Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Calculations of Resonances Energies of the Ne Atom, Ne-like Na+, Mg2+, and Ne+ Ions, Framework of the Modified Atomic Orbital Theory

Received: 14 August 2024     Accepted: 22 January 2025     Published: 11 February 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In the literature, there are several theoretical and experimental methods for calculating the resonance energies and natural widths of atomic systems. For the 1s22s2p6np ¹P1 series of Ne, Na+, Mg2+, and the 1s2s22p5np ¹P1 series of Ne+, various methods have been employed. In this present work, resonance energies resonance energies and width of the 1s22s2p6 np 1P1 series of the Ne, Na+, Mg2+, and 1s2s22p5 np 1P1 of Ne+ ions are calculated. The energies are calculated in the framework of the Modified Atomic Orbital Theory (MAOT). The results obtained compared very well with theoretical and experimental literature values. The possibility to use the MOAT formalism report rapidly with an excellent accuracy the position of the resonances as well as their width within simple analytical formulae is demonstrated. It is demonstrated that the MOAT-method can be used to assist fruitfully experiments for identifying narrow resonance energies. Thus, our results can be used as reference data for the interpretation of atomic spectra for the diagnosis of astrophysical and laboratory plasma. Through this method new values of these energies are reported going up to n=40. These excellent agreements between theory and experiments indicate that the MAOT formalism can be used to report accurate high-lying excited Rydberg series of atomic species for the diagnostic and the modeling of astrophysical or laboratory plasmas.

Published in Nuclear Science (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ns.20251001.11
Page(s) 1-14
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Photoionization, Resonance Energies, Width, Modified Atomic Orbital Theory, Rydberg Series, Synchrotron Radiation

1. Introduction
The emission and absorption of electromagnetic radiation by matter are strongly dependent on photon energy . The resulting spectral patterns are unique to each atom and its various charge states. Therefore, radiation spectra from astrophysical objects or laboratory plasmas can provide insights into the abundances of elements, their ionization stages, and the properties of the environment where these elements are found .
Depending on the temper ature and ambient radiation field of their physical environment, neon atoms exist in different charge states q covering the full range from q=0 to q=10. Terrestrial observatories can access spectral information from beyond the earth’satmosphereonlyat wavelengths exceeding about 100nm . Neon lines observed in astrophysical spectra, such as from planetary nebulae and galaxies , can be used for the diagnostics of the objects.
However, neon ions, due to their structure and various applications in laboratory experiments, astrophysics, and plasma physics, have been the subject of several experimental and theoretical studies.
Autoionization is thus essentially a consequence of electron correlation and requires a many-body theory for its calculation. Studies of the autoionization resonances in noble-gas atoms have long attracted experimental and theoretical scrutiny. The significant cosmic abundance of neon like highly charged ions (HCI) and other similar atomic or ionic many-electron systems has drawn special attention to their photoionization, with particular emphasis upon the asymmetric line profiles exhibited by the autoionization resonances . High-resolution studies with an accuracy of 3 meV in the photon energy range of 44 to 53 eV, revealing new relativistic features of highly excited resonances of Neon converging to different fine-structure thresholds 2p4 (3P)3s 2P and 2p4 (3P)3p 2P states of Ne+, were conducted by Schulz et al. . The Screening Constant by Unit Nuclear Charge (SCUNC) formalism reported accurate photoabsorption data Ne and of Ne-like Na+, Mg2+, Al3+, Si4+, P5+, S6+, and Cl7+ ions. Furthermore, others studied the single, double, and triple photoionization of Ne+ ions by single photons at the synchrotron radiation source PETRA III in Hamburg .
These authors reported natural widths and photon energies of the Ne+ 1s2s22p5 np 1P1 Levels (n=3, 4, 5, 6) from the ground state of Ne .
Photoionization is a well known process and described in literature . A brief outline is given below for the guidance of the readers. Photoionization occurs directly:
Moreover, the photoexcitation of the Ne (1s²2s²2p⁶ ¹S) ground state in the photon energy range of 840-930 eV can lead to the excitation of a single K-shell electron . The calibration measurements allowed us to further investigate photoabsorption by neutral neon as part of the present work on Ne+ ions.
The objective of this study is only focused on the photoionization of neon like Na+, Mg2+ and Ne+ ions. We applied the MAOT formalism to report resonance energies and widths of the 1s22s2p6 np 1P1 series of Ne and Ne-like Na+ and Mg2+. We also report the resonance energy 1s2s22p5 np 1P1 of Ne+ via the same formalism.
In this paper, after providing a brief description of the MAOT procedure, we present the resonance energy calculations for the Rydberg series of Ne and Ne-like ions, as well as the effective quantum number n. The obtained results will then be displayed and discussed. Finally, a conclusion will be drawn.
2. Theory
2.1. General Formalism of the MOAT Method
The bases of the MAOT formalism will be presented in detail in this paper, and the total energy of a given orbital (νl) is expressed in Rydberg units .
(1)
In Eq. (1), Z stands for the atomic number, σ is the screening constant relative to the electron occupying the νℓ orbital, ν and denotes respectively the principal quantum number and the orbital quantum number. However, the doubly excited states (DES) in two electron systems are labelled as . For the previous term, N denotes the quantum number of the inner electron and n that of the outer electron, their respective orbital quantum numbers are l and l', the total spin is represented by S, L is the total angular momentum, and the parity of the system is represented by π. For the doubly excited states, the total energy of an atomic system of many M electrons is expressed as follows :
(2)
In the photoionization study, the general expression of the resonance energy En for (2S+1LJ)nl - Rydberg series is given by (in Rydberg units). For these states
(3)
In this equation, m and q (with m < q) represent the principal quantum numbers of the (2S+1LJ)nl Rydberg series of the atomic system under study, used for the empirical determination of the screening constants, s denotes the spin of the nl- electron (s = 1/2), E<i><sub></sub></i> is the energy value of the series limit, typically obtained from the NIST atomic database, and Z represents the nuclear charge of the element in question. The only challenge encountered when using the MAOT formalism is related to the determination of the term .
The exact expression of this term is derived iteratively by applying the general equation (3) to generate accurate data with constant quantum defect values across all the studied series. During the iteration, the value of <i></i> is set to either 1 or 2. The quantum defect is determined using the standard formula
(4)
In this equation, R refers to the Rydberg constant, E∞ represents the convergence limit, Zcore denotes the electric charge of the core ion, and
(5)
2.2. Resonance Energy of the 1s2s22p5 np 1P1 Series of Ne+
(6)
2.3. Resonance Energy of the 1s22s2p4 (1D) 3s (2D) np1P and 1s22s2p4 (3P) 3p (2P) ns 1P series of Ne
For 1s22s2p4 (1D) 3s (2D) np1P
(7)
For 1s22s2p4 (3P) 3p (2P) ns 1P
(8)
2.4. Resonance Energies and of the Natural Widths of the 1s22s2p6 np 1P1 Series of Na+, Mg2+ (in Rydberg Units)
Resonance energies are given by the simple formula
(9)
The natural widths are given by
In addition, using (5), we express the natural width as follows
(10)
For all other series, the natural widths are given in the same form as the equation.
3. Results and Discussion
In Equations (7, 8, 9), and (10), the σi screening constant data, empirically evaluated, are obtained using the data from Sakho and Equation (6) from synchrotron radiation measurements of Müller et al. . The present paper results are compared with those from existingtheoretical and experimental literature. Each result is mentioned in a table along with its comparisons.
Tables 1 and 3 list resonance energy of the 1s22s2p4 (1D) 3s (2D) np1P and 1s22s2p4 (3P) 3p (2P) ns 1P series of Ne respectively. In this section, our results have been compared with those obtained by the following authors: Theoretically, first with the results from the Screening Constant by Unit Nuclear Charge (SCUNC) method , and then with results from Numerical Calculations (NC) ; experimentally, with results from Synchrotron Radiation (SR) , and then from Photoabsorption (PA) . The energy value of the series limit is and the σi screening constants in Eqs. (7, 8) taken from Sakho . For the the doubly 2s2p4 (1D) 3s (2D) np1P excited states of Ne (m=3) and (q=4) levels equal to 48.9066 eV, and 50.5600 eV, respectively. We get σ1= 8,9621 and σ2 = -1,2570. For the doubly 2s2p4 (3P) 3p (2P) ns 1P excited states of Ne (m=4) and (q=5) levels equal to 50.7601 eV, and 51.8926 respectively. We get σ1= 9,3227 and σ2 = -3,9005.
For doubly 2s2p4 (3P) 3p (2P) ns 1P and 2s2p4 (3P) 3p (2P) ns 1P excited states, the MAOT results listed in Tables 1 and 3 are seen to agree very well with both the quoted experimental and theoretical data up to n = 9 between MAOT and PA from Photoabsorption experiments of Codling et al , to n=16 between MAOT and (SR) from Synchrotron radiation experiments of Schulz et al. . The energy difference or between these levels values at 0,016 eV and 0,014 eV respectively. New theoretical values were found, ranging from n=40. In general, experiments and theories are in perfect agreement.
The effective quantum number n∗ of the doubly 2s2p4 (1D) 3s (2D) np1P, and 2s2p4 (3P) 3p (2P) ns 1P excited states of Ne is presented in Tables 2 and 4, respectively. In pure LS coupling where relativistic effects can be neglected, the effective quantum number is simply n= n− δ, with δ the quantum defect of the resonance. with δ the quantum defect of the resonance. Comparison indicates a very good agreement between the MAOT calculations and the quoted theoretical and experimental values up to n = 20. However, the jj coupling, where the quantum defect is given by , with z being the asymptotic charge seen by the photoelectron and α the fine-structure constant , better describes the resonance parameters in this work through correlation effects. This better explains some MOAT values in Tables 2 and 4.
Table 5 and 6 list resonance energy and natural width of the 2s2p6 np 1P1 series of Na+ and Mg2+. For Na+ and Mg2+, our MOAT results are compared with the theoretical results from SCUNC , HPTL, high-power adjustable laser calculations of Lucatorto et al. , DHF calculations , and HVSS, high-voltage spark spectra of Kastner et al. .
The energy value of the series limit is and the σi screening constants in Eqs. (9, 10) taken from Sakho . For the doubly 2s2p6 np 1P1 excited states of Na+ (m=3) and (q=4) levels equal to 69.950 eV, and 75.320 eV, respectively. We get σ1 = 9,1851 and σ2 = -2,3953. For the doubly 2s2p6 np 1P1 excited states of Mg2+ (m=3) and (q=4) levels equal to 98.776 eV, and 109.004 eV, respectively. We get σ1 = 9,2064 and σ2 = -2,6262.
For natural width of the 2s2p6 np 1P1 series of Na+ and Mg2. We compare the current MAOT calculations with other theoretical and experimental calculations. The screening constants σi in Eq. (10) are taken from Sakho .
For the doubly 2s2p6 np 1P1 excited states of Na+ (m=3) and (q=4) levels equal to 51,56 meV, and 22,50 meV, respectively. We get σ1= 10, 9030 and σ2= -0, 2642. For the doubly 2s2p6 np 1P1 excited states of Mg2+ (m=3) and (q=4) levels equal to 94,51 meV, and 43,44 meV, respectively. We get σ1=11,8460 and σ2= -0,2882. In general, good agreement is obtained between the quoted data; and new values referring to have been cited as references for future studies. Comparison shows excellent agreements with literature calculations.
Table 7 list resonance energy of the 1s2s22p5 np 1P1 of Ne+. For the 1s2s22p5 np 1P1 of Ne+, our MOAT results are compared with those of Muler et al. , the photoabsorption data from Witthoeft et al. and Gorczyca , as well as those from Juett et al. and Gatuzz et al. . The energy value of the series limit is and the σi screening constants in Eqs. (6) are derived from the experimental data of Müller et al. . For these states, (m=3) and (q=4) levels equal to 889.45 eV and 894.90 eV. We get σ1=8,3511 and σ2=-2,8382. The energy difference to n = 3 between these levels values at 0,03 eV. After comparison, we can state that our MAOT method allowed us to obtain accurate values up to n = 20. These values are in good agreement with those obtained from Muller's synchrotron radiation .
Table 1. Resonance energies (E, eV), of the doubly 2s2p4 (1D) 3s (2D) np1P excited states of Ne. EMAOT,SR denotes the energy difference between the present MAOT calculations and the experimental data of SR.

States

Theory

Experiment

MAOT

SCUNC

NC

SR

PA

EMAOT,SR

3

48.9066

48.9066

48.9063

48.9066

48.907

0.00

4

50.5600

50.5664

50.6496

50.56

50.565

0.00

5

51.2096

51.2494

51.3049

51.262

51.276

0.05

6

51.5260

51.5632

51.5865

51.561

51.563

0.03

7

51.7025

51.7326

51.745

51.732

51.736

0.03

8

51.8105

51.8343

51.8419

51.8332

51.842

0.02

9

51.8811

51.9001

51.9047

51.8975

51.898

0.02

10

51.9298

51.9452

51.9479

-

-

11

51.9648

51.9773

51.9789

51.9792

0.01

12

51.9907

52.0011

52.0017

52.0032

0.01

13

52.0104

52.0192

52.0186

52.0208

0.01

14

52.0258

52.0332

52.0299

52.0348

0.01

15

52.0379

52.0444

52.0452

0.01

16

52.0478

52.0534

52.0542

0.01

17

52.0558

52.0607

18

52.0625

52.0668

19

52.0681

52.0719

20

52.0728

52.0762

21

520768

52.0799

22

52.0803

52.0831

23

52.0833

52.0858

24

52.0859

52.0882

25

52.0882

52.0903

26

52.0903

52.0922

27

52.0921

52.0938

28

52.0937

52.0953

29

52.0951

52.0966

30

52.0964

52.0978

31

52.0975

32

52.0986

33

52.0995

34

52.1004

35

52.1012

36

52.1019

37

52.1026

38

52.1032

39

52.1038

40

52.1043

52.114

52.114

MAOT, Modified Atomique Orbital Theory, Present calculations.
SCUNC ; NC ; SR ; PA
Table 2. Effective quantum number n= n− δ of the doubly 2s2p4 (1D) 3s (2D) np1P excited states of Ne.

States

Theory

Experiment

MAOT

SCUNC

NC

SR

3

2.060

2.060

2.060

2.0597 (5)

4

2.959

2.965

3.049

2.963 (7)

5

3.879

3.967

4.102

3.997(12)

6

4.810

4.970

5.082

4.961(13)

7

5.750

5.972

6.078

5.970 (23)

8

6.695

6.974

7.080

6.964 (19)

9

7.644

7.976

8.075

7.933 (28)

10

8.595

8.977

9.069

-

11

9.548

9.978

10.039

10.058 (93)

12

10.503

10.979

11.039

11.10 (13)

13

11.460

11.979

11.985

12.10 (16)

14

12.417

12.980

12.771

13.13 (21)

15

13.375

13.980

14.09 (26)

16

14.335

14.981

15.12 (32)

17

15.294

15.981

18

16.254

16.981

19

17.214

17.982

20

18.174

18.982

21

19.135

19.982

22

20.096

20.982

23

21.057

21.982

24

22.019

22.983

25

22.980

23.983

26

23.942

24.983

27

24.904

25.983

28

25.866

26.983

29

26.828

27.983

30

27.790

28.983

31

28.753

32

29.715

33

30.678

34

31.640

35

32.603

36

33.566

37

34.528

38

35.491

39

36.454

40

37.417

Table 3. Resonance energies (E, eV), of the doubly 2s2p4 (3P) 3p (2P) ns 1P excited states of Ne. EMAOT,SR denotes the energy difference between the present MAOT calculations and the experimental data of SR.

States

Theory

Experiment

MAOT

SCUNC

NC

SR

PA

EMAOT,SR

E

E

E

4

50.7601

50.76

51.1834

50.76

50.749

0.00

5

51.8926

51.9271

52.0367

51.926

51.928

0.03

6

52.3724

52.3847

52.4303

52.388

52.387

0.02

7

52.6159

52.6157

52.64

52.618

-

0.00

8

52.7552

52.7485

52.7623

52.7493

52.737

0.01

9

52.8418

52.8319

52.8394

52.832

52.827

0.01

10

52.8990

52.8876

52.8916

52.8863

52.8863

0.01

11

52.9386

52.9266

52.9282

52.9243

0.01

12

52.9670

52.955

52.9549

52.9513

0.00

13

52.9881

52.9763

14

53.0041

52.9926

15

53.0164

53.0055

16

53.0262

53.0157

17

53.0340

53.0241

18

53.0403

53.0309

19

53.0455

53.0366

20

53.0499

53.0414

21

53.0535

53.0455

22

53.0566

53.049

23

53.0592

53.052

24

53.0614

53.0547

25

53.0634

53.0569

26

53.0651

53.059

27

53.0665

53.0607

28

53.0678

53.0623

29

53.0690

53.0637

30

53.0700

53.065

31

53.0709

32

53.0717

33

53.0724

34

53.0731

35

53.0737

36

53.0742

37

53.0747

38

53.0751

39

53.0756

40

53.0759

53.082

Table 4. Effective quantum number n of the doubly 2s2p4 (3P) 3p (2P) ns 1P excited states of Ne.

States

Theory

Experiment

MAOT

SCUNC

NC

SR

4

2.959

2.421

2.676

2.423 (3)

5

3.879

3.432

3.606

3.438(6)

6

4.810

4.417

4.567

4.444(13)

7

5.750

5.401

5.544

5.446 (24)

8

6.695

6.388

6.580

6.443 (15)

9

7.644

7.376

7.578

7.452 (23)

10

8.595

8.366

8.576

8.447 (33)

11

9.548

9.357

9.576

9.440 (5)

12

10.503

10.350

10.574

10.40 (13)

13

11.460

11.344

14

12.417

12.338

15

13.375

13.333

16

14.335

14.329

17

15.294

15.325

18

16.254

16.322

19

17.214

17.318

20

18.174

18.316

21

19.135

19.313

22

20.096

20.311

23

21.057

21.309

24

22.019

22.307

25

22.980

23.305

26

23.942

24.303

27

24.904

25.301

28

25.866

26.300

29

26.828

27.298

30

27.790

28.297

31

28.753

32

29.715

33

30.678

34

31.640

35

32.603

36

33.566

37

34.528

38

35.491

39

36.454

40

37.417

Table 5. Resonance energies (E, eV) of the 2s2p6 np 1P1 series of Na+ and Mg2+.

States

Na+

Mg2+

MAOT

SCUNC

HPTL

DHF

MAOT

SCUNC

DHF

HVSS

E

E

3

69.950

69.95

69.95

73.746

98.776

98.776

101.525

98.278

4

75.320

75.32

75.18

109.004

109.004

108.722

5

77.372

77.365

77.17

113.072

113.057

112.888

6

78.364

78.359

78.14

115.089

115.078

-

7

78.920

78.918

78.7

116.238

116.232

116.126

8

79.262

79.263

79.04

116.955

116.954

9

79.489

79.491

117.434

117.436

10

79.648

79.65

117.771

117.773

11

79.763

79.765

118.016

118.018

12

79.849

79.851

118.201

118.203

13

79.915

79.917

118.343

118.344

14

79.967

79.968

118.455

118.456

15

80.009

80.009

118.545

118.545

16

80.043

80.043

118.618

118.617

17

80.070

80.07

118.678

118.677

18

80.094

80.093

118.729

118.727

19

80.113

80.112

118.771

118.769

20

80.130

80.128

118.807

118.805

21

80.144

80.142

118.838

118.835

22

80.156

80.154

118.864

118.862

23

80.167

80.165

118.888

118.885

24

80.176

80.174

118.908

118.905

25

80.184

80.182

118.926

118.922

26

80.191

80.189

118.941

118.938

27

80.197

80.196

118.955

118.952

28

80.203

80.201

118.968

118.964

29

80.208

80.206

118.979

118.975

30

80.213

80.211

118.989

118.985

31

80.217

118.998

32

80.221

119.006

33

80.224

119.014

34

80.227

119.020

35

80.230

119.027

36

80.232

119.032

37

80.235

119.038

38

80.237

119.042

39

80.239

119.047

40

80.241

119.051

80.274

80.274

80.091

83.877

119,126

119,126

122.356

118.766

HPTL ; DHF ; HVSS
Table 6. Width (Γ, meV) of the 1s22s2p6 np 1P1 series of Ne-like ions (Z = 11–12).

n

Na+

Mg2+

MAOT

SCUNC

DHF

MAOT

SCUNC

DHF

Γ

Γ

Γ

Γ

Γ

Γ

3

51.55

51.56

60

94.53

94.51

90

4

22.50

22.50

43.45

43.44

5

12.38

12.11

24.72

24.40

6

7.77

7.50

15.89

15.58

7

5.31

5.09

11.05

10.80

8

3.85

3.67

8.11

7.92

9

2.91

2.77

6.20

6.06

10

2.27

2.17

4.88

4.78

11

1.81

1.74

3.94

3.87

12

1.48

1.42

3.24

3.20

13

1.23

1.19

2.71

2.68

14

1.04

1.01

2.30

2.29

15

0.89

0.86

1.97

1.97

16

0.76

1.71

17

0.67

1.50

18

0.58

1.32

19

0.52

1.17

20

0.46

1.05

21

0.41

0.94

22

0.37

0.85

23

0.34

0.77

24

0.31

0.70

25

0.28

0.65

26

0.26

0.59

27

0.24

0.55

28

0.22

0.50

29

0.20

0.47

30

0.19

0.44

Table 7. Resonance energies (E, eV) of the 1s2s22p5 np 1P1 of Ne+ ions. The very good agreement between the MAOT predictions and the recent synchrotron measurement of Müller et al. allows one to expect the MAOT quoted resonance energies for n = 7-20 as accurate. Ep, a denotes the energy difference between the present MAOT calculations and the experimental data of Muler et al 2017.

n

Resonance energies (E, eV)

Ep

Ea

Eb

Ec

Ed

Ee

Ep, a

3

889.45

889.945

890.40

890.40

890.40

890.40

0.50

4

894.90

894.90

895.00

895.40

895.40

895.40

0.00

5

896.96

897.10

897.20

897.30

897.30

897.30

0.14

6

897.93

897.90

898.28

899.2

899.2

899.2

0.03

7

898.46

8

898.78

9

898.98

10

899.12

11

899.22

12

899.29

13

899.35

14

899.39

15

899.43

16

899.45

17

899.47

18

899.49

19

899.51

20

899.52

….

899.63

899.63

p: present calculations; a: Muler et al (2017) ; b: Witthoeft et al (2009) ; c: Gorczyca (2000) ; d: Juett et al. (2006) ; e: Gatuzz et al. (2015) .
4. Conclusion
Photoionization of neutral neon and Ne+ ion has been successfully applied through Modified Atomic Orbital Theory (MAOT). Very high level energies as well as high natural widths have been found. The results presented in this study are in perfect agreement with the results available in the literature. These new high values will serve as a basis for interpreting the spectral lines of the neon atom in astrophysical objects and will serve as references for future theoretical and experimental studies.
Abbreviations

MAOT

Modified Atomic Orbital Theory

SCUNC

Screening Constant by Unit Nuclear Charge

DHF

Dirac-Hartree-Fock

SR

Synchrotron Radiation

PA

Photoabsorption

NC

Numerical Calculations

HPTL

High-power Adjustable Laser

HVSS

High-voltage Spark Spectra

DES

Doubly Excited States

Author Contributions
Each author contributed to improving the final version of the document.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] A. Müller, D. Bernhardt, A. Borovik Jr., T. Buhr, J. Hellhund, K. Holste, A. L. D. Kilcoyne, S. Klumpp, M. Martins, S. Ricz, Astrophys. J. 836, 166 (2017),
[2] Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481,
[3] I. Sakho, At. Data. Nuc. Data Tables 108, 57 (2016),
[4] Sultana N. Nahar, New Astronomy 67 (2019)97-102,
[5] Rubin, R. H., 2004. Proc. IAU Symp. 217. In: Duc, P. A., Braine, J., Brinks, E. (Eds.), Recycling Intergalactic and Interstellar Matter. Astron. Soc. Pac. pp. 190. San Francisco.
[6] Rubin, R. H., Dufour, R. J., Geballe, T. R., Colgan, S. W. J., Harrington, J. P., Lord, S. D., Liao, A. L., Levine, D. A., 2001. ASP Conf. Ser. In: Ferland, G., Savin, W. D. (Eds.), Spectroscopic Challenges of Photoionized Plasmas. Astron. Soc. Pac. Vol. 247. pp. 479. San Francisco.
[7] Dance, D., Palay, E., Nahar, S. N., Pradhan, A. K., 2013. MNRAS 435, 1576–1581. TOPbase. The Opacity Project database:
[8] Crockett, N. R., Garnett, D. R., Massey, P., Jacoby, G., 2006. ApJ 637, 741–751.
[9] S. B. Whitfield, R. Wehlitz, H. R. Varma, T. Banerjee, P. C. Deshmukh, and S. T. Manson, J. Phys. B 39, L335 (2006).
[10] A. K. S. Jha, P. Jha, S. Tyagi, and M. Mohan, Eur. Phys. J. D 39, 391 (2006).
[11] K. Schulz, M. Domke, R. Püttner, A. Gutiérrez, G. Kaindl, G. Miecznik and C. H. Greene, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3095 (1996),
[12] A. Diallo, M. Diouldé Ba, J. K. Badiane, M. T. Gning, M. Sow and I. Sakho, Jour. Mod. Phys. 9, 2594 (2018),
[13] A. Diallo, M. D. Ba, J. K. Badiane, M. T. Gning, M. Sow and I. Sakho, Jour. Atom, Mol. Conden. Nano Phys. 5, 215 (2018),
[14] T. B. Lucatorto and T. J. Mcllrath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 428 (1976).
[15] K. Codling, R. P. Madden, D. L. Ederer, Phys. Rev. 155 (1967) 26.
[16] M. Nrisimhamurty, G. Aravind, P. C. Deshmukh, S. T. Manson, Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015) 013404.
[17] S. O. Kastner, A. M. Crooker, W. E. Behring, and L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 16, 577 (1977).
[18] Witthoeft, M. C., Bautista, M. A., Mendoza, C., et al. 2009, Astrophys. J., 182, 127
[19] Gorczyca, T. W. 2000, Phys. Rev. A, 61, 024702,
[20] Juett, A. M., Schulz, N. S., Chakrabarty, D., & Gorczyca, T. W. 2006, Astrophys. J, 648, 1066.
[21] Gatuzz, E., García, J., Kallman, T., Mendoza, C., & Gorczyca, T. 2015, Astrophys. J, 800, 29.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Diallo, A., Badiane, J. K., Millimono, T. N., Sakouvogui, A., Ba, M. D. (2025). Calculations of Resonances Energies of the Ne Atom, Ne-like Na+, Mg2+, and Ne+ Ions, Framework of the Modified Atomic Orbital Theory. Nuclear Science, 10(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ns.20251001.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Diallo, A.; Badiane, J. K.; Millimono, T. N.; Sakouvogui, A.; Ba, M. D. Calculations of Resonances Energies of the Ne Atom, Ne-like Na+, Mg2+, and Ne+ Ions, Framework of the Modified Atomic Orbital Theory. Nucl. Sci. 2025, 10(1), 1-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ns.20251001.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Diallo A, Badiane JK, Millimono TN, Sakouvogui A, Ba MD. Calculations of Resonances Energies of the Ne Atom, Ne-like Na+, Mg2+, and Ne+ Ions, Framework of the Modified Atomic Orbital Theory. Nucl Sci. 2025;10(1):1-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ns.20251001.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ns.20251001.11,
      author = {Abdourahmane Diallo and Jean Kouhissoré Badiane and Tamba Nicolas Millimono and Ansoumane Sakouvogui and Mamadou Dioulde Ba},
      title = {Calculations of Resonances Energies of the Ne Atom, Ne-like Na+, Mg2+, and Ne+ Ions, Framework of the Modified Atomic Orbital Theory},
      journal = {Nuclear Science},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-14},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ns.20251001.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ns.20251001.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ns.20251001.11},
      abstract = {In the literature, there are several theoretical and experimental methods for calculating the resonance energies and natural widths of atomic systems. For the 1s22s2p6np ¹P1 series of Ne, Na+, Mg2+, and the 1s2s22p5np ¹P1 series of Ne+, various methods have been employed. In this present work, resonance energies resonance energies and width of the 1s22s2p6 np 1P1 series of the Ne, Na+, Mg2+, and 1s2s22p5 np 1P1 of Ne+ ions are calculated. The energies are calculated in the framework of the Modified Atomic Orbital Theory (MAOT). The results obtained compared very well with theoretical and experimental literature values. The possibility to use the MOAT formalism report rapidly with an excellent accuracy the position of the resonances as well as their width within simple analytical formulae is demonstrated. It is demonstrated that the MOAT-method can be used to assist fruitfully experiments for identifying narrow resonance energies. Thus, our results can be used as reference data for the interpretation of atomic spectra for the diagnosis of astrophysical and laboratory plasma. Through this method new values of these energies are reported going up to n=40. These excellent agreements between theory and experiments indicate that the MAOT formalism can be used to report accurate high-lying excited Rydberg series of atomic species for the diagnostic and the modeling of astrophysical or laboratory plasmas.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Calculations of Resonances Energies of the Ne Atom, Ne-like Na+, Mg2+, and Ne+ Ions, Framework of the Modified Atomic Orbital Theory
    AU  - Abdourahmane Diallo
    AU  - Jean Kouhissoré Badiane
    AU  - Tamba Nicolas Millimono
    AU  - Ansoumane Sakouvogui
    AU  - Mamadou Dioulde Ba
    Y1  - 2025/02/11
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ns.20251001.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ns.20251001.11
    T2  - Nuclear Science
    JF  - Nuclear Science
    JO  - Nuclear Science
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 14
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-4346
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ns.20251001.11
    AB  - In the literature, there are several theoretical and experimental methods for calculating the resonance energies and natural widths of atomic systems. For the 1s22s2p6np ¹P1 series of Ne, Na+, Mg2+, and the 1s2s22p5np ¹P1 series of Ne+, various methods have been employed. In this present work, resonance energies resonance energies and width of the 1s22s2p6 np 1P1 series of the Ne, Na+, Mg2+, and 1s2s22p5 np 1P1 of Ne+ ions are calculated. The energies are calculated in the framework of the Modified Atomic Orbital Theory (MAOT). The results obtained compared very well with theoretical and experimental literature values. The possibility to use the MOAT formalism report rapidly with an excellent accuracy the position of the resonances as well as their width within simple analytical formulae is demonstrated. It is demonstrated that the MOAT-method can be used to assist fruitfully experiments for identifying narrow resonance energies. Thus, our results can be used as reference data for the interpretation of atomic spectra for the diagnosis of astrophysical and laboratory plasma. Through this method new values of these energies are reported going up to n=40. These excellent agreements between theory and experiments indicate that the MAOT formalism can be used to report accurate high-lying excited Rydberg series of atomic species for the diagnostic and the modeling of astrophysical or laboratory plasmas.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Theory
    3. 3. Results and Discussion
    4. 4. Conclusion
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Author Contributions
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information