We did this study to investigate the effect of thick (5mm) and thin (1 or 0.625 mm) slice thickness of CT images on evaluating pulmonary nodules' growth to improve their diagnostic accuracy. The clinical and CT data of 251 patients with lung nodules and two follow-up CTs from October 2016 to October 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Malignant nodules were confirmed by pathology, and benign nodules were confirmed by pathology or follow-up. Two radiologists double-blindly assessed the CT features (density, shape, lobes, border), maximum diameter, and volume of nodules on the thick (5MM) and thin (≤1MM) images of two follow-up CTs. We use One-way analysis of variance for quantitative data; the X2 test or FISHER exact probability method was used for qualitative data; and the ROC curve was used to analyze the diagnostic power of nodule size, volume, and change in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. Among 251 pulmonary nodules, 117 (46.6%) benign nodules and 134 (53.3%) malignant nodules. During the CT follow-up, the volume measured on the thick-section image, the diameter, and the volume measured on the thin-section image were statistically different in benign and malignant lung nodules (P<0.001). In contrast, the diameter measured on the thick-section image was similar between these two groups (P=0.328). For benign and malignant pulmonary nodules, the diameter, volume, and change measured on the thin-section image were significantly larger than the thick-section image's data (P<0.001). The ROC curve showed that the diagnostic efficiency of volume was higher compared to the diameter. There were significant differences in nodule type, density change, shape, lobulation, and pleural retraction between benign and malignant nodules for CT features. Accurately assessing the volume changes combined with CT characteristics will help improve lung nodules' diagnosis accuracy. Volume measured on thin-section (1mm) CT images is the best quantitative parameter for assessing the change of pulmonary nodules. Combining Volume change with CT characteristics would help to improve the diagnostic accuracy.
Published in | International Journal of Medical Imaging (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.13 |
Page(s) | 109-116 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Computed Tomography, Volume Measurements, Diameter Measurements, Malignant Tumors, Benign Nodules, MDCT
[1] | Daiwei Han, Marjolein A Heuvelmans, Matthijs Oudkerk et al. Volume versus diameter assessment of small pulmonary nodules in C. T. lung cancer screening. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2017; 6 (1): 52-61. |
[2] | Park EA, Goo JM, Lee JW, et al. Efficacy of computer-aided detection system and thin-slab maximum intensity projection technique in detecting pulmonary nodules in patients with resected metastases. Invest Radiol. 2009; 44 (3): 105–113. |
[3] | Tuddenham WJ et al. Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984; 143 (3): 509- 517. |
[4] | Hanamiya M, Aoki T, Yamashita Y, et al. Frequency and significance of pulmonary nodules on thin-section CT in patients with extrapulmonary malignant neoplasms. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81 (1): 152-7. |
[5] | Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365 (5): 395-409. |
[6] | Anna Rita Larici, Alessandra Farchione et al. Lung nodules: size still matters. Eur Respir Rev. 2017; 26 (1): 170025. |
[7] | Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, et al. Nodular ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT: histologic correlation and evaluation of change at follow-up. Radiographics. 2007; 27 (2): 391–408. |
[8] | Hester A Gietema 1, Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop, Willem P T M Mali, Gerard Groenewegen, Mathias Prokop et al. Pulmonary nodules: Interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT- influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance. Radiol. 2007; 245 (3): 888-94. |
[9] | Winer-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Meyer CA, et al. effect of varying CT section width on volumetric measurement of lung tumors and application of compensatory equations. Radiology. 2003; 229: 184-94. |
[10] | Petrou M, Quint LE, Nan B, et al. Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 306-12. |
[11] | Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V, Bornemann L, et al. Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006; 25: 417-34. |
[12] | Harry J de Koning, Carlijn M van der Aalst, Pim A de Jong, Ernst T Scholten, Kristiaan Nackaerts, Marjolein A Heuvelmans et al. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb; 382 (6): 503-513. |
[13] | Cai Minghui, Shen Tuyang et al. Clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies for metastatic lung tumors. Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer. 2014; 17 (3): 282-5. |
[14] | Mylene T. Truong, Jane P. Ko, Santiago E. Rossi, Ignacio Rossi, Chitra Viswanathan et al. Update in evaluating the solitary pulmonary nodule. RadioGraphics. Vol. 34, No. 6. |
[15] | Anand Devaraj, Bram van Ginneken, Arjun Nair et al. Use of volumetry for lung nodule management, Radiology rsna 2017, vol 284: No 3. |
[16] | Hiren j Mehta, James g Ravenel, Stephanie r shaftman et al. The utility of nodule volume in the context of malignancy prediction for small pulmonary nodules. CHEST 2014; 145 (3): 464-472. |
[17] | James g Ravenel, William M leue, Paul J Nietert, James V Miller et al. Pulmonary nodule volume: effect of reconstruction parameters on the automated measurements-A phantom study. RSNA radiology volume 247; number 2- May 2008. |
[18] | Annemic Snoeckx, Peter reunites, Damien Desbuquoit, Maarten J Spinhoven et al. Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule: size matters, but do not ignore the power of morphology. Insights imaging (2018) 9: 73-86. |
[19] | David F Yankelevitz, Rajiv Gupta, Binsheng Zhao, Claudia I Henschke et al. Small pulmonary nodules: Evaluation with repeat CT – preliminary experience. RSNA radiology 1999; 212: 561-566. |
[20] | Alexander A Bankier, Heber Macmohan, Jin Mo Goo, Geoffrey D Rubin. Recommendations for measuring pulmonary nodules at CT; a statement from the Fleischner society RSNA radiology volume 285 number 2- November 2017. |
[21] | Yoneda K, Ueno J, Nishihara S, et al. Post-processing technique with MDCT data improves the accuracy of detecting lung nodules. Radiat Med 2007; 25: 511–515. |
[22] | Verhagen MV, Smets AMJB, van Schuppen J, Deurloo EE, Schaefer-Prokop C. The impact of reconstruction techniques on observer performance for detecting and characterizing small pulmonary nodules in chest CT of children under 13 years. Eur J Radiol 2018; 100: 142–146. |
[23] | Angelelli G, Grimaldi V, Spinelli F, Scardapane A, Sardar A. Multislice computed tomography in the study of pulmonary metastases. Radiol Med (Torino) 2008; 113: 954–967. |
[24] | Chang B, Hwang JH, Choi YH, et al. Natural history of pure ground-glass opacity lung nodules detected by low-dose CT scan. Chest 2013; 143: 172–178. |
[25] | Goo JM. A computer-aided diagnosis for evaluating lung nodules on chest CT: the current status and perspective. Korean J Radiol 2011; 12: 145–155. |
[26] | Tammemagi MC, Katki HA, Hocking WG, et al. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening [J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 368 (8): 728–736. |
[27] | Zhi-gang chu; yan zhang; Wang-Jia li; Qi Li et al. Primary solid lung cancerous nodules with different sizes. BMC 2019, 19 1060. |
[28] | Wang-Jia Li, Zhi-gang Chu, Qi Li, and Fa-jin Lv et al. Effect of Slab Thickness on the Detection of Pulmonary Nodules using CT Maximum and Minimum Intensity Projection. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2019; 213: 562-567. |
[29] | Jing Yang, Hailin wang, Chen Geng, Yakang Dai et al. Advances in intelligent diagnosis methods for pulmonary ground-glass nodules. Biomed eng online 2018 17; 20. |
[30] | Mingzhu Liang, Rowena Yi, Wei tang et al. Variation in screening CT-detected nodule volumetry as a function of size; AJR 2017; 209: 304-308. |
[31] | Takashi Eguchi, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Satoshi Kawakami et al. Tumor size and computed tomography attenuation of pure pulmonary GGN are useful for predicting pathological invasiveness. PLoS One. 2014 May 20; 9 (5): e97867. |
APA Style
Jannatul Maoya Bashanti, Binjie Fu, Wang Jia Li, Mohammad Arman Hossain, Fajin Lv. (2021). The Influence of Quantitative Parameters Measured on CT with Different Slice Thicknesses on Evaluating the Growth of Pulmonary Nodules. International Journal of Medical Imaging, 9(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.13
ACS Style
Jannatul Maoya Bashanti; Binjie Fu; Wang Jia Li; Mohammad Arman Hossain; Fajin Lv. The Influence of Quantitative Parameters Measured on CT with Different Slice Thicknesses on Evaluating the Growth of Pulmonary Nodules. Int. J. Med. Imaging 2021, 9(2), 109-116. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.13
AMA Style
Jannatul Maoya Bashanti, Binjie Fu, Wang Jia Li, Mohammad Arman Hossain, Fajin Lv. The Influence of Quantitative Parameters Measured on CT with Different Slice Thicknesses on Evaluating the Growth of Pulmonary Nodules. Int J Med Imaging. 2021;9(2):109-116. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.13, author = {Jannatul Maoya Bashanti and Binjie Fu and Wang Jia Li and Mohammad Arman Hossain and Fajin Lv}, title = {The Influence of Quantitative Parameters Measured on CT with Different Slice Thicknesses on Evaluating the Growth of Pulmonary Nodules}, journal = {International Journal of Medical Imaging}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {109-116}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmi.20210902.13}, abstract = {We did this study to investigate the effect of thick (5mm) and thin (1 or 0.625 mm) slice thickness of CT images on evaluating pulmonary nodules' growth to improve their diagnostic accuracy. The clinical and CT data of 251 patients with lung nodules and two follow-up CTs from October 2016 to October 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Malignant nodules were confirmed by pathology, and benign nodules were confirmed by pathology or follow-up. Two radiologists double-blindly assessed the CT features (density, shape, lobes, border), maximum diameter, and volume of nodules on the thick (5MM) and thin (≤1MM) images of two follow-up CTs. We use One-way analysis of variance for quantitative data; the X2 test or FISHER exact probability method was used for qualitative data; and the ROC curve was used to analyze the diagnostic power of nodule size, volume, and change in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. Among 251 pulmonary nodules, 117 (46.6%) benign nodules and 134 (53.3%) malignant nodules. During the CT follow-up, the volume measured on the thick-section image, the diameter, and the volume measured on the thin-section image were statistically different in benign and malignant lung nodules (P<0.001). In contrast, the diameter measured on the thick-section image was similar between these two groups (P=0.328). For benign and malignant pulmonary nodules, the diameter, volume, and change measured on the thin-section image were significantly larger than the thick-section image's data (P<0.001). The ROC curve showed that the diagnostic efficiency of volume was higher compared to the diameter. There were significant differences in nodule type, density change, shape, lobulation, and pleural retraction between benign and malignant nodules for CT features. Accurately assessing the volume changes combined with CT characteristics will help improve lung nodules' diagnosis accuracy. Volume measured on thin-section (1mm) CT images is the best quantitative parameter for assessing the change of pulmonary nodules. Combining Volume change with CT characteristics would help to improve the diagnostic accuracy.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Influence of Quantitative Parameters Measured on CT with Different Slice Thicknesses on Evaluating the Growth of Pulmonary Nodules AU - Jannatul Maoya Bashanti AU - Binjie Fu AU - Wang Jia Li AU - Mohammad Arman Hossain AU - Fajin Lv Y1 - 2021/05/26 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.13 T2 - International Journal of Medical Imaging JF - International Journal of Medical Imaging JO - International Journal of Medical Imaging SP - 109 EP - 116 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-832X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20210902.13 AB - We did this study to investigate the effect of thick (5mm) and thin (1 or 0.625 mm) slice thickness of CT images on evaluating pulmonary nodules' growth to improve their diagnostic accuracy. The clinical and CT data of 251 patients with lung nodules and two follow-up CTs from October 2016 to October 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Malignant nodules were confirmed by pathology, and benign nodules were confirmed by pathology or follow-up. Two radiologists double-blindly assessed the CT features (density, shape, lobes, border), maximum diameter, and volume of nodules on the thick (5MM) and thin (≤1MM) images of two follow-up CTs. We use One-way analysis of variance for quantitative data; the X2 test or FISHER exact probability method was used for qualitative data; and the ROC curve was used to analyze the diagnostic power of nodule size, volume, and change in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. Among 251 pulmonary nodules, 117 (46.6%) benign nodules and 134 (53.3%) malignant nodules. During the CT follow-up, the volume measured on the thick-section image, the diameter, and the volume measured on the thin-section image were statistically different in benign and malignant lung nodules (P<0.001). In contrast, the diameter measured on the thick-section image was similar between these two groups (P=0.328). For benign and malignant pulmonary nodules, the diameter, volume, and change measured on the thin-section image were significantly larger than the thick-section image's data (P<0.001). The ROC curve showed that the diagnostic efficiency of volume was higher compared to the diameter. There were significant differences in nodule type, density change, shape, lobulation, and pleural retraction between benign and malignant nodules for CT features. Accurately assessing the volume changes combined with CT characteristics will help improve lung nodules' diagnosis accuracy. Volume measured on thin-section (1mm) CT images is the best quantitative parameter for assessing the change of pulmonary nodules. Combining Volume change with CT characteristics would help to improve the diagnostic accuracy. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -