Vermicomposting is simple biotechnological process of composting, which certain species of earthworms are used to enhance the process of waste conversion and produce better homogenized end product. Therefore, this study was conducted to prepare and Characterization of vermicompost nutrients made from different sources of organic materials. The experiment was carried out during 2023/24 at Bedele Agricultural Research Center. Vermicomposting was done using Eisenia fetida with seven treatments: wheat straw, maize stalk, sorghum stalk, haricot bean straw, soybean straw, finger millet straw and faba bean straw. The data were analyzed by SAS software version 9.3. Results indicated that for all the seven treatments the pH fluctuated in the range of 6.88 to 8.90, and the highest pH value was recorded from soybean straw with animal manure (8.90) whereas the lowest obtain from wheat straw with animal manure. Electrical conductivity of vermicompost were ranged from 2.02 to 4.44ds/m and the highest value of EC was recorded from soybean with animal manure (4.44ds/m) and the lowest from maize stalk with animal manure (2.02ds/m). The organic carbon of the vermicompost were ranged from 15.18 to 16.54%. The highest and lowest value of organic carbon was recorded from faba bean straw and haricot bean with animal manure (16.54 and 15.18%) respectively. The obtained total nitrogen was ranged from 1.28 to 1.43%. However, the highest was obtained from faba bean straw with animal manure and lowest recorded from maize stalk with cow manure (1.43% and 1.28%) respectively. The available phosphorus of vermicompost ranged from 24.65 to 27.75 ppm, from these results the highest and the lowest was recorded from wheat straw with animal manure and soybean straw with animal manure (27.75 and 24.65 ppm) respectively. The harvested vermicompost had an excellent nutrient rank, confirmed by chemical analysis, and contained all the essential selected macronutrients.
Published in | Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry (Volume 13, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sjac.20251301.13 |
Page(s) | 15-23 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Organic Substrate, Eisenia Fetida, Animal Manure
Treatment No. | Treatment description | Mean of pH (H2O) | Mean of EC (ds/m) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wheat straw with animal manure | 6.88c | 3.97a |
2 | Maize stalk with animal manure | 8.11ab | 2.02b |
3 | Sorghum stalk with animal manure | 7.86b | 3.28ab |
4 | Finger millet straw with animal manure | 7.71bc | 2.89ab |
5 | Haricot bean straw with animal manure | 8.02b | 4.31a |
6 | Soybean straw with animal manure | 8.90a | 4.44a |
7 | Faba bean straw with animal manure | 8.24ab | 2.95ab |
Grand mean | 7.96 | 3.41 | |
LSD (0.05) | 0.920 | 1.88 | |
CV (%) | 6.49 | 31.02 |
Treatment No. | Treatment description | Mean of O.C(%) | Mean of C: N |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wheat straw with animal manure | 15.28ab | 11.60ab |
2 | Maize stalk with animal manure | 14.82b | 11.59b |
3 | Sorghum stalk with animal manure | 15.89ab | 11.60ab |
4 | Finger millet straw with animal manure | 16.09ab | 11.61ab |
5 | Haricot bean straw with animal manure | 15.18ab | 11.60ab |
6 | Soybean straw with animal manure | 16.48a | 11.61ab |
7 | Faba bean straw with animal manure | 16.55a | 11.63a |
Grand mean | 15.75 | 11.60 | |
LSD (0.05) | 1.572 | 0.041 | |
CV (%) | 5.6 | 0.2 |
Treatment No. | Treatment description | Mean of TN (%) | Equivalent ratio of N in vermicompost into urea kg/ha |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wheat straw with animal manure | 1.32ab | 3499.0ab |
2 | Maize stalk with animal manure | 1.28b | 3607.6a |
3 | Sorghum stalk with animal manure | 1.37ab | 3363.9ab |
4 | Finger millet straw with animal manure | 1.38ab | 3323.0ab |
5 | Haricot bean straw with animal manure | 1.31ab | 3530.6ab |
6 | Soybean straw with animal manure | 1.42a | 3245.5b |
7 | Faba bean straw with animal manure | 1.43a | 3235.9b |
Grand mean | 1.36 | 3400.78 | |
LSD (0.05) | 0.138 | 335.97 | |
CV (%) | 5.69 | 5.55 |
Treatment No. | Treatment description | Mean of Avai. P(ppm) |
---|---|---|
1 | Wheat straw with animal manure | 27.75a |
2 | Maize stalk with animal manure | 25.09bc |
3 | Sorghum stalk with animal manure | 26.47abc |
4 | Finger millet straw with animal manure | 25.31abc |
5 | Haricot bean straw with animal manure | 27.43ab |
6 | Soybean straw with animal manure | 24.65c |
7 | Faba bean straw with animal manure | 25.96abc |
Grand mean | 26.09 | |
LSD (0.05) | 2.503 | |
CV (%) | 5.39 |
Treatment No. | Treatment description | Mean of Ca2+ (mg/kg VC) | Mean of Mg2+ (mg/kg VC) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wheat straw with animal manure | 1666.7 | 467.7 |
2 | Maize stalk with animal manure | 1726.7 | 315.2 |
3 | Sorghum stalk with animal manure | 1633.3 | 459.5 |
4 | Finger millet straw with animal manure | 2006.7 | 555.1 |
5 | Haricot bean straw with animal manure | 2006.7 | 392.4 |
6 | Soybean straw with animal manure | 1640.0 | 494.1 |
7 | Faba bean straw with animal manure | 1933.3 | 321.3 |
Grand mean | 1801.91 | 429.32 | |
LSD (0.05) | NS | NS | |
CV (%) | 21.46 | 58.97 |
Treatment No. | Treatment description | Mean of CEC. (cmol(+)/kg in VC) |
---|---|---|
1 | Wheat straw with animal manure | 46.67b |
2 | Maize stalk with animal manure | 54.47a |
3 | Sorghum stalk with animal manure | 46.53b |
4 | Finger millet straw with animal manure | 50.13ab |
5 | Haricot bean straw with animal manure | 46.20bc |
6 | Soybean straw with animal manure | 48.80b |
7 | Faba bean straw with animal manure | 40.87c |
Grand mean | 47.67 | |
LSD (0.05) | 5.64 | |
CV (%) | 6.65 |
C:N | Carbon to Nitrogen Ratio |
CEC | Cation Exchange Capacity |
CV | Vermicompost |
ds/m | Decisimen per Meter |
EC | Electrical Conductivity |
TN | Total Nitrogen |
Ppm | Parts per Million |
Cmol(+)/kg | Centmole per Kilogram |
t/ha | Ton per Hector |
NGO | Non-governmental Organization |
[1] | P. Van Streaten, Agro Geology: the Use of Rocks for Crops, Enviroquest Ltd., Cambridge, ON, Canada, 2007. |
[2] | D. Mengesha and L. Mekonnen, “Integrated agronomic crop managements to improve teff productivity under terminal drought,” in Water Stress, I. Md, M. Rahman, and H. Hasegawa, Eds., pp. 235–254, Intech Open Science, London, UK, 2012. |
[3] | N. Q. Arancon, C. A. Edwards, R. Atiyeh, and J. D. Metzger, 2004. “Effects of vermicompost produced from food waste on the growth and yields of greenhouse peppers,” Bio-Resources Technology, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 139–144. |
[4] | J. Dominguez, “State of the art and new perspectives on vermicomposting research,” in Earthworm Ecology, C. A. Edwardspp. 401–424, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2nd edition, 2004. |
[5] | R. Abafita, “Evaluation of vermicompost on maize productivity and determine optimum rate for maize production,” World Journal of Biology and Medical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–22, 2016. |
[6] | M. R. Haj Seyed Hadi, M. T. Darzi, Z. Ghandehari, and G. H. Riazi, 2011. “Effects of vermicompost and amino acids on the flower yield and essential oil production from Matricaria chamomilla L. J. of Med,” Plants Research, vol. 5, no. 23, pp. 5611–5617, |
[7] | R. K. Sinha, S. Agarwal, K. Chaudhan, and D. Valani, “'e wonders of earthworms and its vermicomposting in farm production: Charles Darwin’s friends of farmers’, with potential to replace destructive chemical fertilizers from agriculture,” Agricultural Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 76–94, 2010. |
[8] | Gandhi M, Sangwan V, Kapoor KK and Dilbaghi N. 1997. Composting of household wastes with and without earthworms. Environment and Ecology 15(2): 432–434. |
[9] | Doan TT, Henry-des-Tureaux T, Rumpe C, Janeau JL, Jouquet P. 2015. Impact of compost, vermicompost and biochar on soil fertility, maize yield and soil erosion in Northern Vietnam: a three year mesocosm experiment. Science Total Environment, 514: 147-154. |
[10] | Rakkani VM, Vincent S, Kumar, AS, Baskar K. 2018. Organic waste management by earthworm. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, 3(1): 13-17. |
[11] | Lim SL, Lee LH, Wu TY. 2016. Sustainability of using composting and vermicomposting technologies for organic solid waste biotransformation: recent overview, greenhouse gases emissions and economic analysis. Journal of Clean Production, 111: 262-278. |
[12] | Coulibaly S. S and Zoro Bi. I. A. 2010. Influence of animal wastes on growth and reproduction of the African earthworm species Eudriluseugeniae (Oligochaeta). European Journal of Soil Biology, 46: 225-229. |
[13] | Najar IA, Khan AB, Hai A. 2015. Effect of macrophyte vermicompost on growth and productivity of brinjal (Solanummelongena) under field conditions. International Journal of Recycling Organic Waste Agriculture, 4: 73-83. |
[14] |
Vermi Co. 2001. Vermicomposting technology for waste management and agriculture: an executive summary.
http://www.vermico.com/summary.htm Grants Pass, OR 97528, USA: Vermi Co. |
[15] | Tara Crescent. 2003. Vermicomposting. Development Alternatives (DA) Sustainable Livelihoods. |
[16] | Nagavallemma, K. P., Wani, S. P., Lacroix, S., Padmaja, V. V., Vineela, C., Rao, M. B., & Sahrawat, K. L. (2004). Vermicomposting: Recycling wastes into valuable organic fertilizer. Global Theme on Agroecosystems Report no. 8. |
[17] | Schuldt M., Chistiansen R., Scatturice L. A. & Mayo J. P. 2007. Lombricultura. Desarrollo y adaptacion a diferentes condiciones de temperie. RedVet. VIII(8): 1-10. |
[18] | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean Santiago, 2015 P. 58. |
[19] | Pisa C, Wuta M (2013) Evaluation of composting performance of mixtures of chicken blood and maize stover in Harare, Zimbabwe. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 2(5): 1–11. |
[20] | Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen Total. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy Monograph No. 9. ASA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 595–624. |
[21] | Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed modification of the titration method. Soil Sci Soc Am J 37: 29–34. |
[22] | Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA (2001) Integrating composting and vermicomposting in the treatment and bioconversion of solids. Bioresour Technol 76: 107–112. |
[23] | Olsen, S. R., C. V. Cole, F. S. Watanabe and L. A. Dean, 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium carbonate. USDA circular 939: 1-19. |
[24] | Wako RE (2021). Preparation and characterization of vermicompost made from different sources of materials. Open J Plant Sci 6(1): 042-048. |
[25] | Padmavathiamma PK, Li LY, Kumari UR (2008) An experimental study of vermi-biowaste composting for agricultural soil improvement. Bioresource Technology 99: 1672-1681. |
[26] | Dominguez JJ, Edwards, CA (2011) Biology and ecology of earthworm species used for vermicomposting. In: Edwards, CA, Arancon, NQ, Sherman, RL (eds) Vermiculture Technology: Earthworms, Organic Waste and Environmental Management. Boco Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 25-35. |
[27] | Joshi, R., Singh, J., Vig, A. P. 2015. Vermicompost as an effective organic fertilizer and biocontrol agent: effect on growth, yield and quality of plants. – Re views in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 14(1): 137–159, |
[28] |
Solis-Mejia L, Islas-Espinoza M, Estellar MV (2012) Vermicompost ing of sewage sludge: earthworm population and agronomic advantages. Compost Sci Util 20(1): 11–17.
http://ri.uaemex.mx/bitstream/handle/20.500.11799/58653/22-Compost%20sciencevermicomposta.pdf |
[29] | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2006. |
[30] | Nagavallemma KP, Wani SP, Stephane Lacroix, Padmaja VV, Vineela C, Babu Rao M and Sahrawat KL. 2004. Vermicomposting: Recycling wastes into valuable organic fertilizer. Global Theme on Agrecosystems Report no. 8. Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 20 pp. V. Vermicomposting: Recycling Wastes into Valuable Organic Fertilizer. |
[31] | Margit Olle, 2019. Vermicompost, its importance and benefit in agriculture: review Journal of Agricultural Science pp. 93–98. |
[32] | Hazelton, P. A. and Murphy, B. W. (2007). 'What Do All the Numbers Mean? - A Guide to the Interpretation of Soil Test Results'. (CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne). |
APA Style
Dube, B., Chimdessa, D., Sori, G. (2025). Preparation and Characterization of Vermicompost Nutrients Made from Different Sources of Organic Materials. Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 13(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20251301.13
ACS Style
Dube, B.; Chimdessa, D.; Sori, G. Preparation and Characterization of Vermicompost Nutrients Made from Different Sources of Organic Materials. Sci. J. Anal. Chem. 2025, 13(1), 15-23. doi: 10.11648/j.sjac.20251301.13
@article{10.11648/j.sjac.20251301.13, author = {Bati Dube and Dagne Chimdessa and Gedefa Sori}, title = {Preparation and Characterization of Vermicompost Nutrients Made from Different Sources of Organic Materials }, journal = {Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry}, volume = {13}, number = {1}, pages = {15-23}, doi = {10.11648/j.sjac.20251301.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20251301.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjac.20251301.13}, abstract = {Vermicomposting is simple biotechnological process of composting, which certain species of earthworms are used to enhance the process of waste conversion and produce better homogenized end product. Therefore, this study was conducted to prepare and Characterization of vermicompost nutrients made from different sources of organic materials. The experiment was carried out during 2023/24 at Bedele Agricultural Research Center. Vermicomposting was done using Eisenia fetida with seven treatments: wheat straw, maize stalk, sorghum stalk, haricot bean straw, soybean straw, finger millet straw and faba bean straw. The data were analyzed by SAS software version 9.3. Results indicated that for all the seven treatments the pH fluctuated in the range of 6.88 to 8.90, and the highest pH value was recorded from soybean straw with animal manure (8.90) whereas the lowest obtain from wheat straw with animal manure. Electrical conductivity of vermicompost were ranged from 2.02 to 4.44ds/m and the highest value of EC was recorded from soybean with animal manure (4.44ds/m) and the lowest from maize stalk with animal manure (2.02ds/m). The organic carbon of the vermicompost were ranged from 15.18 to 16.54%. The highest and lowest value of organic carbon was recorded from faba bean straw and haricot bean with animal manure (16.54 and 15.18%) respectively. The obtained total nitrogen was ranged from 1.28 to 1.43%. However, the highest was obtained from faba bean straw with animal manure and lowest recorded from maize stalk with cow manure (1.43% and 1.28%) respectively. The available phosphorus of vermicompost ranged from 24.65 to 27.75 ppm, from these results the highest and the lowest was recorded from wheat straw with animal manure and soybean straw with animal manure (27.75 and 24.65 ppm) respectively. The harvested vermicompost had an excellent nutrient rank, confirmed by chemical analysis, and contained all the essential selected macronutrients. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Preparation and Characterization of Vermicompost Nutrients Made from Different Sources of Organic Materials AU - Bati Dube AU - Dagne Chimdessa AU - Gedefa Sori Y1 - 2025/01/23 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20251301.13 DO - 10.11648/j.sjac.20251301.13 T2 - Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry JF - Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry JO - Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry SP - 15 EP - 23 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-8053 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjac.20251301.13 AB - Vermicomposting is simple biotechnological process of composting, which certain species of earthworms are used to enhance the process of waste conversion and produce better homogenized end product. Therefore, this study was conducted to prepare and Characterization of vermicompost nutrients made from different sources of organic materials. The experiment was carried out during 2023/24 at Bedele Agricultural Research Center. Vermicomposting was done using Eisenia fetida with seven treatments: wheat straw, maize stalk, sorghum stalk, haricot bean straw, soybean straw, finger millet straw and faba bean straw. The data were analyzed by SAS software version 9.3. Results indicated that for all the seven treatments the pH fluctuated in the range of 6.88 to 8.90, and the highest pH value was recorded from soybean straw with animal manure (8.90) whereas the lowest obtain from wheat straw with animal manure. Electrical conductivity of vermicompost were ranged from 2.02 to 4.44ds/m and the highest value of EC was recorded from soybean with animal manure (4.44ds/m) and the lowest from maize stalk with animal manure (2.02ds/m). The organic carbon of the vermicompost were ranged from 15.18 to 16.54%. The highest and lowest value of organic carbon was recorded from faba bean straw and haricot bean with animal manure (16.54 and 15.18%) respectively. The obtained total nitrogen was ranged from 1.28 to 1.43%. However, the highest was obtained from faba bean straw with animal manure and lowest recorded from maize stalk with cow manure (1.43% and 1.28%) respectively. The available phosphorus of vermicompost ranged from 24.65 to 27.75 ppm, from these results the highest and the lowest was recorded from wheat straw with animal manure and soybean straw with animal manure (27.75 and 24.65 ppm) respectively. The harvested vermicompost had an excellent nutrient rank, confirmed by chemical analysis, and contained all the essential selected macronutrients. VL - 13 IS - 1 ER -