The study was carried out in 2021/22 under irrigation with the objectives of investigating the response of hot pepper (Capsicum annum L.) varieties to organic mulching materials. The treatment consisted of three pepper varieties (Oda haro, Bako local and Mareko fana) and five levels of organic mulching materials (Control, Maize straw, Soybean straw, Sesame straw, and Cattle manure) and combined factorially and laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The results of analysis of variance indicated that the effects of varieties and organic mulching materials were significant (P<0.05) for all parameters. All agronomic traits except days to 50% flowering, number of seeds per fruit and fruit dry weight were significantly affected by the combined effect of organic mulching materials and hot pepper varieties. Mareko fana variety with Cattle manure resulted the highest Marketable yield (1561.1kg/ha). In general, application of cattle manure for pepper varieties, especially Marekofana improved vegetative growth and marketable yield. Thus, hot pepper growers in the study area can use Cattle manure as mulching material that would improve productivity of the crop. However, to give more conclusive recommendation, this experiment should be repeated over locations and cropping seasons by increasing the number of hot pepper varieties.
| Published in | Science Discovery Plants (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.13 |
| Page(s) | 23-32 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Organic Mulching Materials, Hot Pepper, Varieties, Marketable Yield, Unmarketable Yield
Variety | Year of release | Maintainer | Adaptation m.a.s.l | Temperature (°C) | Rain fall | Seed source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mareko Fana | 1976 | MARC | 1400-2200 | 20/29 | 600-1337 | BARC |
Bako Local | 1976 | BARC | 1400-2120 | 20/29 | 600-1237 | BARC |
Oda Haro | 2005 | BARC | 1400-2200 | 13.3/27.9 | 830-1559 | BARC |
Traits | Rep (df=2) | V (df=2) | MM (df=4) | V x MM (df=8) | Error (df=28) | Mean | CV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DF | 0.87 ns | 510.47** | 62.94** | 0.58 ns | 0.67 | 55.66 | 1.48 |
DM | 25.36** | 182.97** | 373.11** | 9.97** | 0.25 | 126.8 | 0.39 |
PH | 9.79 ns | 217.2** | 405.27** | 9.17* | 6.72 | 52.36 | 4.95 |
FL | 4.32** | 5.98** | 50.68** | 0.31** | 0.03 | 7.76 | 2.32 |
NPB | 5.34** | 4.76** | 64.41** | 0.072* | 0.03 | 7.35 | 2.39 |
NFPP | 26.93** | 48.83** | 472.04** | 3.81** | 0.19 | 19.66 | 2.24 |
NSPF | 242.83** | 469.84** | 1457.25** | 3.4ns | 2.4 | 107.06 | 1.45 |
FDW | 3.8** | 3.69** | 58.27** | 0.08 ns | 0.04 | 6.15 | 3.16 |
TSW | 2.4** | 1.32** | 40.3** | 0.095** | 0.01 | 8.04 | 1.27 |
MY | 20102.86** | 10076.48** | 581200.89** | 169.8* | 129.67 | 1236.19 | 0.92 |
UMY | 711.42** | 38.03** | 5925.93** | 127.93** | 5.62 | 175.84 | 1.35 |
TY | 28778.21** | 10320.22** | 666851.38** | 358.89* | 132.9 | 1412.03 | 0.81 |
Varieties | Days to 50% flowering (DF) |
|---|---|
Oda haro | 61.53a |
Bako local | 55.6b |
Mareko fana | 49.87c |
LSD (0.05) | 0.62 |
Mulching materials | |
UM | 51.78e |
SE | 54.55d |
SY | 56.11c |
M | 57.2b |
CM | 58.6a |
LSD (0.05) | 0.79 |
CV% | 1.48 |
Days to 70% maturity | Plant height (PH, cm) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mulching materials | Mulching materials | |||||||||
UM | SE | SY | M | CM | UM | SE | SY | M | CM | |
Oda haro | 120.2kj | 124.9g | 130.9d | 136.8b | 140.7a | 37.57g | 48.65ef | 51.33ed | 52.26cde | 54.6cd |
Bako local | 118.4kl | 122.9hi | 125.3g | 128.5e | 133.3c | 45.36f | 54cd | 56.37c | 61.99ab | 65.39a |
Marekofana | 116.5l | 121.41ij | 124.6gh | 127.5ef | 130.1d | 40.77g | 53.16cd | 54.43cd | 54.22cd | 56.37c |
Mean | 126.8 | 52.36 | ||||||||
LSD (0.05) | 1.83 | 4.33 | ||||||||
CV (%) | 0.39 | 4.95 | ||||||||
Fruit length (FL, cm) | Number of primary branches (NPB) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mulching materials | Mulching materials | |||||||||
UM | SE | SY | M | CM | UM | SE | SY | M | CM | |
Oda haro | 5.33kl | 6.3ij | 7.2gh | 8.4e | 9.73bcd | 3.12l | 5.4j | 6.87h | 8.53ef | 9.97bc |
Bako local | 5.2kl | 6.5hi | 7.93efg | 9de | 10.56ab | 3.63kl | 6.13ij | 7.7fgh | 8.97de | 10.3b |
Marekofana | 5.5jl | 7.4g | 8.87de | 9.97bc | 11.43a | 4.1k | 6.53i | 8fg | 9.3cd | 11.3a |
Mean | 7.76 | 7.35 | ||||||||
LSD (0.05) | 0.87 | 0.92 | ||||||||
CV (%) | 2.32 | 2.39 | ||||||||
Number of fruit per plant (NFPP) | Thousand seed weight (TSW, g) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mulching materials | Mulching materials | |||||||||
UM | SE | SY | M | CM | UM | SE | SY | M | CM | |
Oda haro | 8.93l | 15.36j | 18.5h | 21.3f | 25.3d | 4.7j | 6.9h | 8.2f | 9.2d | 9.7bc |
Bako local | 9.5kl | 16ij | 19.9g | 24.36de | 28.2b | 4.9ij | 7gh | 8.4ef | 9.4cd | 10.1b |
Marekofana | 10.5k | 16.8i | 21.6f | 27.16bc | 31.4a | 5.2i | 7.4g | 8.7e | 9.77bc | 10.9a |
Mean | 19.66 | 8.04 | ||||||||
LSD (0.05) | 1.14 | 0.47 | ||||||||
CV (%) | 2.24 | 1.27 | ||||||||
Varieties | Number of seeds per fruit (NSPF) | Fruit dry weight (FDW, g) |
|---|---|---|
Oda haro | 112.4a | 6.4b |
Bako local | 101.3c | 6.7ab |
Mareko fana | 107.5b | 7.1a |
LSD (0.05) | 1.16 | 0.45 |
Mulching materials | ||
UM | 87.1e | 6.2e |
SE | 104.2d | 6.8cd |
SY | 108.6c | 7.2c |
M | 115.3b | 7.8ab |
CM | 120a | 8.28a |
LSD (0.05) | 1.49 | 0.49 |
CV% | 1.45 | 3.16 |
Marketable yield (MY, kg/ha) | Unmarketable yield (MY, kg/ha) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mulching materials | Mulching materials | |||||||||
UM | SE | SY | M | CM | UM | SE | SY | M | CM | |
Oda haro | 839.4m | 1109.1j | 1243.5g | 1374.8e | 1489.4c | 126j | 181.3fg | 196.7b | 175.78h | 193.2bc |
Bako local | 860.2l | 1139.8i | 1265.5f | 1393.4e | 1512.9b | 133i | 177.16h | 190.5cd | 185.3e | 202.2a |
Marekofana | 883.8k | 1164.4h | 1281.1f | 1424.5d | 1561.1a | 134.2i | 179.6hg | 184.1ef | 191.5c | 187.1de |
Mean | 1236.19 | 175.84 | ||||||||
LSD (0.05) | 19.04 | 3.96 | ||||||||
CV (%) | 0.92 | 1.35 | ||||||||
Total yield (TY, kg/ha) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mulching materials | |||||
UM | SE | SY | M | CM | |
Oda haro | 965.4l | 1302.3i | 1440.1g | 1550.56e | 1670.63b |
Bako local | 993.17k | 1342h | 1456fg | 1578.76d | 1689.96b |
Marekofana | 1018.1j | 1351.5h | 1465.2f | 1615.9c | 1740.7a |
Mean | 1412.03 | ||||
LSD (0.05) | 19.38 | ||||
CV (%) | 0.81 | ||||
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
CSA | Central Statistical Authority |
CV | Coefficient of Variation |
GLM | General Liner Model |
LSD | Least Significant Difference |
RCBD | Randomized Complete Block Design |
SAS | Statistical Analysis System |
| [1] | Rodriguez, Y., Depestre, T., Gomez, O. (2008): Efficiency of selection in pepper lines (Capsicum annuum) from four subpopulations in characters of productive interest. Cienciae Investigación Agraria, 35(1): 29-40. pp. |
| [2] | Beyene T, David P. Ensuring small scale producers in Ethiopia to achieve sustainable an fair access to pepper market. Uganda Journal of Agriculture. 2007; 3(2): 113-119. |
| [3] | Obidiebube EA, Eruotor PG, Akparobi SO, Emosaariue SO, Achebe UA, Kator PE. Response of four cultivars of pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.) to different levels of N, P and K fertilizer in rainforest Agro-ecological zone. Int. J Agric. Sci. 2012; 2(12): 1143-1150. |
| [4] | Molla, T., Kassahun, Y., Melikamu, W. (2019): Evaluation of hot pepper varieties (Capsicum spps.) for yield related traits, quality and yield in Burie district, West Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 6(3): 581-588. Pp. |
| [5] | Berhanu Yadeta, Derbew Belew, Wosene Gebresillase, Fekadu Marame. Variability, heritability and genetic advance in hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes in west Shoa, Ethiopia. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science. 2011; 10(4): 587-592. |
| [6] | Bosland PW, Votava EJ. Peppers, Vegetables and Spices Capsicum. CABI Publishing. New York, 2000: 198 p. |
| [7] | Dessie, G., Birhanu, H. (2017): Growth and Yielding Potential of Hot Pepper Varieties under Rain-Fed Production at Woreta, Northwestern Ethiopia. International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences (IJRSAS) 3(3): 1118. p. |
| [8] | CSA (Central statistical agency, 2020). Agricultural sample survey 2019/2020. Vol. I. Report on area and production of major crops (private peasant holdings, meher season). Statistical Bulletin 584, Central Statistical Agency. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
| [9] | Sathiyamurthy, VA; Rajashree, V; Shanmngasundaram, T; Arumugam, T (2017). Effect of different mulching on weed intensity, yield and economics in chilli (Capsicum annum L.). Int. J Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2017; 6(3): 609-617. |
| [10] | Treder W, Klamkowski K, Mik A, Wojcik P (2004) Response of young apple trees to different orchard floor management systems. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res 12: 113-122. |
| [11] | Alemu Hailiye and Ermias Abate, 2000. Horticultural crops production and associate constraints in North West Ethiopia. Working paper. Agricultural Economics Research Division. Agricultural Research Centere, Adet. P, 18. |
| [12] | SAS Institute. (2009). Statistical Analysis Software user’s guide. SAS Institute. Inc., Cary. |
| [13] | Nsabiyera, V., Ochwo-ssemakula, M. & Sseruwagi, P. (2012). Field performance and quality traits of hot pepper genotypes in uganda. Afr. Crop Sci. J., 20(1) 123 – 139. |
| [14] | Mochiah MB, Baidoo PK and Acheampong G, 2012. Effects of mulching materials on agronomic characteristics, pests of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and their natural enemies population. Agric. Biol. J. North Am. 3: 2253-2261. |
| [15] | Norman, J. C., Opata, J. and Ofori, E. (2011). Growth and yield of okra and hot pepper as affected by mulching. Ghana Journal of Horticulture, 9: 35-42. |
| [16] | Iftikhar, A., Zahoor H., Shuaib R., Noor-Un- Nisa, M. and Summar, A. N. (2011). Response of vegetative and reproductive components of chilli to inorganic and organic mulches. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science. Vol. 48(1), 19-24. |
| [17] | Thakur, P. S., Anju Thakur and Kanaujia, S. P. (2000). Reversal of water stress effects 1. Mulching impact on the performance of Capsicum annuum under water deficit. Indian Journal of Horticulture 57(3): 250-254. |
| [18] | Moniruzzaman, M. (2006). Effects of Plant Spacing and Mulching on Yield and Profitability of mulch in arid region of India. Agrochemica, 31: 183-202. |
| [19] | Korir, N. K., J. N. Aguyoh and L. Gaoqiong, 2006.. Enhanced Growth and Yield of Greenhouse Produced Cucumber under High Altitude Areas of Kenya. Agricultura Tropica Et Subtropica, 39(4): 249-254. |
| [20] | Alabi DA. Effects of fertilizer phosphorus and poultry droppings treatments on growth and nutrient components of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). African J. Biotechnol. 2006; 5: 671–677. |
| [21] | Venkanna, Y. (2008). Effect of mulches, organics and organic solutions on growth, yield and quality of chilli (capsicum annuum l.) Cv. Byadagi dabbi in northern transition zone of Karnataka. Thesis, University of Agricultural Science. Dharwad, Karnataka, India. |
| [22] | Tan, YC; Lai, JS; Adhikari, KR; Shakya, SM; Shukla, AK; Sharma, KR (2009). Efficacy of mulching, irrigation and nitrogen applications on bottle gourd and okra for yield improvement and crop diversification. Irrig. Drain. Syst., 23: 25-41. |
| [23] | Olarewaju JD, Showemino FA. Agronomic indices of drought tolerance in sweet Pepper. Proceedings 24th Hort. Conference. 17-22 September Bosland. P. W. and E. J. Votava, 2000. Peppers, Vegetables and Spices Capsicum. CABI Publishing. New York, 2006; 198. India. |
| [24] | Liasu, M. O. and A. K. K. Achakzai, 2007. Influence ofTithonia diversifolia Leaf mulch and fertilizerApplication on the Growth and Yield of Potted Tomato Plants. American-Eurasian J. Agric. and Environ. Sci., 2(4): 335-340. |
| [25] | Barchenger DW, Clark III RA, Gniffke PA, Ledesma DR, Lin S, Hanson P and Kumar S, 2018. Stability of Yield and Yield Components of Pepper (Capsicum annuum), and Evaluation of Publicly Available Predictive Meteorological Data in East and Southeast Asia. HortSci. 15(12): 1776-1783. |
| [26] | Vos, J. G. M. and Sumarni, N. (1997). Integrated crop management of hot pepper (Capsicumspp.) under tropical lowland conditions. Effects of mulch on crop performance and prediction. Journal of Horticultural Science. 72: 415-424. |
| [27] | Khandaker MM, Rohani F, Dalorima T and Mat N, 2017. Effects of different organic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of Capsicum annuumL. var. Kulai (red Chilli Kulai). Biosci. Biotech. Res. Asia. 14: 185-192. |
| [28] | Fekadu Marame, Dandena Galmesa. Status of Vegetable Crops in Ethiopia. Ugandan Journal of Agriculture. 2006; 12(2): 26-30. |
| [29] | Dzomeku, IK; Mahunu, GK; Bayorbor, TB; ObengDanso P (2009). Effects of mulching on weed control and yield of hot pepper and tomato in the Guinea savannah zone. Ghana J. Hortic., 7: 53-61. |
| [30] | Hassan FA, Ali EF, Mahfouz SA. Comparison between different fertilization sources, irrigation frequency and their combinations on the growth and yield of Coriander plant. Aust. J. Basic & Appl. Sci., 6(3): 2012; 600-615. |
APA Style
Zebene, K., Fesika, T. (2026). Response of Hot Pepper (Capsicum annum L.) Varieties to Organic Mulching Materials at Guto Gida, East Wollega, Ethiopia. Science Discovery Plants, 1(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.13
ACS Style
Zebene, K.; Fesika, T. Response of Hot Pepper (Capsicum annum L.) Varieties to Organic Mulching Materials at Guto Gida, East Wollega, Ethiopia. Sci. Discov. Plants 2026, 1(1), 23-32. doi: 10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.13
@article{10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.13,
author = {Kelemua Zebene and Temesgen Fesika},
title = {Response of Hot Pepper (Capsicum annum L.) Varieties to Organic Mulching Materials at Guto Gida, East Wollega, Ethiopia},
journal = {Science Discovery Plants},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {23-32},
doi = {10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sdplants.20260101.13},
abstract = {The study was carried out in 2021/22 under irrigation with the objectives of investigating the response of hot pepper (Capsicum annum L.) varieties to organic mulching materials. The treatment consisted of three pepper varieties (Oda haro, Bako local and Mareko fana) and five levels of organic mulching materials (Control, Maize straw, Soybean straw, Sesame straw, and Cattle manure) and combined factorially and laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The results of analysis of variance indicated that the effects of varieties and organic mulching materials were significant (P<0.05) for all parameters. All agronomic traits except days to 50% flowering, number of seeds per fruit and fruit dry weight were significantly affected by the combined effect of organic mulching materials and hot pepper varieties. Mareko fana variety with Cattle manure resulted the highest Marketable yield (1561.1kg/ha). In general, application of cattle manure for pepper varieties, especially Marekofana improved vegetative growth and marketable yield. Thus, hot pepper growers in the study area can use Cattle manure as mulching material that would improve productivity of the crop. However, to give more conclusive recommendation, this experiment should be repeated over locations and cropping seasons by increasing the number of hot pepper varieties.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Response of Hot Pepper (Capsicum annum L.) Varieties to Organic Mulching Materials at Guto Gida, East Wollega, Ethiopia AU - Kelemua Zebene AU - Temesgen Fesika Y1 - 2026/02/26 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.13 DO - 10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.13 T2 - Science Discovery Plants JF - Science Discovery Plants JO - Science Discovery Plants SP - 23 EP - 32 PB - Science Publishing Group UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdplants.20260101.13 AB - The study was carried out in 2021/22 under irrigation with the objectives of investigating the response of hot pepper (Capsicum annum L.) varieties to organic mulching materials. The treatment consisted of three pepper varieties (Oda haro, Bako local and Mareko fana) and five levels of organic mulching materials (Control, Maize straw, Soybean straw, Sesame straw, and Cattle manure) and combined factorially and laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The results of analysis of variance indicated that the effects of varieties and organic mulching materials were significant (P<0.05) for all parameters. All agronomic traits except days to 50% flowering, number of seeds per fruit and fruit dry weight were significantly affected by the combined effect of organic mulching materials and hot pepper varieties. Mareko fana variety with Cattle manure resulted the highest Marketable yield (1561.1kg/ha). In general, application of cattle manure for pepper varieties, especially Marekofana improved vegetative growth and marketable yield. Thus, hot pepper growers in the study area can use Cattle manure as mulching material that would improve productivity of the crop. However, to give more conclusive recommendation, this experiment should be repeated over locations and cropping seasons by increasing the number of hot pepper varieties. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -