Sustainable agricultural production and productivity depend on proper soil management and understanding how soils respond to agricultural practices over time. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of small-scale irrigation on selected soil physico-chemical properties in comparison with cultivated and grazing land use systems in Toke Kutaye District. Three small scale irrigation schemes were selected from different directions of the district. A total of 60 composite soil samples were collected from irrigated, cultivated and grazing land use systems at two soil depths (0-15 and 15-30 cm) and analysed at the Debre Zeit National Soil Laboratory. The laboratory results were statistically analysed using SAS 9.4 software. The results indicated that soil pH (H2O), electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic carbon (SOC), available nitrogen (N), exchangeable potassium (K) and sodium (Na) showed no statistically significant differences among the land use systems across all irrigation schemes. However, variations were observed among land use systems, indicating the need for further investigation over longer cropping periods. In contrast, available phosphorus (P) and soil texture showed statistically significant differences among the land use systems and soil depths. However, small scale irrigation has not yet caused significant changes in most of the soil properties considered but continuous irrigation may influence soil quality over the longer cultivation periods. Therefore, long term monitoring over several cropping seasons is recommended to assess cumulative changes in soil properties, while alternative water sources and improved irrigation water management should be promoted to address irrigation water shortages and sustain crop production.
| Published in | American Journal of Ecology (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajoe.20260101.15 |
| Page(s) | 40-51 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Crop Yield, Small Scale Irrigation, Soil Properties, Land Use Systems
Land Use Systems | Depth | Chancho | Soil Textural Class | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clay | Silt | sand | |||
Upper Irrigated Land | 1 | 37.20b | 32.12a | 30.67a | Clay Loam |
2 | 41.20a | 32.80a | 26.00b | Clay | |
Lower Irrigated Land | 1 | 38.80a | 21.60b | 39.60a | Clay Loam |
2 | 38.80a | 29.60a | 31.60b | Clay Loam | |
Upper Cultivated Land | 1 | 28.80b | 23.60b | 47.60a | Sandy Clay Loam |
2 | 42.80a | 25.60a | 31.60b | Clay | |
Lower Cultivated Land | 1 | 43.60b | 31.33a | 25.07a | Clay |
2 | 48.27a | 27.33b | 24.40a | Clay | |
Upper grazing land | 1 | 22.80b | 39.60a | 37.60a | Clay |
2 | 48.80a | 27.60b | 23.60b | Loam | |
Lower Grazing Land | 1 | 32.00b | 33.20a | 34.80b | Clay |
2 | 44.80a | 17.60b | 37.60a | Clay Loam | |
Land Use Systems | Depth | Chole | Soil Textural Class | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clay | Silt | sand | |||
Upper Irrigated Land | 1 | 33.87b | 35.20a | 30.93a | Clay Loam |
2 | 41.47a | 29.87b | 28.53b | Clay | |
Lower Irrigated Land | 1 | 23.20b | 35.20a | 41.60a | Loam |
2 | 48.00a | 33.20b | 18.80b | Clay | |
Upper Cultivated Land | 1 | 33.20a | 35.20a | 31.60a | Clay Loam |
2 | 25.20b | 35.20a | 39.60b | Loam | |
Lower Cultivated Land | 1 | 35.07a | 41.87b | 23.07a | Clay Loam |
2 | 32.40b | 48.53a | 19.08b | Silty Clay Loam | |
Upper grazing land | 1 | 28.00b | 37.20a | 34.80a | Clay Loam |
2 | 33.20a | 33.20b | 33.60b | Clay Loam | |
Lower Grazing Land | 1 | 27.20b | 33.20a | 39.60a | Clay Loam |
2 | 41.20a | 31.20b | 27.60b | Clay | |
Land use systems | Depth | Maruf | Soil Textural Class | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clay | Silt | sand | |||
Upper Irrigated Land | 1 | 18.67a | 41.60a | 39.73a | Loam |
2 | 27.47b | 40.40b | 32.13b | Clay Loam | |
Lower Irrigated Land | 1 | 13.20b | 35.20a | 51.60a | Loam |
2 | 20.80a | 26.40b | 52.80a | Sandy Clay Loam | |
Upper Cultivated Land | 1 | 16.80b | 30.40a | 52.80b | Sandy Loam |
2 | 18.80b | 22.40b | 58.80a | Sandy Loam | |
Lower Cultivated Land | 1 | 30.13b | 30.80a | 39.07a | Clay Loam |
2 | 36.13a | 31.47a | 32.40b | Clay Loam | |
Upper grazing land | 1 | 18.80b | 34.40a | 46.80a | Loam |
2 | 26.80a | 34.40a | 38.80b | Loam | |
Lower Grazing Land | 1 | 16.80b | 40.40a | 42.80a | Loam |
2 | 22.80a | 36.40b | 40.80b | Loam | |
Location of Irrigation scheme | Soil depth | Land use systems | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPI | LWI | UPC | LWC | UPG | LWG | ||
Chancho | 1 | 6.39a | 5.84a | 5.83a | 6.22a | 6.01a | 6.13a |
2 | 6.41a | 5.93a | 5.95a | 6.33a | 6.23a | 6.82a | |
CV = 2.66 LSD (0.05%) = 1.07 | |||||||
Chole | 1 | 6.16a | 6.16a | 6.11a | 6.64a | 6.19a | 5.56a |
2 | 6.38a | 6.17a | 6.02a | 6.72a | 6.10a | 6.48a | |
CV = 2.35 LSD (0.05%) = 1.14 | |||||||
Maruf | 1 | 6.16a | 6.28a | 6.33a | 5.56a | 5.74a | 5.77a |
2 | 5.68a | 6.17a | 6.48a | 5.90a | 5.82a | 5.68a | |
CV = 2.86 LSD (0.05%) = 0.94 | |||||||
Location of Irrigation scheme | Soil depth | Land use systems (EC dS/m) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPI | LWI | UPC | LWC | UPG | LWG | ||
Chancho | 1 | 5.92a | 3.66a | 3.59a | 5.02a | 2.55b | 4.90a |
2 | 4.40b | 3.14a | 3.40a | 3.11b | 3.95a | 2.48b | |
CV = 2.29 LSD (0.05%) = 0.89 | |||||||
Chole | 1 | 4.00a | 3.58a | 3.81a | 4.60a | 4.10a | 3.47a |
2 | 4.48a | 3.84a | 2.52b | 4.23a | 2.83b | 3.45a | |
CV = 10.70 LSD (0.05%) = 0.94 | |||||||
Maruf | 1 | 3.68a | 3.74a | 2.43a | 4.60a | 3.70a | 2.96a |
2 | 2.83a | 2.73b | 3.02a | 3.94a | 2.60a | 2.62a | |
CV = 22.30 LSD (0.05%) = 1.11 | |||||||
Location of Irrigation scheme | Soil depth | Land use systems (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPI | LWI | UPC | LWC | UPG | LWG | ||
Chancho | 1 | 0.92a | 1.35a | 1.55a | 1.14a | 1.31a | 1.45a |
2 | 0.93a | 1.12a | 1.23a | 0.96a | 1.08a | 0.82a | |
CV = 9.41 LSD (0.05%) = 0.88 | |||||||
Chole | 1 | 1.02a | 0.92a | 1.83a | 1.25a | 1.21a | 1.54a |
2 | 0.92a | 0.91a | 1.37a | 1.06a | 1.19a | 1.05a | |
CV = 11.31 LSD (0.05%) = 0.94 | |||||||
Maruf | 1 | 1.28a | 1.37a | 1.74a | 1.23a | 0.90a | 1.11a |
2 | 1.01a | 1.03a | 1.11a | 0.99a | 1.01a | 1.37a | |
CV = 4.37 LSD (0.05%) = 0.84 | |||||||
Location of Irrigation scheme | Soil depth | Land use systems (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPI | LWI | UPC | LWC | UPG | LWG | ||
Chancho | 1 | 0.12a | 0.15a | 0.22a | 0.12a | 0.17a | 0.13a |
2 | 0.11a | 0.11a | 0.13a | 0.14a | 0.15a | 0.14a | |
CV = 9.56 LSD (0.05%) = 0.87 | |||||||
Chole | 1 | 0.13a | 0.14a | 0.14a | 0.15a | 0.13a | 0.17a |
2 | 0.13a | 0.11a | 0.22a | 0.10a | 0.09a | 0.12a | |
CV = 17.73 LSD (0.05%) = 0.89 | |||||||
Maruf | 1 | 0.16a | 0.23a | 0.19a | 0.22a | 0.16a | 0.15a |
2 | 0.17a | 0.19a | 0.24a | 0.19a | 0.15a | 0.22a | |
CV = 6.91 LSD (0.05%) = 1.03 | |||||||
Location of Irrigation scheme | Soil depth | Land use systems | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPI | LWI | UPC | LWC | UPG | LWG | ||
Chancho | 1 | 10.64a | 4.19b | 5.51a | 11.43a | 9.46a | 8.14a |
2 | 6.63b | 4.68a | 4.56b | 8.71b | 6.08b | 4.48b | |
CV = 7.48 LSD (0.05%) = 0.92 | |||||||
Chole | 1 | 9.27a | 8.99a | 6.88a | 9.56a | 6.26b | 5.82a |
2 | 6.25b | 4.50b | 5.76b | 5.39b | 9.26a | 5.04a | |
CV = 23.05 LSD (0.05%) = 0.86 | |||||||
Maruf | 1 | 11.94b | 7.24a | 5.27b | 10.57a | 6.91a | 5.11a |
2 | 14.06a | 4.57b | 13.10a | 6.54b | 5.27b | 5.44a | |
CV = 24.69 LSD (0.05%) = 0.95 | |||||||
Location of Irrigation scheme | Soil depth | Land use systems (cmol/kg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPI | LWI | UPC | LWC | UPG | LWG | ||
Chancho | 1 | 0.87a | 0.96a | 0.85a | 1.15a | 0.85a | 1.08a |
2 | 1.08a | 0.92a | 0.84a | 1.00a | 0.91a | 1.01a | |
CV = 7.48 LSD (0.05%) = 0.89 LSD (0.05%) | |||||||
Chole | 1 | 0.94a | 0.77a | 1.28a | 1.06a | 0.94a | 0.96a |
2 | 0.82a | 0.64a | 0.81a | 1.09a | 0.76a | 1.25a | |
CV = 21.10 LSD (0.05%) = 0.97 LSD (0.05%) | |||||||
Maruf | 1 | 1.13a | 1.01a | 0.66a | 0.56a | 0.37a | 0.35a |
2 | 0.52a | 0.87a | 1.31a | 0.55a | 0.72a | 0.84a | |
CV = 25.61 LSD (0.05%) = 1.02 LSD (0.05%) | |||||||
Location of Irrigation scheme | Soil depth (cm) | Land use systems (cmol/kg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPI | LWI | UPC | LWC | UPG | LWG | ||
Chancho | 1 | 0.43a | 0.13a | 0.18a | 0.49a | 0.48a | 0.31a |
2 | 0.54a | 0.22a | 0.29a | 0.63a | 0.29a | 0.59a | |
CV = 17.20 LSD (0.05%) = 1.02 LSD (0.05%) | |||||||
Chole | 1 | 0.37a | 0.02a | 0.11a | 0.39a | 0.61a | 0.20a |
2 | 0.34a | 0.29a | 0.12a | 0.55a | 0.02a | 0.35a | |
CV = 17.47 LSD (0.05%) = 1.00 LSD (0.05%) | |||||||
Maruf | 1 | 0.20a | 0.04a | 0.11a | 0.19a | 0.11a | 0.20a |
2 | 0.29a | 0.04a | 0.15a | 0.29a | 0.09a | 0.13a | |
CV = 6.64 LSD (0.05%) = 1.05 LSD (0.05%) | |||||||
CEC | Cation Exchange Capacity |
EC | Electrical Conductivity |
ESP | Exchangeable Sodium Percentage |
GDP | Growth Domestic Product |
K | Available Potassium |
N | Available Nitrogen |
Na | Sodium |
OC | Organic Carbon |
RSC | Residual Sodium Carbonate |
SAR | Sodium Adsorption Ratio |
SSP | Soluble Sodium Percentage |
| [1] | Abdissa F, Tesema G. and Yirga C. (2017). Impact analysis of small scale irrigation schemes on household food security the Case of Sibu Sire District in Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Irrigation Drainage Syst Eng., |
| [2] | Ali Javadi, Behrouz Mostafazadeh-Fard, Mohammad Shayannejad, Mohammad Reza Mosaddeghi and Hamed Ebrahimian. (2019). Soil physical and chemical properties and drain water quality as affected by irrigation and leaching managements. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 65(4), 321-331, |
| [3] | Asayehegn K. (2012). Irrigation versus rain-fed agriculture: driving for households’ income disparity, a study from central Tigray. Ethiopia J Agricu Sci Res., 2(1): 20-9. |
| [4] | Azadi, A., Shakeri, S. and Azadi, H. (2025). Impact of different land uses on potassium forms and soil properties: the case of southwestern Iran. Environ Dev Sustain, 27, 25815-25840. |
| [5] | B. W. Tukura, E. G. Ibrahim, E. U. Onche and M. A. G. Ibrahim. (2013). Preliminary Assessment of Physicochemical Properties of Borehole Water in the vicinity of Public Health Facilities in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Chemistry, 5(6) |
| [6] | Cichota R., Kelliher F., Thomas S., Clemens G., Fraser P. and Carrick S. (2016). Effects of irrigation intensity on preferential solute transport in a stony soil. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 59(2): 1-15. |
| [7] | Condron LM, Hopkins DW, Gregorich EG, Black A, Wakelin S. (2014). Long-term irrigation effects on soil organic matter under temperate grazed pasture. European Journal of Soil Science., 65(5): 741-750. |
| [8] | Gebissa Yigezu. (2021). The challenges and prospects of Ethiopian agriculture. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 7(1): 1923619, |
| [9] | Ghosh S, Mondal G, Chakraborty S, Banerjee S, Kumar S, Basu R and Bhattacharyya P. (2025). Geogenic perspectives on potassium dynamics and plant uptake insights from natural and submerged conditions across different soil types with machine learning predictions. Front Soil Sci., 5: 1539477. |
| [10] | John J. Drewry, Sam Carrick, Veronica Penny, David J. Houlbrooke, Seth Laurenson and Nicole L. Mesman. (2020). Effects of irrigation on soil physical properties in predominantly pastoral farming systems: a review,. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, |
| [11] | Kharal, Sudarshan; Khanal, Babu Ram; and Panday, Dinesh. (2018). Assessment of Soil Fertility under Different Land-Use Systems in Dhading District of Nepal. Soil Syst., 2(57), |
| [12] | Kusmita T and Sangita I. (2015). The Role of Physico-Chemical Properties in Soil Quality, A Review. Chem Sci Rev Lett., 4(13), 57 - 66. |
| [13] | Liu C., Dang X., Mayes MA., Chen L. and Zhang Y. (2017). Effect of long term irrigation patterns on phosphorus forms and distribution in the brown soil zone. PLoS ONE, 12(11): e0188361. |
| [14] | Makombe G, Namara R, Hagos F, Awulachew SB and Ayana M. (2011). A comparative analysis of the technical efficiency of rain-fed and smallholder irrigation in Ethiopia. International Water Management Institute, p: 37. |
| [15] | Mehretie B, and Woldeamlak B. (2013). Traditional irrigation and water management practices in highland, Ethiopia: case study in Dangila Woreda. Irrig Drain., |
| [16] | Meseret M., Addis K. and Eyayu M. (2015). Assessing the Physicochemical Properties of Soil under Different Land Use Types. Journal of Envtal and Analytical Toxicology, 5(5). |
| [17] | Nahusenay A. and Kibebew K. (2016). Effects of Land Use, Soil Depth and Topography on Soil Physico chemical Properties along the Toposequence at the Wadla Delanta Massif, North central Highlands of Ethiopia. Journal Environment and Pollution, 5(2), 57-71 |
| [18] | Oliver D. P., R. G. V. Bramley, D. Riches, I. Porter and J. Edwards. (2013). Soil physical and chemical properties as indicators of soil quality in Australian viticulture, Review. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 19(2), 129-310. |
| [19] | Onyeka Okeke, Ernest Ezeh, Harold Chinedu Okeke, Charles Chukwubuikem Aniobi, Cletus and Ifeanyi Akagha. (2020). Comparison of Soil Samples from Selected Anthropogenic Sites within Enugu Metropolis for Physi-cochemical Parameters and Heavy Metal Levels Det. Journal of Environmental Protection, 11(10). |
| [20] | Singh DP and Rathore MS. (2013). Available nutrient status and their relationship with soil properties of Aravalli mountain ranges and Malwa Plateau of Pratapgarh, Rajsthan, India. African J. of Agric. Res., 8(41), 5096-5103. |
| [21] | Sisay, K. (2023). Impact of irrigated agriculture on households income and food security from the southwest region of Ethiopia. Irrig. Drain., 73, 676-693. |
| [22] | Stellmacher T. and Kelboro G. (2019). Family farms, agricultural productivity, and the terrain of food (In) security in Ethiopia. Sustainability, 11(18): 4981. |
| [23] | Umer, Yusuf, Petros Chavula, Eliyas Abdi, Salahad Ahamad, Gilbert Lungu, Hasan Abdula, Mohammed Abdumalik, and Shukri Ahmed. (2024). Small-Scale Irrigation Farming As a Climate-Smart Agriculture Practice; Its Adoption and Impact on Food Security for Ethiopian Smallholder Farmers: A Review. Asian Research Journal of Current Science, 6(1): 163-80. |
| [24] | Yitayh Leul, Mohammed Assen, Shimeles Damene and Asmamaw Legass. (2023). Effects of Land-Use Dynamics on Soil Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen Stock, Western Ethiopia. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, (12). |
| [25] | Zebene Lakew Teffera, Jianhua Li, Tessema Astatkie and Zinabu Marsie Gebru. (2018). Effects Of Irrigation Systems On Physicochemical Properties Of Soil At Different Depths: A Case Study At A Farm Near Ziway Lake, Ethiopia. Irrig. and Drain., |
| [26] | Znaidi A, Brahim N, and Ibrahim H. (2020). Comparison of organic carbon stock of Regosols under two different climates and land use in Tunisia. Arab J Geosci, 13: 1011. |
APA Style
Negera, B. Y. (2026). The Impact of Irrigation on Soil Physico-chemical Properties in Toke Kutaye District, West Shoa, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. American Journal of Ecology, 1(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajoe.20260101.15
ACS Style
Negera, B. Y. The Impact of Irrigation on Soil Physico-chemical Properties in Toke Kutaye District, West Shoa, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Am. J. Ecol. 2026, 1(1), 40-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ajoe.20260101.15
@article{10.11648/j.ajoe.20260101.15,
author = {Belay Yadeta Negera},
title = {The Impact of Irrigation on Soil Physico-chemical Properties in Toke Kutaye District, West Shoa, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia},
journal = {American Journal of Ecology},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {40-51},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajoe.20260101.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajoe.20260101.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajoe.20260101.15},
abstract = {Sustainable agricultural production and productivity depend on proper soil management and understanding how soils respond to agricultural practices over time. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of small-scale irrigation on selected soil physico-chemical properties in comparison with cultivated and grazing land use systems in Toke Kutaye District. Three small scale irrigation schemes were selected from different directions of the district. A total of 60 composite soil samples were collected from irrigated, cultivated and grazing land use systems at two soil depths (0-15 and 15-30 cm) and analysed at the Debre Zeit National Soil Laboratory. The laboratory results were statistically analysed using SAS 9.4 software. The results indicated that soil pH (H2O), electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic carbon (SOC), available nitrogen (N), exchangeable potassium (K) and sodium (Na) showed no statistically significant differences among the land use systems across all irrigation schemes. However, variations were observed among land use systems, indicating the need for further investigation over longer cropping periods. In contrast, available phosphorus (P) and soil texture showed statistically significant differences among the land use systems and soil depths. However, small scale irrigation has not yet caused significant changes in most of the soil properties considered but continuous irrigation may influence soil quality over the longer cultivation periods. Therefore, long term monitoring over several cropping seasons is recommended to assess cumulative changes in soil properties, while alternative water sources and improved irrigation water management should be promoted to address irrigation water shortages and sustain crop production.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Impact of Irrigation on Soil Physico-chemical Properties in Toke Kutaye District, West Shoa, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia AU - Belay Yadeta Negera Y1 - 2026/11/11 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajoe.20260101.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ajoe.20260101.15 T2 - American Journal of Ecology JF - American Journal of Ecology JO - American Journal of Ecology SP - 40 EP - 51 PB - Science Publishing Group UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajoe.20260101.15 AB - Sustainable agricultural production and productivity depend on proper soil management and understanding how soils respond to agricultural practices over time. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of small-scale irrigation on selected soil physico-chemical properties in comparison with cultivated and grazing land use systems in Toke Kutaye District. Three small scale irrigation schemes were selected from different directions of the district. A total of 60 composite soil samples were collected from irrigated, cultivated and grazing land use systems at two soil depths (0-15 and 15-30 cm) and analysed at the Debre Zeit National Soil Laboratory. The laboratory results were statistically analysed using SAS 9.4 software. The results indicated that soil pH (H2O), electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic carbon (SOC), available nitrogen (N), exchangeable potassium (K) and sodium (Na) showed no statistically significant differences among the land use systems across all irrigation schemes. However, variations were observed among land use systems, indicating the need for further investigation over longer cropping periods. In contrast, available phosphorus (P) and soil texture showed statistically significant differences among the land use systems and soil depths. However, small scale irrigation has not yet caused significant changes in most of the soil properties considered but continuous irrigation may influence soil quality over the longer cultivation periods. Therefore, long term monitoring over several cropping seasons is recommended to assess cumulative changes in soil properties, while alternative water sources and improved irrigation water management should be promoted to address irrigation water shortages and sustain crop production. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -