda City of Cameroon. International Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 11(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20251101.12
ACS Style
Kinyui, N. C.; Niba, M. L. F.; Fon, F. L. Dynamic Trends and Patterns of Urban Development in Bamenda City of Cameroon. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Res. 2025, 11(1), 12-24. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20251101.12
AMA Style
Kinyui NC, Niba MLF, Fon FL. Dynamic Trends and Patterns of Urban Development in Bamenda City of Cameroon. Int J Sustain Dev Res. 2025;11(1):12-24. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20251101.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijsdr.20251101.12, author = {Nfor Constance Kinyui and Mary Lum Fonteh Niba and Fombe Lawrence Fon}, title = {Dynamic Trends and Patterns of Urban Development in Bamenda City of Cameroon }, journal = {International Journal of Sustainable Development Research}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {12-24}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsdr.20251101.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20251101.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsdr.20251101.12}, abstract = {The urban developmental process depicts transformation of the landscape through spatial changes in zones closer to towns and cities across the world. This is evident in the spatio-temporal and sectorial changes in demographic, social, economic, technological and environmental aspects. Bamenda City is experiencing rapid growth in population and continues expansion of built-up land use, resulting in the reduction of agricultural and forest lands. There is continuous haphazard densification of buildings and uncontrolled urban sprawl. The aim of this article is to examine the dynamic trends and drivers of urban development anchored on the premise that urban development trends are directly related to population growth in Bamenda City. The methodology uses historical survey and correlational designs of field investigations to administer 300 questionnaires to the target population with a spatial picture reflected on the three municipalities (Bamenda I. Bamenda II and Bamenda III) for comparative analysis. Landsat Images were processed to show the spatio-temporal changes in land uses from 2000-2024. This was complemented by field observations and secondary data sources from institutions. Findings revealed that urban development is manifested in significant increase in infrastructures (22.7%) and peri-urban growth (18.2%). The trend is increasing in spatial rates seen in Bamenda I (47%), Bamenda II (42%) and Bamenda III (45%). Farmland use has reduced from 124.36 km2 (44.6%) in 2000 to 119.17 km2 (42.7%) in 2024 while built-up land has increased from 28.16 km2 (10.1%) 62.99 km2 (22.6%) in 2024. Population increase has been most dominant driver of urban development (Bamenda II (31%), Bamenda I (30%) and Bamenda III (28.8%). This replicates an inseparable nexus between population growth and urban. The study recommends the need for controlled land use planning to mitigate the increasing duplication of land uses and planned urban development. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Dynamic Trends and Patterns of Urban Development in Bamenda City of Cameroon AU - Nfor Constance Kinyui AU - Mary Lum Fonteh Niba AU - Fombe Lawrence Fon Y1 - 2025/02/27 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20251101.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsdr.20251101.12 T2 - International Journal of Sustainable Development Research JF - International Journal of Sustainable Development Research JO - International Journal of Sustainable Development Research SP - 12 EP - 24 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1832 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20251101.12 AB - The urban developmental process depicts transformation of the landscape through spatial changes in zones closer to towns and cities across the world. This is evident in the spatio-temporal and sectorial changes in demographic, social, economic, technological and environmental aspects. Bamenda City is experiencing rapid growth in population and continues expansion of built-up land use, resulting in the reduction of agricultural and forest lands. There is continuous haphazard densification of buildings and uncontrolled urban sprawl. The aim of this article is to examine the dynamic trends and drivers of urban development anchored on the premise that urban development trends are directly related to population growth in Bamenda City. The methodology uses historical survey and correlational designs of field investigations to administer 300 questionnaires to the target population with a spatial picture reflected on the three municipalities (Bamenda I. Bamenda II and Bamenda III) for comparative analysis. Landsat Images were processed to show the spatio-temporal changes in land uses from 2000-2024. This was complemented by field observations and secondary data sources from institutions. Findings revealed that urban development is manifested in significant increase in infrastructures (22.7%) and peri-urban growth (18.2%). The trend is increasing in spatial rates seen in Bamenda I (47%), Bamenda II (42%) and Bamenda III (45%). Farmland use has reduced from 124.36 km2 (44.6%) in 2000 to 119.17 km2 (42.7%) in 2024 while built-up land has increased from 28.16 km2 (10.1%) 62.99 km2 (22.6%) in 2024. Population increase has been most dominant driver of urban development (Bamenda II (31%), Bamenda I (30%) and Bamenda III (28.8%). This replicates an inseparable nexus between population growth and urban. The study recommends the need for controlled land use planning to mitigate the increasing duplication of land uses and planned urban development. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -