This paper conducts a comparative analysis of technology development in Kenya, Estonia, and Mauritius, focusing on how these countries have established themselves as leaders in the digital economy. It employs document analysis as the primary methodology, examining government reports, regulations, pieces of legislation, and case studies to identify best practices and strategies that Kenya can adopt to enhance its digital economy. The findings show that unlike Kenya and Mauritius, Estonia has made digital literacy compulsory for all citizens. It has also employed a citizen-oriented strategy in service delivery. By putting the needs of its citizens at the forefront of digital programs, the Estonian government has developed an efficient and user-friendly digital ecosystems and solutions. PPPs are also more valued in Estonia and Mauritius than in Kenya. As a matter of fact, in the former two countries, private industries build while governments acquire and do the implementation, something that is missing in Kenya. The findings also suggest that compared to Kenya and Mauritius, Estonia has invested heavily in digital literacy, accountable and transparent digital ecosystems, and cyber security. This approach encapsulates e-government’s potential when implemented with robust, steadfast and clear commitment, infrastructure, citizen empowerment, and vision. Estonia views e-government as a vehicle for strengthening democracy and not just building technology; this is the foundation upon which its digital transformation is established. Kenya has made huge strides to make many of its public services accessible online. However, it still has room for improvement in terms of exploiting PPPs to explore collaborations with local and foreign entities.
| Published in | International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 13, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.14 |
| Page(s) | 275-286 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Digital Economy, Digital Policy, Technology, Development, Digital Ecosystems, Mauritius, Estonia, Kenya
| [1] | Ali, M. S. B. (2022). Digitalization and economic development: Insights from developing countries. Taylor & Francis. |
| [2] | Amnesty International. (2024). Citizens’ perspectives on Maisha Namba. Amnesty International. |
| [3] | Chen, Y.-C. (2017). Managing digital governance: Issues, challenges, and solutions. Taylor & Francis. |
| [4] | Chong, D. Y., Meissner, D., Lee, K., Vonortas, N. S., & Radosevic, S. (2021). The challenges of technology and economic catch-up in emerging economies. Oxford University Press. |
| [5] | Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th edition. SAGE. |
| [6] | Dener, C., Nii-Aponsah, H., Ghunney, L. E., & Johns, K. D. (2021). GovTech maturity index: The state of public sector digital transformation. World Bank Publications. |
| [7] | Dosso, M., Amadi-Echendu, J., & Daniels, C. (2021). Entrepreneurship, technology commercialization, and innovation policy in Africa. Springer International Publishing. |
| [8] | Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2021). Digital government and public management: Generating public sector innovation at the crossroads of research and practice. Taylor & Francis. |
| [9] | Greenway, A., & Terrett, B. (2018). Digital transformation at scale: Why the strategy is delivery. London Publishing Partnership. |
| [10] | Guo, Y. (2024). Emerging developments and technologies in digital government. IGI Global. |
| [11] | Liebowitz, J. (2023). Pivoting government through digital transformation. CRC Press. |
| [12] | Lips, M. (2019). Digital government: Managing public sector reform in the digital era. Taylor & Francis. |
| [13] | Mali, N. V. (2019). Governance, public administration, and citizen services: Emerging research and opportunities. IGI Global. |
| [14] | Milakovich, M. E. (2021). Digital governance: Applying advanced technologies to improve public service. Taylor & Francis. |
| [15] | Mowery, D., & Fagerberg, J. (2015). Innovation, technology and economic change. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. |
| [16] | Ndemo, B., & Weiss, T. (2016). Digital Kenya: An entrepreneurial revolution in the making. Palgrave Macmillan UK. |
| [17] | Noman, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). Industrial policy and economic transformation in Africa. Columbia University Press. |
| [18] | Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). The path to becoming a data-driven public sector. OECD. |
| [19] | Perriam, J., & Kjaer, K. M. (2024). Digitalization in practice: Intersections, implications and interventions. De Gruyter. |
| [20] | Rafique, K., Zaman, N., & Ponnusamy, V. (2019). Employing recent technologies for improved digital governance. IGI Global. |
| [21] | Ray, N., Ghatak, S. G. N., & Mukherjee, S. B. (2021). Digitization of economy and society: Emerging paradigms. Apple Academic Press. |
| [22] | Römmele, A., Silverman, M., & Falk, S. (2018). Digital government: Leveraging innovation to improve public sector performance and outcomes for citizens. Springer International Publishing. |
| [23] | Samoilenko, S. V. (2022). Digitalization: Contexts, roles, and outcomes. CRC Press. |
| [24] | Schou, J., & Hjelholt, M. (2018). Digitalization and public sector transformations. Springer International Publishing. |
| [25] | The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Going digital: Shaping policies, improving lives. OECD Publishing. |
| [26] | Trotta, A. (2017). Advances in e-governance: Theory and application of technological initiatives. Taylor & Francis. |
| [27] | Veit, D., & Huntgeburth, J. (2013). Foundations of digital government: Leading and managing in the digital era. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. |
APA Style
Omolo, A. W. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Technology Development in Kenya, Estonia, and Mauritius: Pathways to Becoming a Digital Hub in East Africa. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 13(6), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.14
ACS Style
Omolo, A. W. Comparative Analysis of Technology Development in Kenya, Estonia, and Mauritius: Pathways to Becoming a Digital Hub in East Africa. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2025, 13(6), 275-286. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.14,
author = {Amos William Omolo},
title = {Comparative Analysis of Technology Development in Kenya, Estonia, and Mauritius: Pathways to Becoming a Digital Hub in East Africa},
journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society},
volume = {13},
number = {6},
pages = {275-286},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20251306.14},
abstract = {This paper conducts a comparative analysis of technology development in Kenya, Estonia, and Mauritius, focusing on how these countries have established themselves as leaders in the digital economy. It employs document analysis as the primary methodology, examining government reports, regulations, pieces of legislation, and case studies to identify best practices and strategies that Kenya can adopt to enhance its digital economy. The findings show that unlike Kenya and Mauritius, Estonia has made digital literacy compulsory for all citizens. It has also employed a citizen-oriented strategy in service delivery. By putting the needs of its citizens at the forefront of digital programs, the Estonian government has developed an efficient and user-friendly digital ecosystems and solutions. PPPs are also more valued in Estonia and Mauritius than in Kenya. As a matter of fact, in the former two countries, private industries build while governments acquire and do the implementation, something that is missing in Kenya. The findings also suggest that compared to Kenya and Mauritius, Estonia has invested heavily in digital literacy, accountable and transparent digital ecosystems, and cyber security. This approach encapsulates e-government’s potential when implemented with robust, steadfast and clear commitment, infrastructure, citizen empowerment, and vision. Estonia views e-government as a vehicle for strengthening democracy and not just building technology; this is the foundation upon which its digital transformation is established. Kenya has made huge strides to make many of its public services accessible online. However, it still has room for improvement in terms of exploiting PPPs to explore collaborations with local and foreign entities.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative Analysis of Technology Development in Kenya, Estonia, and Mauritius: Pathways to Becoming a Digital Hub in East Africa AU - Amos William Omolo Y1 - 2025/12/08 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.14 T2 - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JF - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JO - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society SP - 275 EP - 286 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7420 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.14 AB - This paper conducts a comparative analysis of technology development in Kenya, Estonia, and Mauritius, focusing on how these countries have established themselves as leaders in the digital economy. It employs document analysis as the primary methodology, examining government reports, regulations, pieces of legislation, and case studies to identify best practices and strategies that Kenya can adopt to enhance its digital economy. The findings show that unlike Kenya and Mauritius, Estonia has made digital literacy compulsory for all citizens. It has also employed a citizen-oriented strategy in service delivery. By putting the needs of its citizens at the forefront of digital programs, the Estonian government has developed an efficient and user-friendly digital ecosystems and solutions. PPPs are also more valued in Estonia and Mauritius than in Kenya. As a matter of fact, in the former two countries, private industries build while governments acquire and do the implementation, something that is missing in Kenya. The findings also suggest that compared to Kenya and Mauritius, Estonia has invested heavily in digital literacy, accountable and transparent digital ecosystems, and cyber security. This approach encapsulates e-government’s potential when implemented with robust, steadfast and clear commitment, infrastructure, citizen empowerment, and vision. Estonia views e-government as a vehicle for strengthening democracy and not just building technology; this is the foundation upon which its digital transformation is established. Kenya has made huge strides to make many of its public services accessible online. However, it still has room for improvement in terms of exploiting PPPs to explore collaborations with local and foreign entities. VL - 13 IS - 6 ER -
Department of Business and Law, Swiss School of Business Research, Zurich, Switzerland
Information