Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) is an allotetraploid derived from hybridization of the ancestors Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis), followed by spontaneous chromosome doubling. The crop is predominately grown under low-input production system with an average yield ranging between 700 to 900 Kgha-1. Yields are low, and several biotic and abiotic factors, constraint the production. The groundnut rosette disease, caused by synergistic interaction of three viral components, is considered to be the most devastating where it is grown in Africa. The disease is spread by aphid in a persistent manner. The use of aphid and virus resistant cultivars is the most economical means to control the disease. Few reports on DNA markers linked to GRD resistance are available and effort is needed to identify more DNA markers to assist future breeding programmes. Understanding the host-vector-disease interaction at the molecular level would form a stronger basis to breed for resistance while adapting modern technologies. Efforts to identify resistant sources, development of resistant cultivars and identification of DNA marker linked to resistance has been underway and substantial progress made though not fully. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to contribute towards understanding the dynamics of the disease in different countries within SSA so as to resolve the underlying causes of the epidemic.
| Published in | Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jps.20231105.11 |
| Page(s) | 150-154 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Groundnut Rosette Disease, Aphid, DNA Markers, Virus, Vector
| [1] | Prasad, P. V., Kakani, V. G. and Upadhyaya, H. D. 2010. Growth and production of groundnut. UNESCO Encyclopedia: 1-26. |
| [2] | Waliyar, F., P. Kumar, B. Ntare, E. Monyo, S. Nigam, A. Reddy, et al. 2007. A Century of Research on Groundnut Rosette Disease and its Management. Information Bulletin no. 75. |
| [3] | Olorunju, P. E., Ntare, B. R., Pande, S. and Reddy, S. V. 2001. Additional sources of resistance to groundnut rosette disease in groundnut germplasm and breeding lines. Annals of Applied Biology: 139: 259-268. |
| [4] | Taliansky ME and Robinson, DJ. 2003. Molecular biology of umbraviruses: phantom warriors. J. Gen. Virol. 84: 1951-1960. |
| [5] | Taliansky, M. E., Robinson, O. J., & Murant, A. F. (2000). Groundnut rosette disease virus complex: Biology and molecular biology. Advances in Virus Research, 55, 357–400. |
| [6] | Naidu, R. A., Miller, J. S., Mayo, M. A., Wesley, S. V., & Reddy, A. S. (2000). The nucleotide sequence of Indian peanut clump virus RNA 2: Sequence comparisons among pecluviruses. Archives of Virology, 145, 1857–1866. |
| [7] | Naidu R. A., Kimmins F. M. 2007. The effect of groundnut rosette assistor virus on the agronomic performance of four groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. Journal of Phytopathology 155: 350-356. |
| [8] | Naidu R. A., Kimmins F. M., Deom C. M., Subrahmanyam P., Chiyembekeza A. J., Van der Merwe P. J. A. 1999. Groundnut Rosette, A virus disease affecting groundnut production in sub-Saharan Africa. Plant Disease 83: 700-709. |
| [9] | Thresh, J. M. (2003). Control of plant virus diseases in sub-Saharan Africa: The possibility and feasibility of an integrated approach. The African Crop Science Journal, 11, 199–223. |
| [10] | Blackman RL, Eastop VF. (2007) Taxonomic issues, 1–29. In: van Emden HF, Harrington R (Eds) Aphids as Crop Pests. CAB International, Wallingford. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851998190.0001 |
| [11] | Goggin, F. L. 2007. Plant–aphid interactions: molecular and ecological perspectives. Current Opinon in Plant Biology 10: 399–408. |
| [12] | Duffus, J. E. 1973. The yellowing virus diseases of sugar beet. Advances in Virus Reseaerch 18, 347-386. |
| [13] | Subrahmanyam P., Hildebrand G. L., Naidu R. A., Reddy L. J., Singh A. K. 1998. Sources of resistance to groundnut rosette disease in global groundnut germplasm Annals of Applied Biology 132: 473-485. |
| [14] | Subrahmanyam P., van der merwe P. J. A., Chiyembekeza A. J., Chandra S. (2002) Integrated management of groundnut rosette disease. African Crop Science Journal 10: 99-110. |
| [15] | Naidu R. A., Bottenburg H., Subrahmanyam P., Kimmins F. M., Robinson D. J., Thresh J. M. 1998. Epidemiology of groundnut rosette virus disease: current status and future research needs. Annals of Applied Biology 132: 525-548. |
| [16] | Scott KP, Farmer M-J, Robinson DJ, Torrance L, Murant AF. 1996. Comparison of the coat protein of Groundnut rosette assistor virus with those of other luteoviruses. Annals of Applied Biology 128: 77–83. |
| [17] | Block VC., Ziegler, A., Scott, K., Dangora, D. B., Robinson, D. J. and Murant, A. F. 1995. Detection of groundnut rosette umbravirus infections with radioactive and non-radioactive probes to its satellite RNA. Annals of Applied Biology 139: 259-268. |
| [18] | Hull, R., 1964. Spread of Groundnut rosette virus by Aphis craccivora (Koch). Nature 202: 213-214. |
| [19] | Haciwa, H. C. and Kannaiyan J. 1990. Prevalence of groundnut diseases and extent of yield losses due to leaf spot diseases in Zambia. Proceedings of the 4th Regional Groundnut Workshop for Southern Africa, 19 23 March. pp 93-97. Arusha, Tanzania. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. 21. |
| [20] | Adams AN. 1967. The vectors and alternative hosts of groundnut rosette virus in Central Province, Malawi. Rhodesia, Zambia, Malawi. Journal of Agricultural Research 5: 145-151. |
| [21] | Dampc J, Mołoń M, Durak T, Durak R. 2021. Changes in Aphid-Plant Interactions under Increased Temperature. Biology (Basel) 28: 480. doi: 10.3390/biology10060480. PMID: 34071458; PMCID: PMC8227038. |
| [22] | Döring TF, Kirchner SM. 2022. A model for colour preference behaviour of spring migrant aphids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 24: 377. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0283. Epub 2022 Sep 5. PMID: 36058244; PMCID: PMC9441243. |
| [23] | Thresh JM. 2003. Control of Plant Virus Diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Possibility and Feasibility of an Integrated Approach. African Crop Science 11: 199-223. |
| [24] | Ntare, B. R., Olorunju, P. E. and Hildebrand, G. L. 2002. Progress in breeding early maturing peanut cultivars with resistance to groundnut rosette disease in West Africa. Peanut Science 29: 17-23. |
| [25] | Subrahmanyam P., Naidu R. A., Reddy L. J., Singh A. K. (2001) Resistance to groundnut rosette disease in wild Arachis species. Annals of Applied Biology 139: 45-50. |
| [26] | Bock KR, Murant AF and Rajeshwari R. 1990. The nature of the resistance in groundnut to rosette disease. Ann. Appl. Biol. 117: 379-384. |
| [27] | Wu, J., and Baldwin, I. T. (2010). New insights into plant responses to the attack from insect herbivores. Annu. Rev. Gen. 44, 1–24. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102209-163500. |
| [28] | Girousse, C., Moulia, B., Silk, W., and Bonnemain, J.-L. 2005. Aphid infestation causes different changes in carbon and nitrogen allocation in alfalfa stems as well as different inhibitions of longitudinal and radial expansion. Plant Physiol. 137, 1474–1484. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.057430. |
| [29] | Rodriguez, P. A., Stam, R., Warbroek, T., and Bos, J. I. B. 2014. Mp10 and Mp42 from the aphid species Myzus persicae trigger plant defenses in Nicotiana benthamiana through different activities. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 27, 30–39. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-05-13-0156-R. |
| [30] | Rodriguez, P. A., and Bos, J. I. B. (2013). Toward understanding the role of aphid effectors in plant infestation. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26, 25–30. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-05-12-0119-FI. |
APA Style
Mwololo James, Okori Patrick, Munthali Wills, Odong Thomas. (2023). The Groundnut Rosette Disease at a Glance: Basics, Management and the Future. Journal of Plant Sciences, 11(5), 150-154. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231105.11
ACS Style
Mwololo James; Okori Patrick; Munthali Wills; Odong Thomas. The Groundnut Rosette Disease at a Glance: Basics, Management and the Future. J. Plant Sci. 2023, 11(5), 150-154. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20231105.11
AMA Style
Mwololo James, Okori Patrick, Munthali Wills, Odong Thomas. The Groundnut Rosette Disease at a Glance: Basics, Management and the Future. J Plant Sci. 2023;11(5):150-154. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20231105.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jps.20231105.11,
author = {Mwololo James and Okori Patrick and Munthali Wills and Odong Thomas},
title = {The Groundnut Rosette Disease at a Glance: Basics, Management and the Future},
journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
volume = {11},
number = {5},
pages = {150-154},
doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20231105.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231105.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20231105.11},
abstract = {Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) is an allotetraploid derived from hybridization of the ancestors Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis), followed by spontaneous chromosome doubling. The crop is predominately grown under low-input production system with an average yield ranging between 700 to 900 Kgha-1. Yields are low, and several biotic and abiotic factors, constraint the production. The groundnut rosette disease, caused by synergistic interaction of three viral components, is considered to be the most devastating where it is grown in Africa. The disease is spread by aphid in a persistent manner. The use of aphid and virus resistant cultivars is the most economical means to control the disease. Few reports on DNA markers linked to GRD resistance are available and effort is needed to identify more DNA markers to assist future breeding programmes. Understanding the host-vector-disease interaction at the molecular level would form a stronger basis to breed for resistance while adapting modern technologies. Efforts to identify resistant sources, development of resistant cultivars and identification of DNA marker linked to resistance has been underway and substantial progress made though not fully. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to contribute towards understanding the dynamics of the disease in different countries within SSA so as to resolve the underlying causes of the epidemic.},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Groundnut Rosette Disease at a Glance: Basics, Management and the Future AU - Mwololo James AU - Okori Patrick AU - Munthali Wills AU - Odong Thomas Y1 - 2023/09/27 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231105.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jps.20231105.11 T2 - Journal of Plant Sciences JF - Journal of Plant Sciences JO - Journal of Plant Sciences SP - 150 EP - 154 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0731 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231105.11 AB - Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) is an allotetraploid derived from hybridization of the ancestors Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis), followed by spontaneous chromosome doubling. The crop is predominately grown under low-input production system with an average yield ranging between 700 to 900 Kgha-1. Yields are low, and several biotic and abiotic factors, constraint the production. The groundnut rosette disease, caused by synergistic interaction of three viral components, is considered to be the most devastating where it is grown in Africa. The disease is spread by aphid in a persistent manner. The use of aphid and virus resistant cultivars is the most economical means to control the disease. Few reports on DNA markers linked to GRD resistance are available and effort is needed to identify more DNA markers to assist future breeding programmes. Understanding the host-vector-disease interaction at the molecular level would form a stronger basis to breed for resistance while adapting modern technologies. Efforts to identify resistant sources, development of resistant cultivars and identification of DNA marker linked to resistance has been underway and substantial progress made though not fully. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to contribute towards understanding the dynamics of the disease in different countries within SSA so as to resolve the underlying causes of the epidemic. VL - 11 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: