Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It

Meghdad Rahati; Monireh Dehghani Arani; Reza Nanakar; Azam Kazemi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It

Meghdad Rahati, Monireh Dehghani Arani, Reza Nanakar, Azam Kazemi

Published in International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Volume 2, Issue 1)

Received: 5 March 2014 Accepted: 10 April 2014 Published: 20 April 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The idea of quality management systems in recent years in the public and governmental sectors have ‎attracted attention of officials and experts ‎‏.‏Can say that correct deployment of these systems ‎is one of the most important tools that can assist the governments in this matter, and lead to success. ‎In this regard, We decided to survey requirements of this program in the hospitals.‎ ‎Methods: we survey the comments of 85 managers and supervisors of hospitals with five factors influencing on this program and then compared with the results of national assessment. In a descriptive cross-sectional ‎study, we used a five-part questionnaire with 40 Likert-type questions for data collection that ‎Validated with Delphi method. analysis of variance and T-test were used for statistical ‎analysis.‎ Results: among the five factors, ‏‏Leadership and management‏)‏%57,88) Organizational ‎structure‏%)‏62,03) Human resource development‎‏(%‏60,58) customer focus‏(%‏56,35) and Team ‎work‏(%‏58,41) proved to be acceptable.(with assuming 50% accepted in the five-factor).There was significant difference among the total ‎means of influencing factors in the studies hospitals‎(P-value <0.0001) also between Total score (comments ‎of managers and supervisors) and score of national assessment there was no significant differences.(P-value=0.2) Conclusion: It can be said that attention of managers to Leadership and management, ‎Organizational structure, Human resource development, Customer focus and Team work will make effective and efficient ‎implementation Accreditation Program

Published in	International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Volume 2, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12
Page(s)	6-12
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Requirements, Accreditation Program, Hospital

References

[1]	Abasi, s., tavakoli, n., & moslehi, m. (2012). The preparedness of Hospitals with a Quality Management System based on the International Joint Commission accreditation standard functional model in. Health Information Management, 9(4), 502-512.
[2]	Ahmadi, m., khoshgam, m., & mohamad pour, a. (2008). Comparative study of MOH standards with international standards Joint Commission Accreditation. Hakim Research Journal, 10(4), 45- 52.
[3]	Amerioun , A., Mahdavi , S., Mamaghani , H., & etal. (2011). Assessment of International Joint Commission (IJC) accreditation standard in a military hospital laboratory. Iranian Journal of Military Medicine, 13(2), 75-80.
[4]	Azami, s., tabrizi, s., & etal. (2012). Knowledge and attitudes of managers about the accreditation of teaching hospitals, medical universities Tabriz and Ardebil. Journal of Health of Ardabil, 3(2), 7-15.
[5]	Frahbakhsh, m., & frahbakhsh, m. (2011). Review and comparative study of approaches to quality management in health care organizations. The first congress of the student's clinical governance and continuous quality improvement. Tabriz: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.
[6]	Ghaderi, s., & hosseini, h. (2010). Model of factors affecting the quality of banking services. Vision for Business Management, 36(3), 89-115.
[7]	Ghomri zareh, z., & etal. (2009). The impact of the peer review process on the quality of nursing performance and patient satisfaction. Journal of Iranian Nursing, 22(62), 8-21.
[8]	Guo, X., Duff, A., & Hair, M. (2008). Service Quality Measurement in the Chinese Corporate Banking Market. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(5), 305-327.
[9]	Kaplan, c., Brady, w., Dritz, c., & etal. (2010). The Influence of Context on Quality Improvement Success in Health Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Milbank Quarterly, 88(4), 500-559.
[10]	Karimi, s., shokri, a., & etal. (2011). Influence of Accreditation in Services. The ‎first congress of the student's clinical ‎governance and continuous quality ‎improvement. Tabriz: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.
[11]	Kilner, E., & Sheppard, L. A. (2010). The role of teamwork and communication in the emergency department: A systematic review. International Emergency Nursing, 18, 127– 137.
[12]	Korrani, H., & Mahdavi, M. (2008). A LOOK AT Hospital Accreditation Standards. Tehran: Ministry of Health & Medical Education.
[13]	Ministry of Health. (2007). Guideline and evaluation laws for general hospitals. tehran: Ministry of Health, Evaluation Office Publication.
[14]	Talib, F., & Zillur, R. (n.d.). Analysis of interaction among the barriers to total quality management implementation using interpretive structural modeling approach. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 18(4), 563 - 587.
[15]	Tofighi, S. (2002). Comparative study of health ministry standards for hospitals with ISO system and presenting appropriate model for general and special hospitals. tehran: Azad University.
[16]	Torani, S., tabibi, s., & shahbazi, B. (2008). Influencing factors on implementation of total quality management at teaching hospitals affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences. Hakim Research Journal, 11(2), 22- 32.
[17]	Veillard, j., Champagne, F., & etal. (2005). performance assessment framework for hospitals: the WHO regional office for Europe PATH project. Int J Qual Health Care, 17(6), 487-96.
[18]	Yarifard, k., saadati, m., & etal. (2012). Barriers and potential solutions to validate the performance of hospitals in Iran From the perspective of senior executives in Tabriz and Ardabil University of Medical Sciences. The first congress of the student's clinical governance and continuous quality improvement. Tabriz: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.
[19]	Yarmohammadian,M. Shokri,A. Bahmanziari,N. Kordi,A.(2014). The blind spots on Accreditation program. Journal of Health Systems Research,9(11)
[20]	Zolfaghari, r., & kalanteri, m. (2009). Barriers of TQM in Islamic Azad University,Unit Rudehen. New ideas on Educational Sciences, 3(2).

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Meghdad Rahati, Monireh Dehghani Arani, Reza Nanakar, Azam Kazemi. (2014). Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2(1), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Meghdad Rahati; Monireh Dehghani Arani; Reza Nanakar; Azam Kazemi. Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It. Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2014, 2(1), 6-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Meghdad Rahati, Monireh Dehghani Arani, Reza Nanakar, Azam Kazemi. Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It. Int J Econ Behav Organ. 2014;2(1):6-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12,
  author = {Meghdad Rahati and Monireh Dehghani Arani and Reza Nanakar and Azam Kazemi},
  title = {Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It},
  journal = {International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization},
  volume = {2},
  number = {1},
  pages = {6-12},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijebo.20140201.12},
  abstract = {The idea of quality management systems in recent years in the public and governmental sectors have ‎attracted attention of officials and experts ‎‏.‏Can say that correct deployment of these systems ‎is one of the most important tools that can assist the governments in this matter, and lead to success. ‎In this regard, We decided to survey requirements of this program in the hospitals.‎ ‎Methods: we survey the comments of 85 managers and supervisors of hospitals with five factors influencing on this program and then compared with the results of national assessment. In a descriptive cross-sectional ‎study, we used a five-part questionnaire with 40 Likert-type questions for data collection that ‎Validated with Delphi method. analysis of variance and T-test were used for statistical ‎analysis.‎ Results: among the five factors, ‏‏Leadership and management‏)‏%57,88) Organizational ‎structure‏%)‏62,03) Human resource development‎‏(%‏60,58) customer focus‏(%‏56,35) and Team ‎work‏(%‏58,41) proved to be acceptable.(with assuming 50% accepted in the five-factor).There was significant difference among the total ‎means of influencing factors in the studies hospitals‎(P-value <0.0001) also between Total score (comments ‎of managers and supervisors) and score of national assessment there was no significant differences.(P-value=0.2) Conclusion: It can be said that attention of managers to Leadership and management, ‎Organizational structure, Human resource development, Customer focus and Team work will make effective and efficient ‎implementation  Accreditation Program},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It
AU  - Meghdad Rahati
AU  - Monireh Dehghani Arani
AU  - Reza Nanakar
AU  - Azam Kazemi
Y1  - 2014/04/20
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12
T2  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
JF  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
JO  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
SP  - 6
EP  - 12
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7616
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12
AB  - The idea of quality management systems in recent years in the public and governmental sectors have ‎attracted attention of officials and experts ‎‏.‏Can say that correct deployment of these systems ‎is one of the most important tools that can assist the governments in this matter, and lead to success. ‎In this regard, We decided to survey requirements of this program in the hospitals.‎ ‎Methods: we survey the comments of 85 managers and supervisors of hospitals with five factors influencing on this program and then compared with the results of national assessment. In a descriptive cross-sectional ‎study, we used a five-part questionnaire with 40 Likert-type questions for data collection that ‎Validated with Delphi method. analysis of variance and T-test were used for statistical ‎analysis.‎ Results: among the five factors, ‏‏Leadership and management‏)‏%57,88) Organizational ‎structure‏%)‏62,03) Human resource development‎‏(%‏60,58) customer focus‏(%‏56,35) and Team ‎work‏(%‏58,41) proved to be acceptable.(with assuming 50% accepted in the five-factor).There was significant difference among the total ‎means of influencing factors in the studies hospitals‎(P-value <0.0001) also between Total score (comments ‎of managers and supervisors) and score of national assessment there was no significant differences.(P-value=0.2) Conclusion: It can be said that attention of managers to Leadership and management, ‎Organizational structure, Human resource development, Customer focus and Team work will make effective and efficient ‎implementation  Accreditation Program
VL  - 2
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Meghdad Rahati

Dept. Management and Health Information Technology, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
Monireh Dehghani Arani

Dept. Biostatistics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medicine Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Reza Nanakar

Dept. Management and Health Information Technology, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
Azam Kazemi

Dept. Nursing, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Meghdad Rahati, Monireh Dehghani Arani, Reza Nanakar, Azam Kazemi. (2014). Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2(1), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Meghdad Rahati; Monireh Dehghani Arani; Reza Nanakar; Azam Kazemi. Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It. Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2014, 2(1), 6-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Meghdad Rahati, Monireh Dehghani Arani, Reza Nanakar, Azam Kazemi. Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It. Int J Econ Behav Organ. 2014;2(1):6-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12,
  author = {Meghdad Rahati and Monireh Dehghani Arani and Reza Nanakar and Azam Kazemi},
  title = {Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It},
  journal = {International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization},
  volume = {2},
  number = {1},
  pages = {6-12},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijebo.20140201.12},
  abstract = {The idea of quality management systems in recent years in the public and governmental sectors have ‎attracted attention of officials and experts ‎‏.‏Can say that correct deployment of these systems ‎is one of the most important tools that can assist the governments in this matter, and lead to success. ‎In this regard, We decided to survey requirements of this program in the hospitals.‎ ‎Methods: we survey the comments of 85 managers and supervisors of hospitals with five factors influencing on this program and then compared with the results of national assessment. In a descriptive cross-sectional ‎study, we used a five-part questionnaire with 40 Likert-type questions for data collection that ‎Validated with Delphi method. analysis of variance and T-test were used for statistical ‎analysis.‎ Results: among the five factors, ‏‏Leadership and management‏)‏%57,88) Organizational ‎structure‏%)‏62,03) Human resource development‎‏(%‏60,58) customer focus‏(%‏56,35) and Team ‎work‏(%‏58,41) proved to be acceptable.(with assuming 50% accepted in the five-factor).There was significant difference among the total ‎means of influencing factors in the studies hospitals‎(P-value <0.0001) also between Total score (comments ‎of managers and supervisors) and score of national assessment there was no significant differences.(P-value=0.2) Conclusion: It can be said that attention of managers to Leadership and management, ‎Organizational structure, Human resource development, Customer focus and Team work will make effective and efficient ‎implementation  Accreditation Program},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Survey Requirements of the Accreditation Program after the First Round of the National Assessment at Hospital and Compared with the Results of It
AU  - Meghdad Rahati
AU  - Monireh Dehghani Arani
AU  - Reza Nanakar
AU  - Azam Kazemi
Y1  - 2014/04/20
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12
T2  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
JF  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
JO  - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
SP  - 6
EP  - 12
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7616
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20140201.12
AB  - The idea of quality management systems in recent years in the public and governmental sectors have ‎attracted attention of officials and experts ‎‏.‏Can say that correct deployment of these systems ‎is one of the most important tools that can assist the governments in this matter, and lead to success. ‎In this regard, We decided to survey requirements of this program in the hospitals.‎ ‎Methods: we survey the comments of 85 managers and supervisors of hospitals with five factors influencing on this program and then compared with the results of national assessment. In a descriptive cross-sectional ‎study, we used a five-part questionnaire with 40 Likert-type questions for data collection that ‎Validated with Delphi method. analysis of variance and T-test were used for statistical ‎analysis.‎ Results: among the five factors, ‏‏Leadership and management‏)‏%57,88) Organizational ‎structure‏%)‏62,03) Human resource development‎‏(%‏60,58) customer focus‏(%‏56,35) and Team ‎work‏(%‏58,41) proved to be acceptable.(with assuming 50% accepted in the five-factor).There was significant difference among the total ‎means of influencing factors in the studies hospitals‎(P-value <0.0001) also between Total score (comments ‎of managers and supervisors) and score of national assessment there was no significant differences.(P-value=0.2) Conclusion: It can be said that attention of managers to Leadership and management, ‎Organizational structure, Human resource development, Customer focus and Team work will make effective and efficient ‎implementation  Accreditation Program
VL  - 2
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download