Improvement of the parameters which limit the harvest of energy in microbial fuel cell (MFC) is paramount to increase its output and promote commercial application of the technology. Six dual chamber MFCs with either potassium permanganate or potassium ferricyanide as electron acceptor and various combinations of carbon and copper rods as electrodes produced maximum open circuit voltage (OCV) of 0.97V, 1.23V, 1.34V, 0.75V, 1.03V and 0.63V. The power density (at Rext = 1000Ω), which increased with decreasing external resistance until 200Ω beyond which it decreased, peaked at 79.27mW/m2 (105.7mA/m2), 156.32mW/m2 (148.4mA/m2), 92.29mW/m2 (114.0mA/m2), 60.94mW/m2 (92.6mA/m2), 39.94mW/m2 (75.0mA/m2) and 14.21mW/m2 (44.70mA/m2) for the MFCs. Similarly, coulombic efficiency (CE) were 69%, 84%, 74%, 76%,72% and 5.10%, while COD removal were 65%, 51%, 47%, 83%, 48% and 49%. Above results indicated that potassium permanganate outperformed potassium ferricyanide, while use of carbon as both electrodes was better than other blends copper and/or carbon used in the study. Lactobacillus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Streptococcus spp., Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., Aeromonas spp., Micrococcus lyteus, Corynebacterium spp., Cladosporium, Aspergillus versicolour, Candida albicans, A. flavus, Aspergillus nidulans, Trichoderma spp. and Aspergillus fumigatus were microorganisms isolated from the piggery wastewater. Further studies using cheaper, more sustainable materials with better effects on the setup are necessary.
| Published in | International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.12 |
| Page(s) | 8-20 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bioelectricity, Electrodes, Electron Acceptors, Carbon, Copper
| [1] | Lovley, D. R. (2006). Microbial Fuel Cells: Novel microbial physiologies and engineering approaches. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 17: 327–32. |
| [2] | Davis, F., and Higson, S. P. J. (2007). Biofuel cells: Recent advances and applications. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 22 (7): 1224–1235. |
| [3] | Du, Z., Li, H. and Gu., T. (2007). A state of the art review on microbial fuel cells: A promising technology for wastewater treatment and bioenergy. Advance Biotechnology. |
| [4] | Ghangrekar, M. M. and Shinde, V. B. (2008). Simultaneous sewage treatment and electricity generation in membrane-less microbial fuel cell, Water Science Technology, 58: 37–43. |
| [5] | Mathuriya A. S., and Sharma V. N., (2010). Treatment of brewery wastewater and production of electricity through microbial fuel cell technology. International Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 6 (1): 71–80. |
| [6] | Wei, L., Han, H. and Shen, J. (2012). Effects of cathodic electron acceptors and potassium ferricyanide concentrations on the performance of microbial fuel cell. International journal of hydrogen energy, 30: 1–7. |
| [7] | Potter, M. C. (1911). Electrical effects accompanying the decomposition of organic compounds. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B., 84: 260–276. |
| [8] | Pankaj, D. J., and Junaid, A. (2013). Comparative study on sustainable bioelectricity generation from microbial fuel cell using bio-waste as fuel. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3 (8): 1–6. |
| [9] | Zhuang, L., Chen, Q., Zhou, S., Yuan, Y. and Yuan H. (2012). Methanogenesis control using 2-bromoethanesulfonate for enhanced power recovery from sewage sludge in air-cathode microbial fuel cells‖. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 7: 6512-6523. |
| [10] | Borole, A. P., Mielenz, J. R., Vishnivetskaya, T. A. and Hamilton, C. Y. (2009). Controlling accumulation of fermentation inhibitors in biorefinery recycle water using microbial fuel cells. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2 (7): 1–14. |
| [11] | Salgado, C. A. (2009). microbial fuel cells powered by geobacter sulfurreducens. Basic Biotech, 5 (5): 1. |
| [12] | Sengodon, P and Hays, D. B. (2012). Microbial fuel cells: Future fuel technologies. National Petroleum Council (NPC) Study, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas – 77843, pp. 1 -19. Retrieved from http://www.npc.org/ftf_topic_papers/13-microbial_fuel_cells.pdf |
| [13] | Ginkel, S., Oh, S., and Logan, B. (2005). Biohydrogen gas production from food processing and domestic wastewaters, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 30: 1535–1542. |
| [14] | Ieropoulos, I., Greenman, J., Melhuish, C., and Hart, J. (2005). Energy accumulation and improved performance in microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources, 145: 253–256. |
| [15] | Logan, B. E., Hamelers, B., Rozendal, R., Schrӧder, U., Keller, J., Freguia, S., Aelterman, P., Verstraete, W., and Rabaey, K. (2006). Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40: 5181–5192. |
| [16] | Oji, A., Opara, C. C. and Oduola, M. K. (2012). Fundamentals and field application of microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Euro. J. Appl. Eng. Sci. Res., 1 (4): 185-189. |
| [17] | Logan, B. (2010). Scaling up microbial fuel cells and other bioelectrochemical systems. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85: 1665-1671. |
| [18] | Oh, S. E. and Logan, B. E. (2005). Hydrogen and electricity production from a food processing wastewater using fermentation and microbial fuel cell technologies. Water Res., 39: 4673–4682. |
| [19] | Kim, I. S., Chae, K. J., Choi, M. J. and Verstraete, W. (2008) Microbial fuel cells: recent advances bacterial communities and application beyond electricity generation. Environ. Eng. Res., 13: 51-65. |
| [20] | Clauwert, P., Aelterman, P., Pharm, H. T., DeSchamphelaire, L., Carballa, M., Rabaey, K. and Verstraete, W. (2008). Minimizing losses in bio-electrochemical systems: the road to application. Application of Microbial biotechnology, 79: 901 |
| [21] | Li, J., Fu, Q., Liao, Q., Zhu, X., Ye, D. D. and Tian, X. (2009). Persulfate: A self-activated cathodic electron acceptor for microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sour., 194: 269–274. |
| [22] | Ikotun, O. O., Olafusi, O. S., Quadri, H. A. and Bolarinwa, O. A. (2012). Influence of human activities on the water quality of Ogun river in Nigeria. Civil and Environmental Research, 9: 36-48. |
| [23] | Singh, S. N., Srivastav, G. and Bhatt, A. (2012). Physicochemical determination of pollutants in wastewater in Dheradun. Current World Environment, 7 (1): 133-138. |
| [24] | Cheesbrough, M. (2006). Biochemical tests to identify bacteria. In: Cheesbrough M. (ed.) District laboratory practice in tropical countries, Part 2, 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, UK. 7: 62–70. |
| [25] | Sambrook, J. and Russell, D. W. (2001). Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. |
| [26] | Ogugbue, C. J., Ebode, E. E. & Leera, S. (2015). Electricity generation from swine wastewater using microbial fuel cell. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 16 (5): 26–33. |
| [27] | Egbadon, E. O., Akujobi, C. O., Nweke, C. O., Braide, W., Akaluka, C. K. and Adeleye, S. (2016). Simultaneous generation of bioelectricity and treatment of swine wastewater in a microbial fuel cell. International Letters of Natural Sciences, 54: 100-107. |
| [28] | Snell-Castro, R., Godon, J., Delgene`s, J. and Dabert, P. (2005). Characterization of the microbial diversity in a pig manure storage pit using small subunit rDNA sequence analysis. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 52: 229–242. |
| [29] | Nsofor, C. A. and Iroegbu, C. U. (2013). Plasmid profile of antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from domesticated animals in South-East Nigeria. Global Journal of Cell Biology and Enzymology, 1 (1): 050-056. |
| [30] | Leung, K. and Topp, E. (2001). Bacterial community dynamics in liquid swine manure during storage: molecular analysis using DGGE/PCR of 16S rDNA. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 38: 169–177. |
| [31] | Leser, T. D., Amenuvor, J. Z., Jensen, T. K., Lindecrona, R. H., Boye, M. and Moller, K. (2002). Culture-independent analysis of gut bacteria: the pig gastrointestinal tract microbiota revisited. Appl. Environ. Microbiol, 68: 673–690. |
| [32] | Hadagali, A. Shalini, R. and Pratima, B. (2012). Comparative studies on electrodes for the construction of microbial fuel cell. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research, 3 (4): 785-789. |
| [33] | Min, B., Cheng, S. and Logan, B. E. (2005). Electricity generation using membrane and salt bridge microbial fuel cells. Water Res., 39: 1675-1686. |
| [34] | Logan, B. E. (2007). Microbial Fuel Cells (1st edn). Wiley and Sons: USA, 1-44. |
| [35] | Gupta, P., Parkhey, P., Joshi, K., Mahilkar, A., Bhatia, J. K., and Meena, L. N. (2012). Comparative study of microbial fuel cell for electricity generation by enriched exoelectron generating bacteria from environmental samples. Asian Journal of Biotechnology, 4 (3): 137–142. |
| [36] | Pandit, S., Sengupta, A., Kale, S. and Das, D. (2011). Performance of electron acceptors in catholyte of a two-chambered microbial fuel cell using anion exchange membrane. Bioresource Technology, 102: 2736–2744. |
| [37] | Adeleye, S. A. and Okorondu, S. I. (2015). Bioelectricity from students’ hostel waste water using microbial fuel cell. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., 9 (2): 1038-1049. |
| [38] | Gamal, E., Mohamed, A. R., Bahgat, M., Dahshan, A. (2013). Using of microbial fuel cell with metal electrodes and organic enrichment for electricity generation. El-Minia Science Bulletin Volume (Physic. Section), 24 (1): 1-12. |
| [39] | Feng Z, Robert C. T. S., John, R. V. (2008). Techniques for the study and development of microbial fuel cells: an electrochemical perspective. Chemical Sciences, University of Surrey: Guildford. |
| [40] | Ashoka, H., Shalini, R. and Bhat, P. (2012). Comparative studies on electrodes for the construction of microbial fuel cell. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research, 3 (4): 785-789. |
| [41] | You, S., Zhao, Q., Zhang, J., Jiang, J. and Zhao, S. (2006). A microbial fuel cell using permanganate as the cathodic electron acceptor. Journal of Power Sources, 162: 1409–1415. |
| [42] | Guerrero-Rangel, N., Rodriguez-de la Garza, J. A., Garza-Garcia, Y., Rios-Gonzales, L. J., Sosa-Santillan, G. J., de la Garza-Rodriguez, I. M., Martines-Amador, S. Y., Rodriguez-Garza, M. M. and Rodriguez-Martinez, J. (2010). Comparative study of three cathodic electron acceptors on the performance of mediatorless microbial fuel cell. International Journal of Electrical and Power Engineering, 4 (1): 27-31. |
| [43] | Jafary, T., Ghoreyshi, A. A., Najafpour, G. D., Fatemi, S. and Rahimnejad, M. (2012). Investigation on performance of microbial fuel cells based on carbon sources and kinetic models. Int. J. Energy Res. 1–11. |
| [44] | Arbianti, R., Utami, T. S., Hermansyah, H., Novitasari, D., Kristin, E. and Trisnawati, I. (2013). Performance optimization of microbial fuel cell (MFC) using Lactobacillus bulgaricus. Makara Seri Teknologi., 17 (1): 32-38. |
| [45] | He, Z., Kan, J. J., Wang, Y. B., Huang, Y. L., Mansfeld, F. and Nealson, K. H. (2009). Electricity production coupled to ammonium in a microbial fuel cell. Environmental Science and Technology, 43 (9): 3391–3397. |
| [46] | Wang, M., Yan, Z., Huang, B., Zhao, J., and Liu, R. (2013). Electricity generation by microbial fuel cells fuelled with Enteromorpha prolifera hydrolysis. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 8: 2104-2111. |
| [47] | Devasahayam, M. and Masih, S., (2012). Microbial fuel cell demonstrates high coulombic efficiency applicable for water remediation. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 50: 430–438. |
| [48] | Rabaey, K., Boon, N., Hofte, M. and Verstraete, W. (2005). Microbial phenazine production enhances electron transfer in biofuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol., 39: 3401-3408. |
| [49] | Zhang, X., He, W., Ren, L., Stager, J., Evans, P. J. and Logan, B. E. (2015). COD removal characteristics in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology, 176: 23–31. |
| [50] | Mathuriya, A. S. and Sharma, V. N. (2009). Bioelectricity production from various wastewaters through microbial fuel cell technology. J Biochem Tech, 2 (1): 133-137. |
| [51] | Khan, M. R., Karim, M. R. and Amin, M. S. A. (2012). Generation of bio-electricity by microbial fuel cells. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1 (3): 231-237. |
| [52] | Ren, Z., Yan, H., Wang, W., Mench, M. M. and Regan, J. M. (2011). Characterization of microbial fuel cells at microbially and electrochemically meaningful time scales. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45: 2435–2441. |
| [53] | Ismail, Z. Z. and Jaeel, A. J. (2013). Sustainable power generation in continuous flow microbial fuel cell treating actual wastewater: influence of biocatalyst type on electricity production. The Scientific World Journal, 1–7. |
| [54] | Zhang, Y., Min, B., Huang, L., Angelidaki, I., (2011). Electricity generation and microbial community response to substrate changes in microbial fuel cell. Bioresour. Technol., 102 (2): 1166–1173. |
APA Style
Anuforo Henry Uzoma, Ogbulie Tochukwu Ekwutosi, Akujobi Campbell Onyeka. (2017). Comparative Study of Effects of Electrode Materials and Catholyte on Simultaneous Generation of Bioelectricity and Waste water Treatment. International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry, 1(1), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.12
ACS Style
Anuforo Henry Uzoma; Ogbulie Tochukwu Ekwutosi; Akujobi Campbell Onyeka. Comparative Study of Effects of Electrode Materials and Catholyte on Simultaneous Generation of Bioelectricity and Waste water Treatment. Int. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2017, 1(1), 8-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.12
AMA Style
Anuforo Henry Uzoma, Ogbulie Tochukwu Ekwutosi, Akujobi Campbell Onyeka. Comparative Study of Effects of Electrode Materials and Catholyte on Simultaneous Generation of Bioelectricity and Waste water Treatment. Int J Bioorg Chem. 2017;1(1):8-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.12,
author = {Anuforo Henry Uzoma and Ogbulie Tochukwu Ekwutosi and Akujobi Campbell Onyeka},
title = {Comparative Study of Effects of Electrode Materials and Catholyte on Simultaneous Generation of Bioelectricity and Waste water Treatment},
journal = {International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {8-20},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbc.20160101.12},
abstract = {Improvement of the parameters which limit the harvest of energy in microbial fuel cell (MFC) is paramount to increase its output and promote commercial application of the technology. Six dual chamber MFCs with either potassium permanganate or potassium ferricyanide as electron acceptor and various combinations of carbon and copper rods as electrodes produced maximum open circuit voltage (OCV) of 0.97V, 1.23V, 1.34V, 0.75V, 1.03V and 0.63V. The power density (at Rext = 1000Ω), which increased with decreasing external resistance until 200Ω beyond which it decreased, peaked at 79.27mW/m2 (105.7mA/m2), 156.32mW/m2 (148.4mA/m2), 92.29mW/m2 (114.0mA/m2), 60.94mW/m2 (92.6mA/m2), 39.94mW/m2 (75.0mA/m2) and 14.21mW/m2 (44.70mA/m2) for the MFCs. Similarly, coulombic efficiency (CE) were 69%, 84%, 74%, 76%,72% and 5.10%, while COD removal were 65%, 51%, 47%, 83%, 48% and 49%. Above results indicated that potassium permanganate outperformed potassium ferricyanide, while use of carbon as both electrodes was better than other blends copper and/or carbon used in the study. Lactobacillus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Streptococcus spp., Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., Aeromonas spp., Micrococcus lyteus, Corynebacterium spp., Cladosporium, Aspergillus versicolour, Candida albicans, A. flavus, Aspergillus nidulans, Trichoderma spp. and Aspergillus fumigatus were microorganisms isolated from the piggery wastewater. Further studies using cheaper, more sustainable materials with better effects on the setup are necessary.},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative Study of Effects of Electrode Materials and Catholyte on Simultaneous Generation of Bioelectricity and Waste water Treatment AU - Anuforo Henry Uzoma AU - Ogbulie Tochukwu Ekwutosi AU - Akujobi Campbell Onyeka Y1 - 2017/01/24 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.12 T2 - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry JF - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry JO - International Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry SP - 8 EP - 20 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-9392 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20160101.12 AB - Improvement of the parameters which limit the harvest of energy in microbial fuel cell (MFC) is paramount to increase its output and promote commercial application of the technology. Six dual chamber MFCs with either potassium permanganate or potassium ferricyanide as electron acceptor and various combinations of carbon and copper rods as electrodes produced maximum open circuit voltage (OCV) of 0.97V, 1.23V, 1.34V, 0.75V, 1.03V and 0.63V. The power density (at Rext = 1000Ω), which increased with decreasing external resistance until 200Ω beyond which it decreased, peaked at 79.27mW/m2 (105.7mA/m2), 156.32mW/m2 (148.4mA/m2), 92.29mW/m2 (114.0mA/m2), 60.94mW/m2 (92.6mA/m2), 39.94mW/m2 (75.0mA/m2) and 14.21mW/m2 (44.70mA/m2) for the MFCs. Similarly, coulombic efficiency (CE) were 69%, 84%, 74%, 76%,72% and 5.10%, while COD removal were 65%, 51%, 47%, 83%, 48% and 49%. Above results indicated that potassium permanganate outperformed potassium ferricyanide, while use of carbon as both electrodes was better than other blends copper and/or carbon used in the study. Lactobacillus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Streptococcus spp., Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp., Aeromonas spp., Micrococcus lyteus, Corynebacterium spp., Cladosporium, Aspergillus versicolour, Candida albicans, A. flavus, Aspergillus nidulans, Trichoderma spp. and Aspergillus fumigatus were microorganisms isolated from the piggery wastewater. Further studies using cheaper, more sustainable materials with better effects on the setup are necessary. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: