Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages

Debela Bekele

doi:doi:10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages

Debela Bekele

Published in Reports (Volume 1, Issue 4)

Received: 22 November 2021 Accepted: 16 December 2021 Published: 29 December 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The only way to increase agricultural production in the small or marginal units of farming is to increase the productivity per unit time and area. One method of increasing productivity is by using multiple cropping systems. It uses management practices where the total crop production from a single piece of land is achieved by growing single crops in close sequence, growing several crops simultaneously, or combining single and mixed crops in some sequence. Intercropping which is one of the multiple cropping systems is a growth of two crops in the same field, where the component crops are not necessarily sown at the same time nor harvested at the same time, but they are grown simultaneously for a portion of their growing periods. The objective of this paper is to revise intercropping systems and its advantages across the world. Some of the advantages of intercropping are increase productivity, greater stability of yield over different seasons, better use of growth resources, better control of weeds, pests and diseases, control erosion, fixation of nitrogen by the legume component and others. In Ethiopia, maize intercropped with common bean reduced the severity of Angular leaf spot (ALS) disease. When susbtaible faba bean cultivar was grown with either barley, oat, triticale or wheat, on average there was 47.2% reduction of disease severity for intercrops compared to that of the faba bean monocrop and 29.6% less disease area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for intercrops compared to the faba bean monocrop. Disease spread was reduced in mixed cropping because physical barriers against aerial pathogens and their vectors, trapping effect, altering microclimate (shading and humidity) and by spacing effect. The prevalence of the legume-based intercropping systems improves soil fertility by biological N fixation. Biological N; fixation (BNF) is a natural process in legume crops, where atmospheric nitrogen (N2) is fixed into ammonia (NH₃) in plant root nodules by a symbiotic form of Rhizobia. At the end yield advantage occurs because component crops differ in their use of growth resources in such a way that when they are grown in combination they are able to ‘complement’ each other and so make better overall use of resources than when grown separately. For example Sorghum and common bean row intercropping gave the highest agronomic advantage (43%) at Babile and 40% at Alemaya over sole cropping of the component crops.

Published in	Reports (Volume 1, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12
Page(s)	36-42
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Intercropping, Component Crops, Yield, Nitrogen Fixation, Land Equivalent Ratio

References

[1]	Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A., Sinebo, W., 2006. Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. Eur. J. Agron. 25, 202-207.
[2]	Aggrawal, P., D. P Garrity, S. P Libbon and R. R Morris, 1992. Resource use and plant interactions in a rice and mungbean intercrop. Agron. J., 84: 71-78.
[3]	Akter N, Alim A. Md., Islam M. M., Naher Z., Rahman M., Hossain I. M. (2004) Evaluation of Mixed and Intercropping Lentil and Wheat, J. Agron. 3, 48–51.
[4]	Allen, D. J, 1990. The influence of intercropping with cereals and disease developmentin legumes. pp. 62-67. In: S. R. Waddington, A. F. E. Palmer and O. T. Edje (Eds.). Research methods for cereals/legume intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa. CIMMYT, Mexico.
[5]	Allen, D. J., J. K. O. Ampofo and C. S Wortmann, 1996. Pests, diseases, and nutritional disorders of the common bean in Africa: a field guide. CIAT, Cali, Colombia, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 96p.
[6]	Amare Belay, 1992. Effect of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping on yield and yield components of the component crops. M.Sc. Thesis, Alemaya University of Agriculture, Alemaya, Ethiopia. 305p.
[7]	Banik P, Midya A, Sarkar BK, Ghose SS. 2006. Wheat and chickpea intercropping system in an additive series experiment; advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy 24, 325-332.
[8]	Baudoin, J. P., F. Camarena, and M. Lobo, 1997. Improving phaseolus genotypes for multiple cropping sustems. Euphytica, 96: 115-123.
[9]	Beets W. C. (1982) Multiple cropping and tropical farming systems, Gower Publishing Company Limited, Gower House, Aldershit, Hampshire, England.
[10]	Benites J. R., McCollum R. E., Naderman G. C. (1993) Production efficiency of intercrops relative to sequentially planted sole crops in a humid tropical environment, Field Crop. Res. 31, 1–18.
[11]	Bitew Y. and Asargew F. 2014. Rice (Oryza Sativa) and Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) relay intercropping systems in additive series experiment in rain fed lowland ecosystem of the Fogera vertisols. J. Biol, Agric. Healthcare, 4 (27): 199-204.
[12]	Board, J. E. and W. Hall, 1984. Premature flowering in soybean yield reductions at non-optimal planting dates as influenced by temperature and photoperiod. Agro. J., 74: 859-862.
[13]	Boudreau, M. A., Mundt, C. C., 1992. Mechanisms of alteration in bean rust epidemiology due to intercropping with maize. Phytopathol. 10, 1051e1060.
[14]	Bulson H. A. J., Snaydon R. W., Stopes C. E. (1997) Effects of plant density on intercropped wheat and field beans in an organic farming system, J. Agr. Sci. 128, 59–71.
[15]	Chatterjee, B. N. and S. Maiti, 1984. Cropping system: theory and practice. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta. 326 p.
[16]	Chu G. X., Shen Q. R., Cao J. L. (2004) Nitrogen fixation and N transfer from peanut to rice cultivated in aerobic soil in intercropping system and its effect on soil N-fertility, Plant and Soil 263, 17–27 Cocking, 2009.
[17]	Dillon Weston, W. A. R., 1944. Chocolate spot of beans. J. Ministry Agric. 51, 325e326. Ellis.
[18]	Echarte, L., A. Della Maggiora, D. Cerrudo, V. H. Gonzalez, P. Abbate, A, Cerrudo, V. O. Sadras, and P. Calviño. 2011. Yield response to plant density of maize and sunflower intercropped with soybean. Field Crops Res. 121: 423-429.
[19]	Eskandari, H. 2011. Intercropping of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and bean (Vicia faba): Effects of complementary and competition on intercrop components in resource consumption on dry matter production and weed growth. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10: 17755-17762.
[20]	Evans, L. T, 1993. Crop evolution, adaptation and yield. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[21]	Fernández-Aparicio, M., Amri, M., Kharrat, M., Rubiales, D., 2010. Intercropping reduces Mycosphaerella pinodes severity and delays upward progress on the pea plant. Crop Prot. 29, 744e750.
[22]	Fernández-Aparicio, M., Sillero, J. C., Rubiales, D., 2007. Intercropping with cereals reduces infection by Orobanche crenata in legumes. Crop Prot. 26, 1166e1172.
[23]	Fininsa, C. and J. Yuen, 2001. Association of bean rust and common bacterial blight epidemics with cropping systems in Hararghe highlands, eastern Ethiopia. Intl. J. Pest mgt., 47 (3): 211-219.
[24]	Francis CA. 1989. Biological efficiencies in multiple-cropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 42, 1-42.
[25]	Francis, C. A., 1978. Multiple-cropping potentialities of beans and maize. Hort. Sci., 13: 12-17.
[26]	Getachew Agegnehu, Amare Ghizaw, Woldeyesus Sinebo, (2008). Yield potential and land-use efficiency of wheat and faba bean mixed intercropping. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 28 (2), pp. 257-263.
[27]	Haymes R., Lee H. C. (1999) Competition between autumn and spring planted grain intercrops of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and field bean (Vicia faba), Field Crop. Res. 62, 167–176.
[28]	Hiebsch C. K., McCollum R. E. (1987) Area-×-time equivalency ratio: A method for evaluating the productivity of intercrops, Agron. J. 79, 15–22.
[29]	Keswani C. L. and R. A. D. Mreta, 1980. Effect of intercropping on the severity of powdery mildew on green-gram. In: Inter- cropping Proc., Second Symposium on intercropping in semi-arid areas (C. L. Keswani and B. NöUNGURa, Editors). Morogoro, Tanzania, 1101.
[30]	Kidane Giorgis, Amare Abebe, Adhanom Negassi, Legesse Dadi and Weldeyesus Senibo, 1990. Review of cereal/legume intercropping research in Ethiopia. pp. 67-175. In: Waddington.
[31]	Kopke U and Nemecek T (2010) Ecological services of faba bean. Field Crops Research, 115: 217-233.
[32]	Kurdali F., Sharabi N. E., Arslan A. (1996) Rain-fed vetch-barley mixed cropping in the Syrian semiarid conditions. I. Nitrogen nutrition using 15N isotopic dilution, Plant and Soil 183, 137–148.
[33]	Lithourgidis AS, Derdas CA, Damalas CA, Vlachostergois DN, (2011a). Annual inter crops: An alternative path way for sustainable agriculture. Aust J Crop Sci 5: 396-410.
[34]	Mead, R. and R. W Willey, 1980. The concept of land equivalent ratio and advantages in intercropping. Expl. Agric., 16: 217-228.
[35]	Mutembei MM., Gachene CKK., Chemining’wa GN and Karuma AN. 2017. Tillage And Relay Intercropping Effect On Yield And Yield Components Of Upland Rice. J. Agricultural Science and Food Technology. Vol. 3 (4), pp. 64-77 ISSN: 2465-7522.
[36]	Natrajan M., J. Kannaiyan, R. W. Willey and Y. L. Nene, 1985. Studies on the effect of cropping system on Fusarium wilt on pigeon pea. Field Crops Res., 10.
[37]	Nyambo, D. B., T. Matimati, A. L. Komba and R. K. Jana, 1980. Influence of plant combinations and planting configurations on three cereals (maize, sorghum, millet) intercropped with legumes (soybean and green gram). In: Proceedings of 2^nd symposium on Intercropping in Semi-arid areas, held at Morogoro, Tanzania, 4 -7 August.
[38]	Ofori F, Stern WR. 1987. Cereal-legume intercropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 41, 41-90.
[39]	Ogenga-Latigo, M. W., C. W. Baliddawa and J. K. O Ampofob, 1993. Factors influencing the incidence of the Black Bean aphid, Aphis fabae Scrop, on common beans intercropped with maize. Afric. Crop Sci. J., 1 (1): 49-58.
[40]	Pal, M., K. A. Singh and I. P. S Ahlawat, 1985. Cropping systems research: Indices and assessments. pp. 23-45. Nat. symp. Indian Soc. Agro. CSSRI Karnal, 3-5 April.
[41]	Palaniappan, S. P., 1985. Cropping systems in the tropics-principles and management. pp. 6-9. John Willey, Eastern Limited, New Delhi.
[42]	Pearce, R. C. L, J. Garabu, J. H. Grove and H. Lin, 1993. Development of Double-crop soybean under different soil-water regimes. Agron. J., 85 (3): 576-583.
[43]	Petersen, R. G., 1994. Agricultural field experiments: design and analysis. pp. 352-354. Marrcel Dekker, INC., New York.
[44]	Rao M. R., Willey R. W. (1980) Evaluation of yield stability in intercropping: Studies on sorghum/pigeonpea, Exp. Agr. 16, 105–116.
[45]	Sahile S., Fininsa C., Sakhuja P. K., Ahmed S. (2008). Effect of mixed cropping and fungic ides on chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) of faba bean (Vicia faba) in Eth. Crop Prot. 27 275–282. 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.06.003.
[46]	Sanford, J. O., 1979. Establishing wheat after soybeans in double cropping. Agro. J. 71: 109-112.
[47]	Santalla, M., J. M. Amurrio, A. P. Rodino and A. M. de Ron, 2001. Variation in traits affecting nodulation of common bean under intercropping with maize and sole cropping. Euphytica. 122 (2): 243-255.
[48]	Schoeny, A., Jumel, S., Rouault, F., Lemarchand, E., Tivoli, B., 2010. Effect and underlying mechanisms of peaecereal intercropping on the epidemic development of ascochyta blight. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 126.
[49]	Stern WR. 1993. Nitrogen fixation and transfer in intercrop systems. Field Crops Research 34, 335-356.
[50]	Ta, T. C. and M. A. Faris, 1987. Species variation in the fixation and transfer of nitrogen from legumes to associated grasses. Plant soil. 98: 265-274.
[51]	Tamado Tana and Eshetu Mulatu, 2000. Evaluation of sorghum, maize and common bean intercropping systems in Eastern Hararghe. Eth. J. Agric. Sci. 17 (1/2): 33-46.
[52]	Tesfa Bogale, Tolessa Debele, Setegn Gebeyehu, Tamado Tana, Negash Geleta and Tenaw Workayehu, 2001. Development of appropriate cropping systems for various Maize producing regions of Ethiopia. pp. 61-63. In: Enhancing the contribution of Maize to food security in 2^nd Natl. Workshop of Ethiopia. 12-16 November. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. EARO and CIMMYT, Central Press Plc.
[53]	Thiessen Martens, J. R., J. W. Hoeppner, and M. H. Entz. 2001. Legume cover crops with winter cereals in Southern Manitoba: Establishment, productivity, and microclimate effects. Agron. J. 93: 1086-1096.
[54]	Trenbath, B. R., 1976. Plant interactions in mixed crop communities. In: Proceeds. Of multiple cropping symposium, American Society of Agronomy Annual meeting. Knoxville, Tennesse, 24-29 August.
[55]	Tsubo M., Walker S., Ogindo H. O. (2005) A simulation model of cereallegume intercropping systems for semi-arid regions II. Model application, Field Crop. Res. 93, 23–33.
[56]	United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2011. Soil Quality Enhancement Activity - SQL08 – Intercropping to improve soil quality and increase biodiversity. Ranking Period 1 SQL08 1 Nov 19, 2010.
[57]	Urbatzka P, Grass R, Haase T, Schuler C, Hess J. 2009. Fate of legume-derived nitrogen in monocultures and mixtures with cereals. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 132, 116-125.
[58]	Vandermeer, J., 1989. The Ecology of Intercropping. pp. 93-95. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom
[59]	Willey RW. 1990. Resource use in intercropping system. Agricultural Water Management 17, 215-231.
[60]	Willey, R. W., 1979a. Intercropping-its importance and research needs. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstr., 32: 1-10.
[61]	Willey, R. W., 1979b. Intercropping-itsimportance and research needs. 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstr., 32: 73-81.
[62]	Woolley, J. N., I. T. Lepiz, T. de A. P. Castro and J. Voss, 1991. Bean cropping systems in the tropics and sub tropics and their determinants. pp. 679-706. In: Schoonhoven, A. V, and O. Voysest (eds.), Common beans: Research for crop improvement. CABI/CIAT, Wallington, UK.
[63]	Yadav, R. L., K. Prasad and B. S. Dwivedi, 1998. Cropping systems research. pp. 193-213. In: R. L. Yadav, P. Singh, and R. Prasad and I. P. S. Ahlawati (eds.). Fifty Years of Agronomic Research in India. Indian Society of Agronomy, New Delhi.
[64]	Yunusa IAM, Rashid MA. 2007. Productivity and rotational benefits of grass, medic pastures and faba beans in a rainfall-limited environment. Soil and Tillage Research 97, 150–161.
[65]	Zimmermann, M. J. de. O., 1996. Breeding for yield, in mixtures of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica. 92: 129-134. Euphytica. 92: 129-134.
[66]	Crabtree, M., Mirenda, P., and Beukelman, D. (1990). Age and Gender Preferences for Synthetic and Natural Speech. Augmentative Altern. Commun. 6 (4), 256–261. doi: 10.1080/ 07434619012331275544.
[67]	Strodtman K, Emerich D. 2009. Nodule metabolism. In: Emerich D, Krishnan H, eds. Nitrogen fixation in crop production. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 95–124.
[68]	Herridge, D., M., Peoples, R. M. and Boddey. 2008. Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant and Soil, 311: 1–18.
[69]	Cocking, E. C. 2009. The challenge of establishing symbiotic nitrogen fixation in cereals. In: Emerich, D. W. Krishnan, H. B: nitrogen fixation in crop production (eds). American society of agronomy, Inc. 35-64.
[70]	Unkovich, M. J., J. Baldock, and M. B. Peoples. 2010. Prospects and problems of simple linear models for estimating symbiotic N2 fixation by crop and pasture legumes. Plant and Soil, 329: 75–89.
[71]	Unkovich, M. J., Herridge, D. F., Peoples, M. 2008. Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Aus. Cent. Int. Agric. Res., 258-267.
[72]	Chianu, J. N., Nkonya, E. M., Mairura, F. S., Chianu, J. N., Akinnifesi, F. K. 2011. Biological nitrogen fixation and socioeconomic factors for legume production in sub-Saharan Africa. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 31: 139–154.
[73]	Fan, A., Chen X., and Li, Z. 2006. Effects of intercropping systems of trees with soybean on soil physicochemical properties in juvenile plantation. Journal of Forestry Research.; 17 (3): 226–230.
[74]	Camper H. M., C. F. Genter and K. L. Loope. 1972. Double cropping following winter barley harvest in eastern Virginia. Agron. J. 64: 1-3.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Debela Bekele. (2021). Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages. Reports, 1(4), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Debela Bekele. Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages. Reports. 2021, 1(4), 36-42. doi: 10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Debela Bekele. Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages. Reports. 2021;1(4):36-42. doi: 10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12,
  author = {Debela Bekele},
  title = {Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages},
  journal = {Reports},
  volume = {1},
  number = {4},
  pages = {36-42},
  doi = {10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.reports.20210104.12},
  abstract = {The only way to increase agricultural production in the small or marginal units of farming is to increase the productivity per unit time and area. One method of increasing productivity is by using multiple cropping systems. It uses management practices where the total crop production from a single piece of land is achieved by growing single crops in close sequence, growing several crops simultaneously, or combining single and mixed crops in some sequence. Intercropping which is one of the multiple cropping systems is a growth of two crops in the same field, where the component crops are not necessarily sown at the same time nor harvested at the same time, but they are grown simultaneously for a portion of their growing periods. The objective of this paper is to revise intercropping systems and its advantages across the world. Some of the advantages of intercropping are increase productivity, greater stability of yield over different seasons, better use of growth resources, better control of weeds, pests and diseases, control erosion, fixation of nitrogen by the legume component and others. In Ethiopia, maize intercropped with common bean reduced the severity of Angular leaf spot (ALS) disease. When susbtaible faba bean cultivar was grown with either barley, oat, triticale or wheat, on average there was 47.2% reduction of disease severity for intercrops compared to that of the faba bean monocrop and 29.6% less disease area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for intercrops compared to the faba bean monocrop. Disease spread was reduced in mixed cropping because physical barriers against aerial pathogens and their vectors, trapping effect, altering microclimate (shading and humidity) and by spacing effect. The prevalence of the legume-based intercropping systems improves soil fertility by biological N fixation. Biological N; fixation (BNF) is a natural process in legume crops, where atmospheric nitrogen (N2) is fixed into ammonia (NH3) in plant root nodules by a symbiotic form of Rhizobia. At the end yield advantage occurs because component crops differ in their use of growth resources in such a way that when they are grown in combination they are able to ‘complement’ each other and so make better overall use of resources than when grown separately. For example Sorghum and common bean row intercropping gave the highest agronomic advantage (43%) at Babile and 40% at Alemaya over sole cropping of the component crops.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages
AU  - Debela Bekele
Y1  - 2021/12/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12
T2  - Reports
JF  - Reports
JO  - Reports
SP  - 36
EP  - 42
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7146
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12
AB  - The only way to increase agricultural production in the small or marginal units of farming is to increase the productivity per unit time and area. One method of increasing productivity is by using multiple cropping systems. It uses management practices where the total crop production from a single piece of land is achieved by growing single crops in close sequence, growing several crops simultaneously, or combining single and mixed crops in some sequence. Intercropping which is one of the multiple cropping systems is a growth of two crops in the same field, where the component crops are not necessarily sown at the same time nor harvested at the same time, but they are grown simultaneously for a portion of their growing periods. The objective of this paper is to revise intercropping systems and its advantages across the world. Some of the advantages of intercropping are increase productivity, greater stability of yield over different seasons, better use of growth resources, better control of weeds, pests and diseases, control erosion, fixation of nitrogen by the legume component and others. In Ethiopia, maize intercropped with common bean reduced the severity of Angular leaf spot (ALS) disease. When susbtaible faba bean cultivar was grown with either barley, oat, triticale or wheat, on average there was 47.2% reduction of disease severity for intercrops compared to that of the faba bean monocrop and 29.6% less disease area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for intercrops compared to the faba bean monocrop. Disease spread was reduced in mixed cropping because physical barriers against aerial pathogens and their vectors, trapping effect, altering microclimate (shading and humidity) and by spacing effect. The prevalence of the legume-based intercropping systems improves soil fertility by biological N fixation. Biological N; fixation (BNF) is a natural process in legume crops, where atmospheric nitrogen (N2) is fixed into ammonia (NH3) in plant root nodules by a symbiotic form of Rhizobia. At the end yield advantage occurs because component crops differ in their use of growth resources in such a way that when they are grown in combination they are able to ‘complement’ each other and so make better overall use of resources than when grown separately. For example Sorghum and common bean row intercropping gave the highest agronomic advantage (43%) at Babile and 40% at Alemaya over sole cropping of the component crops.
VL  - 1
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Debela Bekele

Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Asella, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Debela Bekele. (2021). Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages. Reports, 1(4), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Debela Bekele. Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages. Reports. 2021, 1(4), 36-42. doi: 10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Debela Bekele. Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages. Reports. 2021;1(4):36-42. doi: 10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12,
  author = {Debela Bekele},
  title = {Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages},
  journal = {Reports},
  volume = {1},
  number = {4},
  pages = {36-42},
  doi = {10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.reports.20210104.12},
  abstract = {The only way to increase agricultural production in the small or marginal units of farming is to increase the productivity per unit time and area. One method of increasing productivity is by using multiple cropping systems. It uses management practices where the total crop production from a single piece of land is achieved by growing single crops in close sequence, growing several crops simultaneously, or combining single and mixed crops in some sequence. Intercropping which is one of the multiple cropping systems is a growth of two crops in the same field, where the component crops are not necessarily sown at the same time nor harvested at the same time, but they are grown simultaneously for a portion of their growing periods. The objective of this paper is to revise intercropping systems and its advantages across the world. Some of the advantages of intercropping are increase productivity, greater stability of yield over different seasons, better use of growth resources, better control of weeds, pests and diseases, control erosion, fixation of nitrogen by the legume component and others. In Ethiopia, maize intercropped with common bean reduced the severity of Angular leaf spot (ALS) disease. When susbtaible faba bean cultivar was grown with either barley, oat, triticale or wheat, on average there was 47.2% reduction of disease severity for intercrops compared to that of the faba bean monocrop and 29.6% less disease area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for intercrops compared to the faba bean monocrop. Disease spread was reduced in mixed cropping because physical barriers against aerial pathogens and their vectors, trapping effect, altering microclimate (shading and humidity) and by spacing effect. The prevalence of the legume-based intercropping systems improves soil fertility by biological N fixation. Biological N; fixation (BNF) is a natural process in legume crops, where atmospheric nitrogen (N2) is fixed into ammonia (NH3) in plant root nodules by a symbiotic form of Rhizobia. At the end yield advantage occurs because component crops differ in their use of growth resources in such a way that when they are grown in combination they are able to ‘complement’ each other and so make better overall use of resources than when grown separately. For example Sorghum and common bean row intercropping gave the highest agronomic advantage (43%) at Babile and 40% at Alemaya over sole cropping of the component crops.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Review on: Inter-Cropping System and Its Advantages
AU  - Debela Bekele
Y1  - 2021/12/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12
T2  - Reports
JF  - Reports
JO  - Reports
SP  - 36
EP  - 42
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7146
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20210104.12
AB  - The only way to increase agricultural production in the small or marginal units of farming is to increase the productivity per unit time and area. One method of increasing productivity is by using multiple cropping systems. It uses management practices where the total crop production from a single piece of land is achieved by growing single crops in close sequence, growing several crops simultaneously, or combining single and mixed crops in some sequence. Intercropping which is one of the multiple cropping systems is a growth of two crops in the same field, where the component crops are not necessarily sown at the same time nor harvested at the same time, but they are grown simultaneously for a portion of their growing periods. The objective of this paper is to revise intercropping systems and its advantages across the world. Some of the advantages of intercropping are increase productivity, greater stability of yield over different seasons, better use of growth resources, better control of weeds, pests and diseases, control erosion, fixation of nitrogen by the legume component and others. In Ethiopia, maize intercropped with common bean reduced the severity of Angular leaf spot (ALS) disease. When susbtaible faba bean cultivar was grown with either barley, oat, triticale or wheat, on average there was 47.2% reduction of disease severity for intercrops compared to that of the faba bean monocrop and 29.6% less disease area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for intercrops compared to the faba bean monocrop. Disease spread was reduced in mixed cropping because physical barriers against aerial pathogens and their vectors, trapping effect, altering microclimate (shading and humidity) and by spacing effect. The prevalence of the legume-based intercropping systems improves soil fertility by biological N fixation. Biological N; fixation (BNF) is a natural process in legume crops, where atmospheric nitrogen (N2) is fixed into ammonia (NH3) in plant root nodules by a symbiotic form of Rhizobia. At the end yield advantage occurs because component crops differ in their use of growth resources in such a way that when they are grown in combination they are able to ‘complement’ each other and so make better overall use of resources than when grown separately. For example Sorghum and common bean row intercropping gave the highest agronomic advantage (43%) at Babile and 40% at Alemaya over sole cropping of the component crops.
VL  - 1
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download