Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Rule-Based Operation of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Power System in Coastal Bangladesh

Received: 6 October 2026     Accepted: 26 October 2026     Published: 10 November 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Coastal communities in Bangladesh, such as Teknaf in Cox's Bazar, suffer from severe energy insecurity due to a fossil-fuel-dominated grid, long transmission lines, and chronic load shedding. This study aims to design and evaluate a grid-connected hybrid power system to improve local energy reliability, reduce grid dependence, and lower carbon emissions. A 24-hour hourly simulation was conducted using real commercial components: five 95 kW wind turbines (475 kW total), a 78.12 kWp bifacial solar PV array, a 128 kWh LiFePO₄ battery, a 100 kVA diesel generator, and bidirectional grid exchange. A transparent, rule-based energy management strategy with four time-of-day operating modules was developed to coordinate the sources and serve a consumer load with a 70-kW evening peak. The simulation results show that renewable generation (1,150 kWh/day) exceeded the consumer demand (929 kWh/day). This reduced gross grid imports by 41.3% and net grid purchase, along with associated CO2 emissions, by 84.5% compared to a CG-only system. However, the temporal mismatch between renewable generation and the evening peak meant that the 128-kWh battery only reduced the peak grid demand from 70 kW to 67.5 kW. Sensitivity analysis identified wind speed and battery capacity as the most dominant design parameters.

Published in American Journal of Energy Engineering (Volume 14, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajee.20261404.12
Page(s) 179-191
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Hybrid Power System, Renewable Energy Sources, Wind-PV-Battery, Grid Interaction, Rule-based Control, CO2 Emission Reduction

1. Introduction
Hybrid renewable energy systems (HRESs) that combine solar photovoltaic (PV) generation, wind turbines, battery energy storage and conventional backup are now a mainstream route to cleaner and more reliable electricity supply . Their main technical challenge is the variability of solar and wind output, which must be balanced against demand through storage sizing and energy management . Recent reviews show that storage, control strategy and grid interaction largely determine whether a hybrid system delivers its expected reliability and stability benefits .
Bangladesh is a strong case for such systems. Its generation mix remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels: renewables supplied only about 3.54% of a 28,132 MW total generation capacity, and grid-connected wind capacity was just 63 MW, despite a national target of 40% renewable electricity by 2041 . The southern coastal belt, which includes Cox's Bazar District and the Teknaf peninsula (Figure 1), has the country's best wind resource, with average speeds of roughly 5.5-7.2 m/s at 100 m hub height . At lower heights the resource is more modest; for example, the highest annual mean speed among 50 surveyed locations was 4.89 m/s at 50 m, recorded at Sandwip . Coastal sites have nonetheless been shown to suit cost-effective generation at 30-40 m tower heights , and GIS-based siting studies have mapped large areas of coastal Bangladesh suitable for wind development .
A growing body of work has applied techno-economic optimization, to hybrid systems in coastal and island Bangladesh. Studies have covered a solar-wind system at Patenga Sea Beach , six off-grid and on-grid configurations for Kunder Char , large-scale electrification of Bhasan Char , a smart PV-wind-battery-grid microgrid with demand response for Hatiya Island , and a hydrogen-assisted off-grid microgrid for Char Ishwar, Noakhali . In Cox's Bazar itself, recent work evaluated a hybrid EV charging station and showed that aligning demand with solar hours reduces cost and emissions . Related studies have added dynamic stability assessment to rural microgrid design and compared battery chemistries, including LiFePO₄, for off-grid hybrid systems .
Figure 1. Location of the study site in Teknaf, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.
In parallel, rule-based energy management systems (EMSs) have been developed to coordinate generation, storage and the grid in a transparent and practical way. Recent proposals include modular rule-based EMSs that adapt to different microgrid configurations in grid-connected and islanded modes , improved rule-based schemes for coordinating batteries in community microgrids , rule-based peak-shaving control for grid-connected PV-battery communities , and rule-based EMSs combined with metaheuristic sizing .
Despite this progress, three gaps remain. First, most coastal Bangladesh studies focus on off-grid island electrification and report annual economic indicators, while grid-connected community systems that both import and export power receive less attention . Second, operating strategy is often left to software defaults, so the hour-by-hour interaction between wind, solar, battery, generator and grid is rarely made explicit or reproducible . Third, few studies model a specific Teknaf community load using real commercial component specifications, or examine how a backup generator and battery maintain supply during grid outages, which remain common in the region. To address these gaps, this paper presents a grid-connected hybrid community power system installed at Teknaf, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and System Design Philosophy
The hybrid community power system described in this study was installed to meet the electricity demand of a coastal community in Teknaf, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh. Teknaf was selected because of its abundant renewable energy resources. The coastal area experiences a typical sea breeze pattern, with average wind speeds ranging from 4.5 to 5.5 m/s at 30-40 m height, and receives an average of 4.5 peak sun hours per day, making it suitable for both wind and solar PV generation.
The system architecture combines wind turbines, solar photovoltaic panels, battery energy storage, a backup diesel generator, and a grid connection to form a resilient and sustainable power supply network. The primary design objective was to maximize the utilization of renewable energy sources while ensuring reliable power delivery during periods of low renewable generation and grid outages. The total renewable generation capacity is 553.12 kW, comprising 475 kW from wind turbines and 78.12 kWp from solar PV panels. This capacity exceeds the community's peak demand of 70 kW by a factor of approximately 7.9, ensuring sufficient generation during favorable conditions and enabling substantial energy export to the grid. Figure 2 presents the overall system architecture.
Figure 2. Overall system architecture of the hybrid community power system.
2.2. User Load Profile
The user load profile was developed based on a connected load of 100 kW and a demand factor of 0.7, yielding a peak demand of 70 kW. The demand factor accounts for the fact that not all connected loads operate simultaneously at their rated capacity, a standard assumption in power system planning. The daily energy consumption is 929 kWh, with a load factor of 55 percent. The load profile exhibits a typical residential-commercial pattern, with minimum demand during early morning hours and peak demand in the evening at 19:00.
Figure 3. Daily Load Curve.
Figure 3 presents the hourly load profile. The load rises gradually from a minimum of 21.8 kW at 04:00 to a daytime plateau of approximately 38 kW between 10:00 and 16:00. A sharp increase occurs after 17:00, reaching the peak of 70 kW at 19:00, followed by a gradual decline through the evening and night. This profile is characteristic of coastal communities in Bangladesh, where evening lighting, cooling, and commercial activities drive peak demand.
2.3. Wind Based Power Generation Model
2.3.1. Turbine Specifications
Table 1. Wind turbine specifications (XANT M-24).

Parameter

Specification

Model

XANT M-24

Rated Power

95 kW

Rotor Diameter

24 m

Swept Area

452 m²

Cut-in Wind Speed

3.0 m/s

Rated Wind Speed

11-12 m/s

Cut-out Wind Speed

25 m/s

Number of Units

5

Total Installed Capacity

475 kW

The wind-based power generation model is based on the XANT M-24 wind turbine (WT), a 95-kW rated machine with a 24 m rotor diameter. Five such WTs are installed, providing a total installed capacity of 475 kW. The turbine has a cut-in wind speed of 3.0 m/s and reaches its rated power at approximately 11-12 m/s. Table 1 presents the technical specifications of the wind turbine.
2.3.2. Wind Power Calculation
The power output from WT at each hour was calculated using the standard wind power equation:
P=12ρAv3Cp(1)
where ρis the air density, A is the rotor swept area, v is the wind speed, and Cp is the power coefficient, assumed to be 0.40 for this analysis. The theoretical model was chosen because the manufacturer's certified power curve was not available for this specific WT model at the time of the study.
2.4. Solar PV based Power Generation Model
2.4.1. Panel Specifications
Table 2. Solar PV panel specifications (Jinko Tiger Neo 620 W).

Parameter

Specification

Model

JKM620N-78HL4-BDV

Cell Type

N-type TOPCon, bifacial, dual glass

Rated Power

620 W

Efficiency

22.2%

Vmp/Imp

45.6 V/13.6 A

Voc/Isc

55.5 V/14.3 A

Temp. Coefficient (Pmax)

-0.29% /°C

Dimensions

2465×1134×30 mm

Number of Panels

126

Total Installed Capacity

78.12 kWp

The solar PV generation model is based on the Jinko Tiger Neo 620 W (JKM620N-78HL4-BDV) module, a bifacial N-type TOPCon panel with an efficiency of approximately 22.2 percent. A total of 126 panels is installed, providing an installed capacity of 78.12 kWp. The panel has a temperature coefficient of -0.29 percent per degree Celsius, which was accounted for in the output calculation. Table 2 presents the technical specifications of the solar PV panel.
2.4.2. Solar Power Calculation
The hourly power output was estimated using a typical solar radiation profile for coastal Bangladesh, with a peak of 850 W/m² at solar noon. The output was calculated using the formula:
PPV=PSTC×GGSTC×1+αTc-TSTC(2)
where PSTCis the rated power at standard test conditions, Gis the actual solar radiation, GSTCis the standard test condition radiation, αis the temperature coefficient, Tc is the cell temperature, and TSTCis the standard test condition temperature.
2.5. Battery Energy Storage System
The battery energy storage system was sized at 128-kWh nominal capacity using eight HiTHIUM HeroEE 16 units, each rated at 16 kWh. The battery chemistry is LiFePO4, which offers high cycle life, thermal stability, and safety. The usable capacity was estimated at 115 kWh, assuming a depth of discharge of 90 percent. The round-trip efficiency was assumed to be 95 percent. Table 3 presents the technical specifications of the battery system.
Table 3. The solar radiation and corresponding electric power for the 126 panels array.

Parameter

Value

Model

HiTHIUM HeroEE 16

Chemistry

LiFePO₄ (LFP)

Nominal Voltage

51.2 V

Capacity per Unit

314 Ah / 16 kWh

Number of Units

8

Total Nominal Capacity

128 kWh

Usable Capacity (90% DoD)

115 kWh

Round-Trip Efficiency

95%

Cycle Life

11,000 cycles

Max Parallel Units

16

Operating Temperature

-10°C to 55°C

The battery system was designed to charge during the midday surplus period (09:00-17:00) and discharge during the evening peak and night hours (18:00-08:00). Table 3 presents the technical specifications of the battery system. The battery management system was configured to maintain the state of charge (SOC) above 20 percent to protect battery life and ensure availability for emergency backup.
Table 4. Backup generator specifications.

Parameter

Specification

Rated Capacity

100 kVA / 80 kW

Voltage

415 V, 3-phase

Frequency

50 Hz

Power Factor

0.8

Speed

1500 RPM

Fuel Type

Diesel

Configuration

Silent/soundproof canopy

Control

ATS

2.6. Backup Generator
A 100 kVA diesel generator was included as the final layer of backup in the system. The generator is rated at 80 kW at a power factor of 0.8 and operates at 415 V, 3-phase, 50 Hz. It is equipped with an automatic transfer switch (ATS) that enables automatic startup during grid failure when the battery state of charge falls below 20 percent. Table 4 presents the generator specifications. The generator was sized to cover the community's peak demand of 70 kW with a margin for surge currents during motor starting and battery charging.
2.7. Grid Connection and Power Flow Convention
The system was designed to operate in parallel with the local grid, allowing both import and export of electricity. The grid connection is rated at 400 V, 3-phase, 50 Hz. In the power flow analysis, positive values indicate import from the grid, while negative values indicate export to the grid. The grid serves as a balancing mechanism, absorbing surplus renewable generation during midday and supplying power during evening peak hours when renewable generation is insufficient.
2.8. Proposed Hybrid Grid Management (HGM) and Operational Modules
The 24-hour operation was divided into four distinct modules based on the availability of renewable resources and the state of the battery. These modules are summarized in Table 5. Module M1 (22:00-05:00) represents the night base period, where neither solar nor wind generation is available, and the battery discharges to reduce grid import. Module M2 (06:00-08:00) represents the morning ramp period, where solar and wind generation begin to increase, and the battery continues to discharge. Module M3 (09:00-16:00) represents the midday surplus period, where both solar and wind generation are high, the battery charges, and excess power is exported to the grid. Module M4 (17:00-21:00) represents the evening peak period, where solar generation is zero, wind generation is low, and the battery discharges to meet peak demand.
Table 5. Operational modules for 24-hour system operation.

Module

Hours

Solar

Wind

Battery

Grid

M1

22:00-05:00

✗

✗

Discharge

Import

M2

06:00-08:00

✓ (low)

✓ (low)

Discharge

Import

M3

09:00-16:00

✓ (high)

✓ (high)

Charge

Export

M4

17:00-21:00

✗

✓ (low)

Discharge

Import

Figure 4. State machine diagram of the four operational modules.
Figure 4 presents a state machine diagram illustrating the transitions between these four operational modules. The transitions occur at fixed times of the day, ensuring deterministic and predictable system operation.
2.9. Economic and Environmental Parameters
The economic analysis was not included due to insufficient local pricing data. The environmental analysis used a grid emission factor of 0.65 kg CO2 per kWh, which is a conservative average of recent estimates for Bangladesh . This factor was applied to the net grid import to estimate daily CO2 emissions. The hybrid community power system proposed in this study was designed to meet the electricity demand of a coastal community in Teknaf, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh. Teknaf was selected as the study location because of its abundant renewable energy resources. The coastal area experiences a typical sea breeze pattern, with average wind speeds ranging from 4.5 to 5.5 m/s at 30-40 m height, and receives an average of 4.5 peak sun hours per day, making it suitable for both wind and solar PV generation.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Overview of System Performance
The HGM system was evaluated over a 24-hour period to assess its technical and environmental performance. The results demonstrate that the system reliably meets the consumer's load demand while achieving a renewable share of approximately 84.5 percent. The total daily generation from wind and solar is 1,150 kWh, exceeding the total load of 929 kWh by 221 kWh. This surplus is exported to the grid, contributing to the economic viability of the system.
Table 6 presents the complete 24-hour power flow results, showing the load, wind generation, solar generation, total generation, grid interaction, and battery action for each hour. The results reveal a clear pattern of midday surplus and evening deficit, which is characteristic of systems with high solar penetration.
3.2. Wind Generation Analysis
The five XANT M-24 turbines generated a total of 785 kWh over the 24-hour period. The peak output of 132.5 kW occurred at 13:00-14:00, when wind speeds reached 5.5 m/s. However, the wind farm produced zero power for 16 hours of the day, from 19:00 to 08:00, when wind speeds fell below the 3.0 m/s cut-in threshold. This zero-production period coincides with the community's evening peak demand, highlighting the need for battery storage and grid support.
The capacity factor of the wind farm is 6.9 percent, which is low compared to typical wind farm capacity factors of 25-40 percent. This low value reflects the modest wind resource at the study site, where average wind speeds are approximately 3.2 m/s at 10 m height. The results suggest that the XANT M-24 turbine, while suitable for low-wind sites, is still oversized for the Teknaf wind regime.
Table 6. Complete 24-hour power flow results.

Hour

Load (kW)

Wind (kW)

Solar (kW)

Total Gen (kW)

Grid (kW)

Battery Action

00:00

31.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

+31.2

Discharge*

01:00

26.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

+26.9

Discharge

02:00

24.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

+24.2

Discharge

03:00

22.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

+22.3

Discharge

04:00

21.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

+21.8

Discharge

05:00

22.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

+22.7

Discharge

06:00

26.1

0.0

1.0

1.0

+25.1

Discharge

07:00

28.9

0.0

9.5

9.5

+19.4

Discharge

08:00

32.2

2.5

22.1

24.6

+7.6

Discharge

09:00

35.0

34.0

34.7

68.7

-33.7

Charge

10:00

36.9

51.0

44.1

95.1

-58.2

Charge

11:00

38.4

72.5

50.4

122.9

-84.5

Charge

12:00

38.8

99.5

53.6

153.1

-114.3

Charge

13:00

38.4

132.5

50.4

182.9

-144.5

Charge

14:00

37.8

132.5

41.0

173.5

-135.7

Charge

15:00

36.9

99.5

28.4

127.9

-91.0

Charge

16:00

38.4

72.5

15.8

88.3

-49.9

Charge

17:00

45.4

51.0

3.2

54.2

-8.8

Charge

18:00

60.5

34.0

0.0

34.0

+26.5

Discharge

19:00

70.0

2.5

0.0

2.5

+67.5

Discharge

20:00

67.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

+67.2

Discharge

21:00

59.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

+59.6

Discharge

22:00

49.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

+49.2

Discharge

23:00

39.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

+39.4

Discharge

*If SOC > 20%
Grid convention: Positive (+) = Import from grid; Negative (-) = Export to grid.
3.3. Solar Generation Analysis
The 126-panel array generated a total of 365 kWh over the 24-hour period. The peak output of 53.6 kW occurred at 12:00, which is approximately 69 percent of the installed capacity of 78.12 kWp. The reduction from rated capacity is attributable to temperature losses, which are significant in the hot coastal climate of Teknaf, and to the typical solar radiation profile, which peaks at 850 W/m² rather than the standard test condition value of 1000 W/m².
The solar generation profile is well-matched with the daytime plateau of the load profile, reducing the need for grid import during 09:00-16:00. However, the solar array produces zero power during the evening peak, when the community's demand is highest. This temporal mismatch is a key challenge in systems with high solar penetration and underscores the importance of battery storage and grid interaction.
Figure 5. Hourly wind, solar PV and total renewable generation versus load on a typical day.
3.4. Battery Performance Analysis
The battery system, with a nominal capacity of 128 kWh and usable capacity of 115 kWh, played a critical role in shifting surplus renewable generation from midday to evening. The battery SOC profile, presented in Figure 6, shows that the battery reached full charge by approximately 14:00 and discharged to approximately 20 percent SOC by 23:00. The battery charged during the midday surplus period (09:00-17:00), absorbing approximately 115 kWh of excess renewable generation. It discharged during the evening peak and night hours (18:00-08:00), supplying approximately 115 kWh to the load. The battery was maintained above 20 percent SOC to protect battery life and ensure availability for emergency backup. The round-trip efficiency of the battery system was assumed to be 95 percent, which is typical for LiFePO4 batteries.
Figure 6. Battery SOC Profile Over 24 Hours.
The battery system significantly reduced grid import during the evening peak. Without the battery, the grid would need to supply the full 70 kW peak demand at 19:00. With the battery, the grid imports at 19:00 was reduced to 67.5 kW, a modest reduction because the battery capacity was insufficient to cover the full evening peak. A larger battery would be required to achieve greater peak shaving.
3.5. Grid Interaction Analysis
The HGM profile, presented in Figure 7, shows that the system exported 401 kWh to the grid and imported 545 kWh from the grid over the 24-hour period. The net grid import was 144 kWh, which is 84.5 percent lower than the CG-only scenario, where the full 929 kWh would be imported. The system was a net exporter during 09:00-17:00, with exports peaking at 144.5 kW at 13:00. The system was a net importer during 18:00-08:00, with imports peaking at 67.5 kW at 19:00.
The HGM transforms from a grid consumer to a grid supplier during midday hours, which is a desirable outcome for grid stability and renewable integration. However, the system remains dependent on the grid during evening peak hours, highlighting the need for either larger battery storage or additional renewable capacity to achieve greater energy independence.
Figure 7. Grid interaction comparison between hybrid grid management and conventional grid systems.
3.6. Comparison with CG System
The HGM system was compared with a CG-only system where 100 percent of the daily demand is supplied by the grid. Table 7 presents the key performance indicators for both systems. The hybrid system reduced grid import by 41.3 percent, net grid purchase by 84.5 percent, and CO2 emissions by 84.5 percent. The renewable share increased from 0 percent to 84.5 percent.
The hybrid system also improved power reliability by providing battery and generator backup during grid outages. In the conventional grid-only system, a grid failure results in a complete blackout. In the hybrid system, a grid failure during daytime is covered by solar and wind generation, while a grid failure during nighttime is covered by battery storage and the backup generator. Table 8 presents a reliability comparison between the two systems.
Table 7. Comparison of key performance indicators.

KPI

CG

HGM

Improvement

Grid Import

929 kWh

545 kWh

-41.3%

Net Grid Purchase

929 kWh

144 kWh

-84.5%

Renewable Share

0%

84.5%

+84.5 pp

Grid Export

0 kWh

401 kWh

+401 kWh

CO2 Emissions

604 kg/day

94 kg/day

-84.5%

Peak Grid Demand

70 kW

67.5 kW

-3.6%

Power Reliability

Grid-dependent

Multi-source backup

Significantly higher

Energy Independence

0%

84.5%

+84.5 pp

3.7. Environmental Analysis
Figure 8 presents the environmental analysis results, comparing the daily and annual carbon dioxide emissions of the conventional grid-only system and the proposed hybrid grid model. The conventional grid system, which relies entirely on grid electricity to meet the community's daily demand of 929 kWh, emits approximately 604 kg of CO2 per day. In contrast, the hybrid grid model, which draws only 144 kWh of net electricity from the grid after accounting for renewable generation and battery storage, emits approximately 94 kg of CO2 per day. This represents a daily reduction of 510 kg of CO2, equivalent to an 84.5 percent decrease in carbon emissions.
Figure 8. Carbon footprint comparison between hybrid and conventional systems.
Table 8. Reliability comparison between hybrid and conventional systems.

Scenario

CG

HGM

Normal grid operation

Load served

Load served; surplus exported

Grid voltage fluctuation

Load affected

Battery/inverter stabilizes

Grid failure (daytime)

Blackout

Solar+Wind+Battery serve load

Grid failure (night)

Blackout

Battery+Generator serve load

Grid failure at peak (19:00)

Blackout

Battery+Generator serve 70 kW

Extended grid outage

Blackout

Generator runs continuously

When extrapolated annually, the conventional grid system would emit approximately 220,460 kg of CO2, while the hybrid system would emit only 34,310 kg, avoiding over 186,000 kg of CO2 emissions each year. The emission calculations are based on a grid emission factor of 0.65 kg CO2 per kWh, which is a conservative average of recent estimates for Bangladesh's electricity grid. These results demonstrate that the integration of wind and solar generation with battery storage can substantially reduce the carbon footprint of community power supply, contributing to national and global climate change mitigation goals.
3.8. Sensitivity Analysis
A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of key parameters on system performance. The parameters considered were wind speed, solar radiation, battery capacity, and load profile. The results show that the system is most sensitive to wind speed and battery capacity. A 10 percent increase in wind speed increased daily wind generation by approximately 30 percent, due to the cubic relationship between wind speed and power. A 20 percent increase in battery capacity reduced grid import during the evening peak by approximately 15 percent. Figure 9 presents a tornado chart summarizing the sensitivity analysis results. The chart highlights the importance of accurate wind resource assessment and adequate battery sizing in system design.
Figure 9. Tornado chart of sensitivity analysis results.
4. Limitations and Future Work
The present study has several limitations. First, the wind and solar generation profiles are based on typical meteorological conditions and may not represent extreme weather events. Second, the battery model assumes ideal charging and discharging behavior and does not account for degradation over time. Third, the economic analysis is based on 2026 market prices and does not include the cost of wind turbines and hybrid inverters.
Future work should focus on the following areas: (1) long-term performance simulation using actual meteorological data; (2) detailed battery degradation modeling; (3) optimization of system sizing using genetic algorithms or other metaheuristic techniques; (4) integration of demand response and load shifting strategies; and (5) comprehensive economic analysis including life-cycle costs and revenue from grid export.
5. Conclusions
This paper presented a grid-connected hybrid power system installed at coastal Teknaf, Bangladesh, combining wind, solar PV, storage, a diesel generator and bidirectional grid exchange under a rule-based, four-module operating strategy. Over a representative day, renewable generation of 1,150 kWh exceeded the 929-kWh demand, reducing grid imports by 41.3% and net grid purchase and associated CO2 emissions by 84.5% compared with a grid-only supply. The results also exposed a key limitation: wind output falls to zero during the evening peak, so the 128-kWh battery reduced the 19:00 grid demand only from 70 kW to 67.5 kW. Wind speed and battery capacity were the most influential design parameters. The fixed-schedule operating modules offer a transparent control scheme that can be adapted to similar coastal communities. Future work will extend the analysis to full-year measured resource data, battery degradation, optimized sizing and life-cycle economics.
Abbreviations

ATS

Automatic Transfer Switch

CG

Conventional Grid

EMS

Energy Management System

HGM

Hybrid Grid Management

PV

Photovoltaic

SOC

State of Charge

WT

Wind Turbine

Author Contributions
Fahim Faisal: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Writing - original draft
Cheng Peng: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing - review & editing
Md Shivly Mahmood: Formal Analysis, Validation, Software
Data Availability Statement
The manuscript has data included as Table.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
[1] A. Khan, M. Bressel, A. Davigny, D. Abbes, and B. Ould Bouamama, "Comprehensive review of hybrid energy systems: Challenges, applications, and optimization strategies," Energies, vol. 18, no. 10, Art. no. 2612, May 2025.
[2] O. Bamisile, D. Cai, H. Adun, M. Dagbasi, C. C. Ukwuoma, Q. Huang, N. Johnson, and O. Bamisile, "Towards renewables development: Review of optimization techniques for energy storage and hybrid renewable energy systems," Heliyon, vol. 10, Art. no. e37482, Sep. 2024.
[3] Z. Fang, J. K. H. Shek, and W. Sun, "A review of grid-connected hybrid energy storage systems: Sizing configurations, control strategies, and future directions," J. Energy Storage, vol. 118, Art. no. 116226, May 2025.
[4] T. Jeyaraj, A. Ponnusamy, and D. Selvaraj, "Hybrid renewable energy systems stability analysis through future advancement technique: A review," Appl. Energy, vol. 383, Art. no. 125355, Apr. 2025.
[5] M. Shahabuddin, M. R. Rahman, N. W. M. Zulkifli, M. U. Khandaker, and Y. Y. Liang, "Wind energy in Bangladesh: Recent developments, challenges and policy recommendations," Discover Sustain., vol. 6, Art. no. 1388, 2025.
[6] M. Hasan, P. Dey, S. Janefar, N. A. Salsabil, I. J. Khan, N.-U.-R. Chowdhury, and O. Farrok, "A critical analysis of wind energy generation potential in different regions of Bangladesh," Energy Rep., vol. 11, pp. 2152–2173, Jun. 2024.
[7] M. Abdullah-Al-Mahbub and A. R. M. T. Islam, "Sustainable wind energy potential in Sandwip and Kalapara coastal regions of Bangladesh: A way of reducing carbon dioxide emissions," Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. e23982, Jan. 2024.
[8] T. Islam, M. S. Alam, M. G. Muktadir, M. M. Tasnim, J. Islam, and K. N. Sakib, "Siting of potential areas for the sustainable development of large-scale onshore wind farms using multi-criteria analysis and geographic information system: A case study on Bangladesh," Sustainability, vol. 18, no. 5, Art. no. 2204, Feb. 2026.
[9] M. A. Islam, M. M. N. Ali, A. Al Mamun, M. S. Hossain, M. H. Maruf, and A. S. M. Shihavuddin, "Optimizing energy solutions: A techno-economic analysis of solar-wind hybrid power generation in the coastal regions of Bangladesh," Energy Convers. Manage.: X, vol. 22, Art. no. 100605, Apr. 2024.
[10] M. F. H. Mojumder, T. Islam, P. Chowdhury, M. Hasan, N. A. Takia, N.-U.-R. Chowdhury, and O. Farrok, "Techno-economic and environmental analysis of hybrid energy systems for remote areas: A sustainable case study in Bangladesh," Energy Convers. Manage.: X, vol. 23, Art. no. 100664, Jul. 2024.
[11] H. Baidya, M. T. R. Zisan, A. Z. Alif, A. Ahmed, M. Hasan, and N.-U.-R. Chowdhury, "Techno-economic comparative analysis of hybrid renewable energy systems optimization considering off-grid remote area electrification in Bangladesh," Energy Convers. Manage.: X, vol. 26, Art. no. 101004, Apr. 2025.
[12] M. E. Azam, M. F. Ali, and M. A. Razzak, "Smart hybrid microgrid for island electrification: Integrated techno-economic optimization, dynamic stability, and demand response," Energy Convers. Manage.: X, vol. 30, Art. no. 101656, May 2026.
[13] T. Hasan, P. Das, M. F. Ali, M. S. Alam, M. Ali, and I. H. Imran, "Techno-economic assessment of a hydrogen-assisted hybrid renewable microgrid with fuel cells for off-grid electrification," Global Challenges, vol. 10, no. 6, Art. no. e70122, Jun. 2026.
[14] M. Bari, M. M. U. Zaman, M. M. A. Rahman, and S. M. I. A. Panna, "Solar-aligned demand management in hybrid renewable EV charging stations: A four-system techno-economic analysis for Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh," Next Energy, vol. 13, Art. no. 100945, Oct. 2026.
[15] D. Biswas, M. F. Ali, M. Saha, M. S. Alam, M. Ali, M. A. AlAqil, O. Obaidi, and M. K. Islam, "Techno-economic optimization, sensitivity analysis and stability evaluation of a high-renewable hybrid microgrid for rural Bangladesh," Sci. Rep., vol. 16, Art. no. 7695, Feb. 2026.
[16] M. F. Ali, D. Biswas, M. R. I. Sheikh, A. Al Mamun, and M. J. Hossen, "Techno-economic optimization of battery storage technologies for off-grid hybrid microgrids in multiple rural locations of Bangladesh," Front. Energy Res., vol. 13, Art. no. 1654615, 2025.
[17] A. Hussain and H.-M. Kim, "A rule-based modular energy management system for AC/DC hybrid microgrids," Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 3, Art. no. 867, 2025.
[18] J. Huang, C. Mao, B. Liu, D. Wang, R. Gao, and B. Gu, "An improved rule-based energy management system: Effective solution to achieve collaborative control of batteries in multiprosumers community microgrid," IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 135634–135651, 2025.
[19] A. Abbasi, H. A. Khalid, H. Rehman, and A. U. Khan, "A novel dynamic load scheduling and peak shaving control scheme in community home energy management system based microgrids," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 32508–32522, 2023.
[20] B. Modu, M. P. Abdullah, A. Alkassem, and M. F. Hamza, "Optimal rule-based energy management and sizing of a grid-connected renewable energy microgrid with hybrid storage using levy flight algorithm," Energy Nexus, vol. 16, Art. no. 100333, 2024.
[21] M. M. Rahman and A. Mallick, "Measurement of the carbon footprint for Bangladesh's electricity generation in 2009-15," in Proc. 2020 Emerging Technology in Computing, Communication and Electronics (ETCCE), 2020, pp. 1–6.
[22] A. K. Karmaker, M. M. Rahman, M. A. Hossain, and M. R. Ahmed, "Exploration and corrective measures of greenhouse gas emission from fossil fuel power stations for Bangladesh," J. Clean. Prod., vol. 244, Art. no. 118645, 2020.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Faisal, F., Peng, C., Mahmood, M. S. (2026). Rule-Based Operation of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Power System in Coastal Bangladesh. American Journal of Energy Engineering, 14(4), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20261404.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Faisal, F.; Peng, C.; Mahmood, M. S. Rule-Based Operation of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Power System in Coastal Bangladesh. Am. J. Energy Eng. 2026, 14(4), 179-191. doi: 10.11648/j.ajee.20261404.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Faisal F, Peng C, Mahmood MS. Rule-Based Operation of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Power System in Coastal Bangladesh. Am J Energy Eng. 2026;14(4):179-191. doi: 10.11648/j.ajee.20261404.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajee.20261404.12,
      author = {Fahim Faisal and Cheng Peng and Md Shivly Mahmood},
      title = {Rule-Based Operation of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Power System in Coastal Bangladesh},
      journal = {American Journal of Energy Engineering},
      volume = {14},
      number = {4},
      pages = {179-191},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajee.20261404.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20261404.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajee.20261404.12},
      abstract = {Coastal communities in Bangladesh, such as Teknaf in Cox's Bazar, suffer from severe energy insecurity due to a fossil-fuel-dominated grid, long transmission lines, and chronic load shedding. This study aims to design and evaluate a grid-connected hybrid power system to improve local energy reliability, reduce grid dependence, and lower carbon emissions. A 24-hour hourly simulation was conducted using real commercial components: five 95 kW wind turbines (475 kW total), a 78.12 kWp bifacial solar PV array, a 128 kWh LiFePO₄ battery, a 100 kVA diesel generator, and bidirectional grid exchange. A transparent, rule-based energy management strategy with four time-of-day operating modules was developed to coordinate the sources and serve a consumer load with a 70-kW evening peak. The simulation results show that renewable generation (1,150 kWh/day) exceeded the consumer demand (929 kWh/day). This reduced gross grid imports by 41.3% and net grid purchase, along with associated CO2 emissions, by 84.5% compared to a CG-only system. However, the temporal mismatch between renewable generation and the evening peak meant that the 128-kWh battery only reduced the peak grid demand from 70 kW to 67.5 kW. Sensitivity analysis identified wind speed and battery capacity as the most dominant design parameters.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Rule-Based Operation of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Power System in Coastal Bangladesh
    AU  - Fahim Faisal
    AU  - Cheng Peng
    AU  - Md Shivly Mahmood
    Y1  - 2026/11/10
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20261404.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajee.20261404.12
    T2  - American Journal of Energy Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Energy Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Energy Engineering
    SP  - 179
    EP  - 191
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2329-163X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20261404.12
    AB  - Coastal communities in Bangladesh, such as Teknaf in Cox's Bazar, suffer from severe energy insecurity due to a fossil-fuel-dominated grid, long transmission lines, and chronic load shedding. This study aims to design and evaluate a grid-connected hybrid power system to improve local energy reliability, reduce grid dependence, and lower carbon emissions. A 24-hour hourly simulation was conducted using real commercial components: five 95 kW wind turbines (475 kW total), a 78.12 kWp bifacial solar PV array, a 128 kWh LiFePO₄ battery, a 100 kVA diesel generator, and bidirectional grid exchange. A transparent, rule-based energy management strategy with four time-of-day operating modules was developed to coordinate the sources and serve a consumer load with a 70-kW evening peak. The simulation results show that renewable generation (1,150 kWh/day) exceeded the consumer demand (929 kWh/day). This reduced gross grid imports by 41.3% and net grid purchase, along with associated CO2 emissions, by 84.5% compared to a CG-only system. However, the temporal mismatch between renewable generation and the evening peak meant that the 128-kWh battery only reduced the peak grid demand from 70 kW to 67.5 kW. Sensitivity analysis identified wind speed and battery capacity as the most dominant design parameters.
    VL  - 14
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • College of Intelligent System Science and Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China

  • College of Intelligent System Science and Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China

  • College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Materials and Methods
    3. 3. Results and Discussion
    4. 4. Limitations and Future Work
    5. 5. Conclusions
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Author Contributions
  • Data Availability Statement
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information