Haricot bean (Phaseolus vulagris L), locally known as ‘Boleqe’ is a very important legume crop grown worldwide. The study was initiated to assess the performance of haricot bean cultivars in relation to growth parameters and to estimate the analysis of growth characteristics. The experiment was conducted during November 2016 up to January 2017 at the compound of Hawassa University in the College of Agriculture during of season. The treatment consists of three Haricot varieties namely; Hawassa Dume, Omo-95 and Red Wolayta were used for test. The experiment was arranged in RCBD with four replications. The data were collected are Days to 50% emergence, Leaf area (cm2), Stem and leaf dry weight (gm) and calculated on Specific leaf area, leaf area ratio, net assimilation ratio and relative growth rate and Biomass dry weight were collected. Analysis of variance showed that the collected data were significantly different with respect to varieties. From the result in terms of (specific leaf area and leaf area ratio) the varieties which show higher value at the first sampling will show also increased value at the second sampling and vice versa. Growth parameters showed increment from the first sampling to the last sample which indicates difference varieties in growing environment. Generally growth parameters showed an increment from emergency to maturity.
Published in | Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jcebe.20210501.11 |
Page(s) | 1-4 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Growth Parameters, Different Haricot Bean Varieties, Haricot Bean
[1] | Mohammed, H. 2015. Improving Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Production under reduced Input Systems. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. |
[2] | Abebe, G. 2009. Effect of NP Fertilizer and Moisture Conservation on the Yield and Yield Components of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in the Semi-Arid Zones of the Central Rift Valley in Ethiopia. Advances in Environmental Biology, 3, 302-307. |
[3] | Teshale, Assefa, Girma, Abebe, Chemeda, Fininsa, Bulti, Tesso & Abdel-Rahman M. Al-Tawaha. 2005. Participatory Bean Breeding with Women and Small Holder Farmers in Eastern Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1: 28-35. |
[4] | Dev, J & Gupta, V. P. 1997. Common bean historic view and breeding strategy. Annals of Biology, 13: 213-219. |
[5] | Walelign Worku, 2002. Growth and Productivity of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Different Moisture and Light Regimes. Ph. D. Thesis. Agricultural University of Norway. |
[6] | Girma Abebe. 2009. Effect of NP Fertilizer and Moisture Conservation on the Yield and Yield Components of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) In the Semi-Arid Zones of the Central Rift Valley in Ethiopia. Advances in Environmental Biology, 3: 302-307. |
[7] | Zelalem Fisseha, 2002. Report on informal survey of major bean diseases in Metekel Zone. Pawe agricultural research center. pp. 14-19 (Unpublished). |
[8] | CSA (Central Statistics Agency).2018. Report on Area and Crop Production of Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Maher Season). Statistical Bulletin 586. Issue I. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 19. |
[9] | Gezahegn Ayele and Dawit Alemu, 2006. Marketing of Pulses in Ethiopia. pp. 346 -351. presented on Food and Forage Legumes of Ethiopia: Progress and Prospects. |
[10] | Teshale Adugna, Mulat Demeke and bezabhe Emana. 2006. Determinants of fertilizer adoption in Ethiopia. Agricultural economics society of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. Ethiopia. |
[11] | Evans GC. 1972. The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. |
[12] | GarnierE, Farrar JF, Poorter H, Dale JE, eds. 1999. Variation in leaf structure: an ecophysiological perspective. New Phytologist (special issue) 143: 1–221. |
[13] | Kvet, J., Ondok, J. P., Necas, J., Jarvis, P. G. 1971. Methods of Growth Analysis. In: Sestak, Z.; Catsky, J.; Jarvis, P. G. (Eds.), Plant Photosynthetic Production: manual and methods. The Hague: The Hague Publisher, p. 343-384. |
[14] | Radford, P. J. 1967. Growth analysis formulae-their use and abuse. Crop Sci. 7: 171-175. |
[15] | Williams, R. F. 1946. The physiology of plant growth with special reference to the concept of. net assimilation rate. Ann. Bot., Lond., N. S. 10, 41. |
[16] | SAS Institute Inc. 2008. Statistical analysis software version 9.0. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc. |
[17] | Gomez and Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons. |
[18] | Wallace, D. H., Ozbun, J. L. & Munger, H. M. 1972. Physiological Genetics of Crop Yield. Adv. Agron., 24: 97-146. |
[19] | Richards, R. A. 2000. Selectable traits to increase crop photosynthesis and yield of grain crops. J. Exper. Bot., 51: 447-458. |
[20] | Watson, D. J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. I. Variation in net-assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties and within and between years. Ann. Bot., N. S., II, 41. |
[21] | Thorne, G. N. I960. Variations with age in net assimilation rate and other growth attributes of sugar beet, potato and barley in a controlled environment. Ann. Bot., N. S., 24, 356. |
[22] | Rakesh P., Vijay P., Madurima D., Mahesh M. and Ramesh C. M. 2017. “Physiological Techniques to Analyze the Impact of Climate Change on Crop Plants”. Division of Plant Physiology, IARI, New Delhi. |
[23] | Escalante Estrada J. Alberto and Ma. Teresa Rodriguez G. 2008. Phenology, growth and analysis and yield of beans in alkaline soils, Armual Report of the bean Improvement Cooperative, 51: 238-239. |
APA Style
Dasta Tsagaye, Nimona Fufa, Desta Bekele. (2021). Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulagris L.) Varieties to Different Growth Parameters at Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20210501.11
ACS Style
Dasta Tsagaye; Nimona Fufa; Desta Bekele. Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulagris L.) Varieties to Different Growth Parameters at Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia. J. Chem. Environ. Biol. Eng. 2021, 5(1), 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.jcebe.20210501.11
AMA Style
Dasta Tsagaye, Nimona Fufa, Desta Bekele. Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulagris L.) Varieties to Different Growth Parameters at Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia. J Chem Environ Biol Eng. 2021;5(1):1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.jcebe.20210501.11
@article{10.11648/j.jcebe.20210501.11, author = {Dasta Tsagaye and Nimona Fufa and Desta Bekele}, title = {Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulagris L.) Varieties to Different Growth Parameters at Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia}, journal = {Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, pages = {1-4}, doi = {10.11648/j.jcebe.20210501.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20210501.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jcebe.20210501.11}, abstract = {Haricot bean (Phaseolus vulagris L), locally known as ‘Boleqe’ is a very important legume crop grown worldwide. The study was initiated to assess the performance of haricot bean cultivars in relation to growth parameters and to estimate the analysis of growth characteristics. The experiment was conducted during November 2016 up to January 2017 at the compound of Hawassa University in the College of Agriculture during of season. The treatment consists of three Haricot varieties namely; Hawassa Dume, Omo-95 and Red Wolayta were used for test. The experiment was arranged in RCBD with four replications. The data were collected are Days to 50% emergence, Leaf area (cm2), Stem and leaf dry weight (gm) and calculated on Specific leaf area, leaf area ratio, net assimilation ratio and relative growth rate and Biomass dry weight were collected. Analysis of variance showed that the collected data were significantly different with respect to varieties. From the result in terms of (specific leaf area and leaf area ratio) the varieties which show higher value at the first sampling will show also increased value at the second sampling and vice versa. Growth parameters showed increment from the first sampling to the last sample which indicates difference varieties in growing environment. Generally growth parameters showed an increment from emergency to maturity.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Response of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulagris L.) Varieties to Different Growth Parameters at Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia AU - Dasta Tsagaye AU - Nimona Fufa AU - Desta Bekele Y1 - 2021/03/17 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20210501.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jcebe.20210501.11 T2 - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering JF - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering JO - Journal of Chemical, Environmental and Biological Engineering SP - 1 EP - 4 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-267X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jcebe.20210501.11 AB - Haricot bean (Phaseolus vulagris L), locally known as ‘Boleqe’ is a very important legume crop grown worldwide. The study was initiated to assess the performance of haricot bean cultivars in relation to growth parameters and to estimate the analysis of growth characteristics. The experiment was conducted during November 2016 up to January 2017 at the compound of Hawassa University in the College of Agriculture during of season. The treatment consists of three Haricot varieties namely; Hawassa Dume, Omo-95 and Red Wolayta were used for test. The experiment was arranged in RCBD with four replications. The data were collected are Days to 50% emergence, Leaf area (cm2), Stem and leaf dry weight (gm) and calculated on Specific leaf area, leaf area ratio, net assimilation ratio and relative growth rate and Biomass dry weight were collected. Analysis of variance showed that the collected data were significantly different with respect to varieties. From the result in terms of (specific leaf area and leaf area ratio) the varieties which show higher value at the first sampling will show also increased value at the second sampling and vice versa. Growth parameters showed increment from the first sampling to the last sample which indicates difference varieties in growing environment. Generally growth parameters showed an increment from emergency to maturity. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -