Rapid expansion of urbanization and industrialization has led to generation of huge quantities of waste materials where majority of organic waste is dumped in landfill sites, creates the organic load on the ground water, and more emissions of landfill gases. The best possible alternative to minimize these potential pollutants is through the process of vermicomposting because earthworms have the ability to convert organic waste into wealth (compost). This experiment was done to evaluate the effect of bedding materials for vermicompost production and performance of earthworm at Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Southwestern Ethiopia. The experiment consisted of three types of bedding materials including (cattle manure, donkey manure and poultry droppings) and four incubation periods (40, 60, 80 and 90 days) arranged factorially in completely randomized block design (RCBD) in three replications. The performance of worms was measured based on more suitable for vermicomposting including biological parameter, which measured the growth rate, the chemical nature of compost (pH), final number of worm, organic matter content (OM) of worm casts, total nitrogen (Tot. N) Content and carbon to nitrogen ratio. All of the above mentioned parameters showed that there is a significant difference observed on type of bedding materials used using ANOVA test. The LSD at (p < 0.05) test demonstrated that donkey manure followed by poultry droppings was more influential in worm biomass production, growth rate, total nitrogen and organic carbon content. In case of pH content of worm cast, it reveals that the optimum pH for worm growth rate is near to neutral condition. As conclusion, different types of bedding material will influence the worm growth.
Published in | Science Development (Volume 2, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.scidev.20210203.15 |
Page(s) | 57-61 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Vermicomposting, Bedding Materials, Biological Parameters
[1] | Ansari A, Jaikishun S (2011) Vermicomposting of sugarcane bagasse and rice straw and its impact on the cultivation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. in Guyana, South America. J Agric Tech 7 2: 225–234. http://www.ijat-aatsea.com. |
[2] | Bachman GR, MetzgerJD. Growth of bedding plants in commercial potting substrate amended with vermicompost. Bioresour Technol. 2007, 99: 3155–3161. |
[3] | Morales-corts MR, Gomez-sánchez MA, Pérez-sanchez R. Evaluation of green/pruning wastes compost and vermicompost, slumgum compost and their mixes as growing media for horticultural production. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 2014, 172: 155–160. |
[4] | Chauhan HK, Singh K (2013) Effect of tertiary combinations of animal dung with agrowastes on the growth and development of earthworm Eisenia fetida during organic waste management. Int J Recy Org Agric 2: 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-7715-2-11. |
[5] | Devi J, Prakash M (2015) Microbial Population dynamics during vermicomposting of three diferent substrates amended with cowdung. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 4 (2): 1086–1092 https://www.ijcmas.com. |
[6] | Dominguez J, State-of-the-art and new perspectives on vermicomposting research, Earthworm Ecology, C. A. Edwards (Ed.), CRC Press LLC, 2004, 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039719.ch20. |
[7] | Edwards CA, Subler S, Arancon N (2011) Quality criteria for vermicomposts. In: Edwards CA, Gajalakshmi S, Abassi SA (2004) Earthworms and vermicomposting. Int J Biotechnol 3: 486–94 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5894. |
[8] | Hernandez A, Castillo H, Ojeda D, Arras A, Lopez J, et al. Effect of vermicompost and compost on lettuce production. Chil J Agric Res. 2010, 70: 583–589. |
[9] | Ibrahim M H, Quaik S & Ismail S, Vermicompost, Its Applications and Derivatives, Prospects of Organic Waste Management and Significance of Earthworms, 2013, 199-130. |
[10] | Islam A K M S, Edwards D G & Asher C J, pH optima for crop growth, Plant and Soil, 1980, 339-357. |
[11] | Ismail SA (2005) the earthworm book. Other India Press, Mapusa, pp 101. |
[12] | Joshi R, Singh J, Vig AP. Vermicompost as an effective organic fertilizer and biocontrol agent: effect on growth, yield and quality of plants. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2015, 14: 137–159. |
[13] | Kaplan M (2016) The National Master Plan for Agricultural Development in Suriname. Final Report. Kaplan Planners Ltd. Regionaland Environmental Planning, pp 255. https://www.share4dev.info/kb/documents/5426.pdf. |
[14] | Kaushik P & Garg V K, Vermicomposting of mixed solid textile mill sludge and cow dung with the epidemic earthworm Eisenia fetida, Bioresource Technology, 90 (2003), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00146-9. |
[15] | Martin, T. E., 1988. Habitat and area effects on forest bird assemblages: is nest predation an influence?. Ecology, 69 (1), pp. 74-84. |
[16] | Negash D, Yohannes B, Waktoli S. Effect of Different Earthworm Feedstocks on vermicompost Quality and Local Earthworm Performance. In: Getachew, A., Gebreyes, G., Tolera A, Daniel M (Eds.), Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrient Management. Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addi Ababa, Ethiopia, pp: 193–202. 2018. |
[17] | Pattnaik S & Reddy M V, Nutrient Status of Vermicompost of Urban Green Waste Processed by Three Earthworm Species — Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavates, Applied and Environmental Soil Science, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2010, 1 13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/967526. |
[18] | SAS (Statistical Analysis System). (2012). SAS 9.3 Macro Language: Reference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. |
[19] | Simsek-Ersahin Y. The Use of Vermicompost Products to Control Plant Diseases and Pests. In: Biology of Earthworms, Soil Biology, pp: 191–213. |
[20] | Sinha K, Valani D, Soni B, Chandran V (2011) Earthworm vermicompost: a sustainable alternative to chemical fertilizers for organic farming. Agriculture issues and policies. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, p 71. |
[21] | Sundberg, C., Smårs, S. and Jönsson, H., 2004. Low pH as an inhibiting factor in the transition from mesophilic to thermophilic phase in composting. Bioresource technology, 95 (2), pp. 145-150. |
[22] | Suthar S, Vermicomposting potential of Perionyx sansibaricus (Perrier) in different waste materials, Bioresource Technology, 98 (2007), 1231–1237. |
[23] | Zhang B G, Li GT, Shen T S, Wang J K & Sun Z, Changes in microbial biomass C, N, and P and enzyme activities in soil incubated with the earthworms Metaphire guillelmi or Eisenia fetida, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32 (2000), 2055–2062. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00111-5. |
APA Style
Habetamu Getinet, Gebreslassie Hailu, Hirut Birhanu. (2021). Evaluation of Earthworm Multiplication Bedding Materials for Effective Vermicompost Production at Jimma, Southwestern Ethiopia. Science Development, 2(3), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20210203.15
ACS Style
Habetamu Getinet; Gebreslassie Hailu; Hirut Birhanu. Evaluation of Earthworm Multiplication Bedding Materials for Effective Vermicompost Production at Jimma, Southwestern Ethiopia. Sci. Dev. 2021, 2(3), 57-61. doi: 10.11648/j.scidev.20210203.15
@article{10.11648/j.scidev.20210203.15, author = {Habetamu Getinet and Gebreslassie Hailu and Hirut Birhanu}, title = {Evaluation of Earthworm Multiplication Bedding Materials for Effective Vermicompost Production at Jimma, Southwestern Ethiopia}, journal = {Science Development}, volume = {2}, number = {3}, pages = {57-61}, doi = {10.11648/j.scidev.20210203.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20210203.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.scidev.20210203.15}, abstract = {Rapid expansion of urbanization and industrialization has led to generation of huge quantities of waste materials where majority of organic waste is dumped in landfill sites, creates the organic load on the ground water, and more emissions of landfill gases. The best possible alternative to minimize these potential pollutants is through the process of vermicomposting because earthworms have the ability to convert organic waste into wealth (compost). This experiment was done to evaluate the effect of bedding materials for vermicompost production and performance of earthworm at Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Southwestern Ethiopia. The experiment consisted of three types of bedding materials including (cattle manure, donkey manure and poultry droppings) and four incubation periods (40, 60, 80 and 90 days) arranged factorially in completely randomized block design (RCBD) in three replications. The performance of worms was measured based on more suitable for vermicomposting including biological parameter, which measured the growth rate, the chemical nature of compost (pH), final number of worm, organic matter content (OM) of worm casts, total nitrogen (Tot. N) Content and carbon to nitrogen ratio. All of the above mentioned parameters showed that there is a significant difference observed on type of bedding materials used using ANOVA test. The LSD at (p < 0.05) test demonstrated that donkey manure followed by poultry droppings was more influential in worm biomass production, growth rate, total nitrogen and organic carbon content. In case of pH content of worm cast, it reveals that the optimum pH for worm growth rate is near to neutral condition. As conclusion, different types of bedding material will influence the worm growth.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Earthworm Multiplication Bedding Materials for Effective Vermicompost Production at Jimma, Southwestern Ethiopia AU - Habetamu Getinet AU - Gebreslassie Hailu AU - Hirut Birhanu Y1 - 2021/09/04 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20210203.15 DO - 10.11648/j.scidev.20210203.15 T2 - Science Development JF - Science Development JO - Science Development SP - 57 EP - 61 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7154 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20210203.15 AB - Rapid expansion of urbanization and industrialization has led to generation of huge quantities of waste materials where majority of organic waste is dumped in landfill sites, creates the organic load on the ground water, and more emissions of landfill gases. The best possible alternative to minimize these potential pollutants is through the process of vermicomposting because earthworms have the ability to convert organic waste into wealth (compost). This experiment was done to evaluate the effect of bedding materials for vermicompost production and performance of earthworm at Jimma Agricultural Research Center, Southwestern Ethiopia. The experiment consisted of three types of bedding materials including (cattle manure, donkey manure and poultry droppings) and four incubation periods (40, 60, 80 and 90 days) arranged factorially in completely randomized block design (RCBD) in three replications. The performance of worms was measured based on more suitable for vermicomposting including biological parameter, which measured the growth rate, the chemical nature of compost (pH), final number of worm, organic matter content (OM) of worm casts, total nitrogen (Tot. N) Content and carbon to nitrogen ratio. All of the above mentioned parameters showed that there is a significant difference observed on type of bedding materials used using ANOVA test. The LSD at (p < 0.05) test demonstrated that donkey manure followed by poultry droppings was more influential in worm biomass production, growth rate, total nitrogen and organic carbon content. In case of pH content of worm cast, it reveals that the optimum pH for worm growth rate is near to neutral condition. As conclusion, different types of bedding material will influence the worm growth. VL - 2 IS - 3 ER -