To cope with the constraint of the COVID-19 pandemic, online teaching is widely used in education. However, the adaptation from conventional face-to-face dominated classroom teaching to that of online mode is generally in a swift way. Considering the significant features of the online learning and teaching situation, both instructors and students would be confront with various challenges. Here is the presentation of the online teaching practice of the Tunnel Engineering during the COVID-19 pandemic. The practice indicates that the major challenges of the instructors are to perform the multiple roles of content expertise and presenter, student work assessor, online teaching procedure facilitator and manager. The students are confronted with the requirements of competence in terms of learner, presenter and respondent. The course design and implementation plan are initially tuned at the beginning of the online teaching to adapt to the new situation. With a new teaching strategy being set up, the online teaching activities have been progressively tailored in corresponding to the feedback from students, peer reviews, the results of formative and summative assessments on the learning and teaching activities. The experience and lesson learned from the Tunnel Engineering online teaching for six classes from the three academic years 2020 to 2022 are presented in terms of course design and implementation plan, assessments, effective interaction and online teaching community.
| Published in | Science Journal of Education (Volume 11, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sjedu.20231103.12 |
| Page(s) | 93-103 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Practice, Challenge and Lesson, Design and Assessment, Online Teaching, Tunnel Engineering, COVID Pandemic
| [1] | C. M. Stracke, R. C. Sharma, A. Bozkurt, et al., “Impact of COVID-19 on formal education: an international review of practices and potentials of open education at a distance,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 23 (4), pp. 1–18. |
| [2] | C. M. Stracke, D. Burgos, G. Santos-Hermosa, et al., “Responding to the initial challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of international responses and impact in school and higher education,” Sustainability, vol. 14, 1876. |
| [3] | F. Martin, K. Budhrani, S. Kumar and A. Ritzhaupt, “Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: roles and competencies,” Online Learning, vol. 23 (1). v23i1. 1329. |
| [4] | F. Hajjej, S. Ayouni, H. Shaiba and A. Al-Luhaidan, “Students’ perspective-based evaluation of online transition during COVID-19 outbreak: A case study of PNU Students,” IJWLTT, vol. 16 (5), pp. 21–38. |
| [5] | C. Maitimu, J. Tomasouw and P. Apituley, “The Effectiveness of the Online Learning Medium Google Classroom on the Learning Outcome. J-EDu: Journal, vol. 1 (2), pp. 73–82. |
| [6] | F. Martin, A. Ritzhaput, S. Kumar and K. Budhrami, “Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design assessment and evaluation, and facilitations,” The Internet of Higher Education, vol. 42, pp. 34–43. |
| [7] | M. Kara and Z. Yildirim, “Identification of the optimal faculty behaviors for performance improvement in distance education,” Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. vol. 21, pp. 83–97. |
| [8] | F. Martin, K. Budhrani and C. Wang, “Examining faculty perception of their readiness to teach online,” Online Learning, vol. 23 (3), pp. 97–119. |
| [9] | S. W. Schmidt, E. M. Hodge and C. M. Tschida, “How university faculty members developed their online teaching skills,” The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, vol. 14 (3), pp. 131–140. |
| [10] | W. Zimmerman, B. Altman, B. Simunich, K. Shattuck and B. Burch, “Evaluating online course quality: A study on implementation of course quality standards,” Online Learning, vol. 24 (4), pp. 147–163. |
| [11] | J. Bawane and J. M. Spector, “Prioritization of online instructor roles: implications for competency-based teacher education programs,” Distance Education, vol. 30 (3), pp. 383–397. |
| [12] | F. Martin, S. Kumar and L. She, “Examining higher education instructor perceptions of roles and competencies in online teaching,” Online Learning, vol. 25 (4), pp. 187–215. |
| [13] | L. S. Agrati, D. Burgos, P. Ducange, et al., “Bridges and mediation in higher distance education: HELMeTO 2020 report,” Educational Sciences, vol. 11, 334. |
| [14] | J. Ma, “The application of systems thinking in tunnel engineering course,” in Learning and Teaching Methodologies, vol. 1, Infonomics Society, 2022, pp. 1–23. |
| [15] | C. M. Stracke, “Quality frameworks and learning design for open education,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 20 (2), pp. 180–203. |
| [16] | M. Moore, “Three Types of Interaction,” American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 3, pp. 1–7. |
| [17] | M. C. Bickle, R. D. Rucker and K. A. Burnsed, “Online learning: examination of attributes that promote student satisfaction,” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, vol. 22 (1). |
| [18] | R. E. Mayer, “Thirty years of research on online learning,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 33 (2), pp. 152–159. |
| [19] | S. Kumar, F. Martin, K. Budhrani and A. Ritzhaupt, “Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Elements of award-winning courses,” Online Learning, vol. 23 (4), pp. 160–180. |
| [20] | L. Kyei-Blankson, E. Ntuli and H. Donnelly, “Establishing the importance of interaction and presence to student learning in online environments,” World Journal of Educational Research, vol. 3 (1), p. 48–65. |
| [21] | J. C. Dunlap and P. R. Lowenthal, “Online educators' recommendations for teaching online: Crowdsourcing in action,” Open Praxis, vol. 10 (1), pp. 79–89. |
| [22] | B. Cung, D. Xu and S. Eichhorn, “Increasing interpersonal interactions in an online course: Does increased instructor email activity and voluntary meeting time in a physical classroom facilitate student learning?” Online Learning, vol. 22 (3), pp. 193–215. |
| [23] | K. Shattuck, W., Zimmerman and D. Adair, “Continuous improvement of the QM Rubric and review processes: Scholarship of integration and application,” Internet Learning, vol. 3 (1), pp. 25–34. |
| [24] | N. Coppola, S. Hiltz and N. Rotter, “Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 18 (4), pp. 169–189. |
| [25] | D. Y. Lee, “Korean and foreign students’ perceptions of the teacher’s role in a multicultural online learning environment in Korea,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 59 (6), pp. 913–935. |
| [26] | I. Álvarez, T. Guasch and A. Espasa, “University teacher roles and competencies in online learning environments: a theoretical analysis of teaching and learning practices,” European Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 32, pp. 321–336. |
| [27] | C. Chang, H. Y. Shen and E. Z. F. Liu, “University faculty’s perspectives on the roles of e-instructors and their online instruction practice,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 15 (3), pp. 72–92. |
| [28] | A. Khan, O. Egbue, B. Palkie and J. Madden, “Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course,” Electronic Journal of E-Learning, vol. 15 (2), pp. 107–115. |
| [29] | F. Martin, C. Wang and A. Sadaf, “Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 37, pp. 52–65. |
| [30] | D. Conrad, “University instructors’ reflections on their first online teaching experiences,” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, vol. 8 (2), pp. 31–44. |
| [31] | N. F. Altowairiki, “Universal Design for Learning infusion in online higher education,” Online Learning, vol. 27 (1), pp. 296-312. |
| [32] | H. Abdel-Rahim, “The effectiveness of online teaching and learning tools: Students’ perceptions of usefulness in an upper-level accounting course,” Learning and Teaching, vol. 14 (3), pp. 52–69. |
| [33] | M. Kara, V. Kukul and R. Çakır, “Conceptions and misconceptions of instructors pertaining to their roles and competencies in distance education: a qualitative case study,” Participatory Educational Research, vol. 5 (2), pp. 67–79. |
| [34] | C. M. Stracke and I. Skuballa, “Using, analysing and evaluating eye-tracking at different educational levels: towards an evaluation framework for impact assessment,” TEM Journal, vol. 10 (2), pp. 483–487. |
| [35] | G. Chatzidamianos and C. Nerantzi, “Stripping the layers of the onion in learning and teaching in HE,” AdvanceHE, 03 Jun 2020. |
| [36] | E. Alemdag and K. Cagiltay, “A systematic review of eye tracking research on multimedia learning,” Computers & Education, vol. 125, pp. 413–428. |
| [37] | C. M. Stracke, "Interoperability and quality development in e-Learning: overview and reference model for e-Learning Standards," in Proc. of the Asia-Europe-Learning Colloquy. Seoul (Korea). |
| [38] | A. Naim and F. Alahmari, “Reference model of E-learning and quality to establish interoperability in higher education systems. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 15 (2), pp. 15–28. |
APA Style
Jianqin Ma. (2023). The Online Teaching Practice of the Tunnel Engineering During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Science Journal of Education, 11(3), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20231103.12
ACS Style
Jianqin Ma. The Online Teaching Practice of the Tunnel Engineering During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sci. J. Educ. 2023, 11(3), 93-103. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20231103.12
AMA Style
Jianqin Ma. The Online Teaching Practice of the Tunnel Engineering During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sci J Educ. 2023;11(3):93-103. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20231103.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20231103.12,
author = {Jianqin Ma},
title = {The Online Teaching Practice of the Tunnel Engineering During the COVID-19 Pandemic},
journal = {Science Journal of Education},
volume = {11},
number = {3},
pages = {93-103},
doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20231103.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20231103.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20231103.12},
abstract = {To cope with the constraint of the COVID-19 pandemic, online teaching is widely used in education. However, the adaptation from conventional face-to-face dominated classroom teaching to that of online mode is generally in a swift way. Considering the significant features of the online learning and teaching situation, both instructors and students would be confront with various challenges. Here is the presentation of the online teaching practice of the Tunnel Engineering during the COVID-19 pandemic. The practice indicates that the major challenges of the instructors are to perform the multiple roles of content expertise and presenter, student work assessor, online teaching procedure facilitator and manager. The students are confronted with the requirements of competence in terms of learner, presenter and respondent. The course design and implementation plan are initially tuned at the beginning of the online teaching to adapt to the new situation. With a new teaching strategy being set up, the online teaching activities have been progressively tailored in corresponding to the feedback from students, peer reviews, the results of formative and summative assessments on the learning and teaching activities. The experience and lesson learned from the Tunnel Engineering online teaching for six classes from the three academic years 2020 to 2022 are presented in terms of course design and implementation plan, assessments, effective interaction and online teaching community.},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Online Teaching Practice of the Tunnel Engineering During the COVID-19 Pandemic AU - Jianqin Ma Y1 - 2023/05/29 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20231103.12 DO - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20231103.12 T2 - Science Journal of Education JF - Science Journal of Education JO - Science Journal of Education SP - 93 EP - 103 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0897 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20231103.12 AB - To cope with the constraint of the COVID-19 pandemic, online teaching is widely used in education. However, the adaptation from conventional face-to-face dominated classroom teaching to that of online mode is generally in a swift way. Considering the significant features of the online learning and teaching situation, both instructors and students would be confront with various challenges. Here is the presentation of the online teaching practice of the Tunnel Engineering during the COVID-19 pandemic. The practice indicates that the major challenges of the instructors are to perform the multiple roles of content expertise and presenter, student work assessor, online teaching procedure facilitator and manager. The students are confronted with the requirements of competence in terms of learner, presenter and respondent. The course design and implementation plan are initially tuned at the beginning of the online teaching to adapt to the new situation. With a new teaching strategy being set up, the online teaching activities have been progressively tailored in corresponding to the feedback from students, peer reviews, the results of formative and summative assessments on the learning and teaching activities. The experience and lesson learned from the Tunnel Engineering online teaching for six classes from the three academic years 2020 to 2022 are presented in terms of course design and implementation plan, assessments, effective interaction and online teaching community. VL - 11 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: