Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Factors Associated with Cesarean Section in Primiparous Women at the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre in Coronthie, Conakry, Guinea

Received: 4 August 2024     Accepted: 29 September 2024     Published: 18 October 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Objective: to analyse the factors associated with Caesarean section in primiparous women. Methods: This was a 12-month (1 January to 31 December 2022) retrospective case-control study conducted at the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre (CMC) in Coronthie. Correctly completed records of primiparous women with a singleton pregnancy were included, with a live foetus in cephalic presentation having been delivered (by Caesarean section or vaginal delivery) from 28 weeks' gestation with a weight ≥ 1000 g. The "cases" consisted of records from primiparous women who had undergone caesarean section. The "controls" were composed by matching each "case" with the record of a patient who had undergone vaginal delivery, according to the order in the delivery register. Socio-demographic, clinical and obstetric characteristics were analysed and compared. A univariate analysis comparing cases to controls and a multivariate analysis looking for an association between maternal determinants were performed. Results: The prevalence of caesarean section in primiparous women was 31%. The average age of primiparous women was 24 ± 5 years. The 20-24 age group was the most represented in both groups, with 35% of caesareans and 42% of vaginal deliveries. The factors significantly associated with caesarean section in primiparous women were advanced maternal age (OR=1.13 CI=1.07-1.20), prolonged pregnancy (OR=25.1 CI =3.23 - 5.40), arterial hypertension (OR=4.98 CI= 2.24 -11.6), premature rupture of membranes (OR= 4.25 CI: 2.27 - 8.05), haemorrhagic complications (OR=8.56 CI=3.05 - 26.6), foetal distress (OR=68.4 CI=18.3 - 45.1) and macrosomia (OR=12.7 CI= 4.83 - 38.6). Conclusion: correct antenatal care and delivery by qualified personnel could help prevent some of these factors and thus reduce the caesarean section rate among primiparous women in our health facility.

Published in Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 12, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.jgo.20241205.14
Page(s) 110-117
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Associated Factors, Caesarean Section, Primipara, Coronthie, Conakry

1. Introduction
According to the WHO, caesarean section is a surgical intervention aimed at reducing maternal and foetal mortality when it is used for a medically justified reason . It is a method of delivery that obstetricians use whenever natural childbirth carries a greater maternal and/or foetal risk than the risk inherent in the procedure . Obstetric risk factors play a major role in predicting the mode of delivery. The risk of caesarean section is increased in the presence of at least one of these factors: foetal distress, malpresentation of the foetus, preterm delivery, gestational diabetes, premature rupture of membranes, multiple pregnancies, arterial hypertension and elderly primiparous women . However, one of the biggest risk factors for Caesarean section is the previous Caesarean section itself. The first caesarean section plays a vital role in a patient's obstetrical prognosis . This underlines the importance of the indication for caesarean section in primiparous women. Studies show that the first delivery, which is often associated with maternal and/or foetal complications, is therefore considered to be high-risk . According to recent WHO estimates covering 150 countries, 21% of all births were by caesarean section in 2018, with averages ranging from 1% to 58% depending on the country . The caesarean section rate among primiparous women also contributes to the increase in the overall number of caesarean sections. In France, Zelli et al. reported in 2016 a caesarean section rate of 38.15% in primiparous women . In the Democratic Republic of Congo, a 2017 study reported a 13.3% caesarean section rate among primiparous women . In Guinea, Keita and al. reported in 2014 a caesarean section rate of 30.5% in primiparous women . The decision to order a caesarean section for the first birth is a major issue in obstetrics due to the associated maternal and perinatal complications . The aim of this study was to analyse the factors associated with the practice of Caesarean section in primiparous women at the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre in Coronthie.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Setting
this was a retrospective case-control study lasting one year (1 January to 31 December 2022), carried out at the maternity unit of the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre in Coronthie, Conakry. This is a level II maternity unit in the Guinean health pyramid, with almost 4,000 deliveries per year, 35% of which are caesarean sections.
2.2. Study Population
Our study population consisted of all the records of primiparous patients who had given birth by caesarean section or vaginal delivery at the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre in Coronthie during the study period.
2.3. Selection Criteria
We included in this study the complete records of primiparous women with a single foetal pregnancy, foetus living in cephalic presentation having given birth (caesarean section or vaginal delivery) from the 28th WA with a weight ≥1000 g at the Communal Medical Centre Bernard Kouchner in Coronthie. Multiple pregnancies, foetal death in utero, other foetal presentations (breech, oblique, transverse, etc.), incomplete records and patients who gave birth outside the Communal Medical Centre Bernard Kouchner were not included.
2.4. Sample Constitution
In order to carry out a case-control comparison, we set up two groups of patients: the "cases" group, made up of records of patients who had undergone a caesarean section meeting the inclusion criteria, and the "controls" group, made up of records of patients who had undergone a vaginal delivery without an instrumental extraction meeting the inclusion criteria. We recorded 1 case for every 1 control.
2.5. Recruitment Method
We carried out systematic random recruitment, taking into account the records of primiparous patients. After calculating the sampling step, which is (sample size/target population size). Our recruitment consisted of skipping 2 files and taking the third file if it met our inclusion criteria. If the file did not meet our inclusion criteria, we automatically moved on to the next one.
2.6. Study Variables and Data Collection
The variables were qualitative (level of education, occupation, marital status, mode of admission, history, state of membranes, state of pelvis) and quantitative (maternal age, age of pregnancy, number of pregnancies, number of antenatal visits, number of ultrasounds and uterine height). The data collection technique consisted of reading the medical records and recording them on a survey form pre-established on Kobocollect. Other data media were used whenever necessary to clarify or supplement the data collected from the medical records.
2.7. Data Analysis
The data was collected from a smartphone using the Kobocollect application and analysed using R software. 4.3.2. The statistical analyses were carried out in two stages: a descriptive stage in which we presented the qualitative variables in the form of numbers and percentages, expressed the quantitative variables in the form of mean and standard deviation; an analytical stage in order to identify the factors potentially associated with the practice of caesarean section in primiparous women using the Chi-square test and Fisher's test for bivariate comparisons. The Chi-squared test was used when the calculated theoretical numbers were ≥ 5, and the Fisher test was used when the calculated theoretical numbers were < 5. All variables with a p-value ≤ 0.20 were included in a multivariate regression model. For each variable retained in the final model, the odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) were calculated. An OR equal to 1 indicates no effect, when it is less than 1 it indicates a protective effect, and when it is greater than 1 it indicates a risk effect. We considered a p-value < 0.05 as indicative of a statistically significant association.
2.8. Ethical Considerations
The data was collected anonymously and the information obtained was used for purely scientific purposes.
2.9. Limitations
The main limitations of this study were that it was retrospective and uni-centric.
3. Results
3.1. Frequency of Caesarean Section in Primiparous Women
During the study period, 3800 deliveries were carried out, of which 1394 were by caesarean section. Of those who underwent caesarean section, 432 were primiparous, representing a frequency of 31%.
3.2. Socio-demographic Profile of Patients
Table 1. Socio-demographic profile of women seen for childbirth (caesarean section and vaginal delivery) at the Bernard Kouchner CMC in Coronthie from 1 January to 31 December 2022.

Socio-demographic profile of patients

Cases

Controls

N=261

%

N=261

%

Age range

≤ 19 years

39

15

79

30

20-24 years old

91

35

110

42

25-29 years old

83

32

52

20

30-34 years old

34

13

20

7.7

≥ 35 years

14

5.4

0

0

24 ± 5 years (11 to 41 years old)

22 ± 4 years (14 to 34 years old)

Level of education

No schooling

48

18

31

12

Primary

18

6.9

32

12

Secondary

90

34

106

41

Higher

105

40

92

35

Marital status

Single

42

16

64

25

Married

219

84

197

75

Profession

Self-employed

79

30

77

30

Student

62

24

112

43

Employed

80

31

44

17

Housewife

40

15

28

11

Analysis of Table 1 shows that the age group most represented was 20 to 24 years (35%) among women who had undergone caesarean section and 42% among those who had vaginal deliveries. Of those who had undergone caesarean section, 84% were married, compared with 75% of those who had vaginal deliveries. Patients with a higher level of education were more numerous (40%) among those who had undergone caesarean section. On the other hand, 41% of vaginal deliveries were by women with secondary education.
3.3. Clinical Characteristics of Patients Received for Delivery at the Bernard Kouchner CMC in Coronthie
Table 2. Clinical characteristics of patients.

Variables

Cases (261)

Controls (261)

N

%

N

%

Age of pregnancy

28-36 SA + 6 days

35

13

24

9.2

37-41 SA + 6 days

214

82

236

90

≥ 42 SA

12

4,6

1

0.4

38.9 WA

39.4 WA

28-42 WA

30-42 WA

Prenatal consultation

None

46

18

24

9.2

1-3

41

16

77

30

≥4

174

67

160

61

Uterine height

≤ 34 cm

150

57

136

52

> 34 cm

111

43

125

48

State of membranes

Intact

128

49

218

84

Ruptured

133

51

43

16

High blood pressure on admission

No

199

76

249

95

Yes

62

24

12

4.6

Bleeding complications

No

230

88

254

97

Yes

31

12

7

2.7

3.4. Factors Associated with Caesarean Section in Primiparous Women
Table 3. Factors associated with the practice of caesarean section in primiparous women at the Bernard Kouchner CMC in Coronthie from 1 January to 31 December 2022.

Variables

Cases

Controls

p-value

N=261

N=261

Age range

<0.001

≤ 19 years

39 (33%)

79 (67%)

20-24 years old

91 (45%)

110 (55%)

25-29 years old

83 (61%)

52 (39%)

30-34 years old

34 (63%)

20 (37%)

≥ 35 years

14 (100%)

0 (0%)

Level of education

0.022

No schooling

48 (61%)

31 (39%)

Primary

18 (36%)

32 (64%)

Secondary

90 (46%)

106 (54%)

Higher

105 (53%)

92 (47%)

Profession

<0.001

Self-employed

79 (51%)

77 (49%)

Student

62 (36%)

112 (64%)

Employed

80 (65%)

44 (35%)

Age of pregnancy

0.002

28-36 WA + 6 days

35 (59%)

24 (41%)

37-41 WA + 6 days

214 (48%)

236 (52%)

≥ 42 WA

12 (92%)

1 (7.7%)

High blood pressure on admission

<0.001

No

199 (44%)

249 (56%)

Uterine height

0.2

≤ 34 cm

150 (52%)

136 (48%)

> 34 cm

111 (47%)

125 (53%)

State of membranes

<0.001

Intact

128 (37%)

218 (63%)

Ruptured

133 (76%)

43 (24%)

Table 4. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with Caesarean section in primiparous women at the Bernard Kouchner CMC in Coronthie from 1 January to 31 December 2022.

Variables

OR

IC 95%

P-value

Age

1.13

[1.07- 1.20]

<0.001

Marital status

Single

Married

1.33

[0.67- 2.70]

0.4

Origin

Conakry

Outside Conakry

0.34

[0.09- 1.07]

0.086

Age of pregnancy

28-36 WA + 6 days

37-41 WA + 6 days

0.82

[0.33- 2.04]

0.7

≥ 42 WA

25.1

[3.23- 540]

0.007

Prenatal consultation

0

1-3

0.16

[0.07- 0.39]

<0.001

≥4

0.38

[0.18- 0.80]

0.011

High blood pressure on admission

No

Yes

4.98

[2.24-11.6]

<0.001

Uterine height

≤ 34 cm

> 34 cm

2.19

[1.27-3.84]

0.005

State of membranes

Intact

Ruptured

4.25

[2.27- 8.05]

<0.001

Bleeding complications

No

Yes

8.54

[3.05-26.6]

<0.001

Fetal distress

No

Yes

68.4

[18.3-45.1]

<0.001

Suspicion of macrosomia

No

Yes

12.7

[4.83-38.6]

<0.001

Multivariate analysis showed that as age increased, primiparous women were 1.13 times more likely to have a caesarean section. Pregnancy at 42 weeks' gestation was 25.1 times significantly associated with caesarean section in primiparous women. Primiparous women with hypertension on admission were 4.98 times more likely to have a caesarean section. Patients with excess uterine height >34 cm were 2.19 times more likely to have a caesarean section. Also, primiparous women with premature rupture of the membranes were 4.25 times more likely to undergo caesarean section. Patients with haemorrhagic complications were 8.56 times more likely to have a caesarean section. Fetal distress and suspected macrosomia significantly increased the risk of Caesarean section in primiparous women by 68.4 times and 12.7 times respectively.
4. Discussion
We conducted a 12-month retrospective case-control study. The overall aim of our study was to contribute to the identification of factors associated with caesarean section in primiparous women.
During the study period, 432 primiparous women underwent caesarean section out of 1394 caesarean sections, i.e. 31%. Our rate is lower than that of Zelli et al , who reported a frequency of 74% in France in 2016. On the other hand, it is much higher than the rate of Munan et al in the Democratic Republic of Congo, who reported a frequency of 13.3% in 2017.
The average age of primiparous women who underwent caesarean section was 24 +/- 5 years, with extremes ranging from 11 to 41 years. In controls, the average age of women giving birth was slightly lower, at 22 +/- 4 years, with a range of 14 to 34 years. The 20 to 24 age group was the largest in both groups, accounting for more than a third (35%) of primiparous women who underwent caesarean section and 42% of those who gave birth vaginally. In Canada, Acharya et al reported in their study that the 24-29 age group was the most important. Other authors such as Zgheib et al in Lebanon found that most caesarean sections were performed in women aged 18 to 35. Similarly, Mongbo et al in Benin in 2016 reported that women undergoing caesarean section were aged between 15 and 35. Of the women who had a caesarean section, 84% were married, compared with 75% of those who had a vaginal delivery. This may suggest the influence of socio-economic and cultural factors limiting access to healthcare. The highest level of education was found among primiparous women (40%) who had undergone caesarean section. In contrast, 41% of women with vaginal deliveries had secondary education. Our result differs from that of Gamble et al who found that women who underwent caesarean section had secondary education. Of the women who underwent caesarean section, 31% were in paid employment, whereas 43% of those who gave birth vaginally were students. Level of education is often correlated with better socio-economic status, which in turn may offer better access to expensive care, including the possibility of choosing a caesarean section, whereas greater financial constraints among students may make them less inclined to opt for a caesarean section, which is generally more expensive than vaginal delivery. Logistic regression showed that as maternal age increased, the risk of caesarean section in primiparous women also increased (OR=1.13; CI=1.07-1.20), making primiparous women 1.13 times more likely to have a caesarean section. Pregnancy at 42 days' gestation (OR=25.1; CI=3.23 - 54.0) was 25.1 times significantly associated with caesarean section. Patients with high blood pressure on admission (OR=4.98; CI= 2.24 - 11.6) were 4.98 times more likely to undergo caesarean section. Patients with uterine height > 34 cm (OR=2.19; CI=1.27 - 3.84) and RPM (OR=4.25; CI=2.27 - 8.05) were 2.19 times and 4.25 times significantly at risk of caesarean section. Patients with haemorrhagic complications (OR=8.56; CI=3.05 - 26.6) were 8.56 times more likely to have a caesarean section. Fetal distress (OR=68.4; CI=18.3 - 45.1) and suspected macrosomia (OR=12.7; CI=4.83 - 38.6) significantly increased patients' risk of caesarean section by 68.4 and 12.7 times respectively. Our results differ from those of Ochieng et al in 2020, who, in Tanzania and Kenya, identified a statistically significant association between the practice of caesarean section and factors such as place of residence, maternal age, socio-economic level, level of education, number of antenatal visits and profession. As far as advanced maternal age is concerned, pregnancies in older primiparous women are often considered to be precious, and may present increased risks of obstetric complications, which is why some obstetricians avoid taking the risk of attempting a vaginal delivery. A pregnancy that exceeds the normal term of 40 WA increases the risks to foetal and maternal well-being, which could lead practitioners to decide on a caesarean section. The fact that uterine height influences Caesarean section in primiparous women could be explained by the fact that uterine height >34 cm, apart from hydramnios, presumes macrosomia. The risk of delivery by caesarean section increases when macrosomia is suspected in primiparous women. Delbrouque et al in 2022 in France reported in their study that maternal age over 28 years, suspected macrosomia and uterine height on admission over 32 cm significantly increased the risk of caesarean section in primiparous women.
5. Conclusion
The prevalence of caesarean section among primiparous women in our study was high. The profile of primiparous women who underwent caesarean section was that of young, married women with a higher level of education. The factors found in our study to be significantly associated with caesarean section in primiparous women were advanced maternal age, late term, high blood pressure, excess uterine height, premature rupture of membranes, haemorrhagic complications, foetal distress and suspected macrosomia. Correct antenatal care and delivery by qualified personnel could help prevent some of these factors and thus reduce the caesarean section rate among primiparous women in our health facility.
Abbreviations

CI

Confidence Interval

Cm

Centimetre

CMC

Communal Medical Centre

g

Gramme

N

Number

WHO

World Health Organisation

OR

Odds Ratio

WA

Weeks of Amenorrhoea

Authors Contributions
All authors contributed to the finalisation of this manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] World Health Organization. World Health Organization recommendations on non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.
[2] Vokaer R. Traité d’obstétrique [A treatise on obstetrics] Tome II Masson Paris 1986, 340-66.
[3] Akilimali PZ, Nzau NE. Les prédicteurs de l'accouchement par césarienne. Hopital général de reference de kinkanda à matadi. République Démocratique du Congo [Predictors of caesarean delivery. Kinkanda general reference hospital in Matadi. Democratic Republic of Congo]. Mali médical 2015; (2): P8.
[4] Delbrouque L. Facteurs de risque de césarienne chez une primipare en travail spontané. Université de Picardie Jules Verne Gynécologie et obstétrique. France [Risk factors for caesarean section in primiparous women in spontaneous labour. Université de Picardie Jules Verne Gynaecology and Obstetrics. France]. HAL. 2022 (3) P: 49.
[5] Munan R, Kakudji Y, Nsambi J, Mukuku O, Maleya A, Kinenkinda X, et al. Accouchement chez la primipare à Lubumbashi: pronostic maternel et périnatal. République démocratique du Congo [Childbirth in primiparous women in Lubumbashi: maternal and perinatal prognosis. Democratic Republic of Congo]. Pan Afr Med J 2017; P: 1-12.
[6] Lasserre Nathalie. La césarienne en urgence chez la femme primipare: le vécu de l'accouchement, les relations mère-enfant et l'accompagnement par les professionnels de santé, France [Emergency caesarean section for primiparous women: experience of childbirth, mother-child relationships and support from healthcare professionals, France] HAL. Sept. 2018; (5) P: 61.
[7] Dumont A, Guilmoto CZ. Trop et pas assez à la fois : le double fardeau de la césarienne [Too much and not enough at the same time: the double burden of a caesarean section]: Popul Sociétés France. 2020; (581): 1-4.
[8] Zelli P, Boussat B, Wetzel A, Ronin C, Pons JC, Sergent F. Indications des premières césariennes dans un centre hospitalo-universitaire régional et stratégies raisonnables pour les diminuer [Indications for first caesarean sections in a regional university hospital centre and reasonable strategies for reducing them]. J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2016 oct.; 45(8): 841-8.
[9] Keita N., Diallo FD., Gandaho E., Leno D. W. A La césarienne en Afrique exemple de la Guinée. CHU de Conakry. Hôpital national Donka, service de gynécologie et obstétrique [Caesarean section in Africa - example of Guinea. Conakry University Hospital. Donka National Hospital, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics]. 38ème journées nationales. Paris 2014. P: 259 (1).
[10] Pierre de Trogoff. Facteurs associés au taux de césarienne: étude rétrospective comparative entre les maternités du Nord-Pas-de-Calais. Université catholique de Lille, Faculté de médecine et maïeutique, Filière maïeutique. Gynécologie et obstétrique [Factors associated with caesarean section rates: a retrospective comparative study of maternity units in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region. Université catholique de Lille, Faculté de médecine et maïeu-tique, Filière maïeutique. Gynaecology and obstetrics]; 2016. HAL Id: ffdumas-01365596.
[11] Acharya K, Paudel YR. Trend and Sociodemographic Correlates of Cesarean Section Utilization in Nepal: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys 2006-2016. BioMed Research International. 2021 Mai 4: e 8888267.
[12] Zgheib SM, Kacim M, Kostev K. Prevalence of and risk factors associated with cesarean section in Lebanon — A retrospective study based on a sample of 29,270 women. Women and Birth. 2017 déc 1; 30(6): e 265-71.
[13] Mongbo V, Ouendo EM, De Brouwere V, Alexander S, Dujardin B, Makoutodé M, Zhang WH. La césarienne de qualité: étude transversale dans 12 hôpitaux au Benin [Quality caesarean section: cross-sectional study in 12 hospitals in Benin]. Revue d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique. 2016 sept 1; 64(4): 281-93.
[14] Gamble JA, Creedy DK. Women’s Preference for a Cesarean Section: Incidence and Associated Factors. Birth. Australia 2001; 28(2): 101-10.
[15] Ochieng Arunda M, Agardh A, Asamoah BO. Cesarean delivery and associated socioeconomic factors and neonatal survival outcome in Kenya and Tanzania: analysis of national survey data. Global Health Action. 2020 déc 31; 13(1): 1748403.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Athanase, L. D. W., Ibrahima, C., Julien, T. T., Mamoudou, M., David, L., et al. (2024). Factors Associated with Cesarean Section in Primiparous Women at the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre in Coronthie, Conakry, Guinea. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 12(5), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241205.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Athanase, L. D. W.; Ibrahima, C.; Julien, T. T.; Mamoudou, M.; David, L., et al. Factors Associated with Cesarean Section in Primiparous Women at the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre in Coronthie, Conakry, Guinea. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2024, 12(5), 110-117. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20241205.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Athanase LDW, Ibrahima C, Julien TT, Mamoudou M, David L, et al. Factors Associated with Cesarean Section in Primiparous Women at the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre in Coronthie, Conakry, Guinea. J Gynecol Obstet. 2024;12(5):110-117. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20241205.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jgo.20241205.14,
      author = {Leno Daniel William Athanase and Conte Ibrahima and Tolno Tamba Julien and Magassouba Mamoudou and Lamah David and Pindou Rence Carla Theresa and Sy Telly},
      title = {Factors Associated with Cesarean Section in Primiparous Women at the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre in Coronthie, Conakry, Guinea
    },
      journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
      volume = {12},
      number = {5},
      pages = {110-117},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20241205.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241205.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20241205.14},
      abstract = {Objective: to analyse the factors associated with Caesarean section in primiparous women. Methods: This was a 12-month (1 January to 31 December 2022) retrospective case-control study conducted at the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre (CMC) in Coronthie. Correctly completed records of primiparous women with a singleton pregnancy were included, with a live foetus in cephalic presentation having been delivered (by Caesarean section or vaginal delivery) from 28 weeks' gestation with a weight ≥ 1000 g. The "cases" consisted of records from primiparous women who had undergone caesarean section. The "controls" were composed by matching each "case" with the record of a patient who had undergone vaginal delivery, according to the order in the delivery register. Socio-demographic, clinical and obstetric characteristics were analysed and compared. A univariate analysis comparing cases to controls and a multivariate analysis looking for an association between maternal determinants were performed. Results: The prevalence of caesarean section in primiparous women was 31%. The average age of primiparous women was 24 ± 5 years. The 20-24 age group was the most represented in both groups, with 35% of caesareans and 42% of vaginal deliveries. The factors significantly associated with caesarean section in primiparous women were advanced maternal age (OR=1.13 CI=1.07-1.20), prolonged pregnancy (OR=25.1 CI =3.23 - 5.40), arterial hypertension (OR=4.98 CI= 2.24 -11.6), premature rupture of membranes (OR= 4.25 CI: 2.27 - 8.05), haemorrhagic complications (OR=8.56 CI=3.05 - 26.6), foetal distress (OR=68.4 CI=18.3 - 45.1) and macrosomia (OR=12.7 CI= 4.83 - 38.6). Conclusion: correct antenatal care and delivery by qualified personnel could help prevent some of these factors and thus reduce the caesarean section rate among primiparous women in our health facility.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Factors Associated with Cesarean Section in Primiparous Women at the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre in Coronthie, Conakry, Guinea
    
    AU  - Leno Daniel William Athanase
    AU  - Conte Ibrahima
    AU  - Tolno Tamba Julien
    AU  - Magassouba Mamoudou
    AU  - Lamah David
    AU  - Pindou Rence Carla Theresa
    AU  - Sy Telly
    Y1  - 2024/10/18
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241205.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jgo.20241205.14
    T2  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JF  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JO  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    SP  - 110
    EP  - 117
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7820
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241205.14
    AB  - Objective: to analyse the factors associated with Caesarean section in primiparous women. Methods: This was a 12-month (1 January to 31 December 2022) retrospective case-control study conducted at the Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre (CMC) in Coronthie. Correctly completed records of primiparous women with a singleton pregnancy were included, with a live foetus in cephalic presentation having been delivered (by Caesarean section or vaginal delivery) from 28 weeks' gestation with a weight ≥ 1000 g. The "cases" consisted of records from primiparous women who had undergone caesarean section. The "controls" were composed by matching each "case" with the record of a patient who had undergone vaginal delivery, according to the order in the delivery register. Socio-demographic, clinical and obstetric characteristics were analysed and compared. A univariate analysis comparing cases to controls and a multivariate analysis looking for an association between maternal determinants were performed. Results: The prevalence of caesarean section in primiparous women was 31%. The average age of primiparous women was 24 ± 5 years. The 20-24 age group was the most represented in both groups, with 35% of caesareans and 42% of vaginal deliveries. The factors significantly associated with caesarean section in primiparous women were advanced maternal age (OR=1.13 CI=1.07-1.20), prolonged pregnancy (OR=25.1 CI =3.23 - 5.40), arterial hypertension (OR=4.98 CI= 2.24 -11.6), premature rupture of membranes (OR= 4.25 CI: 2.27 - 8.05), haemorrhagic complications (OR=8.56 CI=3.05 - 26.6), foetal distress (OR=68.4 CI=18.3 - 45.1) and macrosomia (OR=12.7 CI= 4.83 - 38.6). Conclusion: correct antenatal care and delivery by qualified personnel could help prevent some of these factors and thus reduce the caesarean section rate among primiparous women in our health facility.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre, Conakry, Guinea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Donka National Hospital, University Hospital Centre, Conakry, Guinea

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ignace Deen National Hospital, University Hospital Centre, Conakry, Guinea

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre, Conakry, Guinea

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre, Conakry, Guinea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Donka National Hospital, University Hospital Centre, Conakry, Guinea

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ignace Deen National Hospital, University Hospital Centre, Conakry, Guinea

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Bernard Kouchner Communal Medical Centre, Conakry, Guinea

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ignace Deen National Hospital, University Hospital Centre, Conakry, Guinea

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Methods
    3. 3. Results
    4. 4. Discussion
    5. 5. Conclusion
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Authors Contributions
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information