Organic farming largely excludes the use of chemical fertilizers, synthetic pesticides, genetically modified organisms, antibiotics, and growth hormones. Organic food production in the Southeastern United States is low and not reflective of the national trend. Warm temperatures and high rainfall patterns in this region cause a rapid decomposition of soil organic matter and high insect pest populations; both conditions do not augur well for vegetable production. The specific objectives of this study were to (1) conduct insect host-preference assessments using three popular tomato cultivars and 2) assess efficacy and cost effectiveness of selected biopesticides against tomato hornworm. Field trials involving three tomato cultivars: Celebrity, Mountain magic and Rocky top were conducted at the George Washington Carver Agricultural Experiment Station Organic Research Farm, Tuskegee University Alabama in 2018 and 2019. The experiments were set up as a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 3x4 factorial treatment arrangement (i.e., 3 tomato varieties and 4 spray treatments) replicated 4 times. An assessment of relative performance and cost-effectiveness of the biopesticide active ingredients: Azadirachtin, Spinosad, and Pyrethrin against hornworms on tomato was done. An improvised Economic threshold (ET) of one adult hornworm per 10 foot-row of tomatoes was used. Biopesticides were sprayed on designated plots when visual sampling revealed the attainment of ET populations. The hornworm counts at different sampling dates were analyzed using SAS statistical software. Tomato hornworms showed equal preference for Celebrity, Mountain magic and Rocky top tomato cultivars. Plots treated with the candidate biopesticides recorded similar hornworm populations as untreated control plots in 2018 whereas in 2019, Spinosad and Azadirachtin performed better than the control. Based on the total volume of biopesticide used, per unit cost of each biopesticide, and reduction of hornworms in treated plots, none of the biopesticides was cost-effective in 2018. This is because none of them was effective (i.e., performed better than untreated controls) against the hornworm. In 2019, however, the use of Spinosad and Azadirachtin resulted in hornworm counts that were significantly lower than those recorded in the control study. However, these significant differences in hornworm populations did not translate into differences in tomato yields. Except for a significantly lower hornworm population observed approximately 57 DAT, pyrethrin treatments resulted in hornworm populations that were comparable to those recorded on control plots. Insignificant effects on tomato yield renders moot, any computations of cost-effectiveness. Pyrethrin is clearly the least expensive option but cannot be described as the most cost-effective.
| Published in | American Journal of Entomology (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.aje.20210501.12 |
| Page(s) | 10-17 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Organic Farming, Tomato Hornworm, Economic Threshold, Biopesticides, Spinosad, Azadirachtin, Pyrethrin
| [1] | Villanueva, R. (1998). Tobacco Hornworm, Manduca sexta (Linnaeus), and Tomato Hornworm, Manduca quinquemaculata (Haworth), (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). University of Florida IFAS Extension EENY-031, 1-5. |
| [2] | Bauernfeind, R. J. (2013). Tomato and Tobacco Hornworms. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Bulletin MF-3075. |
| [3] | Walker, H. G., & Anderson, L. D. (1944). Tomato Hornworm Control. Journal of Economic Entomology, 37 (2), 308-308. |
| [4] | Kuhar, T. P., Schultz, P., Doughty, H., Wimer, A., Wallingford, A., Andrews, H., Phillips, C., Cassell, M., & Jenrette, J. (2011). Evaluation of foliar and soil-applied insecticides for the control of foliar insects in fall tomatoes in Virginia, 2010. Arthropod Management Tests, 36 (1), E85. |
| [5] | Middlekauff, W. W., Gonzales, C. Q., & King, R. Q. (1963). Effect of various insecticides in the control of caterpillars attacking tomato in California. Journal of Economic Entomology, 56 (2), 155-158. |
| [6] | Carson, W. G., Kund, G. S., & Trumble, J. T. (1999). Effect of insecticides on tomato insects, 1997. Arthropod Management Tests, 24 (1). |
| [7] | Kuhar, T. P., & Doughty, H. (2009). Evaluation of insecticide treatments for the control of insect pests in snap beans, 2008. Arthropod Management Tests, 34 (1). |
| [8] | Carson, W. G., Kund, G. S., & Trumble, J. T. (2013). Effect of insecticides on tomato insects, 2012. Arthropod Management Tests, 38 (1), E66. |
| [9] | Sud, M. (2020). Managing the biodiversity impacts of fertilizer and pesticide use: Overview and insights from trends and policies across selected OECD countries. |
| [10] | Coats, J. R. (2012). Insecticide mode of action. Academic Press. |
| [11] | Martinou, A. F., Seraphides, N., & Stavrinides, M. C. (2014). Lethal and behavioral effects of pesticides on the insect predator Macrolophus pygmaeus. Chemosphere, 96, 167-173. |
| [12] | Weller, S., Culbreath, A., Gianessi, L., Godfrey, L., Jachetta, J., Norsworthy, J.,... & Madsen, J. (2014). The contributions of pesticides to pest management in meeting the global need for food production by 2050. Issue Paper-Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, (55). |
| [13] | Dutcher, J. D. (2007). A review of resurgence and replacement causing pest outbreaks in IPM. General concepts in integrated pest and disease management, 27-43. |
| [14] | Way, M. J., & Heong, K. L. (1994). The role of biodiversity in the dynamics and management of insect pests of tropical irrigated rice—a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 84 (4), 567-587. |
| [15] | Yardim, E. N., Arancon, N. Q., Edwards, C. A., Oliver, T. J., & Byrne, R. J. (2006). Suppression of tomato hornworm (Manduca quinquemaculata) and cucumber beetles (Acalymma vittatum and Diabrotica undecimpunctata) populations and damage by vermicomposts. Pedobiologia, 50 (1), 23-29. |
| [16] | Edwards, C. A., Arancon, N. Q., Vasko-Bennett, M., Askar, A., & Keeney, G. (2010). Effect of aqueous extracts from vermicomposts on attacks by cucumber beetles (Acalymna vittatum) (Fabr.) on cucumbers and tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta) (L.) on tomatoes. Pedobiologia, 53 (2), 141-148. |
| [17] | Stanley, J. M., & Dominick, C. B. (1958). Response of tobacco-and tomato-hornworm moths to Black Light. Journal of Economic Entomology, 51 (1), 78-80. |
| [18] | Jones, G. A., & Thurston, R. (1970). Effect of an area program using blacklight traps to control populations of tobacco hornworms and tomato hornworms in Kentucky. Journal of Economic Entomology, 63 (4), 1187-1194. |
| [19] | Becg, J. A. (1964). Microbial and chemical control of hornworms attacking tobacco in Ontario. Journal of Economic Entomology, 57 (5), 646-649. |
| [20] | Jackson, D. M. (1983). Control of Tobacco Budworms and Tomato Hornworms with Bacillus Thuringiensis Var. Kurstaki, 1981. Insecticide and Acaricide Tests, 8 (1), 224-224. |
| [21] | Majumdar, A., Caylor, A., & Pitts, J. (2014). Late-season caterpillar control in tomatoes using bioinsecticide premixes and tank-mixes, 2013. Arthropod Management Tests, 39 (1), E27. |
| [22] | Oatman, E. R., & Platner, G. R. (1971). Biological control of the tomato fruitworm, cabbage looper, and hornworms on processing tomatoes in southern California, using mass releases of Trichogramma pretiosum. Journal of Economic Entomology, 64 (2), 501-506. |
| [23] | Pedigo, L. P., & Rice, M. E. (2009). Ecological management of the crop environment. Entomology and pest management, sixth edition. Waveland Press, Inc., Long Grove, IL, 335-368. |
| [24] | Casida, J. E., & Quistad, G. B. (1995). Pyrethrum flowers: production, chemistry, toxicology, and uses. In International Symposium on Pyrethrum Flowers: Production, Chemistry, Toxicology and Uses, Honolulu, Hawaii (USA), 1992. Oxford University Press. |
| [25] | Extoxnet (1994). Pesticides Management Education Program, Cornell University, NY. |
| [26] | Saunders, D. G., & Bret, B. L. (1997). Fate of Spinosad in the environment. Down to Earth, 52 (1), 14-20. |
| [27] | Dureja, P., & Johnson, S. (2000). Photodegradation of azadirachtin-A: A neem-based pesticide. Current Science, 1700-1703. |
| [28] | Johnson, S., Dureja, P., & Dhingra, S. (2003). Photostabilizers for Azadirachtin-A (a neem-based pesticide). Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 38 (4), 451-462. |
| [29] | Veitch, G. E., Beckmann, E., Burke, B. J., Boyer, A., Maslen, S. L., & Ley, S. V. (2007). Synthesis of azadirachtin: a long but successful journey. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 46 (40), 7629-7632. |
| [30] | Ghosh, A., & Chatterjee, M. (2009). Bio-efficacy of Spinosad against tomato fruit borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hub.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its natural enemies. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 2 (5), 108-111. |
| [31] | Toennisson, A., & Burrack, H. (2015). Efficacy of organically acceptable pesticides against key tobacco pests, 2013. Arthropod Management Tests, 39 (1). |
| [32] | Toennisson, A., & Burrack, H. (2018). Efficacy of organically acceptable materials against tobacco pests, 2016. Arthropod Management Tests, 43 (1). |
| [33] | Kessler, A., & Baldwin, I. T. (2002). Manduca quinquemaculata's optimization of intra-plant oviposition to predation, food quality, and thermal constraints. Ecology, 83 (8), 2346-2354. |
| [34] | Kursar, T. A., Wolfe, B. T., Epps, M. J., & Coley, P. D. (2006). Food quality, competition, and parasitism influence feeding preference in a neotropical lepidopteran. Ecology, 87 (12), 3058-3069. |
| [35] | Barone, J. A. (1998). Host-specificity of folivorous insects in a moist tropical forest. Journal of Animal Ecology, 67 (3), 400-409. |
| [36] | Stamp, N. E., & Bowers, M. D. (1990). Phenology of nutritional differences between new and mature leaves and its effect on caterpillar growth. Ecological Entomology, 15 (4), 447-454. |
| [37] | Van Dam, N. M., Horn, M., Mareš, M., & Baldwin, I. T. (2001). Ontogeny constrains systemic protease inhibitor response in Nicotiana attenuata. Journal of chemical ecology, 27 (3), 547-568. |
| [38] | Del Campo, M. L., Miles, C. I., Schroeder, F. C., Mueller, C., Booker, R., & Renwick, J. A. (2001). Host recognition by the tobacco hornworm is mediated by a host plant compound. Nature, 411 (6834), 186-189. |
| [39] | Wang, M., & Riffel, M. (2011). Making the right conclusions based on wrong results and small sample sizes: interpretation of statistical tests in ecotoxicology. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 74 (4), 684-692. |
APA Style
Sonu Koirala B. K., Franklin Quarcoo, Kokoasse Kpomblekou-A, Desmond Mortley. (2021). Organic Tomato Production in Alabama: Host Preference of the Tomato Hornworm (Manduca quinquemaculata) and Performance of Selected Biopesticides. American Journal of Entomology, 5(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20210501.12
ACS Style
Sonu Koirala B. K.; Franklin Quarcoo; Kokoasse Kpomblekou-A; Desmond Mortley. Organic Tomato Production in Alabama: Host Preference of the Tomato Hornworm (Manduca quinquemaculata) and Performance of Selected Biopesticides. Am. J. Entomol. 2021, 5(1), 10-17. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20210501.12
AMA Style
Sonu Koirala B. K., Franklin Quarcoo, Kokoasse Kpomblekou-A, Desmond Mortley. Organic Tomato Production in Alabama: Host Preference of the Tomato Hornworm (Manduca quinquemaculata) and Performance of Selected Biopesticides. Am J Entomol. 2021;5(1):10-17. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20210501.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.aje.20210501.12,
author = {Sonu Koirala B. K. and Franklin Quarcoo and Kokoasse Kpomblekou-A and Desmond Mortley},
title = {Organic Tomato Production in Alabama: Host Preference of the Tomato Hornworm (Manduca quinquemaculata) and Performance of Selected Biopesticides},
journal = {American Journal of Entomology},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {10-17},
doi = {10.11648/j.aje.20210501.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20210501.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aje.20210501.12},
abstract = {Organic farming largely excludes the use of chemical fertilizers, synthetic pesticides, genetically modified organisms, antibiotics, and growth hormones. Organic food production in the Southeastern United States is low and not reflective of the national trend. Warm temperatures and high rainfall patterns in this region cause a rapid decomposition of soil organic matter and high insect pest populations; both conditions do not augur well for vegetable production. The specific objectives of this study were to (1) conduct insect host-preference assessments using three popular tomato cultivars and 2) assess efficacy and cost effectiveness of selected biopesticides against tomato hornworm. Field trials involving three tomato cultivars: Celebrity, Mountain magic and Rocky top were conducted at the George Washington Carver Agricultural Experiment Station Organic Research Farm, Tuskegee University Alabama in 2018 and 2019. The experiments were set up as a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 3x4 factorial treatment arrangement (i.e., 3 tomato varieties and 4 spray treatments) replicated 4 times. An assessment of relative performance and cost-effectiveness of the biopesticide active ingredients: Azadirachtin, Spinosad, and Pyrethrin against hornworms on tomato was done. An improvised Economic threshold (ET) of one adult hornworm per 10 foot-row of tomatoes was used. Biopesticides were sprayed on designated plots when visual sampling revealed the attainment of ET populations. The hornworm counts at different sampling dates were analyzed using SAS statistical software. Tomato hornworms showed equal preference for Celebrity, Mountain magic and Rocky top tomato cultivars. Plots treated with the candidate biopesticides recorded similar hornworm populations as untreated control plots in 2018 whereas in 2019, Spinosad and Azadirachtin performed better than the control. Based on the total volume of biopesticide used, per unit cost of each biopesticide, and reduction of hornworms in treated plots, none of the biopesticides was cost-effective in 2018. This is because none of them was effective (i.e., performed better than untreated controls) against the hornworm. In 2019, however, the use of Spinosad and Azadirachtin resulted in hornworm counts that were significantly lower than those recorded in the control study. However, these significant differences in hornworm populations did not translate into differences in tomato yields. Except for a significantly lower hornworm population observed approximately 57 DAT, pyrethrin treatments resulted in hornworm populations that were comparable to those recorded on control plots. Insignificant effects on tomato yield renders moot, any computations of cost-effectiveness. Pyrethrin is clearly the least expensive option but cannot be described as the most cost-effective.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Organic Tomato Production in Alabama: Host Preference of the Tomato Hornworm (Manduca quinquemaculata) and Performance of Selected Biopesticides AU - Sonu Koirala B. K. AU - Franklin Quarcoo AU - Kokoasse Kpomblekou-A AU - Desmond Mortley Y1 - 2021/04/26 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20210501.12 DO - 10.11648/j.aje.20210501.12 T2 - American Journal of Entomology JF - American Journal of Entomology JO - American Journal of Entomology SP - 10 EP - 17 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-0537 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20210501.12 AB - Organic farming largely excludes the use of chemical fertilizers, synthetic pesticides, genetically modified organisms, antibiotics, and growth hormones. Organic food production in the Southeastern United States is low and not reflective of the national trend. Warm temperatures and high rainfall patterns in this region cause a rapid decomposition of soil organic matter and high insect pest populations; both conditions do not augur well for vegetable production. The specific objectives of this study were to (1) conduct insect host-preference assessments using three popular tomato cultivars and 2) assess efficacy and cost effectiveness of selected biopesticides against tomato hornworm. Field trials involving three tomato cultivars: Celebrity, Mountain magic and Rocky top were conducted at the George Washington Carver Agricultural Experiment Station Organic Research Farm, Tuskegee University Alabama in 2018 and 2019. The experiments were set up as a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 3x4 factorial treatment arrangement (i.e., 3 tomato varieties and 4 spray treatments) replicated 4 times. An assessment of relative performance and cost-effectiveness of the biopesticide active ingredients: Azadirachtin, Spinosad, and Pyrethrin against hornworms on tomato was done. An improvised Economic threshold (ET) of one adult hornworm per 10 foot-row of tomatoes was used. Biopesticides were sprayed on designated plots when visual sampling revealed the attainment of ET populations. The hornworm counts at different sampling dates were analyzed using SAS statistical software. Tomato hornworms showed equal preference for Celebrity, Mountain magic and Rocky top tomato cultivars. Plots treated with the candidate biopesticides recorded similar hornworm populations as untreated control plots in 2018 whereas in 2019, Spinosad and Azadirachtin performed better than the control. Based on the total volume of biopesticide used, per unit cost of each biopesticide, and reduction of hornworms in treated plots, none of the biopesticides was cost-effective in 2018. This is because none of them was effective (i.e., performed better than untreated controls) against the hornworm. In 2019, however, the use of Spinosad and Azadirachtin resulted in hornworm counts that were significantly lower than those recorded in the control study. However, these significant differences in hornworm populations did not translate into differences in tomato yields. Except for a significantly lower hornworm population observed approximately 57 DAT, pyrethrin treatments resulted in hornworm populations that were comparable to those recorded on control plots. Insignificant effects on tomato yield renders moot, any computations of cost-effectiveness. Pyrethrin is clearly the least expensive option but cannot be described as the most cost-effective. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: