The systematic analysis of edible biochips provides accurate and reproducible data that supports quality assurance, safety assessment, and optimization; for utilization in food and industrial processing applications. Despite their wide deployment, limited studies have comprehensively compared the physicochemical properties of different cassava varieties using standardized analytical methods. This study focuses on the investigation of the species-dependent variations in the physicochemical properties of cassava chips. Game-Changer, Obasanjo-II, Poundable, Hope, and Baba-70 denoted as samples A, B, C, D and E respectively were oven-and-sun dried under controlled conditions. Moisture, cyanide, and physicochemical properties were modeled using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Radar plots and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for optimization. The investigation covered percentage composition of fresh and dried samples, vitamins-minerals contents, principal components, correlations matrix, nutrients radar, hydrogen cyanide (HCN) content, moisture content and fundamental chemical attributes affecting the structural integrity of the chips. Sample D exhibited the highest initial moisture content while Sample E recorded the lowest, indicating a species-dependent variation in moisture retention. Minimal cyanide content within acceptable range was achieved, which demonstrates effective detoxification under controlled conditions. Species and temperature exerted a stronger influence than time; and observation identified specie as the most critical factor. PCA revealed complex nutrient trade-offs among minerals and vitamins, while RSM indicated that balanced control of drying time and temperature, rather than extreme settings, ensures optimal moisture reduction and processing efficiency. These findings underscore the hypercritical role of species selection in post-harvest cassava processing and provide baseline data for predicting drying behavior, ensuring product safety, and optimizing processing parameters for food and industrial applications.
Published in | American Journal of Applied Scientific Research (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajasr.20251104.11 |
Page(s) | 176-192 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cassava Chips, Physicochemical Characterization, Cassava Varieties, Moisture and Hydrogen Cyanide Contents, Post-Harvest Processing
Sample | %Protein (F) | %Protein (D) | %Fat (F) | %Fat (D) | %Crude Fiber (F) | %Crude Fiber (D) | %Ash (F) | %Ash (D) | %Carbohydrate (F) | %Carbohydrate (D) | %Moisture Content (F) | %Moisture Content (D) | %Dry Matter (F) | %Dry Matter (D) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 1.87 | 3.10 | 0.26 | 1.15 | 3.96 | 7.99 | 2.05 | 3.05 | 11.80 | 5.87 | 60.14 | 12.45 | 39.86 | 87.55 |
B | 1.09 | 4.09 | 0.24 | 1.22 | 3.15 | 9.46 | 1.56 | 3.29 | 12.59 | 5.59 | 62.85 | 12.98 | 37.15 | 87.02 |
C | 1.54 | 4.46 | 0.31 | 1.29 | 4.26 | 11.26 | 1.87 | 4.12 | 13.35 | 7.35 | 63.54 | 13.14 | 36.46 | 86.86 |
D | 2.48 | 4.76 | 0.37 | 1.34 | 5.24 | 12.24 | 2.85 | 5.24 | 15.84 | 8.86 | 65.53 | 14.83 | 34.47 | 85.17 |
E | 1.38 | 3.88 | 0.24 | 1.20 | 3.67 | 9.15 | 1.45 | 2.99 | 11.08 | 6.08 | 59.58 | 12.95 | 40.42 | 87.05 |
Nutrient (mg/g) | Sample A | Sample B | Sample C | Sample D | Sample E |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Calcium (Ca) | 13.04 | 15.02 | 17.05 | 9.06 | 12.09 |
Magnesium (Mg) | 15.3 | 10.8 | 14.45 | 9.85 | 9.79 |
Potassium (K) | 125 | 86 | 80 | 81 | 83 |
Sodium (Na) | 13.776 | 13.49 | 11.88 | 9.87 | 9.45 |
Phosphorus (P) | 28 | 42 | 17 | 22.6 | 56.5 |
Vitamin A (Vit. A) | 1.75 | 1.69 | 1.28 | 1.09 | 1.05 |
Vitamin C (Vit. C) | 30.89 | 35.25 | 25.45 | 42.97 | 31.78 |
Nutrient (mg/g) | Sample A | Sample B | Sample C | Sample D | Sample E |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca | 39.04 | 37.02 | 35.05 | 27.06 | 18.04 |
Mg | 26.33 | 29.89 | 30.37 | 15.85 | 14.68 |
K | 196 | 174 | 191 | 86 | 198 |
Na | 14.75 | 14.47 | 13.85 | 14.8 | 11.22 |
P | 129 | 139 | 89.15 | 213.6 | 144.5 |
Vit. A | 7.78 | 7.75 | 5.29 | 7.09 | 5.05 |
Vit. C | 50.89 | 41.25 | 30.38 | 52.95 | 51.78 |
Component | Eigenvalue | Proportion | Cumulative |
---|---|---|---|
PC1 | 3.8028 | 0.543 (54.3%) | 0.543 (54.3%) |
PC2 | 1.4754 | 0.211 (21.1%) | 0.754 (75.4%) |
PC3 | 1.0845 | 0.155 (15.5%) | 0.909 (90.9%) |
PC4 | 0.6373 | 0.091 (9.1%) | 1.000 (100%) |
PC5 | 0.0000 | 0.000 (0.0%) | 1.000 (100%) |
PC6 | 0.000 | 0.000 (0.0%) | 1.000 (100%) |
PC7 | -0.0000 | -0.000 (-0.0%) | 1.000 (100%) |
Nutrients (Variables) | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca (mg/g) | 0.356 | 0.531 | 0.184 | 0.320 | -0.529 | -0.387 | -0.160 |
Mg (mg/g) | 0.465 | 0.081 | -0.303 | -0.326 | -0.408 | 0.628 | 0.133 |
K (mg/g) | 0.341 | -0.493 | 0.044 | -0.555 | -0.164 | -0.546 | -0.074 |
Na (mg/g) | 0.463 | -0.213 | 0.145 | 0.388 | 0.210 | -0.062 | 0.722 |
P (mg/g) | -0.186 | -0.021 | 0.875 | -0.239 | 0.223 | 0.261 | 0.153 |
Vit. A (mg/g) | 0.426 | -0.345 | 0.249 | 0.327 | 0.208 | 0.288 | 0.636 |
Vit. C (mg/g) | -0.332 | -0.551 | -0.151 | 0.412 | -0.624 | 0.042 | 0.045 |
Component | Eigenvalue | Proportion | Cumulative |
---|---|---|---|
PC1 | 3.4725 | 0.496 (49.6%) | 0.496 (49.6%) |
PC2 | 2.7165 | 0.388 (38.8%) | 0.884 (88.4%) |
PC3 | 0.7236 | 0.103 (10.3%) | 0.988 (98.8%) |
PC4 | 0.0874 | 0.012 (1.2%) | 1.000 (100%) |
PC5 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 (0.0%) | 1.000 (100%) |
PC6 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 (0.0%) | 1.000 (100%) |
PC7 | -0.0000 | -0.000 (-0.0%) | 1.000 (100%) |
Variable | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | PC6 | PC7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ca (mg/g) | 0.462 | 0.298 | 0.117 | -0.305 | -0.041 | 0.720 | -0.267 |
Mg (mg/g) | 0.531 | 0.056 | -0.040 | 0.364 | -0.528 | -0.381 | -0.397 |
K (mg/g) | 0.284 | -0.410 | 0.605 | -0.005 | -0.277 | 0.075 | 0.551 |
Na (mg/g) | 0.227 | 0.534 | -0.181 | -0.501 | -0.120 | -0.384 | 0.466 |
P (mg/g) | -0.428 | 0.355 | -0.116 | 0.343 | -0.603 | 0.355 | 0.264 |
Vit. A (mg/g) | 0.108 | 0.542 | 0.437 | 0.522 | 0.461 | -0.075 | 0.114 |
Vit. C (mg/g) | -0.421 | 0.188 | 0.618 | -0.365 | -0.230 | -0.228 | -0.410 |
Rank | Time (Min) | Temp. (°C) | Samples (Species) | Cyanide (mg/kg) | Desirability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 43.55 | 30.00 | E | 0.03988 | 0.692 (Selected) |
2 | 34.70 | 30.00 | E | 0.04031 | 0.687 |
3 -5 | 42 - 47 | 30.00 | B | 0.05030 – 0.0505 | 0.57 |
6 – 7 | 37 | 100.00 | A | 0.07047 | 0.34 |
8 – 9 | 43 | 30.00 | C | 0.08100 | 0.22 |
10 – 11 | 34 | 30.00 | A | 0.08400 | 0.18 |
12 - 14 | 45 - 47 | 100.00 | C | 0.08600 | 0.16 |
15 | 45 - 47 | 100.00 | D | 0.09262 | 0.08 |
16 | 42.91 | 30.00 | D | 0.09363 | 0.07 |
Term | F -Value | P -Value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
Model | 14.38 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
A´ (Time) | 67.12 | < 0.0001 | Highly significant |
B´ (Temperature) | 103.59 | < 0.0001 | Highly significant |
C´ (Species) | 1.89 | 0.1276 | Not significant |
A´2 | 36.05 | < 0.0001 | Quadratic effect of time |
B´2 | 9.67 | 0.00032 | Quadratic effect of temperature |
A´B´ | 20.68 | < 0.0001 | Time-dependent interaction |
A´C´, B´C´ | < 1.0 | > 0.5 | Not significant |
A | Game-Changer Cassava Specie |
B | Obasanjo-II Cassava Specie |
C | Poundable Cassava Specie |
D | Hope Cassava Specie |
E | Baba-70 Cassava Specie |
A´ | Time Factor |
B´ | Temperature Factor |
C´ | Specie Factor |
A´2 | Quadratic Effects of Time |
B´2 | Quadratic of Temperature |
A´B´ | Time - temperature Interaction |
A´C´ | Time – Species Interaction |
B´C´ | Temperature – Species Interaction |
% | Percent / Percentage |
Mg/g | Milligram per gram |
RSM | Response Surface Methodology |
KCN | Potassium Cyanide |
PC | Principal Component |
PCA | Principal Component Analysis |
Ca | Calcium |
Mg | Magnesium |
K | Potassium |
Na | Sodium |
P | Phosphorus |
Vit. A | Vitamin A |
Vit. C | Vitamin C |
HCN | Hydrogen Cyanide |
AOAC | Association of Official Analytical Chemists |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
[1] | Swennen, R., Ortiz, R., Gebhardt, S., and Bellotti, A. (2021). Cassava: A Reference Handbook. Springer, New York, NY. |
[2] | Ikuemonisan, E. S., Mafimisebi, T. E., Ajibefwn, I., Adenegan, K., (2020). Cassava Production in Nigeria: trends, instability and decomposition analysis (1970 – 2018). Heliyon, 6(10): e05089. |
[3] | Lozano, J. C., Luna, J. C., & Blanca Meneses, R. (2019). Cassava: characteristics, uses and problems of utilization. Food Reviews International, 31(2): 189-204. |
[4] | Maalekuu, B. K., Owusu-Ansah, F., Atudorei, V, N., & Sossou, M. E. (2019). Cassava drying methods and their effect on quality parameters: A review. Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary, 7(4): 188-200. |
[5] | Ogbu, J. O., Mbaeyi-Nwaoha, I. E., Nwankwo, C. C., & Orji, J. O. (2020). Postharvest Handling Techniques on Cassava (Manihot esculenta): A Review. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International, 20(1), 42-56. |
[6] | Milena, L., Maria, D. F., Arianna, R., and Dante, M. F., (2023). Improved Processing Methods to reduce the total cyanide content of cassava roots from Bwrundi. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12(19): 2685-2691. |
[7] | Tewe, O. O., & Iyayi, E. A. (2022). Toxicological implications of cyanogens in cassava diets. Nutrition Research, 9(11), 1207-1214. |
[8] | Monroy-Rivera, J. A., Angulo, B. E., & Bressani, R. (2018). Chemical and nutritional changes during root cutting and exposure to air in cassava. Journal of Food Science, 61(2), 369-373. |
[9] | Bánkuti, F. I., Madi, A., & Nwogu, A. O. (2019). Effect of processing methods on the nutritional value and toxicity of cassava: A review. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture, 3(2), 14-23. |
[10] | Okudo, H., & Rosentrater, K. A. (2020). Cassava Processing and Utilization: Current Practices and Emerging Trends. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 40(6), 1049-1061. |
[11] | Harrigan, G. G., & Lueschow, S. R. (2019). Cyanide in Cassava: An Update. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62(40), 9754-9763. |
[12] | Hidayat, A., Hermanto, C., Nugroho, A., Hastuti, U. S., & Sumardiono, S. (2022). Variability of cyanide potentials in cassava (Manihot esculenta) leaves and roots. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 82(3), 329-334. |
[13] | Splittstoesser, W. E., & Tunya, H. (2018). Cyanogenic compounds in cassava and their relationship to agroecological factors. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 27(3), 289-298. |
[14] | Huaman, Z., and Spooner, D. M. (2018). Reclassification of landrace populations of cultivated potatoes (Solanum sect. petota). American Journal of Botany. 89(6): 947 – 965. |
[15] | Cardoso, O., Ravagnani, S. P., Ramos, A. C., Pinheiro-Sant’Ana, H. M., Figueira, R. C., & Shimokomaki, M. (2019). Cyanogenic glycosides in Cassava and Linamarin determination in Manioc Flour by HPLC. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 48(4), 541-546. |
[16] | Wheatley, A. O., Sharif, M. K., & Butt, M. S. (2021). Chemical composition and nutritional quality of bitter and sweet apricot kernels. Food Chemistry, 46(1), 41-46. |
[17] | Onwueme, I. (2018). Effect of Harvesting Stages and Drying Methods on Some of the Antinutritive Components of Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Tubers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 26(3): 608-610. |
[18] | Peng, W., Jeffrey, C. S., Jackson, L. S., & Wei-Chuan, C. (2020). Cyanogenic Glucoside Degradation during Processing of Cassava Leaf and Roots: Effects of Traditional African Fermentation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 65(26), 5248-5254. |
[19] | Akinwale, T. O., Ogunlakin, G. O., & Awoyale, W. (2022). Nutritional optimization of cassava-based foods through processing. Food Bioscience, 47, 101781. |
[20] | Olufayo, AA., & Ogunkunle, AT. (2020). Effect of layer thickness and weather conditions on drying of cassava chips under natural convection. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 34(1): 85-91. |
[21] | Udoro, E. O., Omodara, M. A., & Adebayo, S. E. (2023). Moisture reduction techniques in cassava products: Impact on quality and shelf stability. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 60(4), 1051–1060. |
[22] | Akpan, I. E., & Umoh, I. B. (2020). Retention of β-carotene and vitamin C in dried cassava products using optimized drying methods. International Journal of Food Properties, 23(1), 1085–1099. |
[23] | Boakye Peprah, B., Parkes, E. Y., Harrison, O. A., Jacoby, A., Steiner-Asiedu, M. & Labuschagne, M. (2020). Proximate Composition, Cyanide Content, and Carotenoid Retention after Boiling of Provitamin A-Rich Cassava Grown in Ghana. Foods. 9. 1800. |
[24] | Mohidin, S. R. N. S. P., Moshawih, S., Hermansyah, A., Asmuni, M. I., Shafqat, N., & Ming, L. C. (2023). Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz): A Systematic Review for the Pharmacological Activities, Traditional Uses, Nutritional Values, and Phytochemistry. Journal of evidence-based integrative medicine, 28, 2515690X231206227. |
[25] | Popova, A. (2019). The effect of heating on the vitamin C content of selected vegetables. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 3. 2581-9615. |
[26] | Quinn, A. Myrans, H. & Gleadow, R. (2022). Cyanide Content of Cassava Food Products Available in Australia. Foods. 11. 1384. |
[27] | Cumbana, R. P., Dovlo, F., & Mlingi, N. (2019). Variations in various processing methods for the removal of cyanide, phytic acid and tannins from cassava chips. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 42(9), 1055-1061. |
[28] | Odongo, M. & Mutagaya, S. A. (2023). Investigation of Levels of Cyanide in Cassava Tubers Marketed in Kampala. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 9(1), 21-26. |
[29] | Bello, F. A., Obadina, A. O., & Oyedele, H. A. (2024). Evaluating cassava varieties for nutrient-dense snack development. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 24(1), 13812–13826. |
[30] | Lazzari, G. (2022). Drying of Foods: Principles and Practice (Third Edition). Woodhead Publishing Limited. |
[31] | Nartey, F., Amoa-Awua, W. K., & Appiah, V. (2018). Cyanide content of cassava and cassava-based dishes in the Brong-Ahafo region, Ghana. Food Control, 18(7), 905-908. |
[32] | Jimoh, M. O., Afolayan, A. J., & Lewu, F. B. (2021). Mineral composition and bioavailability in cassava-based food products: Effect of variety and processing methods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 98, 103830. |
[33] |
World Health Organization. (2021). Cassava cyanogens and human health. Retrieved from
https://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/chem/cyanogens/en/ |
[34] | Laskar, A. A., Ahmed, M., Khan, A. & Samir, M. (2022). Experimental investigation and statistical validation of mathematical models for hot air drying traits of carrot. Food Science and Technology International. 29. 108201322210932. |
[35] | Kaur, D., Kumar, M., Gupta, O. P., Sharma, S. & Kumar, S. (2018). Drying Characteristics of Fenugreek and Its Computer Simulation for Automatic Operation. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 7. 3275-3291. |
APA Style
Onah, T. O., Aka, C. C., Tommy, S. D. (2025). Species-Dependent Variations in the Physicochemical Properties of Bio-chips: Implications for Quality Control and Processing Optimization of Cassava. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 11(4), 176-192. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20251104.11
ACS Style
Onah, T. O.; Aka, C. C.; Tommy, S. D. Species-Dependent Variations in the Physicochemical Properties of Bio-chips: Implications for Quality Control and Processing Optimization of Cassava. Am. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2025, 11(4), 176-192. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20251104.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajasr.20251104.11, author = {Thomas Okechukwu Onah and Christian Chikezie Aka and Samuel David Tommy}, title = {Species-Dependent Variations in the Physicochemical Properties of Bio-chips: Implications for Quality Control and Processing Optimization of Cassava }, journal = {American Journal of Applied Scientific Research}, volume = {11}, number = {4}, pages = {176-192}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajasr.20251104.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20251104.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajasr.20251104.11}, abstract = {The systematic analysis of edible biochips provides accurate and reproducible data that supports quality assurance, safety assessment, and optimization; for utilization in food and industrial processing applications. Despite their wide deployment, limited studies have comprehensively compared the physicochemical properties of different cassava varieties using standardized analytical methods. This study focuses on the investigation of the species-dependent variations in the physicochemical properties of cassava chips. Game-Changer, Obasanjo-II, Poundable, Hope, and Baba-70 denoted as samples A, B, C, D and E respectively were oven-and-sun dried under controlled conditions. Moisture, cyanide, and physicochemical properties were modeled using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Radar plots and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for optimization. The investigation covered percentage composition of fresh and dried samples, vitamins-minerals contents, principal components, correlations matrix, nutrients radar, hydrogen cyanide (HCN) content, moisture content and fundamental chemical attributes affecting the structural integrity of the chips. Sample D exhibited the highest initial moisture content while Sample E recorded the lowest, indicating a species-dependent variation in moisture retention. Minimal cyanide content within acceptable range was achieved, which demonstrates effective detoxification under controlled conditions. Species and temperature exerted a stronger influence than time; and observation identified specie as the most critical factor. PCA revealed complex nutrient trade-offs among minerals and vitamins, while RSM indicated that balanced control of drying time and temperature, rather than extreme settings, ensures optimal moisture reduction and processing efficiency. These findings underscore the hypercritical role of species selection in post-harvest cassava processing and provide baseline data for predicting drying behavior, ensuring product safety, and optimizing processing parameters for food and industrial applications.}, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Species-Dependent Variations in the Physicochemical Properties of Bio-chips: Implications for Quality Control and Processing Optimization of Cassava AU - Thomas Okechukwu Onah AU - Christian Chikezie Aka AU - Samuel David Tommy Y1 - 2025/10/14 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20251104.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajasr.20251104.11 T2 - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research JF - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research JO - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research SP - 176 EP - 192 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2471-9730 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20251104.11 AB - The systematic analysis of edible biochips provides accurate and reproducible data that supports quality assurance, safety assessment, and optimization; for utilization in food and industrial processing applications. Despite their wide deployment, limited studies have comprehensively compared the physicochemical properties of different cassava varieties using standardized analytical methods. This study focuses on the investigation of the species-dependent variations in the physicochemical properties of cassava chips. Game-Changer, Obasanjo-II, Poundable, Hope, and Baba-70 denoted as samples A, B, C, D and E respectively were oven-and-sun dried under controlled conditions. Moisture, cyanide, and physicochemical properties were modeled using Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Radar plots and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for optimization. The investigation covered percentage composition of fresh and dried samples, vitamins-minerals contents, principal components, correlations matrix, nutrients radar, hydrogen cyanide (HCN) content, moisture content and fundamental chemical attributes affecting the structural integrity of the chips. Sample D exhibited the highest initial moisture content while Sample E recorded the lowest, indicating a species-dependent variation in moisture retention. Minimal cyanide content within acceptable range was achieved, which demonstrates effective detoxification under controlled conditions. Species and temperature exerted a stronger influence than time; and observation identified specie as the most critical factor. PCA revealed complex nutrient trade-offs among minerals and vitamins, while RSM indicated that balanced control of drying time and temperature, rather than extreme settings, ensures optimal moisture reduction and processing efficiency. These findings underscore the hypercritical role of species selection in post-harvest cassava processing and provide baseline data for predicting drying behavior, ensuring product safety, and optimizing processing parameters for food and industrial applications. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -