This systematic literature review examines AI-driven methods and evidence for detecting corruption risks in the public sectors of Ethiopia and neighboring East African countries. Corruption remains a significant challenge to effective public-sector governance, economic development, and the efficient delivery of public services in Ethiopia and East African countries. The increasing availability of digital government data and advances in artificial intelligence (AI) provide new opportunities to identify corruption challenges, detect anomalies, and strengthen transparency and accountability. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided search, screening, and selection procedures, relevant studies were identified from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and regional grey literature repositories. The review synthesizes evidence from 28 studies published between 2010 and 2025 that investigate the application of AI, machine learning (ML), network analysis, anomaly detection, and related computational approaches to corruption-risk identification. The review targeted on four major public-sector domains: public procurement, financial auditing, payroll management, and asset management. Key themes examined include the types and quality of data used, pre-processing and feature-engineering practices, dominant AI and ML algorithms, evaluation metrics, model interoperability, and the practical feasibility of implementation in low-resource environments. The results indicate growing interest in AI-enabled corruption detection, particularly through anomaly detection, classification, predictive modeling, and network-based approaches. However, the evidence base remains limited by fragmented datasets, insufficient data quality, limited access to government records, insufficient technical capacity, and the absence of standardized evaluation frameworks. Ethical concerns, including privacy, algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, and the potential misuse of automated decision-support systems, also require careful consideration. In general, AI can complement, rather than replace, institutional anti-corruption mechanisms. For Ethiopia, priority should be given to strengthening public-sector data infrastructure, improving data governance and interoperability, developing interpret able and context-sensitive AI models, and establishing controlled pilot projects for procurement and financial-integrity monitoring. Sustained collaboration among policymakers, anti-corruption agencies, universities, technology experts, and international partners, together with capacity building and ethical safeguards, is essential for responsible and effective adoption of AI-driven corruption-risk detection systems.
| Published in | Science Discovery Computers (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sdcomput.20260101.12 |
| Page(s) | 15-19 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Artificial Intelligence, Corruption Detection, Public Sector, Ethiopia
| [1] | M. S. Lyra, B. Damásio, F. L. Pinheiro, and F. Bacão, “Fraud, corruption, and collusion in public procurement activities: A systematic literature review on data-driven methods,” Applied Network Science, vol. 7, no. 1, Art. no. 83, 2022, |
| [2] | D. Zinnbauer, “Artificial intelligence in anti-corruption: A timely update on AI technology,” U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI), 2024. |
| [3] | UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP), “Machine learning for fighting corruption in public procurement,” UNESCO IIEP, 2021. |
| [4] | M. Ndolo, A. Wanjoya, and P. Kasyoka, “A hybrid machine learning model for detecting and preventing corruption in Kenya’s public procurement contracts,” Machine Learning Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 131–136, 2025. |
| [5] | FALCON Horizon, “Corruption data acquisition and analysis toolset (R1.0),” FALCON Project, HORIZON-CL3-2022-FCT-01-05, 2024, |
| [6] | Addis Fortune, “Can technology end corruption?,” Addis Fortune, 2024. |
| [7] | M. F. Heredia-Soto, “Early corruption detection system using machine learning algorithms,” 2025. |
| [8] | I. Mergel, N. Edelmann, and N. Haug, “Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, Art. no. 101385, 2019, |
| [9] | “Designing a predictive integrity risk model for Ethiopian public institutions,” Academic Working Paper, 2024, “Transforming Corruption Prevention through Digital Governance.” |
| [10] | Development Eye, “The AI-powered public sector: How African governments can improve service delivery and accountability,” 2024. |
| [11] | Y. C. Chen, M. J. Ahn, and Y. F. Wang, “Artificial intelligence and public values: Value impacts and governance in the public sector,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 6, Art. no. 4796, 2023, |
| [12] | C. Aldemir, M. Anshari, M. Hamdan, N. Ahmad, and E. Ali, “Public service delivery, artificial intelligence and the Sustainable Development Goals: Trends, evidence and complexities,” Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 163–181, 2025, |
| [13] | P. Henman, “Improving public services using artificial intelligence: Possibilities, pitfalls, governance,” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 209–221, 2020, |
| [14] | M. Anshari, M. Hamdan, N. Ahmad, and E. Ali, “Public service delivery, artificial intelligence and the Sustainable Development Goals: Trends, evidence and complexities,” Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 163–181, 2025, |
| [15] | O. O. Temitope and B. R. Qwabe, “Exploring the capabilities of the Fourth Industrial Revolution for improved public service delivery in Nigeria,” International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 952–962, 2023, |
| [16] | S. H. Jeong and H. Lee, “Artificial intelligence in public administration: Understanding the adoption and use for public service performance improvement,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 4, Art. no. 101582, 2021, |
APA Style
Tewabe, T. M. (2026). AI-Driven Insights for Detecting Corruption Risks in Ethiopian Public Sectors: A Systematic Literature Review. Science Discovery Computers, 1(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdcomput.20260101.12
ACS Style
Tewabe, T. M. AI-Driven Insights for Detecting Corruption Risks in Ethiopian Public Sectors: A Systematic Literature Review. Sci. Discov. Comput. 2026, 1(1), 15-19. doi: 10.11648/j.sdcomput.20260101.12
@article{10.11648/j.sdcomput.20260101.12,
author = {Tigist Mintesnot Tewabe},
title = {AI-Driven Insights for Detecting Corruption Risks in Ethiopian Public Sectors: A Systematic Literature Review},
journal = {Science Discovery Computers},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {15-19},
doi = {10.11648/j.sdcomput.20260101.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdcomput.20260101.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sdcomput.20260101.12},
abstract = {This systematic literature review examines AI-driven methods and evidence for detecting corruption risks in the public sectors of Ethiopia and neighboring East African countries. Corruption remains a significant challenge to effective public-sector governance, economic development, and the efficient delivery of public services in Ethiopia and East African countries. The increasing availability of digital government data and advances in artificial intelligence (AI) provide new opportunities to identify corruption challenges, detect anomalies, and strengthen transparency and accountability. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided search, screening, and selection procedures, relevant studies were identified from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and regional grey literature repositories. The review synthesizes evidence from 28 studies published between 2010 and 2025 that investigate the application of AI, machine learning (ML), network analysis, anomaly detection, and related computational approaches to corruption-risk identification. The review targeted on four major public-sector domains: public procurement, financial auditing, payroll management, and asset management. Key themes examined include the types and quality of data used, pre-processing and feature-engineering practices, dominant AI and ML algorithms, evaluation metrics, model interoperability, and the practical feasibility of implementation in low-resource environments. The results indicate growing interest in AI-enabled corruption detection, particularly through anomaly detection, classification, predictive modeling, and network-based approaches. However, the evidence base remains limited by fragmented datasets, insufficient data quality, limited access to government records, insufficient technical capacity, and the absence of standardized evaluation frameworks. Ethical concerns, including privacy, algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, and the potential misuse of automated decision-support systems, also require careful consideration. In general, AI can complement, rather than replace, institutional anti-corruption mechanisms. For Ethiopia, priority should be given to strengthening public-sector data infrastructure, improving data governance and interoperability, developing interpret able and context-sensitive AI models, and establishing controlled pilot projects for procurement and financial-integrity monitoring. Sustained collaboration among policymakers, anti-corruption agencies, universities, technology experts, and international partners, together with capacity building and ethical safeguards, is essential for responsible and effective adoption of AI-driven corruption-risk detection systems.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - AI-Driven Insights for Detecting Corruption Risks in Ethiopian Public Sectors: A Systematic Literature Review AU - Tigist Mintesnot Tewabe Y1 - 2026/09/22 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdcomput.20260101.12 DO - 10.11648/j.sdcomput.20260101.12 T2 - Science Discovery Computers JF - Science Discovery Computers JO - Science Discovery Computers SP - 15 EP - 19 PB - Science Publishing Group UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sdcomput.20260101.12 AB - This systematic literature review examines AI-driven methods and evidence for detecting corruption risks in the public sectors of Ethiopia and neighboring East African countries. Corruption remains a significant challenge to effective public-sector governance, economic development, and the efficient delivery of public services in Ethiopia and East African countries. The increasing availability of digital government data and advances in artificial intelligence (AI) provide new opportunities to identify corruption challenges, detect anomalies, and strengthen transparency and accountability. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided search, screening, and selection procedures, relevant studies were identified from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and regional grey literature repositories. The review synthesizes evidence from 28 studies published between 2010 and 2025 that investigate the application of AI, machine learning (ML), network analysis, anomaly detection, and related computational approaches to corruption-risk identification. The review targeted on four major public-sector domains: public procurement, financial auditing, payroll management, and asset management. Key themes examined include the types and quality of data used, pre-processing and feature-engineering practices, dominant AI and ML algorithms, evaluation metrics, model interoperability, and the practical feasibility of implementation in low-resource environments. The results indicate growing interest in AI-enabled corruption detection, particularly through anomaly detection, classification, predictive modeling, and network-based approaches. However, the evidence base remains limited by fragmented datasets, insufficient data quality, limited access to government records, insufficient technical capacity, and the absence of standardized evaluation frameworks. Ethical concerns, including privacy, algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, and the potential misuse of automated decision-support systems, also require careful consideration. In general, AI can complement, rather than replace, institutional anti-corruption mechanisms. For Ethiopia, priority should be given to strengthening public-sector data infrastructure, improving data governance and interoperability, developing interpret able and context-sensitive AI models, and establishing controlled pilot projects for procurement and financial-integrity monitoring. Sustained collaboration among policymakers, anti-corruption agencies, universities, technology experts, and international partners, together with capacity building and ethical safeguards, is essential for responsible and effective adoption of AI-driven corruption-risk detection systems. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -