This review paper is prepared with objective of to revise the available scientific information about the role and source of enzyme supplementation in poultry ration. The biggest single expense in any system of poultry production is feed accounting for up to 70% of total production cost per bird. The poultry industry readily accepts enzymes as a standard dietary component, especially in wheat and barley-based rations. Enzymes are biological catalyst composed of amino acids with vitamins and minerals. They bring about biochemical reactions without themselves undergoing any change. Poultry naturally produce enzymes to aid the digestion of feed nutrients. However, they do not have enzyme to break down fiber completely and need exogenous enzymes in feed to aid digestion. According to the purpose of application, feed enzymes can be fundamentally divided in to enzymes which are to quantitatively supplement endogenous digestive enzymes of mono gastric animals (Proteases, lipases, Amylases) and enzymes which are not produced by mono gastric animals (β-glucanases, Pentosanases and Phytases). Specific degradation site in the molecule, PH value, temperature, and presence of aerators / inhibitorsare some factors affecting the activity of enzyme. Bacteria, fungi and yeast are micro-organisms used as a source of enzyme in poultry ration. Some of the enzymes that have been used over the past several years or have potential for use in the poultry feed industry include cellulase (ß-glucanases), xylanases and associated enzymes, phytases, proteases, lipases, and galactosidases. The benefits of using enzymes in poultry diets include not only enhanced bird performance and feed conversion but also less environmental problems due to reduced output of excreta, including reducing the gut viscosity, increasing the effectiveness of host (endogenous) enzymes, alteration in feed passage rate, effect on excreta characteristics, effect on litter problems, release of nutrients, availability of phosphorus, increase in available energy, and improvement in nutrient digestibility. The degree of improvement obtained by adding enzymes to the diet depends on many factors including the type and amount of cereal in the diet, the level of anti-nutritive factor in the cereal which can vary within a given cereal (for example, low-versus high-ß-glucan barley), the spectrum and concentration of enzymes used, the type of animal (poultry tend to be more responsive to enzyme treatment than pigs), and the age of the animal (young animals tend to respond better to enzymes than older animals), type of gut micro flora present and the physiology of the bird.
Published in | International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.11 |
Page(s) | 1-7 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Poultry Ration, Enzyme, Micro-Organisms
[1] | Creswell, D. C. 1994. Upgrading the nutritional value of grains with the use of enzymes. Technical bulletin, American Soybean Association, 341 Orchard Road No.11-03Liat Towers, Singapore. |
[2] | Annison, G. and M. Choct. (1991). Anti-nutritive activities of cereal non-starch polysaccharides in broiler diets and strategies for minimizing their effects. World's Poultry Science Journal 47: 232–242. |
[3] | Almirall, M., M. Francesch, A. M. Perez-Venderell, J. Brufau, and E. Esteve-Garcia. 1995. The differences in intestinal viscosity produced by barley and ß-glucanase alter digestaenzyme activities and ileal nutrient digestibilities more in broiler chicks than in cocks. Journal of Nutrition 125: 947–955. |
[4] | A. K. Panda, S. V. Rama Rao, M. V. L. N. Raju, M. R. Reddy and N. K. Praharaj. 2011. The Role of Feed Enzymes in Poultry Nutrition. |
[5] | Acamovic, T. and B. McCleary.1996. Enzyme Special Series-Optimizing the response. Feed Mix 4: 14-19. |
[6] | Bhat, M. K., 2000. Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnology advances, 18(5), pp.355-383. |
[7] | Partridge, G. and C. Wyatt. 1995. More flexibility with new generation of enzymes. World Poultry 11(4), 17–21. |
[8] | Van der Klis, J. D., C. Schelle. and C. Kwakernaak. 1995. Wheat characteristics related to its feeding value and to the response of enzymes. Proceedings 10th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Antalya, Turkey. World's Poultry Science Association. pp. 160–168. |
[9] | Mollah, Y., Bryden, W. L., Wallis, I. R., D. Balnave and E. F. Annison. 1983. Studies on low metabolisable energy wheats for poultry using conventional and rapid assay procedures and the effects of processing. British Poultry Science 24: 81–89. |
[10] | Rogel, A. M., E. F., W. L. Bryden. and D. Balnave. 1987. The digestion of wheat starch in broiler chickens. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38: 639–649. |
[11] | Annison, G. (1993). The role of wheat non-starch polysaccharides in broiler nutrition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44(3): 405-422. |
[12] | Choct, M., R. J. Hughes. R. P. Trimble., K. Angkanaporn and G. Annison.1995. Non starch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes increase the performance of broiler chickens fed wheat of low apparent metabolizable energy. Journal of Nutrition125: 485–492. |
[13] | Ward, N. E. 1995. With dietary modifications, wheat can be used for poultry. Feedstuffs 7 Aug, 14-16. |
[14] | Classen, H. L., T. A. Scott., G. Irish., P. Hucl., M. Swift and M. R. Bedford. 1995. The relationship of chemical and physical measurements to the apparent metabolisable energy (AME) of wheat when fed to broiler chickens with and without a wheat enzyme source. Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Feed Enzymes, Netherlands. |
[15] | Schutte, J. B., J. DeJong. and D. J. Langhout. 1995. Effect of a xylanase enzyme supplementation to wheat-based diets in broiler chicks in relation to dietary factors. Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Feed Enzymes, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands, pp. 95–101. |
[16] | Annison, G. and M. Choct. 1991. Enzymes in poultry diets in:Enzymes in Animal Nutrition. Proceedings Ist Symposium, Switzerland. Oct 13-16. pp: 61-63. |
[17] | Bedford, M. R. and H. L. Classen. 1992. Reduction of intestinal viscosity through manipulation of dietary rye and pentosanase concentration is effected through changes in the carbohydrate composition of the intestinal aqueous phase and results in improved growth rate and food conversion efficiency of broiler chicks. Journal of Nutrition 122: 560–569. |
[18] | Yu, B, and T. K. Chung. 2004. Effects of Multiple Enzyme Mixtures on Growth Performance of Broilers Fed Corn-Soybean Meal Diets. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 13: 178–182. |
[19] | Hesselman, K., K. Elwinger. and S. Thomke. 1982. Influence of increasing levels of -glucanase on the productive value of barley diets for broiler chicks. Animal Feed Science and Technology 7: 351–358. |
[20] | Hasselman, K. and P. Aman. 1986. The effect of ß-glucanase on the utilization of starch and nitrogen by broiler chicks fed on barley of low or high viscosity. Animal Feed Science and Technology15: 83-93. |
[21] | Friesen, O. D., W. Guenter., R. R. Marquardt and B. A. Rotter. 1992. The effect of enzyme supplementation on the apparent metabolizable energy and nutrient digestibilities of wheat, barley, oats, and rye for the young broiler chick. Poultry Science 71: 1710–1721. |
[22] | Marquardt, R. R., D. Boros., W. Guenter and G. Crow. 1994. The nutritive value of barley, rye, wheat and corn for young chicks as affected by use of a Trichodermareesei enzyme preparation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 45: 363–378. |
[23] | Saleh, F., A. Ohtsuka., T. Tanaka and K. Hayashi. 2003. Effect of enzymes of microbial origin on invitrodigestibilities of dry matter and crude protein in maize. Journal of Poultry Science 40: 274-281. |
[24] | Fengler, A. I. and R. R. Marquardt. 1988. Water-soluble pentosans from rye. II. Effects on the rate of dialysis and on the retention of nutrients by the chick. Cereal Chemistry 65: 298–302. |
[25] | Fengler, A. I., J. R. Pawlik. and R. R. Marquardt. 1988. Improvements in nutrient retention and changes in excreta viscosities in chicks fed rye containing diets supplementedwith fungal enzymes, sodium taurocholate and penicillin. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 68: 483–491. |
[26] | Friesen, O. D., W. Guenter., B. A. Rotter and R. R. Marquardt. 1991. The effect of enzyme supplementation on the nutritive value of rye grain (Secalecereale) for the young broiler chick. Poultry Science 70: 2501–2508. |
[27] | Brenes, A., W. Guenter., R. R. Marquardt and B. A. Rotter. 1993. Effect of-glucanase/pentosanase enzyme supplementation on the performance of chickens and laying hens fed wheat, barley, naked oat sand rye diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 73: 941–951. |
[28] | Simons, P. C. M. and H. A. J. Versteegh. 1991. Application of microbial phytase in poultry nutrition. PoultryScience70: (Suppl. 1), 110. |
[29] | Morgan, A. J. and M. R. Bedford. 1995. Advances in the development and application of feed enzymes. Australian Poultry Science Symposium7: 109–115. |
[30] | Adams, E. A. and R. Pough. 1993. Non-starch polysaccharides and their digestion in poultry. Feed Compounder13: 19-21. |
[31] | Allen, C. M., M. R. Bedford and K. J. McCracken. 1995. A synergistic response to enzyme and antibiotic supplementation of wheat-based diets for broilers. Proceedings,10th European Symposiumon Poultry Nutrition, 15–19Oct, Antalya, Turkey. World's Poultry Science Association. pp. 369–370. |
[32] | VukicVranjes, M. and C. Wenk. 1993. Influence of dietary enzyme complex on broiler performance in diets with and without antibiotic supplementation. Enzymes in animal nutrition. KartauseIttingen, Thurgau, Switzerland. pp. 152–155. |
[33] | Benabdeljelil, K. and M. I. Arbaoui. 1994. Effects of enzyme supplementation of barley based diets on hen performance and egg quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology48: 325–334. |
[34] | Wyatt, C. L. and T. Goodman. 1993. Utilization of feed enzymes in laying hen rations. Journal of Applied PoultryResearch2: 68–74. |
APA Style
Mulisa Faji Dida. (2017). Review Paper on Enzyme Supplementation in Poultry Ration. International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.11
ACS Style
Mulisa Faji Dida. Review Paper on Enzyme Supplementation in Poultry Ration. Int. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2017, 1(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.11, author = {Mulisa Faji Dida}, title = {Review Paper on Enzyme Supplementation in Poultry Ration}, journal = {International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry}, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {1-7}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbc.20160101.11}, abstract = {This review paper is prepared with objective of to revise the available scientific information about the role and source of enzyme supplementation in poultry ration. The biggest single expense in any system of poultry production is feed accounting for up to 70% of total production cost per bird. The poultry industry readily accepts enzymes as a standard dietary component, especially in wheat and barley-based rations. Enzymes are biological catalyst composed of amino acids with vitamins and minerals. They bring about biochemical reactions without themselves undergoing any change. Poultry naturally produce enzymes to aid the digestion of feed nutrients. However, they do not have enzyme to break down fiber completely and need exogenous enzymes in feed to aid digestion. According to the purpose of application, feed enzymes can be fundamentally divided in to enzymes which are to quantitatively supplement endogenous digestive enzymes of mono gastric animals (Proteases, lipases, Amylases) and enzymes which are not produced by mono gastric animals (β-glucanases, Pentosanases and Phytases). Specific degradation site in the molecule, PH value, temperature, and presence of aerators / inhibitorsare some factors affecting the activity of enzyme. Bacteria, fungi and yeast are micro-organisms used as a source of enzyme in poultry ration. Some of the enzymes that have been used over the past several years or have potential for use in the poultry feed industry include cellulase (ß-glucanases), xylanases and associated enzymes, phytases, proteases, lipases, and galactosidases. The benefits of using enzymes in poultry diets include not only enhanced bird performance and feed conversion but also less environmental problems due to reduced output of excreta, including reducing the gut viscosity, increasing the effectiveness of host (endogenous) enzymes, alteration in feed passage rate, effect on excreta characteristics, effect on litter problems, release of nutrients, availability of phosphorus, increase in available energy, and improvement in nutrient digestibility. The degree of improvement obtained by adding enzymes to the diet depends on many factors including the type and amount of cereal in the diet, the level of anti-nutritive factor in the cereal which can vary within a given cereal (for example, low-versus high-ß-glucan barley), the spectrum and concentration of enzymes used, the type of animal (poultry tend to be more responsive to enzyme treatment than pigs), and the age of the animal (young animals tend to respond better to enzymes than older animals), type of gut micro flora present and the physiology of the bird.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Review Paper on Enzyme Supplementation in Poultry Ration AU - Mulisa Faji Dida Y1 - 2017/01/17 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.11 T2 - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry JF - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry JO - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry SP - 1 EP - 7 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9392 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.11 AB - This review paper is prepared with objective of to revise the available scientific information about the role and source of enzyme supplementation in poultry ration. The biggest single expense in any system of poultry production is feed accounting for up to 70% of total production cost per bird. The poultry industry readily accepts enzymes as a standard dietary component, especially in wheat and barley-based rations. Enzymes are biological catalyst composed of amino acids with vitamins and minerals. They bring about biochemical reactions without themselves undergoing any change. Poultry naturally produce enzymes to aid the digestion of feed nutrients. However, they do not have enzyme to break down fiber completely and need exogenous enzymes in feed to aid digestion. According to the purpose of application, feed enzymes can be fundamentally divided in to enzymes which are to quantitatively supplement endogenous digestive enzymes of mono gastric animals (Proteases, lipases, Amylases) and enzymes which are not produced by mono gastric animals (β-glucanases, Pentosanases and Phytases). Specific degradation site in the molecule, PH value, temperature, and presence of aerators / inhibitorsare some factors affecting the activity of enzyme. Bacteria, fungi and yeast are micro-organisms used as a source of enzyme in poultry ration. Some of the enzymes that have been used over the past several years or have potential for use in the poultry feed industry include cellulase (ß-glucanases), xylanases and associated enzymes, phytases, proteases, lipases, and galactosidases. The benefits of using enzymes in poultry diets include not only enhanced bird performance and feed conversion but also less environmental problems due to reduced output of excreta, including reducing the gut viscosity, increasing the effectiveness of host (endogenous) enzymes, alteration in feed passage rate, effect on excreta characteristics, effect on litter problems, release of nutrients, availability of phosphorus, increase in available energy, and improvement in nutrient digestibility. The degree of improvement obtained by adding enzymes to the diet depends on many factors including the type and amount of cereal in the diet, the level of anti-nutritive factor in the cereal which can vary within a given cereal (for example, low-versus high-ß-glucan barley), the spectrum and concentration of enzymes used, the type of animal (poultry tend to be more responsive to enzyme treatment than pigs), and the age of the animal (young animals tend to respond better to enzymes than older animals), type of gut micro flora present and the physiology of the bird. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -