A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation

Ritika Rupal; Gajendra Singh

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation

Ritika Rupal^*

, Gajendra Singh

Published in American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 3)

Received: 6 August 2026 Accepted: 2 September 2026 Published: 26 October 2026

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Background: Low birth weight (LBW, <2500 g) and preterm births (<37 weeks) drive most neonatal deaths across India. Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC)—continuous skin-to-skin contact (SSC), exclusive breastfeeding, and early discharge—decreases neonatal mortality by 30–40% in stable neonates and by 25% when initiated immediately after birth (Immediate KMC / iKMC). Despite strong trial efficacy, implementation gaps in achieving universal KMC coverage persist across Indian health systems, with effective population coverage remaining below 20%. Methods & Focus: Using JBI scoping review principles and CFIR 2.0 framing, this review synthesizes evidence across micro- (infant, mother, family), meso- (clinical teams, SNCU/MNCU units, frontline workers), and macro-levels (policy, HMIS, equity). It maps barriers across six care settings, appraises quality improvement (QI) initiatives, clarifies community Home-Based Newborn Care (HBNC) vs Home-Based Care for Young Child (HBYC) visit schedules, evaluates digital health tools, and incorporates growth milestones (proportion reaching ≥2.5 kg by 40 weeks postmenstrual age [PMA]). Conclusion: Achieving sustainable scale-up requires zero-separation Mother-Newborn Care Units (MNCUs), hospital QI routines, family redistribution of KMC to surrogate caregivers, empowered ASHA networks, and duration-sensitive HMIS metrics.

Published in	American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12
Page(s)	49-54
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Kangaroo Mother Care, Low Birth Weight, Preterm, Mother-Newborn Care Unit

1. Introduction & Global Imperative

Preterm births and low birth weight (LBW) remain the leading causes of under-five child mortality globally, accounting for nearly 1 million deaths per year

[1, 3, 20]

. India contributes nearly 40% of the world's LBW burden (3). Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) is a proven, evidence-based intervention comprising continuous/prolonged skin-to-skin contact (SSC), exclusive breastmilk feeding, early facility discharge, and post-discharge continuity

[4, 5]

Cochrane reviews confirm that KMC reduces neonatal mortality by 32–40% in stable LBW infants, while reducing sepsis by 15–47% and hypothermia by 78%

[6, 7]

. Furthermore, the landmark WHO Immediate KMC (iKMC) trial established a 25% mortality reduction when continuous KMC is initiated immediately after birth prior to stabilization in dedicated Mother-Newborn Care Units (MNCUs)

[8]

Despite this clinical evidence, implementation gaps in achieving universal KMC coverage persist across Indian facilities, where population coverage remains under 20%

[10]

. Moreover, while KMC is often termed a low-cost tool, effective health-system scale-up is resource-intensive, requiring investments in MNCU spatial remodeling, nurse staffing, beds/recliners, structured discharge counseling, and frontline tracking systems

[11-13]

2. Methodology & Multilevel Implementation Framework

This synthesis follows JBI scoping review methods and PRISMA-ScR guidance

[14, 15]

. Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, IndMED, and MoHFW/NHM repositories) were searched from inception through December 2024 using terms: ('KMC' OR 'Kangaroo Mother Care' OR 'skin-to-skin contact') AND ('implementation' OR 'quality improvement' OR 'ciKMC' OR 'mHealth' OR 'post-discharge') AND ('India' OR 'LMIC').

Evidence was mapped using CFIR 2.0

[16]

across a nested ecological model: (1) Micro-level: infant clinical needs, maternal physical/mental recovery, and family dynamics; (2) Meso-level: healthcare providers, QI routines, hospital wards (SNCU/MNCU), and frontline workers (ASHAs/ANMs); and (3) Macro-level: national policy, HMIS reporting, financing, and equity.

3. Setting-Specific Bottlenecks & Enablers Across the Continuum

1) Delivery Room & Labor Ward: Routine immediate swaddling, early cord clamping, and rapid transfer to radiant warmers impede early SSC. Establishing delayed cord clamping and labor-room SSC drying protocols enables immediate initiation

[8]

2) Tertiary NICU & District SNCUs (Infant Clinical Barriers): Neonates on CPAP, high-flow oxygen, IV lines, or phototherapy face provider reluctance due to displacement fears

[12]

. Evidence confirms 'KMC under CPAP' and 'KMC phototherapy' are safe and feasible when nursing staff are trained in secure binder positioning

[17, 18, 31]

3) Mother-Newborn Care Units (MNCUs): Co-admitting mothers and sick neonates 24/7 provides zero separation, continuous monitoring, and parental empowerment

[18, 19]

4) Postnatal & Step-Down Wards: Overcrowding, lack of privacy screens, and maternal physical fatigue post-cesarean delivery curtail KMC hours. Dedicated recliners, privacy curtains, and peer-mother mentorship enhance daily duration

[11, 20]

5) Home & Community: Unshared household chores, lack of paternal support, and isolation drive post-discharge drop-off

[21, 22]

. Family counseling and ASHA home visits bridge this transition.

4. Quality Improvement, Family Redistribution, & Equity

1) Quality Improvement (QI) in Facilities: Applying Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, designating physician/nurse KMC Champions, establishing protected daily KMC hours, utilizing bedside duration charts, and weekly audit-and-feedback can increase ward KMC adoption from <15% to >70% within 6–12 months

[17, 23]

2) Family Redistribution of Care: Maternal exhaustion and domestic workload are primary drivers of home discontinuation. Training fathers and grandmothers as surrogate KMC providers redistributes domestic responsibilities and sustains home KMC duration

[2, 24-26]

3) Health Equity & Governance: Rural and tribal households encounter severe poverty, lack of warm seating, and transport barriers. Scale-up requires free ergonomic wraps, transport support, and duration-sensitive indicators in HMIS (e.g., hours/day, 28-day retention) rather than binary check-boxes

[23, 27]

5. Implementation Outcomes, Dose Thresholds, and Growth Milestones

1) Dose Thresholds & Implementation Outcomes: Following implementation science taxonomy (28), outcomes include acceptability, adoption, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. KMC dose must be categorized accurately: Intermittent (1–4 h/day), Prolonged (8–19 h/day), and Continuous (≥20 h/day)

[5, 29]

2) Candidate Growth Milestone (≥2.5 kg by 40 Weeks PMA): Preterm/LBW nutritional recovery is evaluated by the proportion of infants reaching body weight ≥2.5 kg by 40 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) / term-equivalent age, daily weight velocity (g/kg/day), and linear growth

[4, 30]

. Because this endpoint is confounded by gestational age, SGA/AGA status, sepsis, BPD, and hospital stay, it should complement gestation-adjusted growth curves (Fenton / INTERGROWTH-21st) (31).

6. Community Models: ciKMC, HBNC, and HBYC Integration

The Lancet ciKMC trial demonstrated that community-initiated KMC delivered by frontline workers reduced 28-day neonatal mortality by 30% (HR 0.70) and 180-day infant mortality by 25% (HR 0.75) in rural India (3).

Programmatic Alignment (HBNC vs. HBYC): India's community platforms serve distinct roles: (1) Home-Based Newborn Care (HBNC) is the primary neonatal follow-up platform, with ASHAs conducting visits on Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 to verify KMC positioning, measure temperature, track weight, and identify danger signs

[23, 32]

; (2) Home-Based Care for Young Child (HBYC) extends follow-up from months 3 to 15 [at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 months] focusing on complementary feeding, vaccination, and neurodevelopmental screening (32). Participatory women's groups (PLA) further mobilize collective community support

[28, 33, 34, 37]

7. Digital Health Innovations: Biomonitoring & Decision-Support

1) Wearable Biosensors: Silicone-encapsulated chest/foot temperature sensors provide continuous, objective compliance tracking and hypothermia alerts

[35, 36]

. However, evidence is currently in pilot/feasibility stages; practical deployment must overcome unit hardware costs ($15–$40), false-alarm fatigue, battery charging limits, sensor cleaning, and rural connectivity gaps (37).

2) mHealth Decision Support: Frontline tablet apps (POSHAN Tracker, e-HBNC) and automated vernacular IVR calls to fathers reinforce home follow-up, improve scheduling fidelity, and encourage shared family caregiving

[9, 38, 39]

8. Multilevel Implementation Matrices

Table 1. Setting-Specific Implementation Matrix Across Care Settings.

Setting	Dominant Barriers	Key Enablers	Priority Strategies	Responsible Actors	Indicators to Monitor
Delivery Room	Early clamping, swaddling, transfer to warmers.	Delayed clamping, immediate drying on chest.	Workflow redesign; simulation for immediate SSC.	Obstetricians, Midwives, Nurses	SSC in 1st hour (%); time to first breast contact.
Tertiary NICU / SNCU	CPAP, lines, phototherapy, visiting limits.	Trained staff, family participation, wraps.	MNCU remodeling; 'KMC under CPAP'; KMC champions.	Neonatologists, SNCU Nurses	Age at initiation; daily hours in SNCU; line safety.
MNCU	Space reallocation, cross-departmental coordination.	Co-admission 24/7, maternal beds by monitors.	Institutional policy; bedside maternal coaching.	Joint Peds-OB Teams, QI Teams	Daily KMC hours/day; zero-separation rate (%).
Postnatal Ward	Overcrowding, privacy lack, post-cesarean pain.	Recliner chairs, privacy screens, peer modeling.	Install screens/recliners; protected KMC routines.	Postnatal Nurses, Counselors	Proportion achieving ≥8 h/day pre-discharge.
Home / Community	Domestic burden, fatigue, paternal disengagement.	Surrogate care (fathers/grandmothers), wraps.	Family counseling; ASHA HBNC visits (Days 1–28); PLA.	ASHAs, ANMs, Fathers, Mothers	Continuation at Day 7, 14, 28; wt ≥2.5 kg by 40w PMA.
Policy / Systems	Binary HMIS documentation, lack of budget lines.	National policy (INAP), digital monitoring.	Duration-sensitive HMIS metrics; MNCU accreditation.	MoHFW, State NHM, IAP, NNF	District KMC coverage; operational MNCUs (%).

Table 2. Multilevel Determinant-Strategy-Actor-Outcome Matrix.

Level & setting	Barrier / Determinant	Strategy (Standardized)	Actor	Evidence	Implementation Outcome	Clinical / Growth Outcome
Micro (Infant) - NICU	CPAP, phototherapy, line displacement fears.	Clinical adaptation ('KMC under CPAP'); nurse support.	Bedside Nurses	High (RCTs)	Adoption; protocol fidelity.	Earlier full feeds; reduced sepsis/stay.
Micro (Mother) - Ward/Home	Postpartum pain, fatigue, lack of privacy.	Privacy curtains, ergonomic recliners, counseling.	Lactation Counselors	Moderate (QI)	Acceptability; increased daily duration.	Reduced maternal depression/stress.
Micro (Family) - Home	Domestic workload, lack of paternal support.	Family discharge counseling; training surrogate caregivers.	ASHAs, Fathers	High (Cluster RCTs)	Home KMC retention; family adoption.	Weight velocity; ≥2.5 kg by 40w PMA.
Meso (Provider) - SNCU	Misconceptions on stability, nursing workload.	Simulation training, clinical mentorship, KMC Champions.	QI Teams, Faculty	Moderate/High	Provider fidelity; knowledge.	Reduced time to KMC initiation.
Meso (Facility) - Hospital	Parent-infant physical separation.	MNCU zero-separation conversion; PDSA cycles.	Hospital Admins	High (MNCU Trials)	Penetration; sustainability.	25% mortality reduction (iKMC).
Meso (Community) - Sub-Centre	Disconnected post-discharge tracking.	Integration into ASHA HBNC visits (Days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28).	ASHAs, ANMs	High (ciKMC Trial)	Follow-up completeness; coverage.	30% neonatal mortality reduction.
Macro (Policy) - State/National	Binary HMIS reporting, fragmented funds.	Revise HMIS to duration metrics; accreditation standards.	MoHFW, State NHM	Moderate (HPSR)	Institutionalization; equity.	Accelerated progress toward SDG 3.2.

9. Conclusion

Translating KMC efficacy into universal coverage across India requires closing implementation bottlenecks across micro-, meso-, and macro-levels. Restructuring neonatal units into zero-separation MNCUs, embedding hospital PDSA quality improvement routines, empowering ASHA-led HBNC home follow-up, engaging fathers and family surrogate caregivers, deploying pragmatically validated digital tools, and capturing duration-sensitive HMIS metrics are essential to ensure sustainable, continuous KMC and optimize newborn survival and neurodevelopment.

Abbreviations

ANM	Auxiliary Nurse Midwife
ASHAs	Accredited Social Health Activists
HBNC	Home-Based Newborn Care
HBYC	Home-Based Care for Young Child
HMIS	Health Management Information System
iKMC	Immediate KMC
KMC	Kangaroo Mother Care
LBW	Low Birth Weight
MNCUs	Mother-Newborn Care Units
QI	Quality Improvement
SSC	Skin-to-skin Contact

Author Contributions

Ritika Rupal: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft

Gajendra Singh: Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declares no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Blencowe H, Krasevec J, de Onis M, Black RE, An X, Stevens GA, Borghi E, Hayashi C, Estevez D, Cegolon L, Shiekh S, Ponce Hardy V, Lawn JE, Cousens S. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of low birthweight in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jul; 7(7): e849-e860. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30565-5
[2]	Perin J, Mulick A, Yeung D, Villavicencio F, Lopez G, Strong KL, Prieto-Merino D, Cousens S, Black RE, Liu L. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-19: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Feb; 6(2): 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00311-4
[3]	Mazumder S, Taneja S, Dalpath SK, Gupta R, Dube B, Sinha B, Bhatia K, Yoshida S, Norheim OF, Bahl R, Sommerfelt H, Bhandari N, Martines J. Impact of community-initiated Kangaroo Mother Care on survival of low birth weight infants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Jun 7; 18(1): 262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1991-7
[4]	Charpak N, Ruiz JG, Zupan J, Cattaneo A, Figueroa Z, Tessier R, Cristo M, Anderson G, Ludington S, Mendoza S, Mokhachane M, Worku B. Kangaroo Mother Care: 25 years after. Acta Paediatr. 2005 May; 94(5): 514-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb01930.x
[5]	WHO. (2022). Recommendations for Care of the Preterm or LBW Infant. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240058262
[6]	Conde-Agudelo A, Díaz-Rossello JL. Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 23; 2016(8): CD002771. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002771.pub4
[7]	Sivanandan S, Sankar MJ. Kangaroo mother care for preterm or low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jun; 8(6): e010728. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010728
[8]	WHO Immediate KMC Study Group; Arya S, Naburi H, Kawaza K, Newton S, Anyabolu CH, Bergman N, Rao SPN, Mittal P, Assenga E, Gadama L, Larsen-Reindorf R, Kuti O, Linnér A, Yoshida S, Chopra N, Ngarina M, Msusa AT, Boakye-Yiadom A, Kuti BP, Morgan B, Minckas N, Suri J, Moshiro R, Samuel V, Wireko-Brobby N, Rettedal S, Jaiswal HV, Sankar MJ, Nyanor I, Tiwary H, Anand P, Manu AA, Nagpal K, Ansong D, Saini I, Aggarwal KC, Wadhwa N, Bahl R, Westrup B, Adejuyigbe EA, Plange-Rhule G, Dube Q, Chellani H, Massawe A. Immediate "Kangaroo Mother Care" and Survival of Infants with Low Birth Weight. N Engl J Med. 2021 May 27; 384(21): 2028-2038. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2026486
[9]	Balakrishnan, R., Gopichandran, V., Chaturvedi, S. et al. Continuum of Care Services for Maternal and Child Health using mobile technology – a health system strengthening strategy in low and middle income countries. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 16, 84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0326-z
[10]	Neogi SB. How cost-effective is facility-based newborn care in India? Indian Pediatr. 2013 Sep; 50(9): 829-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-013-0223-9
[11]	Joshi A, Londhe A, Joshi T, Deshmukh L. Quality improvement in Kangaroo Mother Care: learning from a teaching hospital. BMJ Open Qual. 2022 May; 11(Suppl 1): e001459. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001459
[12]	Kangaroo Mother Care as an Alternate Mode of Transport to Prevent Hypothermia in Low Birth Weight Babies — An Observational Study. Nadella HC, Mangalgi S, Akshatha S, Maralusiddappa PGC, Veerabhadraiah KM. J Indian Med Assoc 2025; 123(12): 49-54.
[13]	Vesel, L., Bergh, AM., Kerber, K.J. et al. Kangaroo mother care: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15 (Suppl 2), S5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-15-S2-S5
[14]	Peters, M. D. J., C. Marnie, A. C. Tricco, D. Pollock, Z. Munn, L. Alexander, P. McInerney, C. M. Godfrey, and H. Khalil. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth 18: 2119–2126. 2020.
[15]	Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K.K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M.D., Horsley, T., Weeks, L. and Hempel, S., 2018. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of internal medicine, 169(7), pp. 467-473.
[16]	Damschroder, L.J., Reardon, C.M., Widerquist, M.A.O. and Lowery, J., 2022. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation science, 17(1), p. 75.
[17]	Joshi, A., Londhe, A., Joshi, T. and Deshmukh, L., 2022. Quality improvement in Kangaroo Mother Care: learning from a teaching hospital. BMJ Open Quality, 11(Suppl 1).
[18]	Chellani H, Arya S, Mittal P, Bahl R. Mother-Newborn Care Unit (MNCU) Experience in India: A Paradigm Shift in Care of Small and Sick Newborns. Indian J Pediatr. 2022 May; 89(5): 484-489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-022-04145-9
[19]	WHO. (2023). KMC: Global Position Paper and Implementation Vision. World Health Organization. Kangaroo mother care: a transformative innovation in health care https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240072657
[20]	Bilal, S.M., Tadele, H., Abebo, T.A. et al. Barriers for kangaroo mother care (KMC) acceptance, and practices in southern Ethiopia: a model for scaling up uptake and adherence using qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21, 25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03409-6
[21]	Nimbalkar, S., Dave, H., Budh, H., Morgaonkar, V. and Patel, D., 2024. Post-discharge home kangaroo mother care follow-up study in rural Gujarat. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 13(4), p. 1379.
[22]	Sinha LN, Kaur P, Gupta R, Dalpath S, Goyal V, Murhekar M. Newborn care practices and home-based postnatal newborn care programme - Mewat, Haryana, India, 2013. Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2014 Sep 29; 5(3): 22-9. https://doi.org/10.5365/WPSAR.2014.5.1.006
[23]	Rao SPN, Minckas N, Medvedev MM, Gathara D, Y N P, Seifu Estifanos A, Silitonga AC, Jadaun AS, Adejuyigbe EA, Brotherton H, Arya S, Gera R, Ezeaka CV, Gai A, Gobezayehu AG, Dube Q, Kumar A, Naburi H, Chiume M, Tumukunde V, Medhanyie AA, Plange-Rhule G, Shabini J, Ohuma EO, Tadele H, W/Gebriel F, Hadgu A, Alamineh L, Mehta R, Molyneux E, Lawn JE; COVID-19 Small and Sick Newborn Care Collaborative Group. Small and sick newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic: global survey and thematic analysis of healthcare providers' voices and experiences. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar; 6(3): e004347. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004347
[24]	Bazzano, A.N., Felker-Kantor, E., Eragoda, S., Kaji, A. and Horlick, R., 2019. Parent and family perspectives on home-based newborn care practices in lower-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ open, 9(4), p.e025471.
[25]	Pratomo, H., Uhudiyah, U., Sidi, I.P.S., Rustina, Y., Suradi, R., Bergh, A.M., Rogers-Bloch, Q. and Gipson, R., 2012. Supporting factors and barriers in implementing kangaroo mother care in Indonesia. Paediatrica Indonesiana, 52(1), pp. 43-50.
[26]	Pangnuri, P., Lewis, L.E., Mathai, S.S., Aroor, S., Kini, P., Bhat, R. and Mundkur, S.C., 2025. Family Involvement in Kangaroo Care for Low Birth Weight (LBW) and Preterm Newborns-a Point-of-care Quality Improvement (POCQI) Study.
[27]	Kumar, H., Khanna, R., Alwadhi, V. et al. Tracking Weight-for-Age of Infants Using Home Based Newborn Care Plus by ASHA Workers. Indian Pediatr 58, 345–348 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-021-2193-7
[28]	Proctor, E.K., Bunger, A.C., Lengnick-Hall, R. et al. Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review. Implementation Sci 18, 31 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z
[29]	World Health Organization, 2023. Kangaroo mother care: a transformative innovation in health care. Global position paper. World Health Organization.
[30]	Boundy EO, Dastjerdi R, Spiegelman D, Fawzi WW, Missmer SA, Lieberman E, Kajeepeta S, Wall S, Chan GJ. Kangaroo Mother Care and Neonatal Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016 Jan; 137(1): e20152238. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2238
[31]	Charpak, N., Tessier, R., Ruiz, J.G., Hernandez, J.T., Uriza, F., Villegas, J., Nadeau, L., Mercier, C., Maheu, F., Marin, J. and Cortes, D., 2017. Twenty-year follow-up of kangaroo mother care versus traditional care. Pediatrics, 139(1), p.e20162063.
[32]	MoHFW. (2020). Operational Guidelines for Home-Based Care for Young Child (HBYC) and HBNC. Govt of India. https://nhm.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=1416&lid=769
[33]	Mazumder, S., Upadhyay, R.P., Hill, Z. et al. Kangaroo mother care: using formative research to design an acceptable community intervention. BMC Public Health 18, 307 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5197-z
[34]	Tripathy, P., Nair, N., Sinha, R., Rath, S., Gope, R.K., Rath, S., Roy, S.S., Bajpai, A., Singh, V., Nath, V. and Ali, S., 2016. Effect of participatory women's groups facilitated by Accredited Social Health Activists on birth outcomes in rural eastern India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Global Health, 4(2), pp. e119-e128.
[35]	Rao, S., Thankachan, P., Amrutur, B. et al. Continuous, real-time monitoring of neonatal position and temperature during Kangaroo Mother Care using a wearable sensor: a techno-feasibility pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 4, 99 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0293-5
[36]	Kroll, R.R., McKenzie, E.D., Boyd, J.G. et al. Use of wearable devices for post-discharge monitoring of ICU patients: a feasibility study. j intensive care 5, 64 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-017-0261-9
[37]	Tan SY, Sumner J, Wang Y, Wenjun Yip A. A systematic review of the impacts of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions on safety, adherence, quality-of-life and cost-related outcomes. NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jul 18; 7(1): 192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01182-w
[38]	Ward VC, Raheel H, Weng Y, Mehta KM, Dutt P, Mitra R, Sastry P, Godfrey A, Shannon M, Chamberlain S, Kaimal R, Carmichael SL, Bentley J, Abdalla S, Pepper KT, Mahapatra T, Srikantiah S, Borkum E, Rangarajan A, Sridharan S, Rotz D, Nanda P, Tarigopula UK, Atmavilas Y, Bhattacharya D, Darmstadt GL; Ananya Study Group. Impact of mHealth interventions for reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition at scale: BBC Media Action and the Ananya program in Bihar, India. J Glob Health. 2020 Dec; 10(2): 021005. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.10.021005
[39]	Small Z, Thompson SE, Sharma A, Majumdar S, Thout SR, Praveen D and Hirst JE (2024) Mobile health (mHealth) interventions for health promotion during the perinatal period in India: a scoping review. Front. Glob. Womens Health 5: 1427285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1427285

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Rupal, R., Singh, G. (2026). A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation. American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 7(3), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Rupal, R.; Singh, G. A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation. Am. J. Nurs. Health Sci. 2026, 7(3), 49-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Rupal R, Singh G. A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation. Am J Nurs Health Sci. 2026;7(3):49-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12,
  author = {Ritika Rupal and Gajendra Singh},
  title = {A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation},
  journal = {American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {49-54},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajnhs.20260703.12},
  abstract = {Background: Low birth weight (LBW, Methods & Focus: Using JBI scoping review principles and CFIR 2.0 framing, this review synthesizes evidence across micro- (infant, mother, family), meso- (clinical teams, SNCU/MNCU units, frontline workers), and macro-levels (policy, HMIS, equity). It maps barriers across six care settings, appraises quality improvement (QI) initiatives, clarifies community Home-Based Newborn Care (HBNC) vs Home-Based Care for Young Child (HBYC) visit schedules, evaluates digital health tools, and incorporates growth milestones (proportion reaching ≥2.5 kg by 40 weeks postmenstrual age [PMA]). Conclusion: Achieving sustainable scale-up requires zero-separation Mother-Newborn Care Units (MNCUs), hospital QI routines, family redistribution of KMC to surrogate caregivers, empowered ASHA networks, and duration-sensitive HMIS metrics.},
 year = {2026}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation
AU  - Ritika Rupal
AU  - Gajendra Singh
Y1  - 2026/10/26
PY  - 2026
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12
T2  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
JF  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
JO  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
SP  - 49
EP  - 54
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7227
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12
AB  - Background: Low birth weight (LBW, Methods & Focus: Using JBI scoping review principles and CFIR 2.0 framing, this review synthesizes evidence across micro- (infant, mother, family), meso- (clinical teams, SNCU/MNCU units, frontline workers), and macro-levels (policy, HMIS, equity). It maps barriers across six care settings, appraises quality improvement (QI) initiatives, clarifies community Home-Based Newborn Care (HBNC) vs Home-Based Care for Young Child (HBYC) visit schedules, evaluates digital health tools, and incorporates growth milestones (proportion reaching ≥2.5 kg by 40 weeks postmenstrual age [PMA]). Conclusion: Achieving sustainable scale-up requires zero-separation Mother-Newborn Care Units (MNCUs), hospital QI routines, family redistribution of KMC to surrogate caregivers, empowered ASHA networks, and duration-sensitive HMIS metrics.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ritika Rupal

Maternal and Child Health Department, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-4684
Gajendra Singh

Department of Public Health, IIHMR University, Jaipur, India

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3945-5101

Download PDF

Submit an Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Rupal, R., Singh, G. (2026). A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation. American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 7(3), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Rupal, R.; Singh, G. A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation. Am. J. Nurs. Health Sci. 2026, 7(3), 49-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Rupal R, Singh G. A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation. Am J Nurs Health Sci. 2026;7(3):49-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12,
  author = {Ritika Rupal and Gajendra Singh},
  title = {A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation},
  journal = {American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {49-54},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajnhs.20260703.12},
  abstract = {Background: Low birth weight (LBW, Methods & Focus: Using JBI scoping review principles and CFIR 2.0 framing, this review synthesizes evidence across micro- (infant, mother, family), meso- (clinical teams, SNCU/MNCU units, frontline workers), and macro-levels (policy, HMIS, equity). It maps barriers across six care settings, appraises quality improvement (QI) initiatives, clarifies community Home-Based Newborn Care (HBNC) vs Home-Based Care for Young Child (HBYC) visit schedules, evaluates digital health tools, and incorporates growth milestones (proportion reaching ≥2.5 kg by 40 weeks postmenstrual age [PMA]). Conclusion: Achieving sustainable scale-up requires zero-separation Mother-Newborn Care Units (MNCUs), hospital QI routines, family redistribution of KMC to surrogate caregivers, empowered ASHA networks, and duration-sensitive HMIS metrics.},
 year = {2026}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Review on Community Strategies, Digital Health Innovations, and Post-Discharge Continuation
AU  - Ritika Rupal
AU  - Gajendra Singh
Y1  - 2026/10/26
PY  - 2026
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12
T2  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
JF  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
JO  - American Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences
SP  - 49
EP  - 54
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2994-7227
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajnhs.20260703.12
AB  - Background: Low birth weight (LBW, Methods & Focus: Using JBI scoping review principles and CFIR 2.0 framing, this review synthesizes evidence across micro- (infant, mother, family), meso- (clinical teams, SNCU/MNCU units, frontline workers), and macro-levels (policy, HMIS, equity). It maps barriers across six care settings, appraises quality improvement (QI) initiatives, clarifies community Home-Based Newborn Care (HBNC) vs Home-Based Care for Young Child (HBYC) visit schedules, evaluates digital health tools, and incorporates growth milestones (proportion reaching ≥2.5 kg by 40 weeks postmenstrual age [PMA]). Conclusion: Achieving sustainable scale-up requires zero-separation Mother-Newborn Care Units (MNCUs), hospital QI routines, family redistribution of KMC to surrogate caregivers, empowered ASHA networks, and duration-sensitive HMIS metrics.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download