Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media

Ibrahim Horoub

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media

Ibrahim Horoub

Published in Advances in Sciences and Humanities (Volume 8, Issue 1)

Received: 3 February 2022 Accepted: 19 February 2022 Published: 3 March 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This comparative study aims to critically analyze the media discourse of Arab Gulf countries in terms of objectivity, persuasion, and national brands. It is also necessary to investigate the power relations in the Gulf media discourse and the ideologies adopted by the conflicting parties which aim to mobilize public opinion locally and internationally. Arab Gulf media outlets attempt to convince the masses of the legitimacy of the political agenda and foreign policies of Arab countries in the region. In many cases, the Arab Gulf regimes attempt to own hegemony and control over power relations by adopting an inflammatory media discourse capable of distorting the true image of other groups on the one hand and supporting the national brand and the foreign policies of the ruling families on the other. This complex relationship between the media discourse and the structures of power makes the task more difficult to uncover the deep link that constitutes the components of the adopted discourse and opens the door to many interpretations that need good textual and ontological analysis. Therefore, critical discourse analysis was used as a method of data analysis to understand the ideological attitudes during the online media coverage of both Aljazeera and al-Arabiya media networks. The stratified sample of this comparative study consists of 8 news reports retrieved from both websites. The comparative analysis reveals that the Arab media discourse employed by the conflicting parties is far from neutral especially when political crises arise between major powers as in the case of the Gulf dispute between Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and other countries. Al-Arabiya English has used an inflammatory discourse against the Qatari regime to create a negative image of Qatar's foreign policies, while Al-Jazeera English has adopted the Qatari narrative to refute the claims of supporting terrorism, spreading hate speech, and marketing extremist ideologies. However, both media outlets funded by Arab Gulf countries manipulate media content and meaning to mobilize public opinion and convince the international community of the legitimacy of their political agenda, foreign policies, and national identities.

Published in	Advances in Sciences and Humanities (Volume 8, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13
Page(s)	12-21
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Critical Discourse Analysis, Ideological Attitudes, Media Discourse, Arab Gulf Media, Foreign Policies

References

[1]	Al Arabiya English News. (2017). Al Jazeera's "encyclopedia" labels extremists as "jihadis with a cause". Retrieved from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/6/5/qatar-decision-to-cut-ties-violates-our-sovereigntyBos, F., & Ruijs, A. (2021). Quantifying the Non-Use Value of Biodiversity in Cost–Benefit Analysis: The Dutch Biodiversity Points. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 12 (2), 287-312. doi: 10.1017/bca.2020.27.
[2]	Al Arabiya English News. (2017). Abu Dhabi FM launches radio program "Qatar: A Policy of Darkness". Retrieved from: https://english.alarabiya.net/media/television-and-radio/2017/08/10/Abu-Dhabi-FM-launches-radio-program-Qatar-A-Policy-of-Darkness-.
[3]	Al Arabiya English News. (2017). Anti-terror States: Measure taken against Qatar is "boycott" not "blockade". Retrieved from: https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2017/09/15/Anti-terror-States-Measure-taken-against-Qatar-is-boycott-not-blockade-.
[4]	Al Arabiya English News. (2017). Egypt looks into role of former Qatar PM in Mursi espionage case. Retrieved from: https://english.alarabiya.net/features/2017/09/17/Egypt-looks-into-role-of-former-Qatar-PM-in-Mursi-espionage-case.
[5]	Ali, G. A. (2011). Hero or terrorist? A comparative analysis of Arabic and Western media depictions of the execution of Saddam. Discourse & Communication, 5 (4), 301-335.
[6]	Aljazeera English News. (2017). Qatar: Decision to cut ties violates our sovereignty. Retrieved from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/6/5/qatar-decision-to-cut-ties-violates-our-sovereignty.
[7]	Aljazeera English News. (2017). Qatar: 'No justification' for cutting diplomatic ties. Retrieved from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/6/5/qatar-no-justification-for-cutting-diplomatic-ties.
[8]	Aljazeera English News. (2017). Sheikh Tamim: Any talks must respect Qatar sovereignty. Retrieved from: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/7/22/sheikh-tamim-any-talks-must-respect-qatar-sovereignty.
[9]	Aljazeera English News. (2017). Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen "a strategic failure". Retrieved from: https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2017/8/23/saudi-arabias-war-in-yemen-a-strategic-failure.
[10]	BBC Report. (2017). Qatar crisis: What you need to know. Retrieved from: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-40173757.
[11]	Bukhari, S. (2017). The pales and forts of reason: comparative analysis of Pakistani and Indian newspaper headlines to identify ideology and power relations. Ph.D. Dissertation, Girne American University.
[12]	Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London; New York: Longman.
[13]	Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
[14]	Fairclough, N. (2001). The dialectics of discourse. Textus, 14 (2), 231-242.
[15]	Foucault, M. (2013). Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977-1984. Routledge.
[16]	Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of research in education, 23 (1), 119-169.
[17]	Gordon, P., Yadlin, A., Heistein, A., & Orion, A. (2017). The Qatar Crisis: Causes, Implications, Risks, and the Need for Compromise. Institute for National Security Studies.
[18]	Halliday, M. A. K. (1976). An interpretation of the functional relationship between language and social structure. MAK Halliday.
[19]	Herman, E. S. & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon.
[20]	Hetherington, M. J. (1997). Negative news, negative consequences: one reason Americans hate politics. The University of Texas at Austin.
[21]	Kabalan, M. (2017). Elite v. Geography: Actors, Structures and Qatar Foreign policy. Journal of Siyasat Arabia, 28: 7-26. Retrieved from: https://siyasatarabiya.dohainstitute.org/ar/issue028/Documents/Siyassat28_2017_kablan.pdf.
[22]	Kunczik, M. (2005). States, international organizations, and the news media: problems of image cultivation. In Political Communication in a New Era (pp. 125-146). Routledge.
[23]	Mattelart, A., & Mattelart, M. (1998). Theories of communication: A short introduction. Sage.
[24]	Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. Progress in communication sciences, 173-212.
[25]	Szondi, G. (2008). Public diplomacy and nation branding: Conceptual similarities and differences. Clingendael Institute.
[26]	Van Dijk, T. (1995). Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis, [w:] Language and Peace, ed. C. Sch?ffner, A. Wenden.
[27]	Van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction - Discourse as social interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1- 37). London: Sage.
[28]	Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell.
[29]	Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Macmillan International Higher Education.
[30]	Warnaar, M., Zaccara, L., & Aarts, P. (2016). Iran's Relations with the Arab States of the Gulf: Common Interests over Historic Rivalry. Gerlan Press.
[31]	Wolfsfeld, G., & Gadi, W. (1997). Media and political conflict: News from the Middle East (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press.
[32]	Ulrichsen, K. C. (2014). Qatar and the Arab spring. Oxford University Press.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ibrahim Horoub. (2022). Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 8(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ibrahim Horoub. Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media. Adv. Sci. Humanit. 2022, 8(1), 12-21. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ibrahim Horoub. Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media. Adv Sci Humanit. 2022;8(1):12-21. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13,
  author = {Ibrahim Horoub},
  title = {Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media},
  journal = {Advances in Sciences and Humanities},
  volume = {8},
  number = {1},
  pages = {12-21},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ash.20220801.13},
  abstract = {This comparative study aims to critically analyze the media discourse of Arab Gulf countries in terms of objectivity, persuasion, and national brands. It is also necessary to investigate the power relations in the Gulf media discourse and the ideologies adopted by the conflicting parties which aim to mobilize public opinion locally and internationally. Arab Gulf media outlets attempt to convince the masses of the legitimacy of the political agenda and foreign policies of Arab countries in the region. In many cases, the Arab Gulf regimes attempt to own hegemony and control over power relations by adopting an inflammatory media discourse capable of distorting the true image of other groups on the one hand and supporting the national brand and the foreign policies of the ruling families on the other. This complex relationship between the media discourse and the structures of power makes the task more difficult to uncover the deep link that constitutes the components of the adopted discourse and opens the door to many interpretations that need good textual and ontological analysis. Therefore, critical discourse analysis was used as a method of data analysis to understand the ideological attitudes during the online media coverage of both Aljazeera and al-Arabiya media networks. The stratified sample of this comparative study consists of 8 news reports retrieved from both websites. The comparative analysis reveals that the Arab media discourse employed by the conflicting parties is far from neutral especially when political crises arise between major powers as in the case of the Gulf dispute between Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and other countries. Al-Arabiya English has used an inflammatory discourse against the Qatari regime to create a negative image of Qatar's foreign policies, while Al-Jazeera English has adopted the Qatari narrative to refute the claims of supporting terrorism, spreading hate speech, and marketing extremist ideologies. However, both media outlets funded by Arab Gulf countries manipulate media content and meaning to mobilize public opinion and convince the international community of the legitimacy of their political agenda, foreign policies, and national identities.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media
AU  - Ibrahim Horoub
Y1  - 2022/03/03
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13
T2  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JF  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JO  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
SP  - 12
EP  - 21
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-0984
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13
AB  - This comparative study aims to critically analyze the media discourse of Arab Gulf countries in terms of objectivity, persuasion, and national brands. It is also necessary to investigate the power relations in the Gulf media discourse and the ideologies adopted by the conflicting parties which aim to mobilize public opinion locally and internationally. Arab Gulf media outlets attempt to convince the masses of the legitimacy of the political agenda and foreign policies of Arab countries in the region. In many cases, the Arab Gulf regimes attempt to own hegemony and control over power relations by adopting an inflammatory media discourse capable of distorting the true image of other groups on the one hand and supporting the national brand and the foreign policies of the ruling families on the other. This complex relationship between the media discourse and the structures of power makes the task more difficult to uncover the deep link that constitutes the components of the adopted discourse and opens the door to many interpretations that need good textual and ontological analysis. Therefore, critical discourse analysis was used as a method of data analysis to understand the ideological attitudes during the online media coverage of both Aljazeera and al-Arabiya media networks. The stratified sample of this comparative study consists of 8 news reports retrieved from both websites. The comparative analysis reveals that the Arab media discourse employed by the conflicting parties is far from neutral especially when political crises arise between major powers as in the case of the Gulf dispute between Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and other countries. Al-Arabiya English has used an inflammatory discourse against the Qatari regime to create a negative image of Qatar's foreign policies, while Al-Jazeera English has adopted the Qatari narrative to refute the claims of supporting terrorism, spreading hate speech, and marketing extremist ideologies. However, both media outlets funded by Arab Gulf countries manipulate media content and meaning to mobilize public opinion and convince the international community of the legitimacy of their political agenda, foreign policies, and national identities.
VL  - 8
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ibrahim Horoub

Communication Faculty, Girne American University, Girne, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ibrahim Horoub. (2022). Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 8(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ibrahim Horoub. Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media. Adv. Sci. Humanit. 2022, 8(1), 12-21. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ibrahim Horoub. Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media. Adv Sci Humanit. 2022;8(1):12-21. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13,
  author = {Ibrahim Horoub},
  title = {Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media},
  journal = {Advances in Sciences and Humanities},
  volume = {8},
  number = {1},
  pages = {12-21},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ash.20220801.13},
  abstract = {This comparative study aims to critically analyze the media discourse of Arab Gulf countries in terms of objectivity, persuasion, and national brands. It is also necessary to investigate the power relations in the Gulf media discourse and the ideologies adopted by the conflicting parties which aim to mobilize public opinion locally and internationally. Arab Gulf media outlets attempt to convince the masses of the legitimacy of the political agenda and foreign policies of Arab countries in the region. In many cases, the Arab Gulf regimes attempt to own hegemony and control over power relations by adopting an inflammatory media discourse capable of distorting the true image of other groups on the one hand and supporting the national brand and the foreign policies of the ruling families on the other. This complex relationship between the media discourse and the structures of power makes the task more difficult to uncover the deep link that constitutes the components of the adopted discourse and opens the door to many interpretations that need good textual and ontological analysis. Therefore, critical discourse analysis was used as a method of data analysis to understand the ideological attitudes during the online media coverage of both Aljazeera and al-Arabiya media networks. The stratified sample of this comparative study consists of 8 news reports retrieved from both websites. The comparative analysis reveals that the Arab media discourse employed by the conflicting parties is far from neutral especially when political crises arise between major powers as in the case of the Gulf dispute between Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and other countries. Al-Arabiya English has used an inflammatory discourse against the Qatari regime to create a negative image of Qatar's foreign policies, while Al-Jazeera English has adopted the Qatari narrative to refute the claims of supporting terrorism, spreading hate speech, and marketing extremist ideologies. However, both media outlets funded by Arab Gulf countries manipulate media content and meaning to mobilize public opinion and convince the international community of the legitimacy of their political agenda, foreign policies, and national identities.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Persuasion, Media Discourse, and Image Making; Critical Discourse Analysis of Arab Gulf Media
AU  - Ibrahim Horoub
Y1  - 2022/03/03
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13
T2  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JF  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
JO  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
SP  - 12
EP  - 21
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-0984
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20220801.13
AB  - This comparative study aims to critically analyze the media discourse of Arab Gulf countries in terms of objectivity, persuasion, and national brands. It is also necessary to investigate the power relations in the Gulf media discourse and the ideologies adopted by the conflicting parties which aim to mobilize public opinion locally and internationally. Arab Gulf media outlets attempt to convince the masses of the legitimacy of the political agenda and foreign policies of Arab countries in the region. In many cases, the Arab Gulf regimes attempt to own hegemony and control over power relations by adopting an inflammatory media discourse capable of distorting the true image of other groups on the one hand and supporting the national brand and the foreign policies of the ruling families on the other. This complex relationship between the media discourse and the structures of power makes the task more difficult to uncover the deep link that constitutes the components of the adopted discourse and opens the door to many interpretations that need good textual and ontological analysis. Therefore, critical discourse analysis was used as a method of data analysis to understand the ideological attitudes during the online media coverage of both Aljazeera and al-Arabiya media networks. The stratified sample of this comparative study consists of 8 news reports retrieved from both websites. The comparative analysis reveals that the Arab media discourse employed by the conflicting parties is far from neutral especially when political crises arise between major powers as in the case of the Gulf dispute between Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and other countries. Al-Arabiya English has used an inflammatory discourse against the Qatari regime to create a negative image of Qatar's foreign policies, while Al-Jazeera English has adopted the Qatari narrative to refute the claims of supporting terrorism, spreading hate speech, and marketing extremist ideologies. However, both media outlets funded by Arab Gulf countries manipulate media content and meaning to mobilize public opinion and convince the international community of the legitimacy of their political agenda, foreign policies, and national identities.
VL  - 8
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download