This work presented an extended median test for analyzing samples that are not independent but paired or matched given some criteria. Here, the data for analysis are presented in table form with the column corresponding to one factor with ‘c’ treatments or conditions considered as fixed, while the row as second factor with say ‘k’ subjects ,batches, blocks or levels which are considered random given that there is only one observation per cell. These observations themselves may be measurements on as low as the ordinal scale. The null hypothesis to be tested was that there is no difference between the ‘c’ treatments, thus having equal medians. This required the use of Friedman test and an alternative ties adjusted method. Although these methods lead to the same conclusions, the relative sizes of the calculated chi-square values suggest that the Friedman test is likely to lead to an acceptance of a false null hypothesis (Type II error) more frequently and hence likely to be less powerful than the ties adjusted modified extended median test. Nevertheless, the Friedman’s two-way analysis of variance test by ranks is here at least shown to be still more powerful than the usual extended median test.
Published in | Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (Volume 1, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.cbb.20130105.11 |
Page(s) | 22-27 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Friedman Test, Treatment, Modified Extended Median Test, Measurements, Matched Samples, Ties Adjusted Method
[1] | Agresti A.(1992).Analysis of Ordinal Paired Comparison data. Appl Statist 41:287-297. |
[2] | Gibbons, JD (1971). Nonparametric Statistical Inferences. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York. |
[3] | Munzel U, Brunner E.(2002). An exact paired rank test. Biometrical Journal 44:584-593. |
[4] | Oyeka I.C.A and Okeh U.M.(2012). Intrinsically Ties Adjusted Sign Test by Ranks. J Biom Biostat 2012, 3:8 |
[5] | Siegel, Sydney (1956): Nonparametric Statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill KOGAKUSHA, |
[6] | LTD. International Student Edition. |
APA Style
Oyeka Ikewelugo Cyprian Anaene, Okeh Uchechukwu Marius. (2013). Modified Extended Median Test for C Matched Samples. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 1(5), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbb.20130105.11
ACS Style
Oyeka Ikewelugo Cyprian Anaene; Okeh Uchechukwu Marius. Modified Extended Median Test for C Matched Samples. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2013, 1(5), 22-27. doi: 10.11648/j.cbb.20130105.11
AMA Style
Oyeka Ikewelugo Cyprian Anaene, Okeh Uchechukwu Marius. Modified Extended Median Test for C Matched Samples. Comput Biol Bioinform. 2013;1(5):22-27. doi: 10.11648/j.cbb.20130105.11
@article{10.11648/j.cbb.20130105.11, author = {Oyeka Ikewelugo Cyprian Anaene and Okeh Uchechukwu Marius}, title = {Modified Extended Median Test for C Matched Samples}, journal = {Computational Biology and Bioinformatics}, volume = {1}, number = {5}, pages = {22-27}, doi = {10.11648/j.cbb.20130105.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbb.20130105.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cbb.20130105.11}, abstract = {This work presented an extended median test for analyzing samples that are not independent but paired or matched given some criteria. Here, the data for analysis are presented in table form with the column corresponding to one factor with ‘c’ treatments or conditions considered as fixed, while the row as second factor with say ‘k’ subjects ,batches, blocks or levels which are considered random given that there is only one observation per cell. These observations themselves may be measurements on as low as the ordinal scale. The null hypothesis to be tested was that there is no difference between the ‘c’ treatments, thus having equal medians. This required the use of Friedman test and an alternative ties adjusted method. Although these methods lead to the same conclusions, the relative sizes of the calculated chi-square values suggest that the Friedman test is likely to lead to an acceptance of a false null hypothesis (Type II error) more frequently and hence likely to be less powerful than the ties adjusted modified extended median test. Nevertheless, the Friedman’s two-way analysis of variance test by ranks is here at least shown to be still more powerful than the usual extended median test.}, year = {2013} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Modified Extended Median Test for C Matched Samples AU - Oyeka Ikewelugo Cyprian Anaene AU - Okeh Uchechukwu Marius Y1 - 2013/11/30 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbb.20130105.11 DO - 10.11648/j.cbb.20130105.11 T2 - Computational Biology and Bioinformatics JF - Computational Biology and Bioinformatics JO - Computational Biology and Bioinformatics SP - 22 EP - 27 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8281 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbb.20130105.11 AB - This work presented an extended median test for analyzing samples that are not independent but paired or matched given some criteria. Here, the data for analysis are presented in table form with the column corresponding to one factor with ‘c’ treatments or conditions considered as fixed, while the row as second factor with say ‘k’ subjects ,batches, blocks or levels which are considered random given that there is only one observation per cell. These observations themselves may be measurements on as low as the ordinal scale. The null hypothesis to be tested was that there is no difference between the ‘c’ treatments, thus having equal medians. This required the use of Friedman test and an alternative ties adjusted method. Although these methods lead to the same conclusions, the relative sizes of the calculated chi-square values suggest that the Friedman test is likely to lead to an acceptance of a false null hypothesis (Type II error) more frequently and hence likely to be less powerful than the ties adjusted modified extended median test. Nevertheless, the Friedman’s two-way analysis of variance test by ranks is here at least shown to be still more powerful than the usual extended median test. VL - 1 IS - 5 ER -