Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Bacterial Vaginosis and Its Associated Factor Among Pregnant Women Receiving Prenatal Care at Bonga Gebretsadik Shoawo General Hospital, South West Ethiopia

Received: 24 July 2024     Accepted: 29 August 2024     Published: 30 August 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

One of the most frequent causes of irregular vaginal discharge in pregnant women is bacterial vaginosis (BV), which is characterized by a rise of various anaerobic bacteria and a decrease in important bacteria, the lactobacilli. The variation in the prevalence and its contributing causes among various populations, and nations is well known. Hence, in this study, the prevalence and characteristics associated with BV in pregnant women were determined. Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on pregnant women who visited the obstetric and gynecological units at Bonga general hospital in Bonga, south west Ethiopia. Nugent’s scoring method was used for the diagnosis of BV. The prevalence of BV was 19.7% (48/244) [95% CI 17.2–23.2]. Vaginal douching with soap was significantly linked to BV in women (AOR, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.4–9.1). Pregnant women with vaginal discharge and with a foul-smelling odor were four times more likely to have BV (AOR, 4.2; 95% CI: 1.7–10.3; p = 0.001). Furthermore, women who had multiple sexual partners were three times more likely to get BV. It was noted that pregnant women in this study had a high prevalence of BV. We revealed that the majority of women with BV had vaginal discharge and an unpleasant odor. We were able to verify the association between BV in pregnant women with multiple sexual partners and women who practiced vaginal douching with soap. Therefore, additional research may be required to validate and assess the reason for this correlation. Planning a preventive approach for BV that discourages vaginal douching with soap and multiple sexual partners during pregnancy may reduce the prevalence of BV.

Published in Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 12, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.jgo.20241204.13
Page(s) 81-89
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

BV, The Nugent’s Score, Pregnant Women, Southern Ethiopia

1. Introduction
An imbalance of the normal genital tract microbiota results in bacterial vaginosis (BV). It is one of the most frequent causes of abnormal vaginal discharge in women of reproductive age, particularly in pregnant women . It results from an imbalance in the vaginal microbiota characterized depletion of hydrogen-peroxide producing lactobacilli and replaced by anaerobic microorganisms, mainly Gardnerella vaginalis, Mobiluncus, Bacteroides spp, and Mycoplasma hominis . It is thought that BV is essential to the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Even though up to 80% of women had no symptoms, typical symptoms of a consistent, grey, malodorous discharge and itching are still present, highlighting the importance of objective risk assessment for pregnant women . Therefore, investigations recommended creating a clinical risk score to check for pregnant women BV regardless of symptoms .
Bacterial vaginosis is frequent among sexually active women and has been associated with adverse outcomes, including an increased risk of spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight, chorioamnionitis, postpartum endometritis, increased risk of pelvic inflammatory disease and it facilitates the transmission of sexually transmitted infection . Further more recently studes have shown that in women with BV neonatal morbidity was significantly higher, higher rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission, increased intubation for respiratory support and respiratory distress syndrome .
The public health significance of these infections is largely due to infection during pregnancy with the potential transmission to the developing fetus. In fact, reported BV to represent only the “tip of the iceberg” because most infections for women are asymptomatic or (if symptoms exist) unrecognized due to poor health care system for BV, unlike HIV and syphilis. Furthermore, adequate data are not available in Ethiopia to even analyse reporting rates. Even when symptoms exist, the social stigma associated with BV in virtually every society contributes to their under-detection .
Bacterial vaginosis accounts for around half of all vaginal infections globally . The prevalence of BV varies globally, with higher rates observed in Southeast Asia and Africa, influenced by factors such as age, hygiene practices, and sexual behavior . It is reported that prevalence of BV ranged from 28.5% in Eastern Africa to 52.4% in Southern Africa . Pregnancy-related BV studies have been carried out in a number of countries, however information on prevalence and associated factors related to BV among pregnant women in southern Ethiopia is lacking. Due to a lack of resources, pregnant women in Ethiopia are usually only tested for syphilis and HIV, and BV is rarely tested. Knowing the prevalence of BV and the associated risk factors is essential for developing treatment and preventative plans in order to prevent complications during pregnancy and unfavourable outcomes. This study was carried out at one of the hospitals in southern Ethiopia to ascertain the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and related risk factors among pregnant women receiving antenatal care (ANC) follow-up.
2. Material and Method
2.1. Study Area and Design
Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at bonga gebretsadik shoawo general hospital in bonga, south west Ethiopia. The hospital is in Bonga town, Kaffa Zone, around 470 kilometers south of Addis Ababa and at an elevation of 1714 meters above sea level. It is the only hospital in the area and continues to provide medical care to a significant number of patients every year, with approximately one million clients seeking treatment annually. The hospital currently has more than 300 active beds and serves both outpatients and inpatients. Each year, over 10,000 patients are admitted, including those who require less than 48 hours of care and those who need more extended hospitalization. The hospital also provides routine ANC follow-up services to nearly 500 pregnant women each month.
2.2. Study Participant and Sample Size
Pregnant women who visited the obstetric and gynaecological units for ANC follow-up and provided written consent or assent were the study participants. This study did not include pregnant women on antibiotic therapy, bleeding, or those for whom informed consent was not obtained.
Sample Size Determination was done using the formula to estimate a single population proportion is used to calculate the sample size. The sample size is determined under the premise that: n = Z2 p (1-p) / w2 where z= standard normal value at 95% confidence interval which was 1.96 n= the desired sample size, p= previous study on this subject in the near area which is 20.1% (Yalew et al., 2022) = 0.201., w= the absolute precision/margin of error which was 5% = 0.05 and, n= (1.96)2 0.201 (0.799)/ (0.05)2 = 247. Since there are 2,000 people in the source population, the necessary minimum sample was calculated from the preceding estimate by making certain adjustments using the correction formula, nf= n/ (1+n/N), where n was the sample from an infinite population and N was the overall population. In light of this, nf = 247 / (1 + (247 /2,000)) = 220. Adding 10% for the non-response rate =, or 244 women.
2.3. Sampling Technique and Data Collection
A pre-tested, structured questionnaire was used to gather information on participant demographics, gynecological and obstetric features from February to April of 2023. The study used the convenient sampling method. Socio-demographic data including the participant’s age, place of residence, level of education, marital status, and occupation. Gynaecological data included history of STIs and genital tract infections, gestational age, and obstetric data included gravidity, parity, and previous pregnancy outcomes. The questionnaire used to collect was translated into Amharic and back-translated to English by independent translators to ensure the appropriate meaning of each item. Then each participant underwent a clinical examination that included an assessment of signs and symptoms associated with infections, such as itching, pain in the vagina, and foul-smelling discharge. The primary nurses attending the ANC conducted the assessment and recorded the clinical details. All methods were performed in accordance with the microbiology laboratory guidelines Then vaginal swabs were collected by gently inserting one swab at a time approximately 2 inches into the vaginal opening and rotating it twice to ensure contact with the vaginal wall. The vaginal walls were swabbed with sterile cotton swabs, and the samples were appropriately labeled and immediately transported to laboratory.
2.4. Sample Transportation, Processing, and Examination
The vaginal swab was then smeard by rolling the swab onto a microscope glass slide and air-dried, heat fixed, Gram stained, and examined under a microscope using a X40, X100 objectives. The Nugent scoring system was used to evaluate the presence of BV. Women with a Nugent score of 7-10 and discharge were diagnosed as BV-positive and treated accordingly. Women with a Nugent score of 7-10 but no discharge were classified as BV-negative . Prior to the investigation, two laboratory technologists received training on Nugent scoring. This was done to ensure accurate and consistent preparation and reading of gram stains. Then, using established methods, the two trained laboratory technologists read the Nugent score .
2.5. Analysis and Interpretation of Data
In this study, Epidata was used for programmed data entry and documentation. Epi Info was used to design the questionnaire, enter data, and validate the results. Data analysis was conducted using the social science statistical package SPSS version 25. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess factors associated with BV. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
2.6. Ethical Consideration
This research project was approved by ‘The Institutional Research Ethics Review Board (IRB)’ of the College of Medicine and Health Science of Hawassa University, with reference number (IRB/173/15) on 09/03/2023. An official letter from Hawassa University's review committee was delivered to Gebretsadik Shawo General Hospital, providing a comprehensive overview of the study's objectives. Subjects were only enrolled after giving informed consent and being made aware of the purpose and goals of the study. All confirmed positive results were reported to the subjects' responsible physician.
3. Results
3.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Participants
This study involved 244 pregnant women, resulting in a 100% response rate. Over half of the participants, 53.3% were 25 years or older age groups. The majority of the participants 82.8% were married, 59.8% resided in urban areas. In terms of literacy levels, 39.8% of pregnant women were unable to read and write. Additionally, 11.1% were engaged in farming activities, and 17.6% were involved in daily labor work. Again about half of participants have irregular ANC follow-up, 30.3% had symptom and a 52% were multigravida (Table 1).
3.2. Prevalence of BV Among Pregnant Women
In this study a total of 244 slides were scored according to Nugent. The interrater agreement between the two independent readers after the first reading was 0.88 which is very good. BV was indicative in 48 individuals whereas 23 had an intermediate BV score and the rest 173 were negative for BV. Hence, in this study the overall prevalence of bacterial vaginosis by Nugent grade scoring system was 19.7% (48/244) (Table 1).
Table 1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Associated Factors with BV in Pregnant Women.

Characteristics

Total (N=244) n (%)

BV indicated (n=48) (19.7%)

Age of the participants

≤ 25

114 (46.7%)

29 (11.9%)

Above 25

130 (53.3%)

19 (7.8%)

Marital status

Unmarried

28 (11.5%)

3 (1.2%)

Married

202 (82.8%)

42 (17.2%)

Divorced

10 (4.1%)

2 (0.8%)

Widowed

4 (1.6%)

1 (0.4%)

Residence

Urban

146 (59.8%)

33 (13.5%)

Rural

98 (40.2%)

15 (6.1%)

Educational status

Unable to read and write

97 (39.8%)

23 (9.4%)

Read and write only

96 (39.3%)

18 (7.4%)

Secondary school

23 (9.4%)

4 (1.6%)

College and above

28 (11.5%)

3 (1.2%)

Occupation

Housewife

124 (50.8%)

20 (8.2%)

Farmer

27 (11.1%)

2 (0.8%)

Daily laborer

43 (17.6%)

15 (6.1%)

Others

50 (20.5%)

11 (4.5%)

Number of pregnancy

Primigravida

117 (48%)

32 (13.1%)

Multigravida

127 (52%)

16 (6.6%)

ANC visit

Irregular follow-up

127 (52%)

36 (14.8%)

Regular follow-up

117 (48%)

12 (4.9%)

Symptom

Symptomatic

74 (30.3%)

29 (11.9%)

Asymptomatic

170 (69.7%)

19 (7.8%)

Observation: Vaginal discharge with a foul-smelling odor

Yes

47 (19.3%)

25 (%)

No

197 (80.7%)

23 (%)

Vaginal douching using soap

Yes

138 (56.6%)

37 (15.2%)

No

106 (43.4%)

11 (4.5%)

Number of the sexual partner

One

35 (14.3%)

12 (4.9%)

More than one

209 (85.7%)

36 (14.8%)

3.3. BV and Associated Factors
In a bivariable analysis (Table 2), certain variables were found to be significantly associated with BV at a P<0.05 level. Women aged less than or equal to 25 years old were more likely to have BV (OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.7–8.24). The odds of having BV was approximately three time as high for primigravida women (OR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.66–5.13). The highest OR for BV was found for irregular ANC follow-up or pregnant women (OR: 4.35; 95% CI: 1.21–15.66). Women who used daily vaginal douching had higher odds of having BV (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.76–3.93).
However, in multivariable logistic regression analysis as shown in Table 2, pregnant women with irregular ANC follow-up were found to be three times more likely to have BV compared to those on regular follow-up (AOR, 3.1; 95% CI 1.3–7.5; p = 0.011). Women with vaginal discharge and with a foul-smelling odor were four times more likely to have BV (AOR, 4.2; 95% CI: 1.7–10.3; p = 0.001). Women who use soap for vaginal Douching was strongly associated with BV (AOR, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.4–9.1). In addition women who had more than one sexual partner were three times at risk of acquiring BV. However, factors such as age, residing area, educational status, occopation, and marital status were identified as potential predictors of BV in the bivariable analysis but did not show significance in the multivariable analysis.
Table 2. Bivariable and Multivariable Analysis of Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Associated Factors with BV in Pregnant Women.

Characteristics

BV indicated (n=48) (19.7%)

Bivariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

COR

P-value

AOR

P-value

Age of the participants

≤ 25

29 (11.9%)

2.6 (1.3-5.0)

0.004

2.2 (0.9-5.1)

0.067

Above 25

19 (7.8%)

1

1

Residence

Urban

33 (13.5%)

1.6 (0.8-3.1)

0.160

2.0 (0.8-4.8)

0.120

Rural

15 (6.1%)

1

1

Educational status

Unable to read and write

23 (9.4%)

1

Read and write only

18 (7.4%)

1.8 (0.7-4.7)

0.23

Secondary school

4 (1.6%)

1.6 (0.4-7.7)

0.55

College and above

3 (1.2%)

2.5 (0.5-11.8)

0.26

Occupation

Housewife

20 (8.2%)

1

Farmer

2 (0.8%)

3.58 (0.6-21.8)

0.12

Daily laborer

15 (6.1%)

0.87 (0.3-2.4)

0.68

Others

11 (4.5%)

0.71 (0.3-2.0)

0.52

Number of pregnancy

Primigravidia

32 (13.1%)

2.6 (1.3-5.0)

0.004

2.2 (0.9-5.1)

0.067

Meltiravidia

16 (6.6%)

1

1

ANC visit

Irregular follow-up

36 (14.8%)

3.4 (1.7-7.0)

0.000

3.1 (1.3-7.5)

0.011

Regular follow-up

12 (4.9%)

1

1

Symptom

Symptomatic

29 (11.9%)

2.2 (1.1-4.4)

0.015

1.6 (0.6-4.0)

0.264

Asymptomic

19 (7.8%)

1

1

Observation: Vaginal discharge with a foul-smelling odor

Yes

25 (10.2%)

8.5 (4.1-17.6)

0.000

4.2 (1.7-10.3)

0.001

No

23 (9.4%)

1

1

Vaginal Douching using soap

yes

37 (15.2%)

3.1 (1.5-6.5)

0.001

3.6 (1.4-9.1)

0.011

No

11 (4.5%)

1

1

Number of the sexual partner

one

12 (4.9%)

2.5 (1.1-5.4)

0.019

3.0 (1.1-8.0)

0.023

More than one

36 (14.8%)

1

1

4. Discussions
In this study the prevalence of BV was 19.7% which is lower compared the global systematic review, which varies by area from 23% to 29%. And 25% in sub-Saharan Africa . More specifically the systematic review report in sub-Saharan Africa was also indicated a higher prevalence of BV, 28.5% in Eastern Africa . In addition, our prevalence was lower than a similar studies like in central Ethiopia 32% , in other African countries 26% and 24% in Cameroon, 26.3% in the Democratic Republic of Congo , 30.9% in Gana , 28.5% , and 26.7% in Tanzania , 49.8% and 60% 17.2% among Sudanese pregnant women and 64% in Nigeria . There are several possible reasons for this, including as variations in the research populations, variances in the diagnostic techniques used, possible temporal fluctuations in the prevalence of BV, regional or local factors, sampling variability, and study design. In fact, it is widely documented that black women are known to experience BV more frequently than white women, although there is no conclusive reason for this racial disparity, socioeconomic factors may be the suggested contributory .
On the other hand, the current prevalence in this study is closely aligns with the study conducted in different place in Ethiopia; 19.4% in central Ethiopia , 20.1% in northern Ethiopia 21.4% in Eastern Ethiopia and also with South Africa 17.7% and Kenya 19.3% . However, there are some studies that reported a lower prevalence of BV compared to our finding, 2.9% in Kenya , 8.6%) in India , 11.9% in Nigeria and 12.3% in Burkina Faso . This could be brought on by variations in exposures across different geographic regions as well as behavioral, environmental, healthcare infrastructure, socio-cultural factors and socioeconomic factors.
The study found no statistically significant correlation between the presence of BV and participant characteristics including age, marital status, educational level, occupation, gravidity, and BV complaints (P>0.05). This is consistent with Sudan, Ghana , Senegal and Eastern Ethiopia . Nonetheless, a lot of studies found a relationship between BV and attributes like age, occupation, marital status, and level of education This could be due to of variations in sociodemographic factors and hygiene habits that affect the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis within the population. This study like to that of a report from central Ethiopia , has found an association between BV and irregular vaginal discharge as well as an unpleasant odour. However study from Sudan and Tanzania have shown no evdence of association , 18]. Abnormal vaginal discharge, however, is not a reliable or sensitive sign of the presence of BV.
There is no known cause for bacterial vaginosis, and there are no effective long-term treatments to stop this often recurrent illness. As a matter of fact, observational studies have suggested a connection between bacterial vaginosis and vaginal douching. This correlation, however, might be the result of confounding by indication, or confounding caused by women vaginal douching in reaction to symptoms linked to bacterial vaginosis . According to this study, women who used intra-vaginally soap had a nearly three- to four-fold increased risk of developing BV this might because of a lack of knowledge about the health risks associated with this wrong practice. The study also showed that women who have multiple sexual partners were significantly associated with BV. The results of this study are in line with a study that looked at pregnant women in Eastern Ethiopia , India , Democratic Republic of Congo , Tanzania , Nigeria , and in Cameron . This is because a positive association between disturbances of the healthy vaginal microbiota and intra-vaginal cleaning with soap .
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, it was noted that pregnant women had a high prevalence of BV. We were able to verify the association between BV in pregnant women with multiple sexual partners and women who practiced vaginal douching with soap. Therefore, additional research may be required to validate and assess the reason for this correlation. Planning a preventive approach for BV that discourages vaginal douching with soap and multiple sexual partners during pregnancy may reduce the prevalence of BV.
Abbreviations

BV

Bacterial Vaginosis

STIs

Sexually Transmitted Infections

ANC

Antenatal Care

Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the study participants for voluntarily involvement in the study and providing the required information. The authors would like to thank all respective staffs for their support throughout the investigation for coopration during data collection. We acknowledge Hawassa University for sponsoring and providing necessary equipment and reagents for the study.
Ethical Approval
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from IRB OF COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCE OF HAWASSA UNIVERSITY (Ref. No. IRB/0173/15).
Ethical Considerations
First, an ethical approval letter for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the College of Medicine and Health Science of Hawassa University (Ref. No. IRB/0173/15), in line with the codes of the Declaration of Helsinki for Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: November 27, 2013). Then, Support letters of collaboration were obtained from the HUCSH clinical and academic director offices and the Gebretsadik Shawo General Hospital. In addition, written informed consent was obtained from each study participant before the start of data collection. Furthermore, the investigators had no access to information that could identify individual participants during or after data collection. Individuals were informed about their full right to withdraw from the study at any point in the study period.
Author Contributions
Sintayehu Kochito: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Yibeltal Nigatu: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Demissie Asegu: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft
Mengistu Hailemariam Zenebe: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft
Funding
The research fund for collecting data only was obtained from Hawassa University, vice president for Research and Technology Transfer office. However, the office has no role in the design of the study and data collection, analysis, and interpretation of data in writing the manuscript, and in deciding to publish.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article at the PI will be presented upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Greenbaum S, Greenbaum G, Moran-Gilad J, Weintraub AY: Ecological dynamics of the vaginal microbiome in relation to health and disease. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2019, 220(4): 324-335.
[2] Russo R, Karadja E, De Seta F: Evidence-based mixture containing Lactobacillus strains and lactoferrin to prevent recurrent bacterial vaginosis: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised clinical trial. Beneficial microbes 2019, 10(1): 19-26.
[3] Schwebke JR, Desmond R: Natural history of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis in a high-risk group of women. Sexually transmitted diseases 2007, 34(11): 876-877.
[4] Pastore LM, Thorp JM, Jr., Royce RA, Savitz DA, Jackson TP: Risk score for antenatal bacterial vaginosis: BV PIN points. Journal of perinatology: official journal of the California Perinatal Association 2002, 22(2): 125-132.
[5] Ugwumadu A: Role of antibiotic therapy for bacterial vaginosis and intermediate flora in pregnancy. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 2007, 21(3): 391-402.
[6] Ng BK, Chuah JN, Cheah FC, Mohamed Ismail NA, Tan GC, Wong KK, Lim PS: Maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. Frontiers in surgery 2023, 10: 1084867.
[7] WHO: Global health sector Strategy on STI; Global Prevalence and incidence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections: to wards ending STIs Overview and estimates.. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland: 2016, available on the WHO website
[8] Turovskiy Y, Sutyak Noll K, Chikindas ML: The aetiology of bacterial vaginosis. Journal of applied microbiology 2011, 110(5): 1105-1128.
[9] Asare K, Ngcapu S, Osman F, Vandormael A, Mindel A, Naicker N, Khanyile M, S Abdool Karim S, Tomita A, Garrett N. Incidence, recurrence, and prevalence of bacterial vaginosis from acute to chronic HIV infection in a prospective cohort of women in South Africa. Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Jun; 82: 33-39.
[10] Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL: Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. Journal of clinical microbiology 1991, 29(2): 297-301.
[11] Peebles K, Velloza J, Balkus JE, McClelland RS, Barnabas RV: High Global Burden and Costs of Bacterial Vaginosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sexually transmitted diseases 2019, 46(5): 304-311.
[12] Nyemba DC, Haddison EC, Wang C, Johnson LF, Myer L, Davey DJ: Prevalence of curable STIs and bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sexually transmitted infections 2022, 98(7): 484-491.
[13] Ayenalem S, Yusuf L, Ashenafi M: Lactic acid bacterial vaginosis among outpatients in Addis Ababa. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development 2010, 24(3).
[14] Kamga YM, Ngunde JP, Akoachere J-FKT: Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and associated risk factors in pregnant women receiving antenatal care at the Kumba Health District (KHD), Cameroon. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2019, 19(1): 166.
[15] Mbu ER, Kongnyuy EJ, Mbopi-Keou F, Tonye RN, Nana PN, Leke RJ: Gynaecological morbidity among HIV positive pregnant women in Cameroon. Reproductive Health 2008, 5(1): 1-5.
[16] Mulinganya G, De Vulder A, Bisimwa G, Boelens J, Claeys G, De Keyser K, De Vos D, Hendwa E, Kampara F, Kujirakwinja Y et al: Prevalence, risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes of second trimester bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. 2021, 16(10): e0257939.
[17] Konadu DG, Owusu-Ofori A, Yidana Z, Boadu F, Iddrisu LF, Adu-Gyasi D, Dosoo D, Awuley RL, Owusu-Agyei S, Asante KP: Prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis, bacterial vaginosis and trichomoniasis in pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in the middle belt of Ghana. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2019, 19(1): 341.
[18] Shayo PA, Kihunrwa A, Massinde AN, Mirambo M, Rumanyika RN, Ngwalida N, Gumodoka B, Kidola J, Magoma M: Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and associated factors among pregnant women attending at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. Tanzania journal of health research 2012, 14(3).
[19] Abdelaziz ZA, Ibrahim ME, Bilal NE, Hamid ME: Vaginal infections among pregnant women at Omdurman Maternity Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 2014, 8(04): 490-497.
[20] Awoniyi A, Komolafe O, Bifarin O, Olaniran O: Bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women attending a primary health care centre in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Glo Adv Res J Med Med Sci 2015, 4: 057-060.
[21] Ajani G, Oduyebo O, Haruna M, Elikwu C: Nugent scores of pregnant women in a tertiary institution in Nigeria. 2012.
[22] Ness RB, Hillier S, Richter HE, Soper DE, Stamm C, Bass DC, Sweet RL, Rice P: Can known risk factors explain racial differences in the occurrence of bacterial vaginosis? Journal of the National Medical Association 2003, 95(3): 201-212.
[23] Mengistie Z, Woldeamanuel Y, Asrat D, Adera A: Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Tikur Anbessa University Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC research notes 2014, 7: 1-5.
[24] Yalew GT, Muthupandian S, Hagos K, Negash L, Venkatraman G, Hagos YM, Meles HN, Weldehaweriat HH, Al-Dahmoshi HOM, Saki M: Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis and their associated risk factors among pregnant women from northern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. 2022, 17(2): e0262692.
[25] Ahmed M, Admassu Ayana D, Abate D: Bacterial Vaginosis and Associated Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care in Harar City, Eastern Ethiopia. Infection and Drug Resistance 2022, 15(null): 3077-3086.
[26] Redelinghuys MJ, Ehlers MM, Dreyer AW, Lombaard H, Olorunju SA, Kock MM: A cross-sectional study on the relationship of age, gestational age and HIV infection to bacterial vaginosis and genital mycoplasma infection. BMJ open 2015, 5(10).
[27] Masha SC, Wahome E, Vaneechoutte M, Cools P, Crucitti T, Sanders EJ: High prevalence of curable sexually transmitted infections among pregnant women in a rural county hospital in Kilifi, Kenya. PloS one 2017, 12(3): e0175166.
[28] Kinuthia J, Drake AL, Matemo D, Richardson BA, Zeh C, Osborn L, Overbaugh J, McClelland RS, John-Stewart G: HIV acquisition during pregnancy and postpartum is associated with genital infections and partnership characteristics. AIDS (London, England) 2015, 29(15): 2025-2033.
[29] Dadhwal V, Hariprasad R, Mittal S, Kapil A: Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women and predictive value of clinical diagnosis. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2010, 281(1): 101-104.
[30] Imade GE, Musa J, Sagay AS, Kapiga SH, Sankale JL, Idoko J, Kanki P: Association of Bacterial vaginosis and other Sexually Transmitted Infections with HIV among pregnant women in Nigeria. African journal of medicine and medical sciences 2014, 43(Suppl 1): 23-28.
[31] Kirakoya-Samadoulougou F, Nagot N, Defer M-C, Yaro S, Meda N, Robert A: Bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women in Burkina Faso. Sexually transmitted diseases 2008: 985-989.
[32] Kafi, S. K., Mohamed, A. O., & Musa, H. A. A. (2000). Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Among Women in a Suburban Sudanese Community. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 105(3), 249–254.
[33] Bonneton M, Huynh BT, Seck A, Bercion R, Sarr FD, Delarocque-Astagneau E, Vray M: Bacterial vaginosis and other infections in pregnant women in Senegal. BMC infectious diseases 2021, 21(1): 1090.
[34] Shaffi AF, Balandya B, Majigo M, Aboud S. Predictors of Bacterial Vaginosis among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinic at Tertiary Care Hospital in Tanzania: A Cross Sectional Study. East Afr Health Res J. 2021; 5(1): 59-68.
[35] Brotman RM, Klebanoff MA, Nansel TR, Andrews WW, Schwebke JR, Zhang J, Yu KF, Zenilman JM, Scharfstein DO: A longitudinal study of vaginal douching and bacterial vaginosis--a marginal structural modeling analysis. American journal of epidemiology 2008, 168(2): 188-196.
[36] Sangeetha, K. T. Study of aerobic bacterial pathogens associated with vaginitis in reproductive age group women (15-45 years) and their sensitivity pattern. Diss. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India), 2014.
[37] Durugbo, II, Nyengidiki TK, Bassey G, Wariso KT: Bacterial vaginosis among women with tubal factor infertility in Nigeria. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2015, 131(2): 133-136.
[38] Achondou AE, Fumoloh FF, Aseneck AC, Awah AR, Utokoro AM: prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among sexually active women attending the CDC central clinic Tiko, South West region, Cameroon. African journal of infectious diseases 2016, 10(2): 96-101.
[39] Low N, Chersich MF, Schmidlin K, Egger M, Francis SC, van de Wijgert JH, Hayes RJ, Baeten JM, Brown J, Delany-Moretlwe S et al: Intravaginal practices, bacterial vaginosis, and HIV infection in women: individual participant data meta-analysis. PLoS medicine 2011, 8(2): e1000416.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kochito, S., Nigatu, Y., Asegu, D., Zenebe, M. H. (2024). Bacterial Vaginosis and Its Associated Factor Among Pregnant Women Receiving Prenatal Care at Bonga Gebretsadik Shoawo General Hospital, South West Ethiopia. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 12(4), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241204.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kochito, S.; Nigatu, Y.; Asegu, D.; Zenebe, M. H. Bacterial Vaginosis and Its Associated Factor Among Pregnant Women Receiving Prenatal Care at Bonga Gebretsadik Shoawo General Hospital, South West Ethiopia. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2024, 12(4), 81-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20241204.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kochito S, Nigatu Y, Asegu D, Zenebe MH. Bacterial Vaginosis and Its Associated Factor Among Pregnant Women Receiving Prenatal Care at Bonga Gebretsadik Shoawo General Hospital, South West Ethiopia. J Gynecol Obstet. 2024;12(4):81-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20241204.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jgo.20241204.13,
      author = {Sintayehu Kochito and Yibeltal Nigatu and Demissie Asegu and Mengistu Hailemariam Zenebe},
      title = {Bacterial Vaginosis and Its Associated Factor Among Pregnant Women Receiving Prenatal Care at Bonga Gebretsadik Shoawo General Hospital, South West Ethiopia
    },
      journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
      volume = {12},
      number = {4},
      pages = {81-89},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20241204.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241204.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20241204.13},
      abstract = {One of the most frequent causes of irregular vaginal discharge in pregnant women is bacterial vaginosis (BV), which is characterized by a rise of various anaerobic bacteria and a decrease in important bacteria, the lactobacilli. The variation in the prevalence and its contributing causes among various populations, and nations is well known. Hence, in this study, the prevalence and characteristics associated with BV in pregnant women were determined. Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on pregnant women who visited the obstetric and gynecological units at Bonga general hospital in Bonga, south west Ethiopia. Nugent’s scoring method was used for the diagnosis of BV. The prevalence of BV was 19.7% (48/244) [95% CI 17.2–23.2]. Vaginal douching with soap was significantly linked to BV in women (AOR, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.4–9.1). Pregnant women with vaginal discharge and with a foul-smelling odor were four times more likely to have BV (AOR, 4.2; 95% CI: 1.7–10.3; p = 0.001). Furthermore, women who had multiple sexual partners were three times more likely to get BV. It was noted that pregnant women in this study had a high prevalence of BV. We revealed that the majority of women with BV had vaginal discharge and an unpleasant odor. We were able to verify the association between BV in pregnant women with multiple sexual partners and women who practiced vaginal douching with soap. Therefore, additional research may be required to validate and assess the reason for this correlation. Planning a preventive approach for BV that discourages vaginal douching with soap and multiple sexual partners during pregnancy may reduce the prevalence of BV.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Bacterial Vaginosis and Its Associated Factor Among Pregnant Women Receiving Prenatal Care at Bonga Gebretsadik Shoawo General Hospital, South West Ethiopia
    
    AU  - Sintayehu Kochito
    AU  - Yibeltal Nigatu
    AU  - Demissie Asegu
    AU  - Mengistu Hailemariam Zenebe
    Y1  - 2024/08/30
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241204.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jgo.20241204.13
    T2  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JF  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JO  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    SP  - 81
    EP  - 89
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7820
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20241204.13
    AB  - One of the most frequent causes of irregular vaginal discharge in pregnant women is bacterial vaginosis (BV), which is characterized by a rise of various anaerobic bacteria and a decrease in important bacteria, the lactobacilli. The variation in the prevalence and its contributing causes among various populations, and nations is well known. Hence, in this study, the prevalence and characteristics associated with BV in pregnant women were determined. Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on pregnant women who visited the obstetric and gynecological units at Bonga general hospital in Bonga, south west Ethiopia. Nugent’s scoring method was used for the diagnosis of BV. The prevalence of BV was 19.7% (48/244) [95% CI 17.2–23.2]. Vaginal douching with soap was significantly linked to BV in women (AOR, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.4–9.1). Pregnant women with vaginal discharge and with a foul-smelling odor were four times more likely to have BV (AOR, 4.2; 95% CI: 1.7–10.3; p = 0.001). Furthermore, women who had multiple sexual partners were three times more likely to get BV. It was noted that pregnant women in this study had a high prevalence of BV. We revealed that the majority of women with BV had vaginal discharge and an unpleasant odor. We were able to verify the association between BV in pregnant women with multiple sexual partners and women who practiced vaginal douching with soap. Therefore, additional research may be required to validate and assess the reason for this correlation. Planning a preventive approach for BV that discourages vaginal douching with soap and multiple sexual partners during pregnancy may reduce the prevalence of BV.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia; Department of Gynaecology, Gebretsadik Shawo General Hospital, Bonga, Ethiopia

  • Department of Gynaecology, Gebretsadik Shawo General Hospital, Bonga, Ethiopia

  • School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia

  • School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia