Chemotaxonomic relationship between five members recently grouped in the order Brassicales by APGIII were studied on the basis of their roots phenolic compounds constituents. The selected species are; Schimpera arabica from Brassicaceae, Maerua crassifolia and Maerua oblongifolia from Capparacea, Cleome gynandra from Cleomaceae and Salvadora persica from Salvadoraceae. Roots were extracted in ethanol (80%). Phenolic compounds were separated using Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) technique. The developing solvent which is a mixture of Toluene- Chlorophorm – Acetone (in a rate of 10:50:7). The paired affinity between the species was constructed base on roots phenolic compounds, most of the species revealed closeness but The highest paired affinity was observed between Schimperaarabica and Maeruaoblongifolia. Polygonal graphs were constructed on the basis of the paired affinity which reflects the obvious closeness between studied species. This investigations Provided evidence that support grouping the selected species in the order Brassicales. More chemicals investigation for different members and different parts of the order will be better to demonstrate their closeness.
Published in | World Journal of Applied Chemistry (Volume 2, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wjac.20170204.15 |
Page(s) | 140-144 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
TLC, Phenolics, Paired Affinity, Polygonal Graph, Chemotaxonomy, APGIII, Brassicales
[1] | Singh, Ram, Chemotaxonomy: A tool for plant classification. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 2016. 4 (2): p. 90-93. |
[2] | Míka, V, V Kuban, B Klejdus, V Odstrcilová and P Nerusil, Phenolic compounds as chemical markers of low taxonomic levels in the family Poaceae. Plant Soil and Environment, 2005. 51 (11): p. 506. |
[3] | Hohmann, Nora, Eva M Wolf, Martin A Lysak and Marcus A Koch, A time-calibrated road map of Brassicaceae species radiation and evolutionary history. The Plant Cell, 2015. 27 (10): p. 2770-2784. |
[4] | Cronquist, Arthur, An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. 1981: Columbia University Press. |
[5] | Hauser, Larry A and Theodore J Crovello, Numerical analysis of generic relationships in Thelypodieae (Brassicaceae). Systematic Botany, 1982: p. 249-268. |
[6] | Rollins, Reed Clark, The Cruciferae of continental North America: systematics of the mustard family from the Arctic to Panama. 1993: Stanford University Press. |
[7] | Rodman, James, Robert A Price, Kenneth Karol, Elena Conti, Kenneth J Systma and Jeffrey D Palmer, Nucleotide sequences of the rbcL gene indicate monophyly of mustard oil plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 1993: p. 686-699. |
[8] | Cronquist, A, The evolution and classification of flowering plants Second Edition. New York Botanical Garden, New York, 1988. |
[9] | Judd, Walter S, ROGER W SANDERS and MICHAEL J DONOGHUE, Angiosperm family pairs: preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harvard papers in Botany, 1994: p. 1-51. |
[10] | Group, The Angiosperm Phylogeny, An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri botanical Garden, 1998: p. 531-553. |
[11] | Hall, Jocelyn C, Kenneth J Sytsma and Hugh H Iltis, Phylogeny of Capparaceae and Brassicaceae based on chloroplast sequence data. American Journal of Botany, 2002. 89 (11): p. 1826-1842. |
[12] | Price, Robert A, Jeffrey D Palmer and Ihsan A Al-Shehbaz, 1 Systematic Relationships of Arabidopsis: A Molecular and Morphological Perspective. Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Archive, 1994. 27: p. 7-19. |
[13] | Al-Shehbaz, Ihsan Ali, The tribes of Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, 1984. 65 (3): p. 343-373. |
[14] | 14. Koch, Marcus, Bernhard Haubold and Thomas Mitchell-Olds, Molecular systematics of the Brassicaceae: evidence from coding plastidic matK and nuclear Chs sequences. American Journal of Botany, 2001. 88 (3): p. 534-544. |
[15] | Endress, Peter K, Evolution and floral diversity: the phylogenetic surroundings of Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 1992: p. S106-S122. |
[16] | Bowman, John L, Holger Brüggemann, Ji‐Young Lee and Klaus Mummenhoff, Evolutionary changes in floral structure within Lepidium L. (Brassicaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences, 1999. 160 (5): p. 917-929. |
[17] | Al-Shehbaz, Ihsan A, The biosystematics of the genus Thelypodium (Cruciferae). Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University, 1973 (204): p. 3-148. |
[18] | Iltis, Hugh H, Studies in the Capparidaceae. III. Evolution and phylogeny of the western North American Cleomoideae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 1957. 44 (1): p. 77-119. |
[19] | Rodman, JE, KG Karol, RA Price, E Conti and KJ Systma, Nucleotide sequences of rbcL confirm the capparalean affinity of the Australian endemis Gyrostemonaceae. Australian Systematic Botany, 1994. 7 (1): p. 57-69. |
[20] | Rodman, James E, Kenneth G Karol, Robert A Price and Kenneth J Sytsma, Molecules, morphology, and Dahlgren's expanded order Capparales. Systematic Botany, 1996: p. 289-307. |
[21] | Hall, Jocelyn C, Hugh H Iltis and Kenneth J Sytsma, Molecular phylogenetics of core Brassicales, placement of orphan genera Emblingia, Forchhammeria, Tirania, and character evolution. Systematic Botany, 2004. 29 (3): p. 654-669. |
[22] | Hall, Jocelyn C, Systematics of Capparaceae and Cleomaceae: an evaluation of the generic delimitations of Capparis and Cleome using plastid DNA sequence data This paper is one of a selection of papers published in the Special Issue on Systematics Research. Botany, 2008. 86 (7): p. 682-696. |
[23] | II, A, An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003. 141 (4): p. 399-436. |
[24] | Thorne, Robert F, An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso (USA), 1992. |
[25] | Melchior, Hans, A. Engler's Syllabus Der Pflanzenfamilien... II, Band, Angiospermen. 1964: Borntraeger. |
[26] | Aaron, Goldberg, Classification, evolution, and phylogeny of the families of Dicotyledons. Smithsonian contributions to botany (USA). no. 58., 1986. |
[27] | Dahlgren, Rolf, A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot. Noti. ser, 1975. 128: p. 119-47. |
[28] | Dahlgren, Gertrud, The last Dahlgrenogram. System of classification of the dicotyledons. 1989, The Davis and Hedge Festschrift: plant taxonomy, phytogeography and related subjects. Edinburgh, University Press. |
[29] | Rodman, J, P Soltis, D Soltis, K Sytsma and K Karol, Parallel evolution of glucosinolate biosynthesis inferred from congruent nuclear and plastid gene phylogenies. American Journal of Botany, 1998. 85 (7): p. 997-997. |
[30] | Chase, Mark W and James L Reveal, A phylogenetic classification of the land plants to accompany APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009. 161 (2): p. 122-127. |
[31] | Allantospermum, Anarthriaceae, Aristolochiaceae Apodanthaceae, Borthwickia Boraginales, Capparaceae Buxaceae, Cornaceae Centrolepidaceae, Dasypogonaceae Cynomoriaceae, Dioscoreales Dilleniales, Euphorbiaceae Dipterocarpaceae, Francoaceae Forchhammeria and Haptanthaceae Gesneriaceae, An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical journal of the Linnean Society, 2016. 181 (1): p. 1-20. |
[32] | Ellison, William Lee, Ralph E Alston and Billie Lee Turner, Methods of presentation of crude biochemical data for systematic purposes, with particular reference to the genus Bahia (Compositae). American Journal of Botany, 1962: p. 599-604. |
[33] | Hutchinson, John, The Genera Of Flowering Plants (Angiospermae) Vol-2. 1967. |
[34] | Bremer, Birgitta, Kåre Bremer, Mark Chase, Mike Fay, James Reveal, Douglas Soltis, Pamella Soltis and Peter Stevens, An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009. |
APA Style
Mubarak Siddig Hamad, Ahmed Saeed Kabbashi, Ikram Ahmed Madani. (2017). Chemtaxonomic Relationship of Roots Phenolic Compounds for Selected Species of Four Families Recently Grouped in Brassicales by APGIII. World Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2(4), 140-144. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20170204.15
ACS Style
Mubarak Siddig Hamad; Ahmed Saeed Kabbashi; Ikram Ahmed Madani. Chemtaxonomic Relationship of Roots Phenolic Compounds for Selected Species of Four Families Recently Grouped in Brassicales by APGIII. World J. Appl. Chem. 2017, 2(4), 140-144. doi: 10.11648/j.wjac.20170204.15
@article{10.11648/j.wjac.20170204.15, author = {Mubarak Siddig Hamad and Ahmed Saeed Kabbashi and Ikram Ahmed Madani}, title = {Chemtaxonomic Relationship of Roots Phenolic Compounds for Selected Species of Four Families Recently Grouped in Brassicales by APGIII}, journal = {World Journal of Applied Chemistry}, volume = {2}, number = {4}, pages = {140-144}, doi = {10.11648/j.wjac.20170204.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20170204.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjac.20170204.15}, abstract = {Chemotaxonomic relationship between five members recently grouped in the order Brassicales by APGIII were studied on the basis of their roots phenolic compounds constituents. The selected species are; Schimpera arabica from Brassicaceae, Maerua crassifolia and Maerua oblongifolia from Capparacea, Cleome gynandra from Cleomaceae and Salvadora persica from Salvadoraceae. Roots were extracted in ethanol (80%). Phenolic compounds were separated using Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) technique. The developing solvent which is a mixture of Toluene- Chlorophorm – Acetone (in a rate of 10:50:7). The paired affinity between the species was constructed base on roots phenolic compounds, most of the species revealed closeness but The highest paired affinity was observed between Schimperaarabica and Maeruaoblongifolia. Polygonal graphs were constructed on the basis of the paired affinity which reflects the obvious closeness between studied species. This investigations Provided evidence that support grouping the selected species in the order Brassicales. More chemicals investigation for different members and different parts of the order will be better to demonstrate their closeness.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Chemtaxonomic Relationship of Roots Phenolic Compounds for Selected Species of Four Families Recently Grouped in Brassicales by APGIII AU - Mubarak Siddig Hamad AU - Ahmed Saeed Kabbashi AU - Ikram Ahmed Madani Y1 - 2017/11/02 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20170204.15 DO - 10.11648/j.wjac.20170204.15 T2 - World Journal of Applied Chemistry JF - World Journal of Applied Chemistry JO - World Journal of Applied Chemistry SP - 140 EP - 144 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-5982 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjac.20170204.15 AB - Chemotaxonomic relationship between five members recently grouped in the order Brassicales by APGIII were studied on the basis of their roots phenolic compounds constituents. The selected species are; Schimpera arabica from Brassicaceae, Maerua crassifolia and Maerua oblongifolia from Capparacea, Cleome gynandra from Cleomaceae and Salvadora persica from Salvadoraceae. Roots were extracted in ethanol (80%). Phenolic compounds were separated using Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) technique. The developing solvent which is a mixture of Toluene- Chlorophorm – Acetone (in a rate of 10:50:7). The paired affinity between the species was constructed base on roots phenolic compounds, most of the species revealed closeness but The highest paired affinity was observed between Schimperaarabica and Maeruaoblongifolia. Polygonal graphs were constructed on the basis of the paired affinity which reflects the obvious closeness between studied species. This investigations Provided evidence that support grouping the selected species in the order Brassicales. More chemicals investigation for different members and different parts of the order will be better to demonstrate their closeness. VL - 2 IS - 4 ER -